Search

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the management of solid organ transplant recipients and on clinical evolution in post-transplantation. Little is known on the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection in these patients. The severity and lethality of this disease in solid organ transplant patients are higher thanin the general population. This study aims to describe clinical characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 infection in solid organ transplant recipients followed in our center.MethodsIn this observational study, we enrolled all kidney transplant recipientsattending the A.O.U. Federico II of Naples from March 2020 to January 2021. For each patient we evaluated the epidemiological and clinical characteristics as well as outcome.ResultsWe enrolled 369 kidney transplant patients (229, male, 62%). Of these, 51 (13.8%) acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection and 29 showed symptomatic disease. Of the 51 patients with the infection, 48 (94.11%) had at least one comorbidity and such comorbidities did not constitute a risk factor for a more severe disease. Hospitalization was necessary for 7 (13.7%) patients. Of these, 2 required low-flow oxygen supplementation, 3 non-invasive/high flow ventilation and 2 invasive ventilation. Finally, 2 patients died.ConclusionsOur study shows a lower mortality and hospitalization rate compared to figures available in the literature (4% vs. 13–30% and 14% vs. 32–100%, respectively). Furthermore, the comorbidities examined (hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes) did not constitute a risk factor for a more severe disease condition in this patient category. Further studies with larger sample size are necessary to confirm these data.

Vaccination against SARS-CoV2 represents a key weapon to prevent COVID-19, but lower response rates to vaccination have frequently been reported in solid organ transplant recipients. The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of seroconversion to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in a cohort of kidney transplant recipients and the potential role of the different immunosuppressive regimens. We conducted an observational retrospective cohort study in kidney transplant patients vaccinated for COVID-19. For each patient, we evaluated IgG anti-S-RBD SARS-CoV-2 titers immediately before the administration of first COVID-19 vaccination dose, 20 days after the first dose and 40 days after the second dose. Moreover, we evaluated the type of immunosuppressive treatment and the incidence of vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection. We enrolled 121 kidney transplant patients vaccinated for COVID-19. At the time of administration of the first vaccine dose, all patients had a negative antibody titer; only 4.1% had positive antibody titers 20 days after the first dose. More than half patients 62 (51%) had protective antibody titers 40 days after the second dose. A total of 18 Solid Organ Transplant Recipients (SOTRs) (14.9%) got a SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infection during the study period. With regard to immunosuppressive regimen, patients on mycophenolate-based regimen (48.7%) showed the lowest antibody response rates (27.5%) compared to other regimens. Our study confirms that kidney transplant patients show a poor response to two doses of COVID-19 vaccination. Moreover, in our study the use of mycophenolate is significantly associated with a non-response to COVID-19 m-RNA vaccines.

Author(s): Ivan Gentile *, Nicola Schiano Moriello Introduction Since early 2020, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused hundreds of millions of cases and several million deaths worldwide [1]. [...]

Diabetes mellitus represents one of the most frequent comorbidities among patients with COVID-19, constituting a risk factor for a more severe prognosis than that of non-diabetic patients. However, the pathophysiological mechanism underlying this unfavorable outcome is still not completely clear. The goal of our study was to evaluate the potential role of antidiabetic therapy in the evolution of COVID-19. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The intestinal microbiota plays a fundamental role in physiological homeostasis as well as in pathologic conditions. Hepatitis C virus is the leading cause of chronic liver diseases worldwide. The treatment of this infection has been revolutionized by the availability of direct-acting antiviral agents which guarantee a high rate (about 95%) of viral clearance. Few studies have assessed the change in the gut microbiota of patients treated with direct-acting antiviral agents against HCV, and many aspects still need to be clarified. The aim of the study was to evaluate the effects of antiviral therapy on gut microbiota. We enrolled patients with HCV-related chronic liver disease attending the Infectious Diseases Unit of the A.O.U. Federico II of Naples from January 2017 to March 2018 and treated with DAAs. For each patient, a fecal sample was collected and analyzed for the assessment of microbial diversity before the start of therapy and by SVR12 time. We excluded patients who had received antibiotics in the previous 6 months. Twelve patients were enrolled (6 male, 8 genotype 1 (1 subtype 1a), 4 genotype 2). Fibrosis scores were F0 in 1 patient, F2 in 1 patient, F3 in 4 patients and cirrhosis in the remaining 6 (all in Child-Pugh class A). All were treated with DAAs for 12 weeks (5 with Paritaprevir-Ombitasvir-Ritonavir-Dasabuvir, 3 with Sofosbuvir-Ledipasvir, 1 with Sofosbuvir-Ribavirin, 1 with Sofosbuvir-Daclatasvir, 1 with Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir) and 100% achieved SVR12. In all patients, we observed a trend in reduction of potentially pathogenic microorganisms (i.e., Enterobacteriaceae). Furthermore, a trend of increase in α-diversity was observed in patients by SVR12 compared to baseline. This trend was markedly more evident in patients without liver cirrhosis than in those with cirrhosis. Our study shows that viral eradication obtained with DAA is associated with a trend in restoring the heterogeneity of α-diversity and in reducing the percentage of potentially pathogenic microbial species, although this benefit is less evident in patients with cirrhosis. Further studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm these data.

Despite the lightning-fast advances in the management of SARS-CoV after 2 years of pandemic, COVID-19 continues to pose a challenge for fragile patients, who could benefit from early administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to reduce the risk of severe disease progression. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of mAbs against SARS-CoV-2 among patients at risk for severe disease progression, namely elderly and those with comorbidities, before the omicron variant surge. Patients were treated with either casirivimab/imdevimab, sotrovimab, or bamlanivimab/etesevimab. The rates and risk factors for clinical worsening, hospitalization, ICU admission and death (unfavorable outcomes) were evaluated. A stratified analysis according to the presence of SARS-CoV-2 IgG was also performed. Among 185 included patients, we showed low rates of unfavorable outcomes (9.2%), which were more frequent in patients with chronic kidney disease (aOR: 10.44, 95% CI: 1.73−63.03; p < 0.05) and basal D-dimer serum concentrations > 600 ng/mL (aOR 21.74, 95% CI: 1.18−397.70; p < 0.05). Patients with negative SARS-CoV-2 serology at baseline showed higher C-reactive protein values compared with patients with positive serology (p < 0.05) and a trend toward a higher admission rate to SICU and ICU compared with patients with positive serology. Our results thus showed, in a real-life setting, the efficacy of mAbs against SARS-CoV-2 before an Omicron surge when the available mabs become not effective.

Campania is the sixth poorest region of Italy, and it is the region with the highest income inequality. The secondary attack rates of SARS-CoV-2 among households are found to be substantially heterogeneous among published studies and are influenced by socio-economic factors. We conducted a retrospective study to describe the role of socio-economic factors in the household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 among patients living in Campania Region and referring to "Federico II" Hospital. We interviewed 413 subjects followed-up for COVID-19 between the 8 March 2020 and the 24 May 2021 with the aim to collect demographic, clinical, economic, and social data regarding their household and the index cases. The variables associated with SARS-CoV-2 attack rate higher than 50% among households were higher age ( p = 0.023) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index of the index case ( p = 0.023) and, for household characteristics, higher number of families per house ( p = 0.02), location of the houses in Naples' suburbs (Chi 2 = 5.3, p = 0.02) and in Caserta City area (Chi 2 = 4, p = 0.04), and renting the house compared to owning it (Chi 2 = 5.83, p = 0.01). This study confirms the finding described by other authors that household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is correlated with the income inequality of the analyzed geographical area as well as with the indicators of health and economic wealth of the families, and this correlation also applies to the Campania Region.

Worldwide the needlestick injuries of health care workers (HCWs) still represent a major health problem. The authors aimed to evaluate the risk of HCW needlestick injuries in a tertiary university hospital in southern Italy in relation to some HCW characteristics (age, sex, professional profile, work department) and the source of infection. All HCWs of the University Hospital "Federico II" in Naples, Italy, attending the Infectious Diseases Unit after potential accidental contact to blood-borne viruses through needlestick injuries were enrolled during a 22-year period. HCWs underwent clinical analysis and were administered a specific questionnaire to collect (in anonymous fashion) data about age, sex, professional profile and work department. From 1995 to 2016 1,477 needlestick injuries in the same number of people (one accident per person) were recorded by our service. The HCWs were predominately males (n = 806, 55%) and the mean age was 39.4 years (±10.1 SD). The job categories most involved were: physicians (41%), followed by nurses (33%) and healthcare assistants (HCAs, 10%). The incidence proportion was calculated for these highest-risk categories in three defined time points (at the beginning, in the middle and at the end of the study period): 104/2149 (4.86%) in 1995, 41/2498 (1.64%) in 2005 and 25/2057 (1.22%) in 2015. Most injuries occurred in General Surgery (14.21%), Gynecology and Obstetrics (9%) and Pediatrics (6.49%). In about 34% the HCWs had been exposed to HCV infected fluids. Over time, a significant decrease in accidental exposure was recorded for physicians (p= 0.019), nurses (p< 0.0001) and HCAs (p< 0.0001). Our results confirm that some profiles, namely physicians, nurses and healthcare assistants, are still at risk of needlestick injuries, especially in surgical areas, including obstetric wards. Further primary and secondary prevention strategies are needed to decrease the incidence of new cases of needlestick injuries.