Search

Malnutrition is one of the main factors determining cachexia syndrome, which negatively impacts the quality of life and survival. In cancer patients, artificial nutrition is considered as an appropriate therapy when the impossibility of an adequate oral intake worsened nutritional and clinical conditions. This study aims to verify, in a home palliative care setting for cancer patients, if home artificial nutrition (HAN) supplies a patient’s energy requirement, improving nutritional and performance status. A nutritional service team performed counseling at a patient’s home and assessed nutritional status (body mass index, weight loss in the past 6 months), resting energy expenditure (REE), and oral food intake; Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS); cachexia degree; and survival. From 1990 to 2021, 1063 patients started HAN. Among these patients, 101 suspended artificial nutrition for oral refeeding. Among the 962 patients continuing HAN until death, 226 patients (23.5%) survived 6 weeks or less. HAN allowed to achieve a positive energy balance in 736 patients who survived more than 6 weeks, improving body weight and KPS when evaluated after 1 month of HAN. Advanced cancer and cachexia degree at the entry of the study negatively affected the positive impact of HAN.

Objective Providing palliative care (PC) at home for advanced cancer patients has become essential during the Covid-19 emergency. Nevertheless, the home PC professionals (PCPs) faced a challenging situation due to increased number of discharged patients, reduced availability of healthcare facilities and physical/relational barriers between them and patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Covid-19 pandemic on burnout and psychological morbidity among home PCPs in Italy. Methods One hundred and ninety-eighth PC physicians and nurses working in home assistance in Italy were invited to participate. The results obtained by the investigation conducted during the Covid-19 emergency (COVID2020) were compared with data collected in 2016 in the same setting (BURNOUT2016). The questionnaires (socio-demographics, Maslach Burnout Inventory and General Health Questionnaire-12) were the same for both the surveys. The PCPs participating in COVID2020 survey (n=145) were mostly the same (70%) who participated to the BURNOUT2016 study (n=179). Results One hundred and forty-five PCPs participated in the study (response rate 73.2%). During the Covid-19 emergency, home PCPs presented a lower burnout frequency (p

Simple Summary The frequent use of opioid in-home palliative care settings is associated with a high incidence of opioid-induced constipation (OIC) that can significantly worsen a cancer patient’s quality of life. Laxative therapy is the first-line in OIC treatment, and although its application is recommended from the beginning of opioid therapy, in most cases it does not resolve the symptoms. Naloxegol is the specific target therapy for opioid-induced constipation. To our knowledge this is the first study aimed at evaluating the impact of a naloxegol therapy on the quality of life of advanced cancer patients with a short or very short life expectancy in a home palliative setting. Abstract This observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy of naloxegol therapy in resolving opioid-induced constipation (OIC) and in improving the quality of life in a home palliative care cancer setting. Advanced cancer patients with OIC (Rome IV criteria) not relieved by laxatives started a naloxegol therapy 25 mg/day for 4 weeks. Quality of life was evaluated by Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality-of-Life (PAC-QoL) at day 0 and day 28; background pain by Numerical Rating Scale, number of weekly spontaneous bowel movements and Bowel Function Index (BFI) were evaluated at day 0 and every week. Seventy-eight patients who completed the 4-week study improved all four PAC-QoL dimensions (physical and psychological discomfort, worries/concerns and satisfaction level). Weekly spontaneous bowel movements increased and BFI improved. Background pain reduced after seven days and remained lower during the following weeks. Seventy-two patients dropped out the study before day 28 with a reduced survival compared to patients completing the study. Even in these patients, an improvement of bowel function was observed after two weeks. Naloxegol was effective in improving the quality of life, resolving OIC and reducing overall pain in patients with advanced cancer.

CONTEXT: The COVID-19 pandemic strongly challenged healthcare workers, disrupting their work routine and impacting on their professional life. A previous investigation explored levels of burnout and psychological morbidity among palliative care professionals (PCPs) during COVID-19 first wave. OBJECTIVE: To update data about burnout and psychological morbidity among PCPs after a year of COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The same questionnaires on burnout (Maslach Burnout Inventory, MBI) and psychological morbidity (General Health Questionnaire 12 items, GHQ-12) were administered a year after. Differences in MBI and GHQ-12 scores obtained in the two studies (COVID2020 and COVID2021), as well as distributions of PCPs showing burnout symptoms and psychological morbidity were analyzed and compared. We also explored the association between the three dimensions of burnout and socio-demographic and professional characteristics. RESULTS: The sample consisted of 145 PCPs (59% physicians and 41% nurses). Response rate (70.4%) was quite similar to the previous study (73.2%). No differences were observed in the frequency of burnout between COVID2021 and COVID2020; the PCPs in COVID2021 reported marginally higher level of EE (p=.049) and this result is confirmed in physicians (p=.010) while no difference was observed in nurses (p=.326). In addition, the percentage of cases showing psychological morbidity significantly decreased. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show stable levels of burnout and decreasing levels of psychological morbidity among PCPs one year after the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, more research is needed to detail the significance of emotional exhaustion dimension, a variable influenced by the survey.

The World Health Organization plan for a Decade of Healthy Ageing 2020–2030 has established some priorities in the field of palliative and end-of-life care. It states that “people require non-discriminatory access to good-quality palliative and end-of-life care” and recommends the “implementation of strategies for the provision of information, training, respite and support for informal caregivers”. The priorities described are in line with the home care services that National Tumor Assistance (ANT) Foundation has been providing in Italy. This 5-years investigation was designed to measure caregivers’ satisfaction and determine what types of support services are associated with greater satisfaction. 5.441 family caregivers filled out autonomously a 6-item questionnaire at the end of home care assistance, focusing on the level of satisfaction with the social and health services received. The overall data indicate a high satisfaction rate for the home care assistance received. In particular, participants rate positively the assistance provided by healthcare professionals (physicians, nurses and psychologists). The most appreciated aspects of assistance are those ensuring a global management of patients and their families, whereas an area of deficiency emerged was the continuity of care, suggesting the importance to implement the networks between the health care facilities and home care services. The present investigation constitutes a mean to highlight the aspects associated with greater satisfaction and the ones perceived as less satisfactory by caregivers. Moreover, this research constitutes a crucial instrument to improve home care assistance provided by ANT ensuring the best quality of life for both patients and their families.

Non-communicable chronic diseases (NCCDs) are the main cause of morbidity and mortality globally. Demographic aging has resulted in older populations with more complex healthcare needs. This necessitates a multilevel rethinking of healthcare policies, health education and community support systems with digitalization of technologies playing a central role. The European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Aging (A3) working group focuses on well-being for older adults, with an emphasis on quality of life and healthy aging. A subgroup of A3, including multidisciplinary stakeholders in health care across Europe, focuses on the palliative care (PC) model as a paradigm to be modified to meet the needs of older persons with NCCDs. This development paper delineates the key parameters we identified as critical in creating a public health model of PC directed to the needs of persons with NCCDs. This paradigm shift should affect horizontal components of public health models. Furthermore, our model includes vertical components often neglected, such as nutrition, resilience, well-being and leisure activities. The main enablers identified are information and communication technologies, education and training programs, communities of compassion, twinning activities, promoting research and increasing awareness amongst policymakers. We also identified key ‘bottlenecks’: inequity of access, insufficient research, inadequate development of advance care planning and a lack of co-creation of relevant technologies and shared decision-making. Rethinking PC within a public health context must focus on developing policies, training and technologies to enhance person-centered quality life for those with NCCD, while ensuring that they and those important to them experience death with dignity.

As cancer is earlier diagnosed and its treatments improve, palliative care is increasingly playing a vital role in the oncology population. The concept and the timing of application of palliative care have evolved in the last decades. The WHO pain ladder and the greater understanding of appropriate multimodal pain control treatments have dramatically improved the management of cancer pain. Integration of palliative care, which appears crucial for a proper management of patients, can be defined as the provision of palliative care both during curative cancer treatment and after curative treatment has ceased. Clinical assistance should be delivered by specialized physicians in different fields, psychologists and nurses, and should include all aspects of advanced cancer care, from diagnosis to the treatment of symptoms. A further aspect of integration of palliative care concerns the role of the continuity of care in acute or emergency contexts both for out- and inpatients. Further improvements in the management of cancer pain are needed. First, the WHO ladder should be modified with further steps, like those of interventional pain control procedures and techniques, with the aim of being effective also for the small proportion of nonresponsive patients. Second, more research is needed to find out which interventions aiming to improve continuity of care of cancer patients are beneficial to improve patient, provider and process of care outcomes and to identify which outcomes are the most sensitive to change. Of crucial importance would be the development of a standardised instrument to measure the continuity of care in cancer patients. This article is a brief overview on the management of cancer pain, from the pharmacological treatments reported by WHO ladder, to the need for integration and continuity of care.