1. Randomized controlled study of the prediction of diminutive/small colorectal polyp histology using didactic versus computer‐based self‐learning module in gastroenterology trainees
- Author
-
Smith, SCL, Saltzman, J, Shivaji, UN, Lethebe, BC, Cannatelli, R, Ghosh, S, Iacucci, M, Baker, G, Bannaga, A, Fowler, H, Geh, D, Gupta, T, Harvey, PR, Khan, S, Kumar, A, Lim, P, McCulloch, A, O'Rourke, J, Polewiczowska, B, Qurashi, M, Tahir, F, and Widlak, MM
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,education ,Video Recording ,Nice ,Colonic Polyps ,law.invention ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Optical diagnosis ,medicine ,Humans ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,computer.programming_language ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,General surgery ,Computer based ,Gastroenterology ,Colonic Polyp ,Colonoscopy ,Endoscopy ,Diminutive ,Education, Medical, Graduate ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Colorectal Polyp ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Clinical Competence ,Educational Measurement ,business ,computer ,Learning Curve ,Computer-Assisted Instruction - Abstract
Background and Aim The aim of this randomized trial was to evaluate the performance of self‐training versus didactic training in order to increase the diagnostic accuracy of diminutive/small colonic polyp histological prediction by trainees. Methods Sixteen trainees reviewed 78 videos (48 iSCAN‐OE and 30 NBI) of diminutive/small polyps in a pretraining assessment. Trainees were randomized to receive computer‐based self‐learning (n = 8) or didactic training (n = 8) using identical teaching materials and videos. The same 78 videos, in a different randomized order, were assessed. The NICE (NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic) and SIMPLE (Simplified Identification Method for Polyp Labeling during Endoscopy) classification systems were used to classify diminutive/small polyps. Results A higher proportion of high‐confidence predictions of polyps was made by the self‐training group versus the didactic group using both the SIMPLE classification (77.1% [95% CI 73.4–80.3] vs 69.9% [95% CI 66.1–73.5%] [P = 0.005]) and the NICE classification (77% [95% CI 73.2–80.4%] vs 69.8% [95% CI 66–73.4%] [P = 0.006]). When using NICE, sensitivity of the self‐training group compared with the didactic group was 72% versus 83% (P = 0.0005), and the accuracy was 66.1% versus 69.1%. The training improved the confidence of participants and SIMPLE was preferred over NICE. Conclusion Self‐learning for the prediction of diminutive/small polyp histology is a method of training that can achieve results similar to didactic training. Availability of adequate self‐learning teaching modules could enable widespread implementation of optical diagnosis in clinical practice.
- Published
- 2019