1. Why are small public incubators 'lagging behind'? Learning from disability in the selection practices of a French incubator
- Author
-
Benjamin Vedel, Annabelle Jaouen, Walid A. Nakara, Inès Gabarret, EDC Paris, Montpellier Research in Management (MRM), Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université de Montpellier (UM)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD), Lille économie management - UMR 9221 (LEM), Université d'Artois (UA)-Université catholique de Lille (UCL)-Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School-Université Montpellier 1 (UM1), and Université Montpellier 1 (UM1)-Université Paul-Valéry - Montpellier 3 (UPVM)-Université Montpellier 2 - Sciences et Techniques (UM2)-Université de Perpignan Via Domitia (UPVD)-Groupe Sup de Co Montpellier (GSCM) - Montpellier Business School
- Subjects
Economics and Econometrics ,Entrepreneurship ,paradox ,SPI ,entrepreneurial support ,Single-subject design ,Strategic positioning ,050905 science studies ,small public incubator ,0502 economics and business ,Operations management ,Business and International Management ,Marketing ,Lagging ,Selection (genetic algorithm) ,05 social sciences ,Incubator ,entrepreneur ,selection practices ,[SHS.GESTION]Humanities and Social Sciences/Business administration ,Business ,0509 other social sciences ,Thematic analysis ,Project portfolio management ,strategic positioning ,resources ,050203 business & management - Abstract
International audience; This research examines the selection practices used by a small public incubator (SPI) and its strategic implications. SPIs generally depend on small cities and often face difficulties due to a lack of resources and inadequate competitiveness in comparison with well-equipped and more reputed incubators. The selection of projects is the keystone in the development of these small structures. We develop a qualitative approach based on a single case study. Representatives from all the incubated projects were interviewed, as well as all the managers and we performed a thematic analysis of the discourses. The in-depth study of the selection practices and the project portfolio reveals a paradox regarding the incubator’s strategic positioning objectives and the availability of resources. We conclude by discussing the strategic positioning of SPIs regarding in-house resources and the selection practices.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF