Search

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is widely used in the treatment of triple-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), but its use in estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR) positive/HER2-negative BC is questioned because of the low pathologic complete response (pCR) rates. This retrospective study assessed the mRNA-based MammaTyper® assay's capability of predicting pCR with NACT, and ER, PR, Ki67, and HER2 status at immunohistochemical (IHC) through transcriptomics., Methods: Diagnostic biopsies from 76 BC patients treated at the Cremona Hospital between 2012-2018 were analyzed. Relative mRNA expression levels of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR, and MKI67 were measured using the MammaTyper® kit and integrated into a pCR score. Predicting capability of pCR and standard IHC biomarkers could be assessed with ROC curves in 75 and 76 patients, respectively., Results: Overall, 68.0% patients obtained a MammaTyper® high-score and 32.0% a MammaTyper® low-score. Among high-score patients, 62.7% achieved pCR, compared to 16.7% in the low-score group (p = 0.0003). The binary MammaTyper® score showed good prediction of pCR in the overall cohort (area under curve [AUC] = 0.756) and in HR+/HER2-negative cases (AUC = 0.774). In cases with residual disease, the continuous MammaTyper® score correlated moderately with residual tumor size and decrease in tumor size. MammaTyper® showed substantial agreement with IHC for ESR1/ER and ERBB2/HER2, and moderate agreement for PGR/PR and MKI67/Ki67., Conclusion: Overall, MammaTyper® pCR score may serve as a standardized tool for predicting NACT response in HR+/HER2-negative BC, potentially guiding treatment strategies. Additionally, it could provide a more standardized and reproducible assessment of ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 status., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Francesco Schettini reports honoraria from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo for educational events/materials and travel expenses from Novartis, Gilead and Daiichy-Sankyo. Daniele Generali declares personal fees for educational events by Novartis, Lilly, Pfizer, Daiichy-Sankyo, Roche; research funds from Astrazeneca, Novartis and LILT. Uğur Şahin is CEO and Mark Laible is an employee of BioNTech SE. Ralph M Wirtz is an employee of STRATIFYER Molecular Pathology GmbH. The other authors have nothing to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: There are no validated predictive markers for lapatinib and capecitabine in patients with trastuzumab-resistant HER2 positive metastatic breast cancer., Methods: Data of 148 consecutive patients treated with lapatinib and capecitabine from March 2007 to December 2013 were collected from 13 Italian institutions. Estimates of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were obtained with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with logrank test. The association of clinicopathological variables and the outcome was studied by binary logistic regression analysis and Cox proportional hazard analysis., Results: At a median follow-up of 41 months, median PFS and OS were 7 and 21 months, respectively. Patents with a PFS longer than 7 months had a significantly longer OS, compared with patients with a PFS equal to or shorter than 7 months (36 vs 15 months; p<0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed the benefit of lapatinib-based therapy in terms of PFS and OS was significantly associated with time-to-progression (TTP) on prior first-line trastuzumab-based therapy. In particular, each additional month on first-line trastuzumab based therapy was associated with a reduction in hazard of progression and death after the initiation of lapatinib-based therapy of 2% and 4%, respectively., Conclusions: A longer TTP to first line trastuzumab seems to predict a prolonged PFS and OS with subsequent lapatinib and capecitabine.

Metronomic chemotherapy (mCT), a frequent administration of low-dose chemotherapy, allows prolonged treatment duration and minimizes the toxicity of standard-dose chemotherapy. mCT has multiple actions against cancer cells including inhibition of angiogenesis and modulation of the immune system. A number of studies lend support to the clinical efficacy of mCT in advanced breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer. However, further evidence is necessary to describe the optimal use of mCT and to identify suitable patients. Oral vinorelbine has emerged as a promising metronomic treatment in patients with metastatic breast cancer and non-small-cell lung cancer and is the only orally available microtubule-targeting agent. This paper reviews current evidence on metronomic oral vinorelbine, discusses its management and defines a suitable patient profile on the basis of a workshop of Italian experts.

Background: The management of pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer is controversial and no data about the efficacy of trastuzumab in this setting are available from randomized clinical trials. The aims of this retrospective study were to assess how patients are managed in clinical practice in Italy, which clinical or biological characteristics influenced the choice of adjuvant systemic therapy and the outcome of patients., Methods: Data of consecutive patients who underwent surgery from January 2007 to December 2012 for HER2-positive, pT1a-b pN0 M0 breast cancer were retrospectively collected from 28 Italian centres. Analysis of contingency tables and multivariate generalized logit models were used to investigate the association between the baseline clinical and biological features and the treatment strategy adopted., Results: Among 303 enrolled patients, 204 received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, 65 adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and 34 did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy. At the multivariate analysis age, tumor size, proliferation index and hormone receptor status were significantly associated with the treatment choice. Five-year disease-free survival (DFS) probability was 95%, 94.3% and 69.6% for patients treated with adjuvant systemic therapy and trastuzumab, with adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab and for patients who did not receive adjuvant systemic therapy, respectively (p<0.001)., Conclusions: The majority of patients (66%) with pT1a-b pN0 HER2-positive breast cancer enrolled in this retrospective study received adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab, whereas only 11% patients did not receive any adjuvant systemic therapy. It should be emphasized, however, that in the adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab group 94% of tumors were hormone receptor positive and 89% of patients were treated with endocrine therapy only [corrected]. The 5-year DFS probability was significantly higher for patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy with trastuzumab compared with patients not receiving adjuvant systemic therapy or receiving adjuvant systemic therapy without trastuzumab.

Aim: This observational study investigates the use of adjuvant trastuzumab (AT) in HER2-positive breast cancer patients in a real-life setting, focusing on relapse and discontinuation rates., Patients & Methods: Data on a group of HER2-positive patients collected from 13 oncology centers of northeast Italy were analyzed., Results: In total, 1245 patients were analyzed. 13.1% of patients were excluded from AT because of comorbidities, age, tumor stage, refusal or other reasons; 8.2% of patients who received AT interrupted the therapy, mainly for toxicity. Overall the relapse rate was 10.9% in the AT-treated population versus 22.6% in nontreated patients (follow-up: 37.4 and 62.1 months, respectively). Disease-free survival (DFS) was lower in AT-relapsed patients than in not-relapsed. Statistical analysis showed a correlation between DFS and estrogen receptor status in AT-treated patients., Conclusion: Relapse rates are lower in clinical setting compared to clinical trials. Overall, AT is effective in HER2-positive early-stage breast cancer patients.

Purpose of the Study: Trastuzumab combined with sequential chemotherapy with taxanes and anthracyclines as primary systemic therapy achieved high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR). Non-pegylated liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin (NPLD) has shown equal efficacy but minor cardiotoxicity compared to doxorubicin. This phase II study aimed to evaluate the activity and safety of trastuzumab with sequential chemotherapy for early or locally advanced HER2 positive BC., Methods: Preoperative treatment included NPLD (60 mg/mq iv) plus cyclophosphamide (600 mg/mq iv) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles followed by docetaxel (35 mg/mq iv) plus trastuzumab (4 mg/mq loading dose iv, then 2 mg/mq iv) weekly for 16 weeks. Primary endpoint was pCR defined as the absence of residual invasive cancer both in the breast and regional nodes. Clinical staging was exploratory evaluated by CT-PET., Results: 43 pts were treated from december 2005 to September 2011, 39 of them were evaluable for the purpose of study. Median age was 53 years (range: 31-78), the majority of pts had tumour stage cT2 (63%), tumour grade 3 (86%), clinical nodes involvement N+ (77%), ER positive (56%) and Ki-67 ≥20% (77%). pCR was reported in 19 (49%) of 39 pts. There was an association between Ki-67 ≥20% at baseline and pCR (p = 0.018). No cardiac toxicity or discontinuation of trastuzumab was reported. CT-PET modified the clinical stage for 10 patients showing new loco-regional lymph nodes., Conclusions: This study confirms that integrating anti-HER2 therapy in primary treatment for HER2 positive breast cancer is active. NPLD is a safe option to minimize cardiotoxicity., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neoadjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy is frequently administered in breast cancer. Pathological complete response (pCR) rates vary according to clinical disease stage and biology of breast cancer. The critical role of angiogenesis in the progression of breast cancer, together with significantly improved efficacy when bevacizumab is combined with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting, provides a strong rationale for evaluating the integration of bevacizumab into neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens., Methods: A single-arm, multicentre, phase II, open-label study evaluated four 3-weekly cycles of FEC (5-fluorouracil 600 mg/m(2), epirubicin 90 mg/m(2) and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m(2)) followed by 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel (80 mg/m(2)) in combination with bevacizumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks as neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-negative stage III locally advanced or inflammatory breast carcinoma. The primary endpoint was pCR rate., Results: Planned treatment was completed in 49 of the 56 enrolled patients. In the intent-to-treat population, the pCR rate was 21% and the clinical response rate was 59%. Breast-conserving surgery was achieved in 34% of patients. In the subgroup of 15 patients with triple-negative disease, the pCR rate was 47%. Grade 3 adverse events in ≥5% of patients were neutropenia, leucopenia, asthenia, and rash. One case each of hypertensive retinopathy and post-operative wound complication, both after treatment completion, were considered probably related to bevacizumab. There were no treatment-related deaths and no cardiac function abnormalities., Conclusions: This study indicates that FEC followed by weekly paclitaxel with bevacizumab is an active neoadjuvant regimen for locally advanced breast cancer, with no major safety concerns., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT00559845., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This trial was conducted to assess the activity and tolerability of the gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol triplet combination in patients with operable breast cancer. After core biopsy, 43 women with stage II-IIIA breast cancer were treated with gemcitabine 1000 mg m(-2) over 30 min on days 1 and 4, epirubicin 90 mg m(-2) as an intravenous bolus on day 1, and taxol 175 mg m(-2) as a 3-h infusion on day 1, every 21 days for four cycles. The primary end point was the percentage of pathological complete responses (pCR) in the breast; secondary end points were tolerability, clinical response rates, overall and progression-free survival, tumour biomarkers before and after primary chemotherapy (PCT). All patients were included in safety and survival analyses; 41 eligible patients were evaluated for response. The overall clinical response rate was 87.8% (95% CI 77.8-97.8), with 26.8% complete responses (95% CI 13.3-40.3). A pCR in the breast was observed in six patients (14.6%; 95% CI 3.8-25.4); 15 patients (36.6%; 95% CI 21.9-51.3) had negative axillary lymph nodes. Grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 67.4% of the patients; febrile neutropenia occurred in 1.9% of cycles (granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was used in 3.2% of the cycles to shorten the duration of neutropenia). A statistically significant difference between Mib-1 at baseline (> or =20% in 71.4% of the patients) and at definitive surgery (28.6%, P < 0.05) was observed. The gemcitabine, epirubicin, taxol regimen is active and well tolerated as PCT for operable breast cancer. This combination allows the administration of full doses of active agents with a low incidence of febrile neutropenia.

Background: Although tumor markers are frequently used in the follow-up of patients with breast cancer, two points are still being debated: 1) their cost/effectiveness has been neither demonstrated nor disproved; 2) the reliability of the currently used dichotomous division into a positive/negative cut-off should be definitely validated. Dynamic criteria of interpretation based on serial serum samples would probably be more effective for early detection of relapse., Patients and Methods: The aim of the present study was to compare the dichotomous cut-off based decision criteria to a dynamic serial sample based assessment of tumor markers. Since 1989, 794 patients have been followed in 11 institutions. CEA and CA15.3 were measured once a month for three months before every clinical examination. The present paper concerns the evaluation variability in 405 patients without evidence of disease in the first three institutions joining the study., Results: In patients without evidence of disease, the coefficient of variation of all samples for every patient showed a median value of 19 for CEA and 21 for CA15.3. Variability was negatively associated with the antigen level and was most likely due to the analytical component. This was also confirmed by the significant difference in variability among the three institutions evaluated. The median value of the critical difference was 53% for CEA and 57% for CA15.3., Conclusions: 1) Individually tailored dynamic decision criteria are applicable in about 50% of the cases. 2) The problem of improving the precision of tumor marker assays in the low dose range must be urgently addressed to the manufacturers of tumor markers by the scientific community in order to apply individually tailored decision criteria for patients in whom the serum level of biological markers is low.