1. Noninvasive Estimation of PA Pressure, Flow, and Resistance With CMR Imaging
- Author
-
Dave Capener, Charlie Elliot, Robin Condliffe, Judith Hurdman, Allison Morton, Tom Sproson, David G. Kiely, Christopher Hill, Andrew J. Swift, Smitha Rajaram, Jim M. Wild, and Christine Davies
- Subjects
Body surface area ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cardiac output ,Receiver operating characteristic ,business.industry ,Hemodynamics ,medicine.disease ,Pulmonary hypertension ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,medicine.artery ,Internal medicine ,Pulmonary artery ,cardiovascular system ,medicine ,Vascular resistance ,Cardiology ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,cardiovascular diseases ,Radiology ,Pulmonary wedge pressure ,business ,Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine - Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to develop a composite numerical model based on parameters from cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging for noninvasive estimation of the key hemodynamic measurements made at right heart catheterization (RHC). Background Diagnosis and assessment of disease severity in patients with pulmonary hypertension is reliant on hemodynamic measurements at RHC. A robust noninvasive approach that can estimate key RHC measurements is desirable. Methods A derivation cohort of 64 successive, unselected, treatment naive patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension from the ASPIRE (Assessing the Spectrum of Pulmonary Hypertension Identified at a Referral Centre) Registry, underwent RHC and CMR within 12 h. Predicted mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) was derived using multivariate regression analysis of CMR measurements. The model was tested in an independent prospective validation cohort of 64 patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension. Surrogate measures of pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and cardiac output (CO) were estimated by left atrial volumetry and pulmonary arterial phase contrast imaging, respectively. Noninvasive pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) was calculated from the CMR-derived measurements, defined as: (CMR-predicted mPAP – CMR-predicted PCWP)/CMR phase contrast CO. Results The following composite statistical model of mPAP was derived: CMR-predicted mPAP = –4.6 + (interventricular septal angle × 0.23) + (ventricular mass index × 16.3). In the validation cohort a strong correlation between mPAP and MR estimated mPAP was demonstrated (R2 = 0.67). For detection of the presence of pulmonary hypertension the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.96 (0.92 to 1.00; p Conclusions CMR imaging can accurately estimate mean pulmonary artery pressure in patients with suspected pulmonary hypertension and calculate PVR by estimating all major pulmonary hemodynamic metrics measured at RHC.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF