Search

Your search keyword '"Stafford, O"' showing total 8 results
Start Over Author "Stafford, O" Search Limiters Full Text
8 results on '"Stafford, O"'

1. Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries

Author

Randall, AK, Leon, G, Basili, E, Martos, T, Boiger, M, Baldi, M, Hocker, L, Kline, K, Masturzi, A, Aryeetey, R, Bar-Kalifa, E, Boon, SD, Botella, L, Burke, T, Carnelley, KB, Carr, A, Dash, A, Fitriana, M, Gaines, SO, Galdiolo, S, Hart, CM, Joo, S, Kanth, B, Karademas, E, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, SA, McHugh, L, Milek, A, Murphy, E, Natividade, JC, Portugal, A, Quiñones, Á, Relvas, AP, Rumondor, PCB, Rusu, P, Sallay, V, Saul, LA, Schmitt, DP, Sels, L, Shujja, S, Taylor, LK, Ozguluk, SB, Verhofstadt, L, Yoo, G, Zemp, M, Donato, S, Totenhagen, CJ, van Eickels, RL, Adil, A, Anaba, EA, Asampong, E, Beauchemin-Roy, S, Berry, A, Brassard, A, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, L, Fonseca, G, Gaugue, J, Geonet, M, Hermesch, N, Abdul Wahab Khan, RK, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, MF, Lawless, N, Londero-Santos, A, Major, S, Marot, TA, Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, PCJ, Pagani, AF, Parise, M, Parvin, R, De, M, Péloquin, K, Rebelo, B, Righetti, F, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, S, Samrock, S, Serea, M, Seok, CB, Sotero, L, Stafford, O, Thomadakis, C, Topcu-Uzer, C, Ugarte, C, Low, WY, Simon-Zámbori, P, Siau, CS, Duca, DS, Filip, C, Park, H, Wearen, S, Bodenmann, G, Chiarolanza, C, Randall, AK, Leon, G, Basili, E, Martos, T, Boiger, M, Baldi, M, Hocker, L, Kline, K, Masturzi, A, Aryeetey, R, Bar-Kalifa, E, Boon, SD, Botella, L, Burke, T, Carnelley, KB, Carr, A, Dash, A, Fitriana, M, Gaines, SO, Galdiolo, S, Hart, CM, Joo, S, Kanth, B, Karademas, E, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, SA, McHugh, L, Milek, A, Murphy, E, Natividade, JC, Portugal, A, Quiñones, Á, Relvas, AP, Rumondor, PCB, Rusu, P, Sallay, V, Saul, LA, Schmitt, DP, Sels, L, Shujja, S, Taylor, LK, Ozguluk, SB, Verhofstadt, L, Yoo, G, Zemp, M, Donato, S, Totenhagen, CJ, van Eickels, RL, Adil, A, Anaba, EA, Asampong, E, Beauchemin-Roy, S, Berry, A, Brassard, A, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, L, Fonseca, G, Gaugue, J, Geonet, M, Hermesch, N, Abdul Wahab Khan, RK, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, MF, Lawless, N, Londero-Santos, A, Major, S, Marot, TA, Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, PCJ, Pagani, AF, Parise, M, Parvin, R, De, M, Péloquin, K, Rebelo, B, Righetti, F, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, S, Samrock, S, Serea, M, Seok, CB, Sotero, L, Stafford, O, Thomadakis, C, Topcu-Uzer, C, Ugarte, C, Low, WY, Simon-Zámbori, P, Siau, CS, Duca, DS, Filip, C, Park, H, Wearen, S, Bodenmann, G, and Chiarolanza, C

Abstract

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented

Published
2022

2. Erratum to Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries

Author

Randall, AK, Leon, G, Basili, E, Martos, T, Boiger, M, Baldi, M, Hocker, L, Kline, K, Masturzi, A, Aryeetey, R, Bar-Kalifa, E, Boon, SD, Botella, L, Burke, T, Carnelley, KB, Carr, A, Dash, A, Fitriana, M, Gaines, SO, Galdiolo, S, Hart, CM, Joo, S, Kanth, B, Karademas, E, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, SA, McHugh, L, Milek, A, Murphy, E, Natividade, JC, Portugal, A, Quinones, A, Relvas, AP, Rumondor, PCB, Rusu, P, Sallay, V, Saul, LA, Schmitt, DP, Sels, L, Shujja, S, Taylor, LK, Ozguluk, SB, Verhofstadt, L, Yoo, G, Zemp, M, Donato, S, Totenhagen, CJ, van Eickels, RL, Adil, A, Anaba, EA, Asampong, E, Beauchemin-Roy, S, Berry, A, Brassard, A, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, L, Fonseca, G, Gaugue, J, Geonet, M, Hermesch, N, Khan, RKAW, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, M-F, Lawless, N, Londero-Santos, A, Major, S, Marot, TA, Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, PCJ, Pagani, AF, Parise, M, Parvin, R, De, M, Peloquin, K, Rebelo, B, Righetti, F, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, S, Samrock, S, Serea, M, Seok, CB, Sotero, L, Stafford, O, Thomadakis, C, Topcu-Uzer, C, Ugarte, C, Low, WY, Simon-Zambori, P, Siau, CS, Duca, D-S, Filip, C, Park, H, Wearen, S, Bodenmann, G, Chiarolanza, C, Randall, AK, Leon, G, Basili, E, Martos, T, Boiger, M, Baldi, M, Hocker, L, Kline, K, Masturzi, A, Aryeetey, R, Bar-Kalifa, E, Boon, SD, Botella, L, Burke, T, Carnelley, KB, Carr, A, Dash, A, Fitriana, M, Gaines, SO, Galdiolo, S, Hart, CM, Joo, S, Kanth, B, Karademas, E, Karantzas, Gery, Landolt, SA, McHugh, L, Milek, A, Murphy, E, Natividade, JC, Portugal, A, Quinones, A, Relvas, AP, Rumondor, PCB, Rusu, P, Sallay, V, Saul, LA, Schmitt, DP, Sels, L, Shujja, S, Taylor, LK, Ozguluk, SB, Verhofstadt, L, Yoo, G, Zemp, M, Donato, S, Totenhagen, CJ, van Eickels, RL, Adil, A, Anaba, EA, Asampong, E, Beauchemin-Roy, S, Berry, A, Brassard, A, Chesterman, Susan, Ferguson, L, Fonseca, G, Gaugue, J, Geonet, M, Hermesch, N, Khan, RKAW, Knox, Laura, Lafontaine, M-F, Lawless, N, Londero-Santos, A, Major, S, Marot, TA, Mullins, Ellie, Otermans, PCJ, Pagani, AF, Parise, M, Parvin, R, De, M, Peloquin, K, Rebelo, B, Righetti, F, Romano, Daniel, Salavati, S, Samrock, S, Serea, M, Seok, CB, Sotero, L, Stafford, O, Thomadakis, C, Topcu-Uzer, C, Ugarte, C, Low, WY, Simon-Zambori, P, Siau, CS, Duca, D-S, Filip, C, Park, H, Wearen, S, Bodenmann, G, and Chiarolanza, C

Published
2022

3. Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries

Author

Randall, A. K., Leon, G., Basili, E., Martos, T., Boiger, M., Baldi, M., Hocker, L., Kline, K., Masturzi, A., Aryeetey, R., Bar-Kalifa, E., Boon, S. D., Botella, L., Burke, T., Carnelley, K., Carr, A., Dash, A., Fitriana, M., Gaines, S. O., Galdiolo, S., Claire M, H., Joo, S., Kanth, B., Karademas, E., Karantzas, G., Landolt, S. A., Mchugh, L., Milek, A., Murphy, E., Natividade, J. C., Portugal, A., Quinones, A., Relvas, A. P., Rumondor, P. C. B., Rusu, P., Sallay, V., Saul, L. A., Schmitt, D. P., Sels, L., Shujja, S., Taylor, L. K., Ozguluk, S. B., Verhofstadt, L., Yoo, G., Zemp, M., Donato, Silvia, Totenhagen, C. J., van Eickels, R. L., Anaba, E. A., Beauchemin-Roy, S., Berry, A., Brassard, A., Chesterman, S., Ferguson, L., Fonseca, G., Gaugue, J., Geonet, M., Hermesch, N., Knox, L., Lafontaine, M. -F., Lawless, N., Londero-Santos, A., Major, S., Marot, T. A., Mullins, E., Otermans, P. C. J., Ariela F, P., Parise, Miriam, Parvin, R., De, M., Peloquin, K., Rebelo, B., Righetti, F., Romano, D., Salavati, S., Samrock, S., Serea, M., Seok, C. B., Sotero, L., Stafford, O., Thomadakis, C., Topcu-Uzer, C., Ugarte, C., Yun, L. W., Simon-Zambori, P., Siau, C. S., Duca, D. -S., Filip, C., Park, H., Wearen, S., Bodenmann, G., Chiarolanza, C., Donato S. (ORCID:0000-0002-8406-4604), Parise M. (ORCID:0000-0003-2150-6636), Randall, A. K., Leon, G., Basili, E., Martos, T., Boiger, M., Baldi, M., Hocker, L., Kline, K., Masturzi, A., Aryeetey, R., Bar-Kalifa, E., Boon, S. D., Botella, L., Burke, T., Carnelley, K., Carr, A., Dash, A., Fitriana, M., Gaines, S. O., Galdiolo, S., Claire M, H., Joo, S., Kanth, B., Karademas, E., Karantzas, G., Landolt, S. A., Mchugh, L., Milek, A., Murphy, E., Natividade, J. C., Portugal, A., Quinones, A., Relvas, A. P., Rumondor, P. C. B., Rusu, P., Sallay, V., Saul, L. A., Schmitt, D. P., Sels, L., Shujja, S., Taylor, L. K., Ozguluk, S. B., Verhofstadt, L., Yoo, G., Zemp, M., Donato, Silvia, Totenhagen, C. J., van Eickels, R. L., Anaba, E. A., Beauchemin-Roy, S., Berry, A., Brassard, A., Chesterman, S., Ferguson, L., Fonseca, G., Gaugue, J., Geonet, M., Hermesch, N., Knox, L., Lafontaine, M. -F., Lawless, N., Londero-Santos, A., Major, S., Marot, T. A., Mullins, E., Otermans, P. C. J., Ariela F, P., Parise, Miriam, Parvin, R., De, M., Peloquin, K., Rebelo, B., Righetti, F., Romano, D., Salavati, S., Samrock, S., Serea, M., Seok, C. B., Sotero, L., Stafford, O., Thomadakis, C., Topcu-Uzer, C., Ugarte, C., Yun, L. W., Simon-Zambori, P., Siau, C. S., Duca, D. -S., Filip, C., Park, H., Wearen, S., Bodenmann, G., Chiarolanza, C., Donato S. (ORCID:0000-0002-8406-4604), and Parise M. (ORCID:0000-0003-2150-6636)

Abstract

Following the global outbreak of COVID-19 in March 2020, individuals report psychological distress associated with the “new normal”—social distancing, financial hardships, and increased responsibilities while working from home. Given the interpersonal nature of stress and coping responses between romantic partners, based on the systemic transactional model this study posits that perceived partner dyadic coping may be an important moderator between experiences of COVID-19 psychological distress and relationship quality. To examine these associations, self-report data from 14,020 people across 27 countries were collected during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic (March–July, 2020). It was hypothesized that higher symptoms of psychological distress would be reported post-COVID-19 compared to pre-COVID-19 restrictions (Hypothesis 1), reports of post-COVID-19 psychological distress would be negatively associated with relationship quality (Hypothesis 2), and perceived partner DC would moderate these associations (Hypothesis 3). While hypotheses were generally supported, results also showed interesting between-country variability. Limitations and future directions are presented.

Published
2022

5. A 20-Year Systematic Review of the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' Test across Neurodegenerative Conditions.

Author

Stafford O, Gleeson C, Egan C, Tunney C, Rooney B, O'Keeffe F, McDermott G, Baron-Cohen S, and Burke T

Abstract

Social cognition has a broad theoretical definition, which includes the ability to mentalise, i.e., recognise and infer mental states to explain and predict another's behaviour. There is growing recognition of the clinical, diagnostic, and prognostic value of assessing a person's ability to perform social cognitive tasks, particularly aspects of theory of mind, such as mentalising. One such measure of mentalising is the 'Reading the Mind in the Eyes' test (RMET). This systematic review and meta-analysis consider performance on the RMET, applied to people with neurodegenerative conditions in matched control studies, since its publication in 2001. Overall, this review includes 22 papers with data from N = 800 participants with neurodegenerative conditions: Alzheimer's disease, n = 31; Parkinson's disease, n = 221; Lewy body dementia, n = 33; motor neuron disease, n = 218; Huntington's disease n = 80; multiple sclerosis, n = 217; and N = 601 matched typical controls. Our meta-analyses show that deficits in mentalising, as measured by the RMET, are consistently reported across neurodegenerative conditions, with participants in both early and late disease stages being affected. Social cognition is an emerging field of cognitive neuroscience requiring specific and sensitive measurement across each subdomain. Adult-based meta-normative data feature, for which future groups or individuals could be compared against, and hypotheses relating to the source of these mentalising deficits are further discussed. This review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020182874).

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

6. Quality of Life Outcomes in a Community Cohort of Adults With an Intellectual Disability Using the Personal Outcome Scale.

Author

Burke T, Deffew A, Stafford O, Docherty C, Burke S, Mostert R, van Loon J, Lombardi M, Vaughan M, Brickell R, Keogh M, Mahon W, and O'Halloran D

Abstract

Objectives: Quality of life (QoL) is a multi-dimensional phenomenon composed of core domains that are influenced by personal characteristics, values, and environmental contributions. There are eight core domains of QoL aligned with both the United Nations and the International Association for the Scientific Study of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IASSIDD). The Personal Outcome Scale (POS), is a semi-structured self and proxy instrument that specifically measures these aspects of QoL for people with an intellectual disability., Methods: A total of 85 people with an intellectual disability and their primary keyworker ( n = 85) took part in this study. A convenience sample recruitment strategy was employed to recruit participants during the calendar year from January-December 2020. Participants completed the self-report and proxy POS, and clinic-demographic data was also considered., Results: QoL is higher in those who have a dedicated service planner and also for those with a less severe to profound disability. People who were in gainful employment reported significantly higher QoL as did those availing of outreach and residential services, over and above local services., Conclusions: This research shows that there are distinct and specific factors that relate to QoL for people with an intellectual disability community-based services in Ireland. Future research could aim to investigate these longitudinally, and specifically how QoL relates to cognitive and functional outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Burke, Deffew, Stafford, Docherty, Burke, Mostert, van Loon, Lombardi, Vaughan, Brickell, Keogh, Mahon and O'Halloran.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Psychological Flexibility Mediates Wellbeing for People with Adverse Childhood Experiences during COVID-19.

Author

Browne A, Stafford O, Berry A, Murphy E, Taylor LK, Shevlin M, McHugh L, Carr A, and Burke T

Abstract

Background: The psychological impact of COVID-19 is multifaceted, both acute and chronic, and has not affected everyone equally., Method: This longitudinal study compared those with and without Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACEs) on measures of psychological distress and wellbeing over time., Results: All groups (No ACE, Low ACE, and High ACE) had similar levels of distress at Time 1, with significant increases in psychological distress for those with ACEs over time, but not for those without. Psychological Flexibility was strongly and significantly associated with decreases in psychological distress and improved wellbeing. It significantly mediated the relationship between ACE and wellbeing., Conclusions: Those with ACEs report significantly increased psychological distress over time, compared to those without ACE during the COVID-19 pandemic. Evidence-based interventions using Psychological Flexibility may improve mental health and wellbeing to help further mediate its effects.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. Increased Psychological Distress during COVID-19 and Quarantine in Ireland: A National Survey.

Author

Burke T, Berry A, Taylor LK, Stafford O, Murphy E, Shevlin M, McHugh L, and Carr A

Abstract

Background: The emergence of the coronavirus pneumonia (COVID-19) resulted in a global pandemic. The psychological impact of an epidemic is multifaceted and acute, with long-term consequences., Methods: A cross-sectional online survey-based design was employed, assessing the psychological impact of COVID-19 on members of the Irish public during the quarantine period of COVID-19 in Ireland. Participants were invited to complete the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21) retrospectively (prior to quarantine) and during the quarantine period, as well as measures of illness perceptions, well-being, and a bespoke measure (the Effects of COVID Questionnaire, ECQ), which assessed perceptions of COVID-related stresses associated with personal concerns, caring for children, caring for aging parents, as well as gratitude., Results: A total of n = 1620 entered the survey platform, with a total of n = 847 surveys completed by members of the Irish public. Entry into COVID-19 quarantine was associated with significant increases in clinically significant symptoms of depression, stress, and anxiety. The ECQ reliably assessed a range of COVID-19-related stresses and had large and significant correlations with the DASS-21., Conclusions: The COVID-19 quarantine was associated with stresses and significant increases in symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress in a national Irish cohort. The public require increased access to mental health services to meet this increase in COVID-19-related psychological distress.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results