12 results on '"Slot, Annerie"'
Search Results
2. Clinical Behavior and Molecular Landscape of Stage I p53-Abnormal Low-Grade Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinomas
- Author
-
Jamieson, Amy, Vermij, Lisa, Kramer, Claire J.H., Jobsen, Jan J., Jürgemlienk-Schulz, Ina, Lutgens, Ludy, Mens, Jan Willem, Haverkort, Marie A.D., Slot, Annerie, Nout, Remi A., Oosting, Jan, Carlson, Joseph, Howitt, Brooke E., Ip, Philip P.C., Lax, Sigurd F., McCluggage, W. Glenn, Singh, Naveena, McAlpine, Jessica N., Creutzberg, Carien L., Horeweg, Nanda, Gilks, C. Blake, Bosse, Tjalling, Jamieson, Amy, Vermij, Lisa, Kramer, Claire J.H., Jobsen, Jan J., Jürgemlienk-Schulz, Ina, Lutgens, Ludy, Mens, Jan Willem, Haverkort, Marie A.D., Slot, Annerie, Nout, Remi A., Oosting, Jan, Carlson, Joseph, Howitt, Brooke E., Ip, Philip P.C., Lax, Sigurd F., McCluggage, W. Glenn, Singh, Naveena, McAlpine, Jessica N., Creutzberg, Carien L., Horeweg, Nanda, Gilks, C. Blake, and Bosse, Tjalling
- Abstract
PURPOSE: The clinical significance of the p53-abnormal (p53abn) molecular subtype in stage I low-grade endometrioid endometrial carcinoma (EEC) is debated. We aimed to review pathologic and molecular characteristics, and outcomes of stage I low-grade p53abn EEC in a large international cohort. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Previously diagnosed stage I p53abn EC (POLE-wild-type, mismatch repair-proficient) low-grade EEC from Canadian retrospective cohorts and PORTEC-1&2 trials were included. Pathology review was performed by six expert gynecologic pathologists blinded to p53 status. IHC profiling, next-generation sequencing, and shallow whole-genome sequencing was performed. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis. RESULTS: We identified 55 stage I p53abn low-grade EEC among 3,387 cases (2.5%). On pathology review, 17 cases (31%) were not diagnosed as low-grade EEC by any pathologists, whereas 26 cases (47%) were diagnosed as low-grade EEC by at least three pathologists. The IHC and molecular profile of the latter cases were consistent with low-grade EEC morphology (ER/PR positivity, patchy p16 expression, PIK3CA and PTEN mutations) but they also showed features of p53abn EC (TP53 mutations, many copy-number alterations). These cases had a clinically relevant risk of disease recurrence (5-year recurrence-free survival 77%), with pelvic and/or distant recurrences observed in 12% of the patients. CONCLUSIONS:A subset of p53abn EC is morphologically low-grade EEC and exhibit genomic instability. Even for stage I disease, p53abn low-grade EEC are at substantial risk of disease recurrence. These findings highlight the clinical relevance of universal p53-testing, even in low-grade EEC, to identify women at increased risk of recurrence.
- Published
- 2023
3. Clinical Behavior and Molecular Landscape of Stage I p53-Abnormal Low-Grade Endometrioid Endometrial Carcinomas
- Author
-
MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, Jamieson, Amy, Vermij, Lisa, Kramer, Claire J H, Jobsen, Jan J, Jürgemlienk-Schulz, Ina, Lutgens, Ludy, Mens, Jan Willem, Haverkort, Marie A D, Slot, Annerie, Nout, Remi A, Oosting, Jan, Carlson, Joseph, Howitt, Brooke E, Ip, Philip P C, Lax, Sigurd F, McCluggage, W Glenn, Singh, Naveena, McAlpine, Jessica N, Creutzberg, Carien L, Horeweg, Nanda, Gilks, C Blake, Bosse, Tjalling, MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, Jamieson, Amy, Vermij, Lisa, Kramer, Claire J H, Jobsen, Jan J, Jürgemlienk-Schulz, Ina, Lutgens, Ludy, Mens, Jan Willem, Haverkort, Marie A D, Slot, Annerie, Nout, Remi A, Oosting, Jan, Carlson, Joseph, Howitt, Brooke E, Ip, Philip P C, Lax, Sigurd F, McCluggage, W Glenn, Singh, Naveena, McAlpine, Jessica N, Creutzberg, Carien L, Horeweg, Nanda, Gilks, C Blake, and Bosse, Tjalling
- Published
- 2023
4. Patients' and clinicians' preferences in adjuvant treatment for high-risk endometrial cancer:Implications for shared decision making
- Author
-
Post, Cathalijne C.B., Mens, Jan Willem M., Haverkort, Marie A.D., Koppe, Friederike, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Snyers, An, Roeloffzen, Ellen M.A., Schaake, Eva E., Slot, Annerie, Stam, Tanja C., Beukema, Jannet C., van den Berg, Hetty A., Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Nijman, Hans W., de Kroon, Cornelis D., Kroep, Judith R., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Creutzberg, Carien L., Post, Cathalijne C.B., Mens, Jan Willem M., Haverkort, Marie A.D., Koppe, Friederike, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Snyers, An, Roeloffzen, Ellen M.A., Schaake, Eva E., Slot, Annerie, Stam, Tanja C., Beukema, Jannet C., van den Berg, Hetty A., Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Nijman, Hans W., de Kroon, Cornelis D., Kroep, Judith R., Stiggelbout, Anne M., and Creutzberg, Carien L.
- Abstract
Background: Decision making regarding adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer is complex. The aim of this study was to determine patients' and clinicians' minimally desired survival benefit to choose chemoradiotherapy over radiotherapy alone. Moreover, influencing factors and importance of positive and negative treatment effects (i.e. attribute) were investigated. Methods: Patients with high-risk endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant pelvic radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy and multidisciplinary gynaecologic oncology clinicians completed a trade-off questionnaire based on PORTEC-3 trial data. Results: In total, 171 patients and 63 clinicians completed the questionnaire. Median minimally desired benefit to make chemoradiotherapy worthwhile was significantly higher for patients versus clinicians (10% vs 5%, p = 0.02). Both patients and clinicians rated survival benefit most important during decision making, followed by long-term symptoms. Older patients (OR 0.92 [95%CI 0.87–0.97]; p = 0.003) with comorbidity (OR 0.34 [95% CI 0.12–0.89]; p = 0.035) had lower preference for chemoradiotherapy, while patients with better numeracy skills (OR 1.2 [95%CI 1.05–1.36], p = 0.011) and chemoradiotherapy history (OR 25.0 [95%CI 8.8–91.7]; p < 0.001) had higher preference for chemoradiotherapy. Conclusions: There is a considerable difference in minimally desired survival benefit of chemoradiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer among and between patients and clinicians. Overall, endometrial cancer patients needed higher benefits than clinicians before preferring chemoradiotherapy.
- Published
- 2021
5. Patients' and clinicians' preferences in adjuvant treatment for high-risk endometrial cancer: Implications for shared decision making
- Author
-
MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, Post, Cathalijne C.B., Mens, Jan Willem M., Haverkort, Marie A.D., Koppe, Friederike, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Snyers, An, Roeloffzen, Ellen M.A., Schaake, Eva E., Slot, Annerie, Stam, Tanja C., Beukema, Jannet C., van den Berg, Hetty A., Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Nijman, Hans W., de Kroon, Cornelis D., Kroep, Judith R., Stiggelbout, Anne M., Creutzberg, Carien L., MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, Post, Cathalijne C.B., Mens, Jan Willem M., Haverkort, Marie A.D., Koppe, Friederike, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Snyers, An, Roeloffzen, Ellen M.A., Schaake, Eva E., Slot, Annerie, Stam, Tanja C., Beukema, Jannet C., van den Berg, Hetty A., Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Nijman, Hans W., de Kroon, Cornelis D., Kroep, Judith R., Stiggelbout, Anne M., and Creutzberg, Carien L.
- Published
- 2021
6. PORTEC-4a: international randomized trial of molecular profile-based adjuvant treatment for women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer
- Author
-
Heerik, A. van den, Horeweg, N., Nout, R.A., Lutgens, L., Steen-Banasik, E.M. van der, Westerveld, G.H., Berg, H.A. van den, Slot, Annerie, Koppe, F.L.A., Kommoss, S., Mens, J.W.M., Nowee, M.E., Bijmolt, S., Cibula, D., Stam, T.C., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I.M., Snyers, A., Hamann, Moritz, Zwanenburg, A.G., Coen, V., Vandecasteele, K., Gillham, C., Chargari, C., Verhoeven-Adema, K.W., Putter, H., Hout, W.B. Van den, Wortman, B.G., Nijman, Hans, Bosse, T., Creutzberg, C.L., Heerik, A. van den, Horeweg, N., Nout, R.A., Lutgens, L., Steen-Banasik, E.M. van der, Westerveld, G.H., Berg, H.A. van den, Slot, Annerie, Koppe, F.L.A., Kommoss, S., Mens, J.W.M., Nowee, M.E., Bijmolt, S., Cibula, D., Stam, T.C., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, I.M., Snyers, A., Hamann, Moritz, Zwanenburg, A.G., Coen, V., Vandecasteele, K., Gillham, C., Chargari, C., Verhoeven-Adema, K.W., Putter, H., Hout, W.B. Van den, Wortman, B.G., Nijman, Hans, Bosse, T., and Creutzberg, C.L.
- Abstract
Contains fulltext : 229912.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access), BACKGROUND: Vaginal brachytherapy is currently recommended as adjuvant treatment in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer to maximize local control and has only mild side effects and no or limited impact on quality of life. However, there is still considerable overtreatment and also some undertreatment, which may be reduced by tailoring adjuvant treatment to the patients' risk of recurrence based on molecular tumor characteristics. PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: To compare the rates of vaginal recurrence in women with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, treated after surgery with molecular-integrated risk profile-based recommendations for either observation, vaginal brachytherapy or external pelvic beam radiotherapy or with standard adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy STUDY HYPOTHESIS: Adjuvant treatment based on a molecular-integrated risk profile provides similar local control and recurrence-free survival as current standard adjuvant brachytherapy in patients with high-intermediate risk endometrial cancer, while sparing many patients the morbidity of adjuvant treatment and reducing healthcare costs. TRIAL DESIGN: A multicenter, international phase III randomized trial (2:1) of molecular-integrated risk profile-based adjuvant treatment (experimental arm) or adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (standard arm). MAJOR INCLUSION/EXCLUSION CRITERIA: Women aged 18 years and over with a histological diagnosis of high-intermediate risk endometrioid endometrial cancer after total abdominal or laparoscopic hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. High-intermediate risk factors are defined as: (i) International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IA (with invasion) and grade 3; (ii) stage IB grade 1 or 2 with age ≥60 and/or lymph-vascular space invasion; (iii) stage IB, grade 3 without lymph-vascular space invasion; or (iv) stage II (microscopic and grade 1). ENDPOINTS: The primary endpoint is vaginal recurrence. Secondary endpoints are recurrence-free a
- Published
- 2020
7. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3) : final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
de Boer, Stephanie M., Powell, Melanie E., Mileshkin, Linda, Katsaros, Dionyssios, Bessette, Paul, Haie-Meder, Christine, Ottevanger, Petronella B., Ledermann, Jonathan A., Khaw, Pearly, Colombo, Alessandro, Fyles, Anthony, Baron, Marie Helene, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Kitchener, Henry C., Nijman, Hans W., Wilson, Godfrey, Brooks, Susan, Carinelli, Silvestro, Provencher, Diane, Hanzen, Chantal, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M., Singh, Naveena, Do, Viet, D'Amico, Romerai, Nout, Remi A., Feeney, Amanda, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Putter, Hein, Creutzberg, Carien L., McCormack, Mary, Whitmarsh, Karen, Allerton, Rozenn, Gregory, Deborah, Symonds, Paul, Hoskin, Peter J., Adusumalli, Madhavi, Anand, Anjana, Wade, Robert, Stewart, Alexandra, Taylor, Wendy, Kruitwagen, Roy F.P.M., Hollema, Harry, Pras, Elizabeth, Snyers, An, Stalpers, Lukas, Jobsen, Jan J., Slot, Annerie, Mens, Jan Willem M., and Stam, Tanja C.
- Subjects
Canada ,Time Factors ,Endometrial Neoplasms/mortality ,Clinical Trial, Phase III ,Risk Factors ,Paclitaxel/administration & dosage ,Journal Article ,Humans ,Comparative Study ,Aged ,Neoplasm Staging ,Gynecologic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects ,Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ,Australia ,Carboplatin/administration & dosage ,Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/adverse effects ,Middle Aged ,Europe ,Multicenter Study ,Treatment Outcome ,Oncology ,Randomized Controlled Trial ,Carcinoma, Endometrioid/mortality ,Lymph Node Excision ,Female ,Radiotherapy, Adjuvant ,Dose Fractionation, Radiation ,Neoplasm Grading ,Cisplatin/administration & dosage ,New Zealand - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Although women with endometrial cancer generally have a favourable prognosis, those with high-risk disease features are at increased risk of recurrence. The PORTEC-3 trial was initiated to investigate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy during and after radiotherapy (chemoradiotherapy) versus pelvic radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: PORTEC-3 was an open-label, international, randomised, phase 3 trial involving 103 centres in six clinical trials collaborating in the Gynaecological Cancer Intergroup. Eligible women had high-risk endometrial cancer with FIGO 2009 stage I, endometrioid-type grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion or lymph-vascular space invasion (or both), endometrioid-type stage II or III, or stage I to III with serous or clear cell histology. Women were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive radiotherapy alone (48·6 Gy in 1·8 Gy fractions given on 5 days per week) or radiotherapy and chemotherapy (consisting of two cycles of cisplatin 50 mg/m 2 given during radiotherapy, followed by four cycles of carboplatin AUC5 and paclitaxel 175 mg/m 2) using a biased-coin minimisation procedure with stratification for participating centre, lymphadenectomy, stage of cancer, and histological type. The co-primary endpoints were overall survival and failure-free survival. We used the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox regression analysis for final analysis by intention to treat and adjusted for stratification factors. The study was closed on Dec 20, 2013, after achieving complete accrual; follow-up is ongoing. PORTEC-3 is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN14387080, and ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00411138. RESULTS: 686 women were enrolled between Nov 23, 2006, and Dec 20, 2013. 660 eligible patients were included in the final analysis, of whom 330 were assigned to chemoradiotherapy and 330 were assigned to radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 60·2 months (IQR 48·1-73·1). 5-year overall survival was 81·8% (95% CI 77·5-86·2) with chemoradiotherapy versus 76·7% (72·1-81·6) with radiotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0·76, 95% CI 0·54-1·06; p=0·11); 5-year failure-free survival was 75·5% (95% CI 70·3-79·9) versus 68·6% (63·1-73·4; HR 0·71, 95% CI 0·53-0·95; p=0·022). Grade 3 or worse adverse events during treatment occurred in 198 (60%) of 330 who received chemoradiotherapy versus 41 (12%) of 330 patients who received radiotherapy (p
- Published
- 2018
8. Adjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone for women with high-risk endometrial cancer (PORTEC-3): final results of an international, open-label, multicentre, randomised, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, de Boer, Stephanie M., Powell, Melanie E., Mileshkin, Linda, Katsaros, Dionyssios, Bessette, Paul, Haie-Meder, Christine, Ottevanger, Petronella B., Ledermann, Jonathan A., Khaw, Pearly, Colombo, Alessandro, Fyles, Anthony, Baron, Marie Helene, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Kitchener, Henry C., Nijman, Hans W., Wilson, Godfrey, Brooks, Susan, Carinelli, Silvestro, Provencher, Diane, Hanzen, Chantal, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M., Singh, Naveena, Do, Viet, D'Amico, Romerai, Nout, Remi A., Feeney, Amanda, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Putter, Hein, Creutzberg, Carien L., McCormack, Mary, Whitmarsh, Karen, Allerton, Rozenn, Gregory, Deborah, Symonds, Paul, Hoskin, Peter J., Adusumalli, Madhavi, Anand, Anjana, Wade, Robert, Stewart, Alexandra, Taylor, Wendy, Kruitwagen, Roy F.P.M., Hollema, Harry, Pras, Elizabeth, Snyers, An, Stalpers, Lukas, Jobsen, Jan J., Slot, Annerie, Mens, Jan Willem M., Stam, Tanja C., PORTEC study group, MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, de Boer, Stephanie M., Powell, Melanie E., Mileshkin, Linda, Katsaros, Dionyssios, Bessette, Paul, Haie-Meder, Christine, Ottevanger, Petronella B., Ledermann, Jonathan A., Khaw, Pearly, Colombo, Alessandro, Fyles, Anthony, Baron, Marie Helene, Jürgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Kitchener, Henry C., Nijman, Hans W., Wilson, Godfrey, Brooks, Susan, Carinelli, Silvestro, Provencher, Diane, Hanzen, Chantal, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Smit, Vincent T.H.B.M., Singh, Naveena, Do, Viet, D'Amico, Romerai, Nout, Remi A., Feeney, Amanda, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Putter, Hein, Creutzberg, Carien L., McCormack, Mary, Whitmarsh, Karen, Allerton, Rozenn, Gregory, Deborah, Symonds, Paul, Hoskin, Peter J., Adusumalli, Madhavi, Anand, Anjana, Wade, Robert, Stewart, Alexandra, Taylor, Wendy, Kruitwagen, Roy F.P.M., Hollema, Harry, Pras, Elizabeth, Snyers, An, Stalpers, Lukas, Jobsen, Jan J., Slot, Annerie, Mens, Jan Willem M., Stam, Tanja C., and PORTEC study group
- Published
- 2018
9. Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of EORTC Trial 22991.
- Author
-
UCL - SSS/IREC/SLUC - Pôle St.-Luc, UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiothérapie oncologique, Bolla, Michel, Maingon, Philippe, Carrie, Christian, Villa, Salvador, Kitsios, Petros, Poortmans, Philip M P, Sundar, Santhanam, van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M, Armstrong, John, Bosset, Jean-François, Herrera, Fernanda G, Pieters, Bradley, Slot, Annerie, Bahl, Amit, Ben-Yosef, Rahamim, Boehmer, Dirk, Scrase, Christopher, Renard, Laurette, Shash, Emad, Coens, Corneel, van den Bergh, Alphonsus C M, Collette, Laurence, UCL - SSS/IREC/SLUC - Pôle St.-Luc, UCL - (SLuc) Service de radiothérapie oncologique, Bolla, Michel, Maingon, Philippe, Carrie, Christian, Villa, Salvador, Kitsios, Petros, Poortmans, Philip M P, Sundar, Santhanam, van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M, Armstrong, John, Bosset, Jean-François, Herrera, Fernanda G, Pieters, Bradley, Slot, Annerie, Bahl, Amit, Ben-Yosef, Rahamim, Boehmer, Dirk, Scrase, Christopher, Renard, Laurette, Shash, Emad, Coens, Corneel, van den Bergh, Alphonsus C M, and Collette, Laurence
- Abstract
Purpose Up to 30% of patients who undergo radiation for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer relapse biochemically within 5 years. We assessed if biochemical disease-free survival (DFS) is improved by adding 6 months of androgen suppression (AS; two injections of every-3-months depot of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist) to primary radiotherapy (RT) for intermediate- or high-risk localized prostate cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 819 patients staged: (1) cT1b-c, with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) $ 10 ng/mL or Gleason$7, or (2) cT2a (International Union Against Cancer TNM1997),with no involvement of pelvic lymph nodes and no clinical evidence of metastatic spread, with PSA # 50 ng/mL, were centrally randomized 1:1 to either RT or RT plus AS started on day 1 of RT. Centers opted for one dose (70, 74, or 78 Gy). Biochemical DFS, the primary end point, was defined from entry until PSA relapse (Phoenix criteria) and clinical relapse by imaging or death of any cause. The trial had 80%power to detect hazard ratio (HR), 0.714 by intent-to-treat analysis stratified by dose of RT at the two-sided a = 5%. Results The median patient age was 70 years. Among patients, 74.8% were intermediate risk and 24.8% were high risk. In the RT arm, 407 of 409 patients received RT; in the RT plus AS arm, 403 patients received RT plus AS and three patients received RT only. At 7.2 years median follow-up, RT plus AS significantly improved biochemical DFS (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.66; P , .001, with 319 events), as well as clinical progression-free survival (205 events, HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.84; P = .001). In exploratory analysis, no statistically significant interaction between treatment effect and dose of RT could be evidenced (heterogeneity P = .79 and P = .66, for biochemical DFS and progression-free survival, respectively). Overall survival data are not mature yet. Conclusion Six months of concomitant and adjuvant AS improves biochemical and c
- Published
- 2016
10. Long-term impact of endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment on health-related quality of life and cancer survivorship : Results from the randomized PORTEC-2 trial
- Author
-
De Boer, Stephanie M., Nout, Remi A., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Jobsen, Jan J, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Van Der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M., Mens, Jan Willem M., Slot, Annerie, Stenfert Kroese, Marika C., Oerlemans, Simone, Putter, Hein, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Nijman, Hans W, Creutzberg, Carien L., De Boer, Stephanie M., Nout, Remi A., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Jobsen, Jan J, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Van Der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M., Mens, Jan Willem M., Slot, Annerie, Stenfert Kroese, Marika C., Oerlemans, Simone, Putter, Hein, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Nijman, Hans W, and Creutzberg, Carien L.
- Published
- 2015
11. Long-term impact of endometrial cancer diagnosis and treatment on health-related quality of life and cancer survivorship: Results from the randomized PORTEC-2 trial
- Author
-
MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, De Boer, Stephanie M., Nout, Remi A., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Jobsen, Jan J, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Van Der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M., Mens, Jan Willem M., Slot, Annerie, Stenfert Kroese, Marika C., Oerlemans, Simone, Putter, Hein, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Nijman, Hans W, Creutzberg, Carien L., MS Radiotherapie, Cancer, De Boer, Stephanie M., Nout, Remi A., Jurgenliemk-Schulz, Ina M., Jobsen, Jan J, Lutgens, Ludy C.H.W., Van Der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M., Mens, Jan Willem M., Slot, Annerie, Stenfert Kroese, Marika C., Oerlemans, Simone, Putter, Hein, Verhoeven-Adema, Karen W., Nijman, Hans W, and Creutzberg, Carien L.
- Published
- 2015
12. Outcome of Endometrial Cancer Stage IIIA with Adnexa or Serosal Involvement Only
- Author
-
Jobsen, Jan J., primary, Naudin ten Cate, Lambert, additional, Lybeert, Marnix L. M., additional, Scholten, Astrid, additional, van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M., additional, van der Palen, Job, additional, Stenfert Kroese, Marika C., additional, Slot, Annerie, additional, Schutter, Eltjo M. J., additional, and Siesling, Sabine, additional
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.