Anura V Kurpad, Ann-Sophie Iuel-Brockdorf, Christian Fabiansen, Per Ashorn, Maren Johanne Heilskov Rytter, Jonathan C. K. Wells, Susan Shepherd, Suzanne Filteau, Charles W Yaméogo, Vibeke Brix Christensen, Kim F. Michaelsen, Bernardette Cichon, André Briend, Henrik Friis, Christian Ritz, Lääketieteen ja biotieteiden tiedekunta - Faculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, and University of Tampere
Background Children with moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) are treated with lipid-based nutrient supplement (LNS) or corn-soy blend (CSB). We assessed the effectiveness of (a) matrix, i.e., LNS or CSB, (b) soy quality, i.e., soy isolate (SI) or dehulled soy (DS), and (c) percentage of total protein from dry skimmed milk, i.e., 0%, 20%, or 50%, in increasing fat-free tissue accretion. Methods and findings Between September 9, 2013, and August 29, 2014, a randomised 2 × 2 × 3 factorial trial recruited 6- to 23-month-old children with MAM in Burkina Faso. The intervention comprised 12 weeks of food supplementation providing 500 kcal/day as LNS or CSB, each containing SI or DS, and 0%, 20%, or 50% of protein from milk. Fat-free mass (FFM) was assessed by deuterium dilution technique. By dividing FFM by length squared, the primary outcome was expressed independent of length as FFM index (FFMI) accretion over 12 weeks. Other outcomes comprised recovery rate and additional anthropometric measures. Of 1,609 children, 4 died, 61 were lost to follow-up, and 119 were transferred out due to supplementation being switched to non-experimental products. No children developed allergic reaction. At inclusion, 95% were breastfed, mean (SD) weight was 6.91 kg (0.93), with 83.5% (5.5) FFM. In the whole cohort, weight increased 0.90 kg (95% CI 0.88, 0.93; p < 0.01) comprising 93.5% (95% CI 89.5, 97.3) FFM. As compared to children who received CSB, FFMI accretion was increased by 0.083 kg/m2 (95% CI 0.003, 0.163; p = 0.042) in those who received LNS. In contrast, SI did not increase FFMI compared to DS (mean difference 0.038 kg/m2; 95% CI −0.041, 0.118; p = 0.35), irrespective of matrix. Having 20% milk protein was associated with 0.097 kg/m2 (95% CI −0.002, 0.196) greater FFMI accretion than having 0% milk protein, although this difference was not significant (p = 0.055), and there was no effect of 50% milk protein (0.049 kg/m2; 95% CI −0.047, 0.146; p = 0.32). There was no effect modification by season, admission criteria, or baseline FFMI, stunting, inflammation, or breastfeeding (p > 0.05). LNS compared to CSB resulted in 128 g (95% CI 67, 190; p < 0.01) greater weight gain if both contained SI, but there was no difference between LNS and CSB if both contained DS (mean difference 22 g; 95% CI −40, 84; p = 0.49) (interaction p = 0.017). Accordingly, SI compared to DS increased weight by 89 g (95% CI 27, 150; p = 0.005) when combined with LNS, but not when combined with CSB. A limitation of this and other food supplementation trials is that it is not possible to collect reliable data on individual adherence. Conclusions Based on this study, children with MAM mainly gain fat-free tissue when rehabilitated. Nevertheless, LNS yields more fat-free tissue and higher recovery rates than CSB. Moreover, current LNSs with DS may be improved by shifting to SI. The role of milk relative to soy merits further research. Trial registration ISRCTN registry ISRCTN42569496, Malnourished children accrue more fat free tissue with lipid-based food supplements compared to corn-soy blend ones, as revealed in a trial in Burkina Faso led by Christian Fabiansen, Author summary Why was this study done? Moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) is widespread among children in low-income countries and is a risk factor for morbidity, severe acute malnutrition, and death. WHO recommends more research on food supplements for children with MAM. Currently, there is no consensus on either the effectiveness of lipid-nutrient supplement (LNS) compared to corn-soy blend (CSB), or on the role of key factors like milk and soy. There is concern that children receiving LNS might accumulate too much fat tissue. What did the researchers do and find? In a large randomised trial of 1,609 children with MAM, conducted in a humanitarian setting in Burkina Faso, we investigated the effectiveness of key factors in supplemental foods, namely (a) the matrix (LNS versus CSB), (b) the soy quality (soy isolate versus dehulled soy), and (c) the level of dry skimmed milk. We evaluated body composition to assess the quality of weight gain, and used fat-free mass tissue accretion as our primary outcome. Fat-free tissue accretion as well as recovery from MAM were both higher when using LNS compared to CSB. Children given LNS did not put on excessive fat. What do these findings mean? Our findings support a wider use of LNS in the treatment of children with MAM. A switch to LNS would lead to greater gain of fat-free tissue and recovery, and would benefit millions of children.