Search

Objective: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) is a broadly applied diagnosis that may describe multiple subtypes of pain. The purpose of this study was to identify phenotypes of knee OA, using measures from the following pain-related domains: 1) knee OA pathology, 2) psychological distress, and 3) altered pain neurophysiology., Methods: Data were selected from a total of 3,494 participants at visit 6 of the Osteoarthritis Initiative study. Latent class analysis was applied to the following variables: radiographic OA severity, quadriceps strength, body mass index, the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale, the Coping Strategies Questionnaire-Catastrophizing subscale, number of bodily pain sites, and knee joint tenderness at 4 sites. The resulting classes were compared on the following demographic and clinical factors: age, sex, pain severity, disability, walking speed, and use of arthritis-related health care., Results: A 4-class model was identified. Class 1 (4% of the study population) had higher CCI scores. Class 2 (24%) had higher knee joint sensitivity. Class 3 (10%) had greater psychological distress. Class 4 (62%) had lesser radiographic OA, little psychological involvement, greater strength, and less pain sensitivity. Additionally, class 1 was the oldest, on average. Class 4 was the youngest, had the lowest disability, and least pain. Class 3 had the worst disability and most pain., Conclusion: Four distinct pain phenotypes of knee OA were identified. Psychological factors, comorbidity status, and joint sensitivity appear to be important in defining phenotypes of knee OA-related pain., (© 2016, American College of Rheumatology.)

Objective: To point out the crux of why so many people failed to grasp statistics and to bring forth a "triple-type theory of statistics" to solve the problem in a creative way., Methods: Based on the experience in long-time teaching and research in statistics, the "three-type theory" was raised and clarified. Examples were provided to demonstrate that the 3 types, i.e., expressive type, prototype and the standardized type are the essentials for people to apply statistics rationally both in theory and practice, and moreover, it is demonstrated by some instances that the "three types" are correlated with each other. It can help people to see the essence by interpreting and analyzing the problems of experimental designs and statistical analyses in medical research work., Results: Investigations reveal that for some questions, the three types are mutually identical; for some questions, the prototype is their standardized type; however, for some others, the three types are distinct from each other. It has been shown that in some multifactor experimental researches, it leads to the nonexistence of the standardized type corresponding to the prototype at all, because some researchers have committed the mistake of "incomplete control" in setting experimental groups. This is a problem which should be solved by the concept and method of "division"., Conclusion: Once the "triple-type" for each question is clarified, a proper experimental design and statistical method can be carried out easily. "Triple-type theory of statistics" can help people to avoid committing statistical mistakes or at least to decrease the misuse rate dramatically and improve the quality, level and speed of biomedical research during the process of applying statistics. It can also help people to improve the quality of statistical textbooks and the teaching effect of statistics and it has demonstrated how to advance biomedical statistics.

This study aimed at investigating the characteristics of table and graph that people perceive and the data types which people consider the two displays are most appropriate for. Participants in this survey were 195 teachers and under-graduates from four universities in Beijing. The results showed people's different attitudes towards the two forms of display.