Search

Background: Endovascular intervention (EI) is the most commonly used modality for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Since the inception of this technique, numerous publications have reported the associated clinical outcomes. However, no publication has reported the comparative outcomes over a period of time in which both the stent platform and adjunctive medical therapy have evolved. This study aims to assess the impact of the concomitant evolution of both the endovascular approach and optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on CMI outcomes over three consecutive time eras., Methods: A retrospective review at a quaternary center from January 2003 to August 2020 was performed to identify patients who underwent EIs for CMI. The patients were divided into three groups based on the date of intervention: early (2003-2009), mid (2010-2014), and late (2015-2020). At least one angioplasty/stent was performed for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and/or celiac artery. The patients' short- and mid-term outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were also conducted to evaluate the clinical predictors for primary patency loss in SMA only subgroup., Results: A total of 278 patients were included (early, 74; mid, 95; late, 109). The overall mean age was 71 years, and 70% were females. High technical success (early, 98.6%; mid, 100%; late, 100%; P = .27) and immediate resolution of symptoms (early, 86.3%; mid, 93.7%; late, 90.8%; P = .27) were noted over the three eras. In both the celiac artery and SMA cohorts, the use of bare metal stents (BMS) declined over time (early, 99.0%; mid, 90.3%; late, 65.5%; P < .001) with a proportionate increase in covered stents (CS) (early, 0.99%; mid, 9.7%; late, 28.9%; P < .001). The use of postoperative antiplatelet and statins has increased over time (early, 89.2%; mid, 97.9%; late, 99.1%; P = .003) and (early, 47%; mid, 68%; late, 81%; P = .001), respectively. In the SMA stent-only cohort, no significant differences were noted in primary patency rates between BMS and CS (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-2.87; P = .94). High-intensity preoperative statins were associated with fewer primary patency loss events compared to none/low- or moderate-intensity statins (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.72; P = .014)., Conclusions: Consistent outcomes were observed for CMI EIs across three consecutive eras. In the SMA stent-only cohort, no statistically significant difference in early primary patency was noted for CS and BMS, making the use of CS at additional cost controversial and possibly not cost effective. Notably, the preoperative high-intensity statins were associated with improved SMA primary patency. These findings demonstrate the importance of guideline-directed medical therapy as an essential adjunct to EI in the treatment of CMI., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Aneurysmal pathology of the aorta is well-defined in the Marfan syndrome (MFS) population. Owing in part to the rarity of pathologies, the prevalence of intracranial aneurysms (IA) in MFS is poorly defined. There is debate as to whether or not there is an association between the two. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of IA in a population of patients with MFS who underwent intracranial imaging., Methods: This was a single-center retrospective review of patients with MFS. Between 1995 and 2021, 983 patients were reviewed. We identified 198 patients with MFS who had intracranial imaging. Imaging consisted of CTA and/or MRA, and was read by an attending radiologist. Details of the aneurysm, patient demographics, and aortic characteristics were collected., Results: The prevalence of IA was 7.1% (14/198). Age of patients with IA (55.0 ± 15.1 years) was not significantly different than those without IA (52.6 ± 16.0 years) (P = .58). The most common location of IA was the internal carotid artery. The mean diameter of the IA was 7 ± 5.8 mm. No ruptures of the internal carotid artery were identified. One patient (0.5%) underwent intervention for the IA. There were no significant differences found in aortic characteristic including dimensions, history of dissection, or aneurysm., Conclusions: In a large, single-center experience over 20 years, we identified patients with confirmed MFS who underwent intracranial imaging. The prevalence of IA in our experience was 7.1%. There were no patient or aortic characteristics found to be significantly associated with IA; however, this finding may be due to the small number of aneurysms. Although this number is higher than the historically reported prevalence in the general population, a collection of experiences from multiple institutions will likely be required to truly define the risk of IA in MFS and to determine whether screening is warranted., (Copyright © 2023 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The natural history of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) has not been well-studied. The optimal size threshold for elective repair of isolated CIAAs is also not well-defined. We sought to determine the natural history and growth rates of isolated CIAAs to justify a surveillance protocol and size for elective repair., Methods: Isolated CIAAs (>2 cm) identified from January 1, 2008, through February 29, 2020, at a single center were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and details of CIAA operative repairs were retrospectively collected. All available duplex ultrasound and computed tomography scans were reviewed from time of CIAA identification through June 2020., Results: There were 244 isolated CIAAs found in 167 patients. The cohort was 94% male with an average age of 68.1 ± 8.8 years at the time of CIAA detection. CIAAs were identified with ultrasound examination 69% of the time with a mean CIAA diameter of 2.3 cm. Operative repair of a CIAA was performed in 11.4% of the cohort at an average diameter of 3.30 ± 1.02 cm. The majority of these repairs were performed via an endovascular approach (73.7%; n = 14). There were no symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs. Concurrent aortic growth that led to an abdominal aortic aneurysm with diameter of at least 3 cm occurred in 10.6% (n = 26) of isolated CIAAs. The average length of time from CIAA diagnosis to repair was 65.7 ± 47.1 months. The overall CIAA growth rate was 0.4 mm/y. A subgroup analysis based on CIAA size demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y fore CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49 cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 1.3 mm/y for CIAAs 3.0 cm or larger. There were two CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm with extreme growth, which significantly impacted the CIAA growth rate on sensitivity analysis. After excluding those two CIAAs from the model, the overall CIAA growth rate was 0.3 mm/y. The subgroup analysis then demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y for CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 0.5 mm/y for CIAAs 3 cm or larger., Conclusions: Isolated CIAAs are typically slow growing aneurysms that expectedly grow faster as they enlarge. Given the rare occurrence of rapid isolated CIAA growth, we recommend surveillance at 3 years for 2.00 to 2.49 cm isolated CIAAs, 2 years for 2.50 to 2.99 cm isolated CIAAs, and yearly for isolated CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm. The lack of symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs in this study supports delaying elective repair until an isolated CIAA diameter reaches at least 3.5 cm. These recommendations should be considered for isolated CIAA practice guidelines., (Copyright © 2022 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Accurate documentation of patient care and acuity is essential to determine appropriate reimbursement as well as accuracy of key publicly reported quality metrics. We sought to investigate the impact of standardized note templates by inpatient advanced practice providers (APPs) on evaluation and management (E/M) charge capture, including outside of the global surgical package (GSP), and quality metrics including case mix index (CMI) and mortality index (MI). We hypothesized this clinical documentation initiative as well as improved coding of E/M services would result in increased reimbursement and quality metrics., Methods: A documentation and coding initiative on the heart and vascular service line was initiated in 2016 with focus on improving inpatient E/M capture by APPs outside the GSP. Comprehensive training sessions and standardized documentation templates were created and implemented in the electronic medical record. Subsequent hospital care E/M (current procedural terminology codes 99231, 99232, 99233) from the years 2015 to 2017 were audited and analyzed for charge capture rates, collections, work relative value units (wRVUs), and billing complexity. Data were compared over time by standardizing CMS values and reimbursement rates. In addition, overall CMI and MI were calculated each year., Results: One year following the documentation initiative, E/M charges on the vascular surgery service line increased by 78.5% with a corresponding increase in APP charges from 0.4% of billable E/M services to 70.4% when compared with pre-initiative data. The charge capture of E/M services among all inpatients rose from 21.4% to 37.9%. Additionally, reimbursement from CMS increased by 65% as total work relative value units generated from E/M services rose by 78.4% (797 to 1422). The MI decreased over the study period by 25.4%. Additionally, there was a corresponding 5.6% increase in the cohort CMI. Distribution of E/M encounter charges did not vary significantly. Meanwhile, the prevalence of 14 clinical comorbidities in our cohort as well as length of stay (P = .88) remained non-statistically different throughout the study period., Conclusions: Accurate clinical documentation of E/M care and ultimately inpatient acuity is critical in determining quality metrics that serve as important measures of overall hospital quality for CMS value-based payments and rankings. A system-based documentation initiative and expanded role of inpatient APPs on vascular surgery teams significantly improved charge capture and reimbursement outside the GSP as well as CMI and MI in a consistently complex patient population., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective/background: Spinal drain (SD) placement is an adjunct used in open and endovascular aortic surgery to mitigate the risk of spinal cord injury. SD placement can lead to subdural hematoma and intracranial hemorrhage (SDH/ICH). Previous studies have highlighted a correlation between incidence of SDH/ICH and amount of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) drained. We have two philosophies of SD management in our institution. One protocol allows fluid removal for pressure >10 cm H 2 O with no volume restriction. A second, similar protocol restricts CSF drainage to <25 mL/h. We examined SD complications and the influence of volume restriction., Methods: Patients were identified according to the Current Procedure Terminology codes for SD placement, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, fenestrated/branched endovascular aortic repair, endovascular abdominal aortic repair, and open thoracic or thoracoabdominal aortic repair between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2015. Patients' demographics included age, gender, race, body mass index, and comorbidities such as hypertension, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, diabetes mellitus, bleeding disorder, and connective tissue disorders. Management protocol was classified as volume independent (VI) or volume dependent (VD) by physician order. Postoperative complications related to the SD were noted., Results: We identified 948 patients who had an SD placed during the study period; 473 were done before aortic surgeries. A total of 364 patients (77%) underwent endovascular aortic surgery. The mean age at the time of procedure was 67.2 years, and 66% of patients were male. Thirty-nine patients (8.3%) were noted to have connective tissue disorders. Bloody SD placement occurred in 14 patients (3.1%) requiring rescheduling of the operation. SDH/ICH occurred in 11 patients (2.3%), postoperative blood tinged SD output in 94 patients (19.9 %), and 22 patients (4.7 %) had a CSF leak after SD removal. The incidence of SDH/ICH was not affected by the management protocol (2.6% VI vs 2.0% VD, P = .66), whereas the incidence of postoperative blood tinged SD output was significantly higher in the VI group (25.1% VI vs 15.0% VD, P = .006). Perioperative low-dose aspirin (81 mg) and prophylactic subcutaneous heparin did not increase the incidence of SDH/ICH. Postoperative thrombocytopenia was found to be associated with higher incidence of SDH/ICH (median 86,000 vs 113,000, P = .002)., Conclusions: Severe complications of SD placement (SDH/ICH) occur in 2.3% of SD patients undergoing aortic surgery, and the risk is higher in the setting of postoperative thrombocytopenia. SD volume limitation, blood tinged drainage, antiplatelet medication, and low-dose heparin do not affect the risk of SDH/ICH. The risks of spinal drains for aortic surgery should be balanced against potential benefits., (Copyright © 2021 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a proven intervention for stroke risk reduction in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. High-risk patients are often offered carotid stenting to minimize the risk and optimize the outcomes. As a referral center for high-risk patients, we evaluated and analyzed our experience with high-risk CEA patients., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients who had undergone CEA at a tertiary referral center. The demographics, indications for surgery, physiologic and anatomic risk factors, intraoperative surgical management, perioperative complications, morbidity, and mortality were analyzed. The high-risk physiologic factors identified included an ejection fraction <30%, positive preoperative stress test results, and compromised pulmonary function test results. The high-risk patients included those requiring home oxygen, those with a partial pressure of oxygen of <60 mm Hg, and patients with a forced expiratory volume in 1 second of <30%. The high-risk anatomic factors identified included previous head and/or neck radiation, a history of ipsilateral neck surgery, contralateral nerve palsy, redo CEA, previous ipsilateral stenting, contralateral occlusion, contralateral CEA, nasotracheal intubation, and digastric muscle division. After propensity score matching, patients with and without high-risk physiologic and anatomic factors were compared. The primary outcomes were a composite of stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were cranial injury and surgical site infection., Results: During a 10-year period, 1347 patients had undergone CEA at the Cleveland Clinic main campus. Of the 1347 patients, 1152 met the criteria for analysis. Propensity score matching found adequate matches for 424 high-risk patients, with 173 patients having at least one physiologic high-risk factor and 293 at least one anatomic high-risk factor. No significant differences were found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Overall, the stroke rate for the standard-risk and high-risk patients was 1.9% and 1.4%, respectively. The high-risk patients were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, although most were temporary. When patients with one or multiple risk factors were analyzed, no significant difference was found in the primary composite outcome or any of its components. Patients with two or more risk factors were significantly more likely to have experienced a cranial nerve injury, with most being temporary., Conclusions: In our large series, CEA remained a viable and safe surgical solution for patients with high-risk anatomic and physiologic risk factors, with acceptable stroke, myocardial infarction, and 30-day mortality rates., (Copyright © 2020 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Iliac conduits (ICs) are used for challenging iliac access during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) with contradictory reports of safety and increased surgical complications, morbidity, and mortality in national database reviews. The objective of this study was to examine outcomes related to IC placement before or concomitant with EVAR at a high-volume single center., Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent IC placement for endovascular aortic repair from 2006 to 2016 was conducted. Planned and unplanned, as well as staged and concomitant IC for EVAR, thoracic EVAR, and fenestrated/branched EVAR were included. Categorical factors were described using frequencies and percentages. Continuous measures were summarized in comparative tables. Comparisons between the planned and unplanned groups, concomitant and staged groups, and between those with and without a postoperative event were performed using Pearson χ 2 tests, two-sample t-tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests., Results: A total of 137 patients underwent IC placement, of which 9 were bilateral procedures, for a total of 144 IC placements. IC placement was necessary in 14 EVARs (9.7%), 38 thoracic EVARs (26.4%), and 92 fenestrated/branched EVARs (63.9%). The 30-day related mortality was 2.1% (n = 3). Perioperative morbidities included return to the operating room in five patients (5.6%) for bleeding (n = 4) and graft thrombosis (n = 1), 4 myocardial infarctions (2.8%), 5 episodes of respiratory failure (3.5%), 12 wound complications (8.3%), and 7 renal injuries (4.9%), of which 3 had progression to dialysis (2.1%). Other complications included return to the operating room for endoleak reintervention (n = 3) and late graft infection (n = 1 [0.7%]). There were 112 ICs (77.8%) planned and 65 (45.1%) were staged. Staged ICs were less likely to have postoperative complications (P < .001), respiratory failure (P < .05), infectious complications (P < .05), and postoperative cerebrovascular accidents (P < .05). ICs were done to accommodate 20F to 24F sheath sizes in 131 instances (91.0%). Factors associated with unplanned IC placement were iliac rupture and an inability to advance the endograft in arteries deemed size-appropriate preoperatively (P < .001). Unplanned ICs were associated with higher estimated blood loss (P < .001), operating room transfusion volume (P < .001), and overall complication rates (P < .05). Women (P < .05), preoperative chronic kidney disease (P < .05), and concomitant IC placement (P < .001) were associated with higher overall complication rates. Operative time, estimated blood loss, and operating room transfusion volume were associated with increased rate of complications in comparison between all subgroups (P < .05)., Conclusions: ICs are a safe and viable option for high-risk patients with challenging iliac artery access for EVVAR. ICs are best performed in a planned fashion or in a staged manner, when feasible., (Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

With the increasing incidence of end-stage renal disease, hemodialysis vascular access presents an ongoing struggle, and a multidisciplinary approach must be considered to provide long-term durable access for patients on chronic hemodialysis. Surgeons must be very thoughtful in planning the steps of access for these patients and consider fistula first and catheter last, without forgetting that prosthetic grafts may be a legitimate first option for patients. This article provides a review of surgical management of dialysis access, including primary access options and follow-up of this difficult patient population.