Search

An orally administered, fixed‐dose coformulation of sodium phenylbutyrate‐taurursodiol (PB‐TURSO) significantly slowed functional decline in a randomized, placebo‐controlled, phase 2 trial in ALS (CENTAUR). Herein we report results of a long‐term survival analysis of participants in CENTAUR. In CENTAUR, adults with ALS were randomized 2:1 to PB‐TURSO or placebo. Participants completing the 6‐month (24‐week) randomized phase were eligible to receive PB‐TURSO in the open‐label extension. An all‐cause mortality analysis (35‐month maximum follow‐up post‐randomization) incorporated all randomized participants. Participants and site investigators were blinded to treatment assignments through the duration of follow‐up of this analysis. Vital status was obtained for 135 of 137 participants originally randomized in CENTAUR. Median overall survival was 25.0 months among participants originally randomized to PB‐TURSO and 18.5 months among those originally randomized to placebo (hazard ratio, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34‐0.92; P = .023). Initiation of PB‐TURSO treatment at baseline resulted in a 6.5‐month longer median survival as compared with placebo. Combined with results from CENTAUR, these results suggest that PB‐TURSO has both functional and survival benefits in ALS.

Introduction Our aim in this study was to identify the prevalence and clinical characteristics of LRP4/agrin‐antibody–positive double‐seronegative myasthenia gravis (DNMG). Methods DNMG patients at 16 sites in the United States were tested for LRP4 and agrin antibodies, and the clinical data were collected. Results Of 181 DNMG patients, 27 (14.9%) were positive for either low‐density lipoprotein receptor–related protein 4 (LRP4) or agrin antibodies. Twenty‐three DNMG patients (12.7%) were positive for both antibodies. More antibody‐positive patients presented with generalized symptoms (69%) compared with antibody‐negative patients (43%) (P ≤ .02). Antibody‐positive patients’ maximum classification on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America (MGFA) scale was significantly higher than that for antibody‐negative patients (P ≤ .005). Seventy percent of antibody‐positive patients were classified as MGFA class III, IV, or V compared with 39% of antibody‐negative patients. Most LRP4‐ and agrin‐antibody–positive patients (24 of 27, 89%) developed generalized myathenia gravis (MG), but with standard MG treatment 81.5% (22 of 27) improved to MGFA class I or II during a mean follow‐up of 11 years. Discussion Antibody‐positive patients had more severe clinical disease than antibody‐negative patients. Most DNMG patients responded to standard therapy regardless of antibody status.

BackgroundCoformulated sodium phenylbutyrate/taurursodiol (PB/TURSO) was shown to prolong survival and slow functional decline in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).ObjectiveDetermine whether PB/TURSO prolonged tracheostomy/ventilation-free survival and/or reduced first hospitalisation in participants with ALS in the CENTAUR trial.MethodsAdults with El Escorial Definite ALS ≤18 months from symptom onset were randomised to PB/ TURSO or placebo for 6 months. Those completing randomised treatment could enrol in an open-label extension (OLE) phase and receive PB/TURSO for ≤30 months. Times to the following individual or combined key events were compared in the originally randomised treatment groups over a period spanning trial start through July 2020 (longest postrandomisation follow-up, 35 months): death, tracheostomy, permanent assisted ventilation (PAV) and first hospitalisation.ResultsRisk of any key event was 47% lower in those originally randomised to PB/TURSO (n=87) versus placebo (n=48, 71% of whom received delayed-start PB/TURSO in the OLE phase) (HR=0.53; 95% CI 0.35 to 0.81; p=0.003). Risks of death or tracheostomy/PAV (HR=0.51; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.84; p=0.007) and first hospitalisation (HR=0.56; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.95; p=0.03) were also decreased in those originally randomised to PB/TURSO.ConclusionsEarly PB/TURSO prolonged tracheostomy/PAV-free survival and delayed first hospitalisation in ALS.Trial registration numberNCT03127514;NCT03488524.

Introduction/Aims. Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is exceedingly rare and has been an enigmatic disease. Recent progress has drastically changed this perception, with early biomarkers being investigated and potential medications for PLS emerging at the preclinical stage. The aim of this paper is to describe a study of PLS natural history and discuss the limitations and proposed solutions to the study of a rare and slowly progressive disease. Methods. The PLS Natural History Study is a 30-site, 24-month, prospective study that is supported by multiple funding sources. The study aims to enroll 50 early PLS (disease duration ≤4 years) and 50 definite PLS (disease duration 4 to 15 years) participants using modified PLS Diagnostic Criteria. Smartphone-based assessments including semi-quantitative and quantitative measures and patient-reported outcomes are utilized. In-person quantitative measures are also completed during site visits. The change in the PLS Functional Rating Scale score is the primary outcome. The study utilizes the NeuroBANK® patient-centric data capture and management platform. The biostatistical analysis plan has been developed. Results. In one year, 28 participants have been recruited. Enrollment has been much slower than anticipated due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the rarity of PLS, and potential study competition for internal resources from ALS clinical trials. Discussion. We discuss the need for more innovative methods to enroll and study individuals with such rare diseases and propose a number of mechanisms by which more efficient enrollment could be facilitated.

BACKGROUND: Sodium phenylbutyrate and taurursodiol have been found to reduce neuronal death in experimental models. The efficacy and safety of a combination of the two compounds in persons with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) are not known. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial, we enrolled participants with definite ALS who had had an onset of symptoms within the previous 18 months. Participants were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive sodium phenylbutyrate–taurursodiol (3 g of sodium phenylbutyrate and 1 g of taurursodiol, administered once a day for 3 weeks and then twice a day) or placebo. The primary outcome was the rate of decline in the total score on the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R; range, 0 to 48, with higher scores indicating better function) through 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were the rates of decline in isometric muscle strength, plasma phosphorylated axonal neurofilament H subunit levels, and the slow vital capacity; the time to death, tracheostomy, or permanent ventilation; and the time to death, tracheostomy, permanent ventilation, or hospitalization. RESULTS: A total of 177 persons with ALS were screened for eligibility, and 137 were randomly assigned to receive sodium phenylbutyrate–taurursodiol (89 participants) or placebo (48 participants). In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, the mean rate of change in the ALSFRS-R score was −1.24 points per month with the active drug and −1.66 points per month with placebo (difference, 0.42 points per month; 95% confidence interval, 0.03 to 0.81; P = 0.03). Secondary outcomes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Adverse events with the active drug were mainly gastrointestinal. CONCLUSIONS: Sodium phenylbutyrate–taurursodiol resulted in slower functional decline than placebo as measured by the ALSFRS-R score over a period of 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between the two groups. Longer and larger trials are necessary to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sodium phenylbutyrate–taurursodiol in persons with ALS. (Funded by Amylyx Pharmaceuticals and others; CENTAUR Clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT03127514.)

Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is an inflammatory polyradiculoneuropathy associated with numerous viral infections. Recently, there have been many case reports describing the association between coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) and GBS, but much remains unknown about the strength of the association and the features of GBS in this setting. We reviewed 37 published cases of GBS associated with COVID-19 to summarize this information for clinicians and to determine whether a specific clinical or electrodiagnostic (EDx) pattern is emerging. The mean age (59 years), gender (65% male), and COVID-19 features appeared to reflect those of hospitalized COVID-19 patients early in the pandemic. The mean time from COVID-19 symptoms to GBS symptoms was 11 days. The clinical presentation and severity of these GBS cases was similar to those with non-COVID-19 GBS. The EDx pattern was considered demyelinating in approximately half of the cases. Cerebrospinal fluid, when assessed, demonstrated albuminocytologic dissociation in 76% of patients and was negative for severe acute respiratory distress syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) in all cases. Serum antiganglioside antibodies were absent in 15 of 17 patients tested. Most patients were treated with a single course of intravenous immunoglobulin, and improvement was noted within 8 weeks in most cases. GBS-associated COVID-19 appears to be an uncommon condition with similar clinical and EDx patterns to GBS before the pandemic. Future studies should compare patients with COVID-19-associated GBS to those with contemporaneous non-COVID-19 GBS and determine whether the incidence of GBS is elevated in those with COVID-19.

Primary lateral sclerosis (PLS) is a condition that most neurologists will never personally diagnose. For the estimated several thousand people living with PLS globally, while it may not be life-sh...

Importance Cryptogenic sensory polyneuropathy (CSPN) is a common generalized slowly progressive neuropathy, second in prevalence only to diabetic neuropathy. Most patients with CSPN have significant pain. Many medications have been tried for pain reduction in CSPN, including antiepileptics, antidepressants, and sodium channel blockers. There are no comparative studies that identify the most effective medication for pain reduction in CSPN. Objective To determine which medication (pregabalin, duloxetine, nortriptyline, or mexiletine) is most effective for reducing neuropathic pain and best tolerated in patients with CSPN. Design, Setting, and Participants From December 1, 2014, through October 20, 2017, a bayesian adaptive, open-label randomized clinical comparative effectiveness study of pain in 402 participants with CSPN was conducted at 40 neurology care clinics. The trial included response adaptive randomization. Participants were patients with CSPN who were 30 years or older, with a pain score of 4 or greater on a numerical rating scale (range, 0-10, with higher scores indicating a higher level of pain). Participant allocation to 1 of 4 drug groups used the utility function and treatment’s sample size for response adaptation randomization. At each interim analysis, a decision was made to continue enrolling (up to 400 participants) or stop the whole trial for success (80% power). Patient engagement was maintained throughout the trial, which helped guide the study and identify ways to communicate and disseminate information. Analysis was performed from December 11, 2015, to January 19, 2018. Interventions Participants were randomized to receive nortriptyline (n = 134), duloxetine (n = 126), pregabalin (n = 73), or mexiletine (n = 69). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a utility function that was a composite of the efficacy (participant reported pain reduction of ≥50% from baseline to week 12) and quit (participants who discontinued medication) rates. Results Among the 402 participants (213 men [53.0%]; mean [SD] age, 60.1 [13.4] years; 343 White [85.3%]), the utility function of nortriptyline was 0.81 (95% bayesian credible interval [CrI], 0.69-0.93; 34 of 134 [25.4%] efficacious; and 51 of 134 [38.1%] quit), of duloxetine was 0.80 (95% CrI, 0.68-0.92; 29 of 126 [23.0%] efficacious; and 47 of 126 [37.3%] quit), pregabalin was 0.69 (95% CrI, 0.55-0.84; 11 of 73 [15.1%] efficacious; and 31 of 73 [42.5%] quit), and mexiletine was 0.58 (95% CrI, 0.42-0.75; 14 of 69 [20.3%] efficacious; and 40 of 69 [58.0%] quit). The probability each medication yielded the highest utility was 0.52 for nortriptyline, 0.43 for duloxetine, 0.05 for pregabalin, and 0.00 for mexiletine. Conclusions and Relevance This study found that, although there was no clearly superior medication, nortriptyline and duloxetine outperformed pregabalin and mexiletine when pain reduction and undesirable adverse effects are combined to a single end point. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT02260388

A 79-year-old man was referred to the neuromuscular clinic for evaluation of severe polyneuropathy. Four years ago, he noted bilateral lower extremity numbness below the knee, particularly in his shins. At the time he also had a right transcarpal ligament release at an outside institution for a diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome. This procedure did not provide any relief of his right-hand numbness. He also had numbness in his left hand. One year ago, he began tripping over his feet due to ankle weakness, resulting in falls on several occasions. Concurrently, he complained of burning in the hands more than in the feet, and treatment with gabapentin and a topical Lidoderm patch was started. Six months ago, he started having bilateral hand weakness with trouble opening jars or manipulating buttons. At the same time, he developed near-syncope and was found to have orthostatic hypotension, and treatment with midodrine was started. A Foley catheter was placed 1 year ago because of urinary retention and bilateral hydronephrosis, attributed at the time to benign prostatic hypertrophy. He also noted erectile dysfunction and constipation for a few years. The patient reported an involuntary 25-pound weight loss in the last year. His medical history included bilateral cataract surgery at 75 years but was otherwise negative. He denied any family history of neuropathy. He was a heavy smoker but did not drink or use illicit drugs. There were no toxic exposures. His general examination showed a drop of 20 mm Hg in his systolic blood pressure when standing without an increase in pulse rate. His mental status and cranial nerves were normal. His intrinsic hand muscles were atrophic. He had bilateral mild proximal and severe distal weakness in his arms and legs. He had loss of sensation to pinprick up to the knees and midforearms bilaterally …

A 48-year-old woman was referred to the neuromuscular clinic because of progressive generalized weakness for 4 months. Her symptoms started after she had a thyroidectomy and radioactive iodine treatment for a thyroid papillary carcinoma. She had proximal arm weakness when washing her hair and had trouble climbing steps and getting out of her chair without using her arms. About 2 months later, she developed fluctuating bilateral ptosis and blurred vision. Her symptoms were associated with episodes of transient horizontal binocular diplopia that would last for a couple of minutes and get worse by the end of the day. She also had dry eyes and mouth. A month later, she started having episodes of transient dysarthria. At that time she was found to have a low am cortisol level by the medical team while being evaluated for her symptoms. She was treated with a hydrocortisone taper which partially improved her weakness and a follow-up cortisol level suggested resolution of the adrenal insufficiency. The patient was on levothyroxine with normal thyroid gland function. She smoked 1 or 2 cigarettes daily for 10 years. She denied head drop, shortness of breath, lightheadedness, constipation, or weight loss. Her general examination, including orthostatic blood pressure, was normal. Her mental status was normal; visual acuity could be corrected to 20/20. Her pupils were symmetric with a sluggish response to light. Extraocular movements were intact and there was no ocular misalignment on alternate cover testing. There was no lid-twitch. She had mild right ptosis that worsened with sustained upgaze. Facial sensation was intact. There was no facial weakness, dysarthria, or dysphagia. The palate was midline and elevated symmetrically. The tongue movements were normal. No fasciculations were observed. Her strength was 4/5 in both biceps and psoas, which improved on repeated testing. The remaining neurologic examination, including deep …

A 34-year-old, previously healthy woman presented with a 3-year history of persistent numbness and tingling in her feet ascending to the knees. She was a lifelong long-distance runner, and she normally experiences numbness and tingling in both feet while running that resolve within minutes of stopping her exercise. Three years ago, she developed diarrhea that was followed a week later by paresthesias in her feet and legs with a stocking distribution to the knees. Her symptoms were associated with a transient feeling of overwhelming fatigue, limiting her ambulation to 1 city block. She did not, however, have any functional weakness. After 2 weeks, milder hand and left face paresthesias developed. Four weeks later, her symptoms plateaued and persisted. Three months later, she developed more intense paresthesias and a sensation of “crawling” below both knees. At that time, she was seen at another hospital, where the examination showed bilateral pes cavus and hammertoes. There was no nerve thickening. Cranial nerves were intact. Strength was normal except for mild bilateral thenar weakness and slight difficulty with heel walking. The deep tendon reflexes were decreased at the arms and ankles. There was decreased pinprick sensation in the feet in a stocking-glove distribution with hyperalgesia. Vibration was moderately diminished at the ankles. Nerve conduction studies and electromyography (NCS/EMG) at that time showed uniform, mild conduction velocity slowing of both sensory and motor conduction with borderline prolonged distal latencies in the median and ulnar nerves. She was treated with a 1-month taper of prednisone beginning with 80 mg daily. The crawling sensation resolved and the paresthesias became less intense and stabilized. She was able to resume distance running, but still had persistent, mild numbness in her feet with bouts of increasing intensity every several months. Three years later, the patient presented to us for a …

We congratulate Sorenson et al.1 for their well-executed IGF-1 trial in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). While the title appropriately reflects the subcutaneous mode of IGF-1 delivery, the article fails to distinguish this critical limitation. What is the bioavailability in CSF and brain parenchyma in humans treated twice daily with 0.05 mg/kg IGF-1? Animal studies indicate that subcutaneous delivery of ∼0.8 mg/kg IGF-1 results in a maximal CSF concentration of 3 ng/mL IGF-1 at 2 hours postinjection.2 This equates to 0.4 nM IGF-1 in CSF at peak. The Sorenson et al. trial dose was 16-fold lower, suggesting that the maximal CSF concentration in patients would be 0.025 nM. The Kd of the IGF-1 receptor is 0.15 nM.3 Therefore, at 0.025 nM, only 14% of high-affinity and less than 1% of low-affinity receptors will be occupied. Likewise, the concentration of IGF-1 in CSF overestimates the bioavailable concentration within the brain parenchyma. IGF-1 injected into the lateral ventricle of rats exhibits a half-life of only 12 minutes in the CSF and penetrates …

Combining agents with different mechanisms of action may be necessary for meaningful results in treating ALS. The combinations of minocycline-creatine and celecoxib-creatine have additive effects in the murine model. New trial designs are needed to efficiently screen the growing number of potential neuroprotective agents. Our objective was to assess two drug combinations in ALS using a novel phase II trial design. We conducted a randomized, double-blind selection trial in sequential pools of 60 patients. Participants received minocycline (100 mg)-creatine (10 g) twice daily or celecoxib (400 mg)-creatine (10 g) twice daily for six months. The primary objective was treatment selection based on which combination best slowed deterioration in the ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised (ALSFRS-R); the trial could be stopped after one pool if the difference between the two arms was adequately large. At trial conclusion, each arm was compared to a historical control group in a futility analysis. Safety measures were also examined. After the first patient pool, the mean six-month decline in ALSFRS-R was 5.27 (SD=5.54) in the celecoxib-creatine group and 6.47 (SD=9.14) in the minocycline-creatine group. The corresponding decline was 5.82 (SD=6.77) in the historical controls. The difference between the two sample means exceeded the stopping criterion. The null hypothesis of superiority was not rejected in the futility analysis. Skin rash occurred more frequently in the celecoxib-creatine group. In conclusion, the celecoxib-creatine combination was selected as preferable to the minocycline-creatine combination for further evaluation. This phase II design was efficient, leading to treatment selection after just 60 patients, and can be used in other phase II trials to assess different agents.

Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is the most common form of motor neuron disease (MND). It is currently incurable and treatment is largely limited to supportive care. Family history is associated with an increased risk of ALS, and many Mendelian causes have been discovered. However, most forms of the disease are not obviously familial. Recent advances in human genetics have enabled genome-wide analyses of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that make it possible to study complex genetic contributions to human disease. Genome-wide SNP analyses require a large sample size and thus depend upon collaborative efforts to collect and manage the biological samples and corresponding data. Public availability of biological samples (such as DNA), phenotypic and genotypic data further enhances research endeavors. Here we discuss a large collaboration among academic investigators, government, and non-government organizations which has created a public repository of human DNA, immortalized cell lines, and clinical data to further gene discovery in ALS. This resource currently maintains samples and associated phenotypic data from 2332 MND subjects and 4692 controls. This resource should facilitate genetic discoveries which we anticipate will ultimately provide a better understanding of the biological mechanisms of neurodegeneration in ALS.