Search

Aim: To explore the relationship of clinicopathological features and the distribution of neutrophils in the tumor microenvironment with the prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma., Methods: Two hundred and fifty-four formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissue blocks were analyzed, including tissues from cholangiocarcinoma (n = 254), and tumor adjacent tissues (n = 238). Tissue sections were stained for CD15 using immunohistochemical staining. CD15 expression was detected to identify the distribution of neutrophils in the local tumor microenvironment. The neutrophil density of the tumor tissues and the adjacent tumor tissues was detected to reflect their inflammatory status. Clinical data and follow-up information of cholangiocarcinoma patients who underwent surgery from January 2004 to December 2010 were analyzed retrospectively. The relationship between clinicopathological features and the distribution of neutrophils with prognosis of the patients were analyzed., Results: The positive expression level of CD15 was only significantly related to the TNM stage. CD15 expression was higher in tumor tissues than in adjacent tissues (73.6% vs 54.6%), with significant differences. Patients with high expression of CD15 had significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those with low expression of CD15 (median overall survival time 39.77 mo vs 16.87 mo, P = 0.008). Patients with high CD15 expression had significantly shorter disease free survival time (DFS) than those with low expression of CD15 (median DFS 38.27 mo vs 16.83 mo, P = 0.029). COX multivariate analysis indicated that high CD15 expression in tumor tissues was an independent risk factor for predicting OS for patients with cholangiocarcinoma [P = 0.012, relative risk (RR) = 1.601], but it was not an independent risk factor for predicting DFS (P = 0.073, RR = 1.462)., Conclusion: Patients with high CD15 expression in cancer tissues had shorter DFS and OS. High expression of CD15 is an independent risk factor for OS.

Objective: To assess the diagnostic value of oxygen saturation combined with airflow (OF) monitoring for diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS)., Methods: Sixty-two subjects including suspected OSAHS and non-snorers underwent overnight polysomnography (PSG) and OF monitoring simultaneously in sleep laboratory. The apnea-hypopnea index (AHI), lowest oxygen saturation (LSaO(2)), and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) recorded by OF were compared with those recorded by PSG. The AHI and ODI data that showed skew distribution underwent square root transformation to approximate to normal distribution. Pair t test was used for difference hypothesis test. The agreement between the two measures was analyzed using Bland-Altman plot., Results: Forty-five of the 62 subjects were diagnosed as with OSAHS based on PSG with the mean AHI value of (40 +/- 27) events per hour. The mean AHI values derived from OF (OF-AHI) and PSG (PSG-AHI) according to total sleep time were (28 +/- 26) and (29 +/- 28) times per hour respectively, and those after square root transformation were (4.6 +/- 2.7) and (4.7 +/- 2.7) times per hour respectively (P = 0.08). The mean LSaO(2) derived from OF (OF-LSaO(2)) was (82 +/- 11)%, not significantly different from that derived from PSG (PSG-LSaO(2)) [(82 +/- 10)%, P = 0.65]. The ODI derived from OF (OF-ODI) after square root transformation was (3.0 +/- 2.4) times/h, significantly lower than that derived from PSG (PSG-ODI) after square root transformation [(4.0 +/- 2.9) times/h, P = 0.00]. The Bland-Altman plot revealed a good agreement between the OF-AHI and PSG-AHI in non-OSAHS people and patients with mild OSAHS (P = 0.28), however, the OF-AHI was lower than PSG-AHI (P = 0.00) in the patients with moderate to severe OSAHS. There was no significant difference between OF-LSaO(2) and PSG-LSaO2 (P = 0.65)., Conclusions: There is a good agreement between OF and PSG for AHI and LSaO(2). OF can be used to screen patients with suspected OSAHS in high risk population. However, OF tends to underestimate the AHI in moderate to severe OSAHS so additional manual analysis is necessary to confirm the diagnosis.