Search

Acquired thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) without an obvious cause, and may include fever, mild renal failure, and neurologic deficits. It is characterized by a deficiency of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) cleaving enzyme, ADAMTS13 (a disintegrin and metalloproteinase, with a thrombospondin type 1 motif, member 13), resulting in formation of microthrombi in the high sheer environment of the microvasculature. This causes microvascular occlusion, MAHA, and organ ischemia. Diagnosis is based on the presence of clinical symptoms, laboratory aberrations consistent with MAHA, decreased ADAMTS13 activity, and possibly presence of anti-ADAMTS13 autoantibodies. Upfront treatment of acute TTP includes plasma exchange and corticosteroids. A significant number of patients are refractory to this treatment and will require further interventions. There are limited data and consensus on the management of the refractory TTP patient. Management involves simultaneously ruling out other causes of thrombocytopenia and MAHA, while also considering other treatments. In this article, we describe our management of the patient with refractory TTP, and discuss use of rituximab, increased plasma exchange, splenectomy, and immunosuppressive options, including cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and cyclosporine. We also review recent evidence for the potential roles of bortezomib and N-acetylcysteine, and explore new therapeutic approaches, including recombinant ADAMTS13 and anti-VWF therapy., (© 2015 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Background: Azathioprine (AZA), used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), is metabolized by thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT). The accumulation of individual metabolites varies because humans display genetic polymorphism for TPMT expression. Deficiencies in TPMT result in accumulation of toxic metabolites, followed by neutropenia and hepatic inflammation. Concern over acute toxicity frequently leads to under dosing and frequent monitoring tests and visits., Objective: To determine whether assessment of TPMT activity before the administration of AZA would predict acute toxicity and, thus, allow for reductions in health care costs related to biochemical screening for, and management of, AZA-induced adverse events., Methods: Before AZA treatment, 29 patients with IBD were prospectively randomized to one of two groups: group 1, in which no TPMT assay was performed, was started on AZA at 1 mg/kg/day and then titrated every two weeks to a target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day; and group 2, in which TPMT assays were performed, was started on AZA at the target dose of 2.5 mg/kg/day. For both groups, complete blood count and liver enzymes were monitored weekly for six weeks and at monthly intervals thereafter. Additional tests and health care interventions were undertaken at the discretion of the attending physicians., Results: Of the 29 patients in the study, 15 were randomly assigned to group 1 and 14 to group 2. Demographics and disease activity were similar for both groups. Mean follow-up time was 7.1 months (range 3.5 to 10.7 months). Eight patients from group 1 and six patients from group 2 withdrew as a result of AZA-induced adverse events. There was no correlation between the TPMT activity and the development of AZA-induced adverse events. The direct health care costs for group 1 (300.11 dollars per patient) were lower than in group 2 (348.87 dollars per patient)., Conclusion: The prospective assessment of TPMT enzyme activity before initiating AZA therapy in IBD patients incurred additional cost and did not predict AZA-induced toxicity.