Search

BACKGROUND: Blood products derived from donors on medication can contain drugs which might pose a risk for the recipients or influence the quality of the product itself. MATERIAL AND METHODS: To judge the eligibility of blood donors on medication, 4 drug classes have been formed with respect to their pharmacological properties, and blood products have been divided in accordance with their single-donor plasma contents. RESULTS: For drugs with dose-dependent pharmacodynamics, no deferral periods are necessary for donation of blood products containing less than 50 ml single-donor plasma for application to adults. Waiting periods of t(max) + 5 t(1/2) were calculated for the other blood products. Teratogenic drugs do not require special considerations (exception: retinoids, thalidomide and lenalidomide, dutasteride or finasteride with waiting periods for all blood products). A deferral period of t(max) + 24 t(1/2) is proposed for every blood product from blood donors on genotoxic drugs. Drugs without systemic effects can be neglected. Irreversible inhibitors of platelet function cause a 10-day waiting period if production of platelet concentrates is intended. CONCLUSION: Donors on medication are allowed to donate blood for blood products containing less than 50 ml plasma of a single donor, like red blood cell concentrates, for the use in adults without deferral periods, except those taking retinoids, thalidomide, lenalidomide, dutasteride, finasteride, or genotoxic drugs.

Assessment of effectiveness of oximes in severely organophosphate poisoned patients is hampered by sedation, artificial ventilation and other therapeutic measures as well as varying individual clinical courses due to, e.g. differences in type and amount of poison ingested or time elapsed before treatment starts. To evaluate oxime effects a suitable surrogate parameter would be helpful. Red blood cell acetylcholinesterase (RBC-AChE) is easily obtainable, shows a similar structure as synaptic enzyme and may be useful to reflect the AChE status at the synaptic site. Accordingly, it appeared rational to check whether RBC-AChE activity could be correlated with neuromuscular transmission (NMT), an easily accessible clinical parameter. The correlation was assessed in a clinical trial with severely OP-poisoned patients who were treated with obidoxime. The investigation revealed a good correlation between both parameters and showed, that a very low RBC-AChE activity (<10% of normal) was associated with a strongly impaired NMT marker, the so called decrement-phenomenon, RBC-AChE activity between 10 and 30% by impaired NMT with the decrement-increment-phenomenon and RBC activities above 30% generally by normal muscle function. Accordingly, RBC-AChE appears to be a suitable parameter for judgment of oxime effectiveness at the neuromuscular junction, one of the most important targets for therapy where atropine is ineffective in OP-poisoning.

Standard treatment of poisoning by organophosphorus compounds (OP) includes the administration of an anti-muscarinic, e.g. atropine, and of an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) reactivator (oxime). Two oximes, obidoxime and pralidoxime (2-PAM), are presently commercially available, yet, these compounds are considered to be of insufficient efficacy against certain nerve agents, e.g. soman and cyclosarin. In the past decades, numerous new oximes were synthesized and tested for their antidotal efficacy. The available data indicate that two Hagedorn oximes, HI 6 and HLö 7, are promising antidotes against various nerve agents. The efficacy of antidotes against nerve agent poisoning cannot be investigated in humans for ethical reasons. Therefore, it is necessary to use surrogate parameters for the evaluation of oxime efficacy. Reactivation of inhibited AChE is considered to be the main mechanism of action of oximes. Clinical data indicate that changes in erythrocyte AChE activity correlate to neuromuscular function indicating that interactions between AChE, inhibitor and oximes can be investigated in vitro with human erythrocyte AChE. Different theoretical models were used for the evaluation of reactivating efficacy of oximes with nerve agent-inhibited human AChE and for estimating effective oxime concentrations. The calculations demonstrate the marked differences between oximes in dependence of the inhibitor and provide a basis for the estimation of the required oxime dose as well as of dosing intervals.

Background: Acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning causes tens of thousands of deaths each year across the developing world. Standard treatment involves administration of intravenous atropine and oxime to counter acetylcholinesterase inhibition at the synapse. The usefulness of oximes, such as pralidoxime and obidoxime, has been challenged over the past 20 years by physicians in many parts of the world, who have failed to see benefit in their clinical practice., Objectives: To find the clinical trial evidence for oximes producing clinical benefit in acute organophosphorus pesticide-poisoned patients., Search Strategy: We carried out a systematic search to find randomised clinical trials (RCTs) of oximes in acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning, using MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. All articles with the text words 'organophosphate' or 'oxime' together with 'poisoning' or 'overdose' were examined. (Search last updated November 2003.), Selection Criteria: Articles that could possibly be randomised clinical trials were retrieved to determine if this was the case., Data Collection and Analysis: The published methodology of the possible RCTs located is not clear. One was found in abstract form only and two other published trials also had many gaps in the published methodology. We have attempted to contact the principal authors of all three trials but have been unable to obtain further information., Main Results: Two RCTs have been published, involving 182 patients treated with pralidoxime. These trials did not find benefit. However, the studies did not take into account a number of issues important for outcome and the methodology is unclear. Therefore, a generalised statement on effectiveness cannot be supported by the published results. In particular, characteristics at baseline were not evenly balanced, the dose of oxime was much lower than recommended in guidelines, there were substantial delays to treatment, and the type of organophosphate was not taken into account. The abstract of the third trial, a small possible RCT, is uninterpretable without further data., Authors' Conclusions: Current evidence is insufficient to indicate whether oximes are harmful or beneficial in the management of acute organophosphorus pesticide poisoning. A much larger RCT is required to compare the World Health Organization recommended pralidoxime regimen (>30 mg/kg bolus followed by >8 mg/kg/hr infusion) with placebo. There are many theoretical and practical reasons why oximes may not be useful to patients with overwhelming self-poisoning. Such a study will need to be designed with pre-defined sub-group analysis to allow identification of patient sub-groups that may benefit from oximes.