Search

Myocardial infarction (MI) and depression are leading causes of mortality and morbidity globally, and these conditions are increasing recognized as being fundamentally interconnected. The recently recognized gut-heart-brain axis offers insights into depression following MI, but effective treatments for this comorbidity remain lacking. To address this medical need, we employed an animal model of MI to investigate the potential repurposing of sotagliflozin (SOTA), an approved sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitor for diabetes, for managing depression following MI and identifying potential SOTA-associated microbial mechanisms. SOTA treatment improved cardiac dysfunction and alleviated depression-like behaviors induced by MI, accompanied by alterations in gut microbiota composition, such as changes in the Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group, Alloprevotella, and Prevotellaceae UCG-001. Moreover, fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) using fecal samples from SOTA-treated MI mice demonstrated that gut microbiota contributed to the beneficial effects of SOTA on cardiac dysfunction and depression-like behaviors in MI mice. Intriguingly, FMT-based intervention and concordance analysis of gut microbiota before and after FMT suggested that Prevotellaceae NK3B31 group, Alloprevotella, and Prevotellaceae UCG-001 were associated with the beneficial effects of SOTA. Furthermore, functional prediction of gut microbiota and correlation analysis support the significance of these dynamic microbial communities. In conclusion, these findings suggest that SOTA could serve as a potential drug to ameliorate cardiac dysfunction and depressive symptoms in MI patients via through the gut-heart-brain axis.

Background and aim: Dapagliflozin inhibits the sodium-glucose cotransporter protein 2 (SGLT-2), while sotagliflozin, belonging to a new class of dual-acting SGLT-1/SGLT-2 inhibitors, has garnered considerable attention due to its efficacy and safety. Both Dapagliflozin and sotagliflozin play a significant role in treating worsening heart failure in diabetes/nondiabetes patients with heart failure. Therefore, this article was to analyze and compare the cost per outcome of both drugs in preventing one event in patients diagnosed with diabetes-related heart failure. Method: The Cost Needed to Treat (CNT) was employed to calculate the cost of preventing one event, and the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) represents the anticipated number of patients requiring the intervention treatment to prevent a single adverse event, or the anticipated number of patients needing multiple treatments to achieve a beneficial outcome. The efficacy and safety data were obtained from the results of two published clinical trials, DAPA-HF and SOLOISTWHF. Due to the temporal difference in the drugs' releases, we temporarily analyzed the price of dapagliflozin to calculate the price of sotagliflozin within the same timeframe. The secondary analyses aimed to assess the stability of the CNT study and minimize differences between the results of the RCT control and trial groups, employing one-way sensitivity analyses. Result: The final results revealed an annualized Number Needed to Treat (aNNT) of 4 (95% CI 3-7) for preventing one event with sotagliflozin, as opposed to 23 (95% CI 16-55) for dapagliflozin. We calculated dapagliflozin's cost per prevented event (CNT) to be $109,043 (95% CI $75,856-$260,755). The price of sotagliflozin was set below $27,260, providing a favorable advantage. Sensitivity analysis suggests that sotagliflozin may hold a cost advantage. Conclusion: In this study, sotagliflozin was observed to exhibit a price advantage over dapagliflozin in preventing one events, cardiovascular mortality, or all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Evidence for reducing cardiovascular and renal events with sotagliflozin is uncertain among type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. To gather more evidence, this meta-analysis assesses the beneficial effects of sotagliflozin, a dual sodium--glucose cotransporter 1 and 2 inhibitor, in reducing the cardiovascular and renal events in diabetic patients with or without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Scopus, Google Scholar, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and PubMed were the databases used to search. The studies published from January 1, 2018, to January 30, 2022, were considered. The eligibility of studies was assessed independently. The data were collected in a modified Cochrane data extraction form. The included studies' quality was assessed with the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The quality of evidence for renal and cardiovascular outcomes was evaluated using GRADEpro software. The number of events of urgent visits to the hospital and requiring hospitalization was reduced (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.69, 0.78; P value <0.00001). The mortality rate because of cardiovascular events was decreased with sotagliflozin (RR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.67, 0.80; P value <0.00001). Patients taking sotagliflozin had a drastic decline in the number of deaths due to stroke and non-fatal myocardial infarction. Yet, there is no difference between the groups in terms of changes in mortality due to other causes or the glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Sotagliflozin demonstrated effectiveness in reducing the mortality rate related to heart failure and cardiovascular events when the dose was increased from 200 mg to 400 mg. Despite this, evidence is still needed to prove the renal protective action. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have recently been recommended as a foundational therapy for patients with heart failure (HF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) because of their favourable effects on mortality, clinical events and quality of life. While clinical practice guidelines have recommended dapagliflozin or empagliflozin in all patients with HFrEF, or sotagliflozin in those with HFrEF and concomitant diabetes, the timing and practical integration of these drugs in clinical practice is less well defined. We propose that these drugs are candidates for early, upfront administration to patients with newly diagnosed HFrEF and for patients hospitalized with HF. Growing evidence has established early benefits, with clinically meaningful reductions in clinical events that reach statistical significance within days to weeks, following dapagliflozin, empagliflozin or, in diabetic patients, sotagliflozin initiation. Secondly, although major clinical trials have tested these drugs in patients already receiving background HF therapy, secondary analyses showed that their efficacy is independent of that. Third, SGLT2 inhibitors are generally safe and well tolerated, with clinical trial data reporting minimal effects on blood pressure, glycaemia-related adverse events, and no excess in acute kidney injury. Rather, they exert renal protective effects and reduce risk of hyperkalaemia, properties that favour initiation, tolerance and persistence of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists. This review supports the early initiation of dapagliflozin and empagliflozin (or sotagliflozin limited to patients with diabetes) to rapidly improve clinical outcome and quality of life of HFrEF patients.

Aim: To assesses the cost–effectiveness of sotagliflozin for the treatment of patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes. Materials & methods: A de novo cost–effectiveness model with a Markov structure was created for patients hospitalized for heart failure with comorbid diabetes. Outcomes of interest included hospital readmissions, emergency department visits and all-cause mortality measured over a 30-year time horizon. Baseline event frequencies were derived from published real-world data studies; sotagliflozin’s efficacy was estimated from SOLOIST-WHF. Health benefits were calculated quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs included pharmaceutical costs, rehospitalization, emergency room visits and adverse events. Economic value was measured using the incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER). Results: Sotagliflozin use decreased annualized rehospitalization rates by 34.5% (0.228 vs 0.348, difference: -0.120), annualized emergency department visits by 40.0% (0.091 vs 0.153, difference: -0.061) and annualized mortality by 18.0% (0.298 vs 0.363, difference: -0.065) relative to standard of care, resulting in a net gain in QAYs of 0.425 for sotagliflozin versus standard of care. Incremental costs using sotagliflozin increased by $19,374 over a 30-year time horizon of the patient, driven largely by increased pharmaceutical cost. Estimated ICER for sotagliflozin relative to standard of care was $45,596 per QALY. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin is a cost-effective addition to standard of care for patients hospitalized with heart failure and comorbid diabetes.

Background: Heart failure (HF) is a highly prevalent disease, among the primary factors contributing to morbidity and death. One of its types is heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) comprising 40%–50% of newly diagnosed HF cases. Despite the high prevalence of HFpEF, there is still a lack of knowledge regarding the best drugs and treatment approaches to be used. However, the sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors could be a promising treatment. Objectives: To examine SGLT2 inhibitors' effect on hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in HFpEF patients. Search methods: We conducted searches for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science up to July 2024. Selection criteria: We chose RCTs that examined the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors and placebo in individuals with higher than 40% ejection fraction (HFpEF). Data collection and analysis: The methodology for the systematic review and meta-analysis was in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis. Main results: We included 8 studies with 16,509 participants. Drugs examined in our paper included empagliflozin, dapagliflozin, sotogliflozin, and ertugliflozin. Various outcomes were analyzed in different papers. However, different SGLT2 inhibitors lead to a decreased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization and kidney injury. Our meta-analysis showed a decreased risk of cardiovascular hospitalization but not death due to cardiovascular causes or other causes. These results were regardless of baseline status of eGFR, systolic blood pressure, atrial fibrillation or flutter, diabetes mellitus, sex, body mass index, and nt-proBNP. The included studies were of moderate to high quality. Conclusion: For individuals with HFpEF, SGLT2 inhibitors have been proven to be a safe and effective medication. However, more studies are needed for longer durations, reporting adverse events, effects on exercise tolerance, and other secondary outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: As an antidiabetic agent, sotagliflozin was recently approved for heart failure (HF). However, its cardiovascular benefits in type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) patients with HF or cardiovascular (CV) risk factors have not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study is to evaluate the cardiovascular benefits and safety of sotagliflozin in T2DM patients with HF or CV risk factors using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Methods: Data were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane Library from their inception to 16 August 2023. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing sotagliflozin with a placebo, dapagliflozin, and empagliflozin in adult T2DM patients with HF or CV risks for at least 12 weeks were included in the study. Data analysis was conducted using R 4.2.3 and Stata 17.0. Cardiovascular efficacy outcomes included HF events (hospitalization or urgent visits for HF), MACE (deaths from CV causes, hospitalizations for HF, nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and strokes), cardiovascular death, the decrease in SBP, and weight loss. Safety outcomes are urinary tract infection, diarrhea, and diabetic ketoacidosis. Results: Eleven studies with 30,952 patients were included. Compared to dapagliflozin and empagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin showed the best effect in reducing HF events [OR (95% CI), 0.79 (0.66, 0.94) and 0.90 (0.63, 1.27)]. Compared to dapagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin [OR (95% CI), 0.76 (0.66, 0.87)] was superior in preventing MACE. Compared to empagliflozin, 200 mg of sotagliflozin [OR (95% CI), 1.46 (1.04, 2.05)] was inferior in preventing CV death. Sotagliflozin showed a poorer SBP decreasing effect than empagliflozin and dapagliflozin [MD (95% CI), 1.30 (0.03, 2.56) and 2.25 (0.35, 4.14), respectively]. There was no significant difference between sotagliflozin and other interventions in weight loss. Sotagliflozin exhibited no increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis or urinary tract infection among all interventions, however, it showed a mild risk for diarrhea than placebo [OR (95% CI), 1.47 (1.28, 1.69)]. Conclusion: Sotagliflozin displayed moderate CV benefits and acceptable safety. Sotagliflozin can be one of the recommended options for T2DM patients with HF or CV risk factors, which will be important for evidence-based use of sotagliflozin as well as decision-making of T2DM medication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure (HF) is a chronic disorder that decreases heart function and causes a person to be less tolerant to exercise, have a lower quality of life, and prone to death. Novel therapeutic strategies are still needed despite improvements in HF management. Sotagliflozin is a promising medication for the treatment of HF, which is a dual sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 as well as 2 (SGLT1 and SGLT2) inhibitor. The purpose of this in-depth study is to assess sotagliflozin's effectiveness and safety in the treatment of HF. The effects of sotagliflozin on different facets of HF pathophysiology, such as blood flow, myocardial remodeling, and neurohormonal stimulation, are discussed in preclinical and clinical investigations. Sotagliflozin has been shown to be effective in lowering the risk of HF hospitalization and heart attack in patients with HF with either type 2 diabetic mellitus (T2DM) and chronic kidney disease (CKD), according to numerous randomized trials, including the most recent SOLOIST-WHF or SCORED trials. Sotagliflozin's simultaneous inhibition of SGLT1 along with SGLT2 creates a special pharmacological profile that addresses both the metabolic as well as non-metabolic problems seen in HF. This review provides a comprehensive summary of various aspects related to sotagliflozin and heart failure, including the pathophysiology in heart failure, US-FDA approved treatment for HF, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamics data of sotagliflozin, reported adverse drug reactions (ADRs), and ongoing clinical trials.

The SCORED (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Moderate Renal Impairment Who Are at Cardiovascular Risk) and SOLOIST-WHF (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure) trials demonstrated that sotagliflozin, an SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor, improves outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes who have heart failure (HF) or kidney disease. We assessed the efficacy of sotagliflozin on HF clinical outcomes in individuals with differing baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels. We included all adults from SCORED and SOLOIST-WHF. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death, hospitalizations for HF, and urgent visits for HF. The efficacy of sotagliflozin compared with placebo was evaluated by baseline HbA1c using competing-risk marginal proportional hazards models. We identified 11,744 adults. Individuals with HbA1c ≤7.5% experienced the primary outcome at a lower rate in the sotagliflozin group (11.2 per 100 person-years) than the placebo group (15.5 per 100 person-years) (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.57-0.93). Similarly, individuals with HbA1c of 7.6% to 9.0% experienced the primary outcome at a lower rate in the sotagliflozin group (7.3 per 100 person-years) than the placebo group (9.4 per 100 person-years) (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.63-0.96). These findings were also consistent among individuals with HbA1c >9.0%, with a primary outcome rate in the sotagliflozin group (7.8 per 100 person-years) that was lower than the placebo group (11.6 per 100 person-years) (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.50-0.84). The efficacy of sotagliflozin was consistent by baseline HbA1c level (P for interaction = 0.58). In individuals with type 2 diabetes and either HF or kidney disease, sotagliflozin reduced HF outcomes irrespective of baseline HbA1c. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: To provide a pooled effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular outcomes in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF: ≥50%) or/and mildly reduced EF (HFmrEF: 41–49%) regardless of baseline diabetes. Methods: We systemically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science databases and clinical trial registries using appropriate keywords till August 28, 2022, to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or post-hoc analysis of RCTs, reporting cardiovascular death (CVD) and/or urgent visits/hospitalization for heart failure(HHF) in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF receiving SGLTi vs. placebo. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for outcomes were pooled together using generic inverse variance method with fixed-effects model. Results: We identified six RCTs, pooling data retrieved from 15,769 patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. Pooled analysis showed that compared to placebo, SGLT2i use was significantly associated with improved CVD/HHF outcomes in HFmrEF/HFpEF (pooled HR 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74, 0.86, p

Objective: Sotagliflozin is a dual sodium-glucose co-transporter-1 and 2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitor with selectivity towards SGLT2. Previous studies showed that SGLT2 inhibitors can improve cardiac function and reduce myocardial infarction size in animal models of myocardial infarction (MI). However, it remains unknown whether the dual inhibition of SGLT1/2 by sotagliflozin has beneficial effects in this context. In this study, we investigated the potential cardioprotective effects of sotagliflozin in an animal model of MI. Methods: Sprague Dawley (SD) rats underwent left anterior descending coronary artery ligation or sham ligation then were randomly assigned to receive either sotagliflozin (10 mg/kg) or vehicle via intraperitoneal injection. Fourteen days post-MI, we assessed cardiac function using echocardiography and evaluated histological and molecular markers of cardiac remodeling and inflammation in the left ventricle. Results: Our findings indicate that sotagliflozin treatment resulted in improved cardiac function and reduced infarct size compared with the vehicle-treated group. Additionally, sotagliflozin improved cardiac remodeling as shown by the decreased cardiac hypertrophy and cardiac apoptosis in the post-MI heart. Mechanistically, an apparent reduction in the cardiac inflammatory response in sotagliflozin-treated hearts was observed in the post-MI rats. Conclusion: Overall, our results suggest that sotagliflozin may have cardioprotective effects against myocardial infarction.

Background: Hypoglycemia rates usually increase when insulin treatment is intensified to improve glycemic control. We evaluated (post hoc) hypoglycemic rates in adult patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) on sotagliflozin (a dual sodium-glucose cotransporter [SGLT] 1 and 2 inhibitor) in two phase 3, 52-week clinical trials (inTandem 1 and 2; NCT02384941 and NCT02421510). Materials and Methods: We analyzed rates of documented hypoglycemia (level 1, blood glucose ≥54 to

Abstract Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is associated with comparable poor outcomes as other subtypes of heart failure and remains a medical unmet need due to the paucity of effective therapies. According to large cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials in patients with heart failure, sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce CV mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There has been a lack of dedicated trials in HFmrEF. However, several large outcome trials in heart failure that enrolled patients with HFmrEF could provide a hint on the role of SGLT2is in this subgroup. This review focuses on CV effects of three major SGLT2is—dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin—in patients with HFmrEF. A narrative review of trials investigating the efficacy of each medication in treating heart failure with LVEF > 40% is provided with a focus on their LVEF subgroup analyses. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current state of evidence regarding the potential of SGLT2is in HFmrEF management. Current limited evidence suggests that SGLT2is might be a favourable treatment modality for patients with HFmrEF to reduce hospitalization for heart failure and CV mortality. This conclusion needs to be further supported by clear HFmrEF subgroup analysis of the existing trials. Further outcome trials involving sufficient patients with different subtypes of HFmrEF are needed to confirm and assess CV benefits of SGLT2is in HFmrEF. Possible mechanisms by which SGLT2is exert their cardioprotective effect are also described briefly.

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a lethal autosomal-recessive inherited disease caused by mutations in the cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. In the present work, we derived human proximal lung organoids (HLOs) from patient-derived pluripotent stem cells (PSCs) carrying disease-causing CFTR mutations. We evaluated the forskolin (Fsk)-stimulated swellings of these HLOs in the presence of CFTR modulators (VX-770 and/or VX-809) and demonstrated that HLOs respond to CFTR modulators in a mutation-dependent manner. Using this assay, we examined the effects of the sodium-dependent glucose cotransporter 1/2 (SGLT1/2) inhibitor drugs phlorizin and sotagliflozin on the basis of our findings that SGLT1 expression is upregulated in CF HLOs and airway epithelial cells compared with their wild-type counterparts. Unexpectedly, both drugs promoted dF/dF HLO swelling. These results reveal SGLTs, especially SGLT1, as potential therapeutic targets for treating CF lung diseases and demonstrate the use of PSC-derived HLOs as a preclinical tool in CF drug development.

Results from recent randomized controlled trials on inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) have determined a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents have been shown not only to ameliorate metabolic control, but also to independently protect from cardiovascular events and to reduce the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in these patients. The magnitude of the nephroprotective effect observed in these studies is likely to make SGLT2 inhibitors the most impactful drug class for the treatment of diabetic patients with CKD since the discovery of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors. Even more surprisingly, SGLT2 inhibitors have also been shown to slow CKD progression in non-diabetic individuals with varying degrees of proteinuria, suggesting that activation of SGLT2 is involved in the pathogenesis of CKD independent of its etiology. As indications continue to expand, it is still unclear whether the observed benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors may extend to CKD patients at lower risk of progression and if their association with other agents may confer additional protection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heart failure is prevalent worldwide. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are effective in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction, whether SGLT2i are effective in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains to be determined. Methods: All relevant citations in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were identified from inception to September, 2022. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A subgroup analysis was performed according to diabetes mellitus status and the ejection fraction. Secondary endpoints were cardiovascular death, hospitalization for heart failure and all cause death. Results: Seven studies involving 11,604 patients were included in the metaanalysis. Compared with placebo, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors reduced the incidence of the primary outcome by 24%, with an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 [0.69, 0.84]. For secondary outcomes, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors were associated with a lower incidence of hospitalization for heart failure, but not cardiovascular or all-cause death; the OR and 95% CI were 0.73 [0.66, 0.82], 0.92 [0.81, 1.04], 0.96 [0.88, 1.05], respectively. Conclusions: This study proves the clinical efficacy of SGLT2i for treatment of HFpEF patients with or without diabetes, which was mainly driven by prevention of HHF rather than cardiovascular or all-cause death. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Diabetesmellitus (DM) is a global health problem, and it has become a shocking threat in the contemporary era. The objective of this study was to analyze the safety of sotagliflozin in patients with DM systematically and intuitively. Methods: On November 15, 2021, literature retrieval was performed on PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane libraries. The meta-analysis results included genital mycotic infection, related-to-acidosis events, and other related adverse events, including diarrhea, severe nocturnal hypoglycemia event, and volume depletion. In addition, a subgroup analysis was also conducted based on different doses of sotagliflozin. Moreover, the patient-treated years analyzed in the study were 12 weeks, 24 weeks, and 52 weeks, respectively, for type 1 diabetes, and were 12 weeks, 22 weeks, and 52 weeks, respectively, for type 2 diabetes. Results: The results of this meta-analysis illustrated that sotagliflozin could increase the risk of genital mycotic infection for patients with T1D and T2D (RR: 3.49, 95% Cl: 2.54-4.79, p < 0.001; RR: 2.83, 95% Cl: 2.04-3.93, p < 0.001; respectively). In addition, the subgroup analysis showed that the drug doses that could increase the risk of genital mycotic infection were 400 mg and 200 mg (RR: 3.63, 95% Cl: 2.46-5.36, p < 0.001; RR: 3.21, 95% Cl: 1.84-5.62, p < 0.001; respectively) in T1D. Moreover, sotagliflozin could increase the risk of events related to acidosis in the patients of T1D, including acidosis-related adverse events, positively adjudicated diabetic ketoacidosis, acidosis-related event, and diabetic ketoacidosis (RR: 7.49, 95% Cl: 3.20-17.52, p < 0.001; RR: 6.05, 95% Cl: 2.56-14.30, p < 0.001; RR: 4.83, 95% Cl: 3.13-7.45, p < 0.001; RR: 8.12, 95% Cl: 3.06-21.52, p < 0.001; respectively). In the patients of T2D, sotagliflozin could not increase the risk of DKA (RR: 1.30, 95% Cl: 0.34-4.99, p = 0.70). About serious of acidosis-related adverse events, positively adjudicated diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) and acidosis-related event, the included studies were not reported for T2D patients. As for the other related adverse events, sotagliflozin was found to be a risk factor for diarrhea and volume depletion in T1D patients (RR: 1.44, 95% Cl: 1.09-1.90, p = 0.01; RR: 2.50, 95% Cl: 1.33-4.69, p < 0.01; respectively) and T2D patients (RR: 1.44, 95% Cl: 1.26-1.64, p < 0.001; RR: 1.25, 95% Cl: 1.07-1.45, p < 0.01; respectively). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that the adverse events of sotagliflozin were tolerable to patients with DM, in terms of the incidence of genital mycotic infection, related-to-acidosis events, diarrhea, volume depletion, and severe nocturnal hypoglycemia events. In addition, the subgroup analysis of sotagliflozin dosage is considered to have great clinical significance for future guidance of sotagliflozin application in patients with DM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) is associated with comparable poor outcomes as other subtypes of heart failure and remains a medical unmet need due to the paucity of effective therapies. According to large cardiovascular (CV) outcome trials in patients with heart failure, sodium–glucose co‐transporter‐2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce CV mortality and hospitalizations for heart failure in patients with heart failure across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). There has been a lack of dedicated trials in HFmrEF. However, several large outcome trials in heart failure that enrolled patients with HFmrEF could provide a hint on the role of SGLT2is in this subgroup. This review focuses on CV effects of three major SGLT2is—dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and sotagliflozin—in patients with HFmrEF. A narrative review of trials investigating the efficacy of each medication in treating heart failure with LVEF > 40% is provided with a focus on their LVEF subgroup analyses. The purpose of this review is to discuss the current state of evidence regarding the potential of SGLT2is in HFmrEF management. Current limited evidence suggests that SGLT2is might be a favourable treatment modality for patients with HFmrEF to reduce hospitalization for heart failure and CV mortality. This conclusion needs to be further supported by clear HFmrEF subgroup analysis of the existing trials. Further outcome trials involving sufficient patients with different subtypes of HFmrEF are needed to confirm and assess CV benefits of SGLT2is in HFmrEF. Possible mechanisms by which SGLT2is exert their cardioprotective effect are also described briefly. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Sodium-glucose co-transporters (SGLTs) mediate sodium and glucose transport across cell membranes. SGLT2 inhibitors have a recognized place within heart failure (HF) guidelines. We evaluated the effect of sotagliflozin on HF and cardiovascular outcomes in participants with type 2 diabetes. Scopus, Medline, Embase and Central were searched from inception until 2 June 2023. Randomized controlled trials evaluating sotagliflozin in type 2 diabetes participants and reporting HF events were selected. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and systolic blood pressure were evaluated. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used. Pooled mean difference (MD), relative risk (RR), 95% confidence intervals and the number needed to treat (NNT) were estimated (PROSPERO: CRD42023432732). We selected nine studies (n = 15 320 participants: n = 8040 intervention and n = 7280 control). The median follow-up was 13.4 months (Q1 = 13, Q3 = 21). One study recruited participants with HF at baseline. After a follow-up of >52 weeks, sotagliflozin significantly reduced the risk of HF [n = 8 studies; RR = 0.66 (0.64, 0.69)], stroke [n = 6 studies; RR = 0.75 (0.58, 0.97)] and MACE [n = 8 studies; RR = 0.73 (0.66, 0.81)]. The NNT was 20 and 26 for HF and MACE, respectively. Sotagliflozin lowered systolic blood pressure [n = 7; MD = -2.38 mmHg (-2.79, -1.97)]. No dose-dependent effect was identified for HF [200 mg: RR = 0.38 (0.16, 0.89), 400 mg: RR = 0.57 (0.39, 0.85), P-value = 0.22]. The high risk of bias was a limitation of this review. Sotagliflozin reduced HF and cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes participants. Research exploring its effects in HF and comparisons with SGLT2 inhibitors is warranted to determine if dual SGLT inhibition surpasses selective inhibition., (© 2024 The Author(s). ESC Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)

The present meta-analysis included 8 cardiovascular outcome trials with 57,185 patients at high cardiometabolic risk. In comparison with placebo, treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors was associated with a significantly lower risk of pneumonia (RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76–0.95, p = 0.004; I2 = 0, p = 0.48). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Results from recent randomized controlled trials on inhibitors of the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) have determined a paradigm shift in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents have been shown not only to ameliorate metabolic control, but also to independently protect from cardiovascular events and to reduce the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in these patients. The magnitude of the nephroprotective effect observed in these studies is likely to make SGLT2 inhibitors the most impactful drug class for the treatment of diabetic patients with CKD since the discovery of renin–angiotensin system inhibitors. Even more surprisingly, SGLT2 inhibitors have also been shown to slow CKD progression in non-diabetic individuals with varying degrees of proteinuria, suggesting that activation of SGLT2 is involved in the pathogenesis of CKD independent of its etiology. As indications continue to expand, it is still unclear whether the observed benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors may extend to CKD patients at lower risk of progression and if their association with other agents may confer additional protection.

Background: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a major cause of blindness globally. Sodium Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have been demonstrated to exert cardiorenal protection in patients with diabetes. However, their potential beneficial effect on DR is less well studied. The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the SGLT2 inhibition with Dapagliflozin (DAPA) on DR in well-characterised DR mouse models and controls. Methods: Dapagliflozin was administered to mice with and without diabetes for 8 weeks via their drinking water at 25 mg/kg/day. Urine glucose levels were measured weekly and their response to glucose was tested at week 7. After 8 weeks of treatment, eye tissue was harvested under terminal anaesthesia. The retinal vasculature and neural structure were assessed using immunofluorescence, immunohistochemistry and electron microscopy techniques. Results: Dapagliflozin treated DR mice exhibited metabolic benefits reflected by healthy body weight gain and pronounced glucose tolerance. Dapagliflozin reduced the development of retinal microvascular and neural abnormalities, increased the beneficial growth factor FGF21 (Fibroblast Growth Factor 21). We highlight for the first time that SGLT2 inhibition results in the upregulation of SGLT1 protein in the retina and that SGLT1 is significantly increased in the diabetic retina. Conclusions: Blockade of SGLT2 activity with DAPA may reduce retinal microvascular lesions in our novel DR mouse model. In conclusion, our data demonstrates the exciting future potential of SGLT1 and/or SGLT2 inhibition as a therapeutic for DR.

Given the mode of action of the drug, this is not surprising - but would also position omecamtiv mecarbil as a possible add-on therapy in patients with severe systolic dysfunction, in whom hypotension is often a complicating issue for conventional treatment. While the COVID-19 sensitivity analysis was meaningful in view of reported associations of the pandemic with reduced HF hospitalization rates 8 that may particularly impact recurrent HF events in the trial, how such analyses will be viewed in guidelines remains unknown. Perhaps most tantalizing are the implications of SOLOISTWHF for the safe initiation of SGLT inhibitors in hospitalized patients, as well as possible benefit in patients with HF and preserved LVEF. Biography: Dr Lam is a Senior Consultant at NHCS specializing in heart failure and recognized globally for expertise in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. [Extracted from the article]

The article analyzes the new results of randomized clinical trials on the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors in patients with cardiovascular diseases, heart failure with and without type 2 diabetes. The data of the latest studies (EMPEROR reduced, VERTIS CV, SOLOIST-WHF, SCORED) are presented in more detail.

Sotagliflozin (SOTA) is a dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2 used in adults with type 1 diabetes. The mechanism of action, based on the inhibition of both the SGLT1 and SGLT2 cotransporters, allows simultaneous increase of glucose excretion and slowing down the absorption of glucose in the intestine. Recently, test results have been published showing a beneficial effect of sotagliflozin on type 1 diabetes control [1,2,3]. Sotagliflozin use leads to a significant reduction in glycosylated haemoglobin (HbA1c) [1,2,3] , postprandial glucose reduction [1,2,3], weight loss [1,2,3], systolic blood pressure reduction [1,2,3] and reducing the risk of hypoglycaemia during the treatment [1,2,3]. Treatment of type 1 diabetes is based on a model of intensive, functional insulin therapy with the use of human insulin preparations or analogues of this insulin [10]. The therapy is carried out by multiple, subcutaneous injections of insulin doses or in the form of continuous insulin infusion with a personal insulin pump [10]. According to the recommendations of the Polish Diabetes Association (PTD) for patients with type 1 diabetes in terms of glycemic control, the primary goal is to maintain HbA1C  7% (53mmol / mol) and when the goal is not associated with the risk of hypoglycaemia, the target value is  6.5%. The use of proper treatment and sustaining HbA1C at the level recommended by PTD allows to prevent acute and chronic complications of the disease and at the same time allows patients to live actively and, consequently, improves their life quality [10]. According to recently published studies, preparations from SGLT-1 and SGLT-2 inhibitor groups may be helpful in obtaining and sustaining the treatment objective recommended by PTD.

Objective: Evaluate the effect of sotagliflozin, a dual inhibitor of sodium glucose cotransporter (SGLT) 1 and 2, on arterial stiffness in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) treated with sotagliflozin as adjunct to optimized insulin therapy. Methods: In this post hoc analysis, indirect markers of arterial stiffness, including pulse pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and double product, were calculated using observed systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), or pulse rate at 24 weeks using data from a pooled patient population from the inTandem1 and inTandem2 randomized controlled trials (n = 1575). Results: Baseline characteristics were similar among groups. Relative to placebo at Week 24, sotagliflozin 200 mg and 400 mg reduced SBP by 2.03 mm Hg (95% CI −3.30 to −0.75; p = 0.0019) and 2.85 mm Hg (−4.12 to −1.57; p < 0.0001), respectively. DBP decreased by 1.1 and 0.9 mm Hg, MAP by 1.4 and 1.6 mm Hg, and double product by 202.5 and 221.1 bpm × mm Hg, respectively (p < 0.05 for all). No increases in heart rate were observed. Conclusion: In adults with T1D, adding sotagliflozin to insulin significantly reduced blood pressure and other markers of arterial stiffness and vascular resistance. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Objectives It is controversial whether sodium glucose transporter (SGLT) 2 inhibitors increase glucagon secretion via direct inhibition of SGLT2 in pancreatic α cells. The role of SGLT1 in α cells is also unclear. We aimed to elucidate these points that are important not only for basic research but also for clinical insight. Methods Plasma glucagon levels were assessed in the high-fat, high-sucrose diet (HFHSD) fed C57BL/6J mice treated with dapagliflozin or canagliflozin. RT-PCR, RNA sequence, and immunohistochemistry were conducted to test the expression of SGLT1 and SGLT2 in α cells. We also used αTC1 cells and mouse islets to investigate the molecular mechanism by which SGLT1 modulates glucagon secretion. Results Dapagliflozin, but not canagliflozin, increased plasma glucagon levels in HFHSD fed mice. SGLT1 and glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), but not SGLT2, were expressed in αTC1 cells, mouse islets and human islets. A glucose clamp study revealed that the plasma glucagon increase associated with dapagliflozin could be explained as a response to acute declines in blood glucose. Canagliflozin suppressed glucagon secretion by inhibiting SGLT1 in α cells; consequently, plasma glucagon did not increase with canagliflozin, even though blood glucose declined. SGLT1 effect on glucagon secretion depended on glucose transport, but not glucose metabolism. Islets from HFHSD and db/db mice displayed higher SGLT1 mRNA levels and lower GLUT1 mRNA levels than the islets from control mice. These expression levels were associated with higher glucagon secretion. Furthermore, SGLT1 inhibitor and siRNA against SGLT1 suppressed glucagon secretion in isolated islets. Conclusions These data suggested that a novel mechanism regulated glucagon secretion through SGLT1 in α cells. This finding possibly explained the distinct effects of dapagliflozin and canagliflozin on plasma glucagon levels in mice. Highlights • SGLT1, but not SGLT2, is expressed in αTC1 cells, mouse islets and human islets. • SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin increases plasma glucagon in diabetic mice. • SGLT2/low potency SGLT1 inhibitor canagliflozin does not increase plasma glucagon. • Canagliflozin suppresses glucagon secretion by inhibiting SGLT1 in α cells. • Higher expression of SGLT1 in islets is associated with higher glucagon secretion. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Clinical trials of sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) in patients with type 2 diabetes and comorbid cardiovascular and kidney disease have shown reductions in major adverse cardiovascular events, heart failure hospitalizations, and attenuation of the progression of kidney disease. The magnitude of benefit appears to be greater than expected due to glycemic control, reduced blood pressure, and loss of adiposity. This impact is also independent from reduced renal function and lesser degrees of natriuresis and glycosuria. However, these agents have also been associated with limb amputation, Fournier's gangrene, diabetic ketoacidosis, metabolic bone disease, and increased hematopoiesis. A strong off-target effect of SGLT2i on the sodium-proton antiporter (exchanger) on the cell surface and intracellular organelles explains the wide-ranging effects of these agents. By slowing the restoration of pH within cells, SGLT2i activate secondary processes that mimic ischemic preconditioning in the heart and kidney and increased hematopoiesis in bone marrow which would explain salutary effects. Conversely, the inability to rapidly recover pH in ischemic peripheral tissues explains the progression of diabetic extremity ulcers, gangrene, propensity for metabolic bone disease, and diabetic ketoacidosis in patients who are predisposed. This paper will review the evidence for the strong off-target effect of SGLT2i on the sodium-proton exchanger and its potential effect on the organ systems and processes in which SGLT2i appear to have activity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this systematic review, we sought to summarize the 3 recent sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) trials (Dapagliflozin Effect on CardiovasculAR Events (DECLARE-TIMI 58), Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment Study (CANVAS) Program, and Empagliflozin, Cardiovascular Outcomes, and Mortality in Type 2 Diabetes (EMPA-REG OUTCOME)) and to explore the potential causes for their different results. We found that the major adverse cardiovascular event rates per 1000 patient-years for drug and placebo, as well as the corresponding relative risk reductions, were 22.6, 24.2, 7%; 26.9, 31.5, 14%; 37.4, 43.9, 14% for DECLARE-TIMI 58, CANVAS, and EMPA-REG OUTCOME, respectively. DECLARETIMI 58 had the fewest cardiorenal events (across treatment and control arms) and EMPA-REG OUTCOME the most. DECLARE-TIMI 58 used alternative inclusion criterion for baseline renal function (creatinine clearance ≧ 60 mL/min) compared to the other trials (estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) > 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 bodysurface area). Therefore, the DECLARE-TIMI 58 study cohort had higher eGFR (mean eGFR 85.2 mL/min/1.73 m2 compared to 76.5 and 74 in CANVAS and EMPAREG OUTCOME, respectively); this may have caused the difference in results. Additionally contributing to the high event rate in EMPA-REG OUTCOME was the requirement of prior confirmed cardiovascular disease (CVD), resulting in 99.2% of patients with CVD compared to only 65.6% and 40.6% in CANVAS and DECLARE-TIMI 58, respectively (which did not require CVD). In conclusion, there is a need for large-scale studies of SGLT2i with matching inclusion/exclusion criteria and appropriate endpoints to ensure a truly direct comparison of the drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The sotagliflozin molecule exhibits two fundamentally different molecular conformations in form 1 {systematic name: (2 S,3 R,4 R,5 S,6 R)-2-[4-chloro-3-(4-ethoxybenzyl)phenyl]-6-(methylsulfanyl)tetrahydro-2 H-pyran-3,4,5-triol, C21H25ClO5S, (I)} and the monohydrate [C21H25ClO5S·H2O, (II)]. Both crystals display hydrogen-bonded layers formed by intermolecular interactions which involve the three -OH groups of the xyloside fragment of the molecule. The layer architectures of (I) and (II) contain a non-hydrogen-bonded molecule-molecule interaction along the short crystallographic axis ( a axis) whose total PIXEL energy exceeds that of each hydrogen-bonded molecule-molecule pair. The hydrogen-bonded layer of (I) has the topology of the 4-connected sql net and that formed by the water and sotagliflozin molecules of (II) has the topology of a 3,7-connected net. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After the debut of the results of the effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Post Worsening Heart Failure (SOLOIST-WHF) and Sotagliflozin in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease and Type 2 Diabetes (SCORED) trials at the American Heart Association's 2020 Scientific session, sotagliflozin became the first drug and the third sodium glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor to be approved for heart failure (HF) across the spectrum of ejection fraction (EF). In light of this recent major U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of sotagliflozin, we conducted a systematic review to compare the cardiovascular mortality rates between sotagliflozin and dapagliflozin in patients with HF. To find relevant articles, we extensively searched major research literature databases and search engines such as PubMed, MEDLINE, PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane Library. We compared the results of significant trials involving sotagliflozin with the trials studying dapagliflozin to provide comprehensive mortality results of both drugs. The results showed that the timely initiation of sotagliflozin in HF cases significantly reduces cardiovascular mortality, hospitalizations, and urgent HF visits. Comparative trials with dapagliflozin indicate enhanced mortality reduction associated with greater initial symptom burden. The results of these major trials cannot be overlooked due to the large size of the combined trials, the randomized design, and the high standards with which they were conducted. The pathophysiology behind the cardioprotection offered by these agents is complex and multifactorial, but it is believed that due to the diuretic-like function, SGLT-2 inhibitors reduce glycemic-related toxicity, promote ketogenesis, and exert antihypertrophic, antifibrotic, and anti-remodeling properties. The benefits of dapagliflozin on cardiovascular death and worsening HF in patients with mildly reduced or preserved EF appeared especially pronounced in those with a greater degree of symptomatic impairment at baseline. Sotagliflozin led to a rise in the count of days patients were alive and not hospitalized (DAOH), which offers an extra patient-centered measure to assess the impact of the disease burden. The data in our article will help future researchers conduct large-scale trials with sotagliflozin to identify and implement it in the treatment of patients with HF as a mortality-reducing drug and to improve the quality of life for patients with HF., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2023, Iyer et al.)

Background: Approximately 25% of patients admitted to hospitals for worsening heart failure (WHF) are readmitted within 30 days., Objectives: The authors conducted a post hoc analysis of the SOLOIST-WHF (Effect of Sotagliflozin on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Post-WHF) trial to evaluate the efficacy of sotagliflozin versus placebo to decrease mortality and HF-related events among patients who began study treatment on or before discharge from their index hospitalization., Methods: The main endpoint of interest was cardiovascular death or HF-related event (HF hospitalization or urgent care visit) occurring within 90 and 30 days after discharge for the index WHF hospitalization. Treatment comparisons were by proportional hazards models, generating HRs, 95% CIs, and P values., Results: Of 1,222 randomized patients, 596 received study drug on or before their date of discharge. Sotagliflozin reduced the main endpoint at 90 days after discharge (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.35-0.82]; P = 0.004) and at 30 days (HR: 0.49 [95% CI: 0.27-0.91]; P = 0.023) and all-cause mortality at 90 days (HR: 0.39 [95% CI: 0.17-0.88]; P = 0.024). In subgroup analyses, sotagliflozin reduced the 90-day main endpoint regardless of sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, left ventricular ejection fraction, or mineralocorticoid receptor agonist use. Sotagliflozin was well-tolerated but with slightly higher rates of diarrhea and volume-related events than placebo., Conclusions: Starting sotagliflozin before discharge in patients with type 2 diabetes hospitalized for WHF significantly decreased cardiovascular deaths and HF events through 30 and 90 days after discharge, emphasizing the importance of beginning sodium glucose cotransporter treatment before discharge., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures This study was supported by Sanofi and Lexicon Pharmaceuticals. Dr Pitt has received consulting fees from Lexicon, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck, and Phasebio; has received consulting fees and/or stock options from Viror, KBP Biosciences, Cereno Scientific, Tricida, SCPharmaceuticals, SQinnovatiions, G-3 Pharmaceuticals, Protonintel, and Brainstorm medical; holds U.S. Patent 9931412 on site specific delivery of eplerenone to the myocardium; and U.S. Patent pending 63/045,783 on histone-modulating agents for the protection and treatment of organ damage. Dr Bhatt is the Chair of SOLOIST with research funding paid by Lexicon to Brigham and Women’s Hospital; he is on the Advisory Board for AngioWave, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Elsevier Practice Update Cardiology, High Enroll, Janssen, Level Ex, McKinsey, Medscape Cardiology, Merck, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Regado Biosciences, and Stasys; is on the Board of Directors for AngioWave (stock options), Boston VA Research Institute, Bristol Myers Squibb (stock), DRS.LINQ (stock options), High Enroll (stock), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care, and TobeSoft; is Inaugural Chair for the American Heart Association Quality Oversight Committee; is a consultant for Broadview Ventures; is on the Data Monitoring Committees for Acesion Pharma, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute, for the PORTICO trial, funded by St. Jude Medical, now Abbott), Boston Scientific (Chair, PEITHO trial), Cleveland Clinic (including for the ExCEED trial, funded by Edwards), Contego Medical (Chair, PERFORMANCE 2), Duke Clinical Research Institute, Mayo Clinic, Mount Sinai School of Medicine (for the ENVISAGE trial, funded by Daiichi Sankyo; for the ABILITY-DM trial, funded by Concept Medical), Novartis, Population Health Research Institute; Rutgers University (for the NIH-funded MINT Trial); has received honoraria from American College of Cardiology (Senior Associate Editor, Clinical Trials and News, ACC.org; Chair, ACC Accreditation Oversight Committee), Arnold and Porter law firm (work related to Sanofi/Bristol-Myers Squibb clopidogrel litigation), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (formerly Harvard Clinical Research Institute; is on the RE-DUAL PCI clinical trial steering committee funded by Boehringer Ingelheim; is on the AEGIS-II executive committee funded by CSL Behring), Belvoir Publications (Editor in Chief, Harvard Heart Letter), Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group (clinical trial steering committees), Cowen and Company, Duke Clinical Research Institute (clinical trial steering committees, including for the PRONOUNCE trial, funded by Ferring Pharmaceuticals), HMP Global (Editor in Chief, Journal of Invasive Cardiology), Journal of the American College of Cardiology (Guest Editor; Associate Editor), K2P (Co-Chair, interdisciplinary curriculum), Level Ex, Medtelligence/ReachMD (CME steering committees), MJH Life Sciences, Oakstone CME (Course Director, Comprehensive Review of Interventional Cardiology), Piper Sandler, Population Health Research Institute (for the COMPASS operations committee, publications committee, steering committee, and USA national co-leader, funded by Bayer), Slack Publications (Chief Medical Editor, Cardiology Today’s Intervention), Society of Cardiovascular Patient Care (Secretary/Treasurer), WebMD (CME steering committees), Wiley (steering committee); Clinical Cardiology (Deputy Editor), NCDR-ACTION Registry Steering Committee (Chair), VA CART Research and Publications Committee (Chair); Patent: Sotagliflozin (named on a patent for sotagliflozin assigned to Brigham and Women's Hospital who assigned it to Lexicon; neither he nor Brigham and Women’s Hospital receive any income from this patent); has received research funding from Abbott, Acesion Pharma, Afimmune, Aker Biomarine, Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beren, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardax, CellProthera, Cereno Scientific, Chiesi, CSL Behring, Eisai, Ethicon, Faraday Pharmaceuticals, Ferring Pharmaceuticals, Forest Laboratories, Fractyl, Garmin, HLS Therapeutics, Idorsia, Ironwood, Ischemix, Janssen, Javelin, Lexicon, Lilly, Medtronic, Merck, Moderna, MyoKardia, NirvaMed, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Owkin, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PLx Pharma, Recardio, Regeneron, Reid Hoffman Foundation, Roche, Sanofi, Stasys, Synaptic, The Medicines Company, and 89Bio; has received royalties from Elsevier (Editor, Braunwald’s Heart Disease); is site co-investigator for Abbott, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, CSI, Endotronix, St. Jude Medical (now Abbott), Philips, SpectraWAVE, Svelte, Vascular Solutions; is a trustee for the American College of Cardiology; and has done unfunded research for FlowCo and Takeda. Dr Szarek has received salary support from CPC, a nonprofit academic research organization affiliated with the University of Colorado, that receives research grant/consulting funding from Abbott, Agios, Alexion Pharma, Alnylam, Amgen, Angionetics, ARCA Biopharma, Array, AstraZeneca, Atentiv, Audentes, Bayer, Better Therapeutics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Cardiol Therapeutics, CellResearch, Cook Medical, Cook, CSL Behring, Eidos Therapeutics, EP Trading Co, Esperion Therapeutics, Everly Health, Faraday, Fortress Biotech, HDL Therapeutics, Heartflow, Hummingbird Bioscience, Insmed, Janssen, Kowa Research, Lexicon, Merck, MedPace, Medtronic, Moderna, Novate Medical, NovoNordisk, Pfizer, PhaseBio, PPD Development, Prairie Education and Research, Prothena Biosciences, Regeneron, Regio Biosciences, Sanifit Therapeutics, Sanofi, Smith and Nephew, Stealth BioTherapeutics, University of Colorado, University of Pittsburgh, Worldwide Clinical Trials, Wraser, and the Yale Cardiovascular Research Group; has received fees for performing analyses, steering committee fees, and travel support from Sanofi and Regeneron; has received consulting fees from CiVi, Esperion, and Amarin; has received Data Safety and Monitoring Board membership fees from Resverlogix and Janssen; and is a member of the JACC editorial board. Dr Cannon has received research grants from Amgen, Better Therapeutics, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer; consulting fees from Aegerion/Amryt, Alnylam, Amarin, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, Ascendia, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck, Pfizer, Rhoshan, and Sanofi; and service on the Data and Safety Monitoring Boards for the Veteran’s Administration, Applied Therapeutics, and NovoNordisk. Dr Leiter has received research funding from, has provided CME on behalf of, and/or has acted an adviser to AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier. Dr McGuire has received honoraria for trial leadership from Lexicon, Sanofi, Boehringer Ingelheim, Merck & Co, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Esperion, Lilly USA, CSL Behring; and has received honoraria for consultancy from Lilly USA, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, CSL Behring, Bayer, GlaxoSmithKline, and Lexicon. Dr Lewis has received consultant fees from Sanofi. Dr Riddle has received honoraria for consulting from Adocia, Anji, Xeris, DalCor, and Theracos. Dr Voors has received consultancy and speaker fees and research support from AstraZeneca, Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cyrokinetics, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, NooNordisk, and Roche diagnostics. Dr Metra has received personal fees from Actelion, Amgen, Livanova, and Vifor pharma as a member of Executive or Data Monitoring Committees of sponsored clinical trials; from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boheringer Ingelhelm, Edwards Lifesciences, Novartis for participation in advisory boards and/or speeches at sponsored meetings. Dr Lund has received support from the Karolinska Institutet, the Swedish Research Council [grant 523-2014-2336], and the Swedish Heart Lung Foundation [grants 20150557, 20190310] and grants from AstraZeneca, Vifor, Boston Scientific, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, and MSD; consulting honoraria from Vifor, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Pharmacosmos, MSD, MedScape, Sanofi, Lexicon, Myokardia, Boehringer Ingelheim, Servier, Edwards Lifesciences, and Alleviant; and speaker honoraria from Abbott, OrionPharma, MedScape, Radcliffe, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Bayer; and has patents with AnaCardio and stock ownership in AnaCardio. Dr Komajda has received honoraria from Servier, Novartis, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Sanofi as adviser/member of clinical trials committees. Dr Testani has received grants and/or personal fees from 3ive labs, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Cardionomic, MagentaMed, Reprieve Inc, FIRE1, W. L. Gore & Associates, Sanofi, Sequana Medical, Otsuka, Abbott, Merck, Windtree Therapeutics, Lexicon pharmaceuticals, Precardia, Relypsa, Regeneron, BD, Edwards Lifesciences, and Lilly; and has a patent treatment of diuretic resistance issued to Yale and Corvidia Therapeutics Inc, a patent methods for measuring Renalase issued to Yale, and a patent treatment of diuretic resistance pending with Reprieve Inc. Dr Ponikowski has received consultancy fees and speaker honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Vifor Pharma, Amgen, Servier, Novartis, Bayer, MSD, Pfizer, Impulse Dynamics, Renal Guard Solutions, BMS, AbbottVascular, and the Radcliffe Group. Dr Lopes has received research grants or contracts from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis; funding for educational activities or lectures from Pfizer, Daiichi Sankyo, and Novo Nordisk; and funding for consulting or other services from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novo Nordisk. Dr Ezekowitz has received research support for trial leadership from Bayer, Merck & Co, Novo Nordisk, Cytokinetics, Applied Therapeutics, American Regent; and honoraria for consultancy from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novo Nordisk, Otsuka, Bayer, and Novartis. Dr Davies and Mr Sun are employed by and may have stock or stock options in Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Dr Verma has received research and/or speaking honoraria from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, CMS, HLS, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, and Sanofi; and is the President of the Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge Translation Research Group and holds the Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Cardiovascular Surgery. Dr Kosiborod has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim; served as a consultant or advisory board member for Alnylam, Amgen, Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, Esperion Therapeutics, Janssen, Lexicon, Merck (Diabetes and Cardiovascular), Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Sanofi, Vifor Pharma; has received other research support from AstraZeneca; and honoraria from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Steg has received research grants from Amarin, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier; speaker or consultant fees from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Janssen, Kowa, Idorsia, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo-Nordisk, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, Servier; and is a Senior Associate Editor of Circulation. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aims: The SOLOIST-WHF trial demonstrated efficacy of sotagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and recent worsening heart failure (HF) regardless of ejection fraction (EF). Selection criteria in trials may limit their generalizability. Therefore, we aimed to investigate eligibility for sotagliflozin based on the SOLOIST-WHF criteria in a real-world HF population., Methods and Results: SOLOIST-WHF criteria were applied to patients stabilized after HF hospitalization in the Swedish HF Registry according to (i) literal scenario (all inclusion/exclusion criteria) or (ii) pragmatic scenario (only criteria likely to influence treatment decisions). Of 5453 inpatients with T2DM and recent worsening HF, 51.4% had reduced EF (HFrEF), 19.1% mildly reduced (HFmrEF), and 29.5% preserved EF (HFpEF). Eligibility (literal) was: 27.2% (32.4% in HFrEF, 24.7% in HFmrEF, 19.7% in HFpEF) and eligibility (pragmatic) was 62.8% (69.1%, 60.3%, 53.4%, respectively). In the literal scenario, criteria limiting eligibility were HF duration <3 months, eGFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m2, age >85 years, acute coronary syndrome <3 months, and insufficiently high N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels. Eligible vs. non-eligible patients had more severe HF, higher cardiovascular (CV) comorbidity burden, higher use of HF treatments, and higher event rates (all-cause death 30.8 vs. 27.2 per 100 patient-years, CV death 19.1 vs. 16.6, and HF hospitalization 36.7 vs. 24.0)., Conclusion: In this large, real-world HF cohort with T2DM, ∼1/3 of patients were eligible for sotagliflozin in the literal and ∼2/3 of patients in the pragmatic scenario. Eligible patients had more severe HF and higher event rates, in particular CV and HF events., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.)

The sodium-dependent glucose transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are an important emerging class for the treatment of diabetes. Development of SGLT2 inhibitors has been oriented around a desire for high selectivity for the SGLT2 protein relative to the SGLT1 protein. More recently, genetic and pharmacology research in mice has indicated that gastrointestinal SGLT1 inhibition may also be an appropriate therapeutic target to treat diabetes. Combining SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibition in a single molecule would provide complementary insulin-independent mechanisms to treat diabetes. Therefore, sotagliflozin (LX4211) has been developed as a dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2. The differentiating clinical features of dual inhibitor of SGLT1 and SGLT2 include a large postprandial glucose reduction, elevation of glucagon-like peptide 1 and modest urinary glucose excretion. These features may have clinical implications for the use of sotagliflozin in the treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]