Search

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an autosomal dominant disorder with risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in children and adolescents. Mavacamten, also referred to as MYK-461, a myosin inhibitor of cardiac myocytes is studied in symptomatic HCM. The safety and efficacy of this medication is not well studied in pooled meta -analysis. Online database search was performed from inception to September 2023. We selected randomized clinical trials that compared Mavacamten with placebo/guideline medical treatment for HCM. We studied safety outcomes (Serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment emergent adverse events (TEAs) and Atrial fibrillation). Functional status of patients was assessed as New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification improvement of at least + 1 grade, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) change from baseline). Relative risk ratios were used in randomized model using Review Manager Version 5.4 statistical software. A total of 4 RCTs comprising 503 patients were included in meta -analysis. On random effect model, we found that HCM patients that received Mavacamten had significant symptomatic improvement as depicted by improvement in NYHA class by at least + 1 grade (RR = 2.15; P < 0.0001) and KCCQ CSS score improvement (MD = 8.38; P < 0.00001) as compared to placebo arm. There was no statistically significant difference in SAEs (RR = 0.87; P = 0.69) and atrial fibrillation onset (RR = 0.80; P = 0.73) between HCM and placebo arm. The studies had low heterogeneity/publication bias. Mavacamten can improve symptoms in HCM patients, and can be additive to other alternative regimen in HCM patients with no statistical significance of risk of SAE or atrial fibrillation onset as compared to placebo., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Introduction: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), spanning from non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) to liver fibrosis, poses a global health challenge amid rising obesity and metabolic syndrome rates. Effective pharmacological treatments for NASH and liver fibrosis are limited., Objective: This study systematically reviews and meta-analyzes the safety and efficacy of resmetirom, a selective thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist, in NASH and liver fibrosis treatment. By analyzing data from clinical trials, we aim to offer evidence-based recommendations for resmetirom's use in managing these conditions and identify avenues for future research., Methods: Electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were systematically searched, supplemented by manual screening of relevant sources. Only English-language randomized controlled trials were included. Data extraction, risk of bias assessment, pooled analyses, and meta-regression were performed., Results: Three randomized controlled trials involving 2231 participants were analyzed. Resmetirom demonstrated significant reductions in hepatic fat fraction [standardized mean difference (SMD) -4.61, 95% CI -6.77 to -2.44, P < 0.0001], NASH resolution without worsening fibrosis [risk ratio (RR) 2.51, 95% CI 1.74-3.64, P = 0.00001), and liver fibrosis improvement (RR 2.31, 95% CI 1.20-4.44, P = 0.01). Secondary outcomes showed significant improvements in lipid profiles, liver enzymes, and NASH biomarkers with resmetirom treatment. Meta-regression revealed associations between covariates and primary outcomes., Conclusion: Resmetirom exhibits promising efficacy in reducing hepatic fat, improving NASH resolution, and ameliorating liver fibrosis with a favorable safety profile. Further research is warranted to validate findings and optimize therapeutic strategies for NASH and liver fibrosis management., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Aims: Increased use of digital devices in the modern era has led to the development of digital eye strain (DES) or computer vision syndrome in their users. This can result in the development of various ocular and visual symptoms among them. In this study, the authors aimed to view the prevalence of digital eye strain among radiology physicians in Pakistan and their associated risk factors., Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate occupational DES among radiology physicians in Pakistan. The data collection was done using the convenience sampling technique, and the data were analyzed using IBM SPSS for Windows, Version 25.0., Results: Out of the 247 respondents, 33.6% were males and 66.4% were females. 41.7% of them were between 30 and 40 years of age and 51.8% of them were radiology residents. 52.2% of the participants had a refractive error and were using a corrective lens. The majority of the radiologists in our study (84.2%) preferred picture archiving and communication system (PACS) over films and 82.2% of them reported having breaks of less than 15 min. Major symptoms reported by the participants were tired or heavy eyes (69.6%) and headache (69.3%). The proportion of developing DES was higher in females [ P =0.001, adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=2.94], radiology residents ( P =0.031, aOR=3.29), and working hours of more than 4 h per day ( P <0.001, aOR=0.04)., Conclusion: With recent advances in the field of radiology in Pakistan, the frequency of developing DES among radiologists is increasing. Being a female, having long working hours, and having noticeable flickers on the digital screens were among the significant factors in developing DES among radiologists., Competing Interests: The author declares no conflicts of interest.Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article, (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Competing Interests: The authors have no funding or conflicts of interest to declare.