Search

Adverse effects due to off-target activity can be predicted by careful comparison of the relationship between expected plasma concentration and off-target activity of the test compound with that of reference drugs targeting that receptor for their therapeutic efficacy. The ratio between plasma concentration (unbound) and the K i at the receptor is a surrogate measure reflecting receptor occupancy. Where data are available for reference drugs, we have curated and evaluated this at 100 receptors, 72 of which can involve both negative and positive modulations by drugs: a total of 172 'receptor modulations'. This provides a quantitative framework upon which to achieve consistent risk assessment of off-target interactions across receptors, across compounds and between assessors. It therefore achieves a significant departure from an opinion-based to an evidence-based approach to secondary pharmacology. Demonstration of proof-of-principle was achieved for one of the receptor interactions (α 1A -adrenoceptor antagonism leading to postural hypotension in clinical use) due to the availability of high-quality off-target K i data for >30 drugs at this receptor., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest All authors are or were employees of Certara UK Ltd. with the exception of LRR, KHP and HV., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Secondary pharmacological profiling is increasingly applied in pharmaceutical drug discovery to address unwanted pharmacological side effects of drug candidates before entering the clinic. Regulators, drug makers and patients share a demand for deep characterization of secondary pharmacology effects of novel drugs and their metabolites. The scope of such profiling has therefore expanded substantially in the past two decades, leading to the implementation of broad in silico profiling methods and focused in vitro off-target screening panels, to identify liabilities, but also opportunities, as early as possible. The pharmaceutical industry applies such panels at all stages of drug discovery routinely up to early development. Nevertheless, target composition, screening technologies, assay formats, interpretation and scheduling of panels can vary significantly between companies in the absence of dedicated guidelines. To contribute towards best practices in secondary pharmacology profiling, this review aims to summarize the state-of-the art in this field. Considerations are discussed with respect to panel design, screening strategy, implementation and interpretation of the data, including regulatory perspectives. The cascaded, or integrated, use of in silico and off-target profiling allows to exploit synergies for comprehensive safety assessment of drug candidates., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In mammals, endogenous circadian clocks sense and respond to daily feeding and lighting cues, adjusting internal ∼24 h rhythms to resonate with, and anticipate, external cycles of day and night. The mechanism underlying circadian entrainment to feeding time is critical for understanding why mistimed feeding, as occurs during shift work, disrupts circadian physiology, a state that is associated with increased incidence of chronic diseases such as type 2 (T2) diabetes. We show that feeding-regulated hormones insulin and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) reset circadian clocks in vivo and in vitro by induction of PERIOD proteins, and mistimed insulin signaling disrupts circadian organization of mouse behavior and clock gene expression. Insulin and IGF-1 receptor signaling is sufficient to determine essential circadian parameters, principally via increased PERIOD protein synthesis. This requires coincident mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) activation, increased phosphoinositide signaling, and microRNA downregulation. Besides its well-known homeostatic functions, we propose insulin and IGF-1 are primary signals of feeding time to cellular clocks throughout the body., (Copyright © 2019 MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: In 2015, IQ DruSafe conducted a survey of its membership to identify industry practices related to in vitro off target pharmacological profiling of small molecules., Methods: An anonymous survey of 20 questions was submitted to IQ-DruSafe representatives. Questions were designed to explore screening strategies, methods employed and experience of regulatory interactions related to in vitro secondary pharmacology profiling., Results: The pharmaceutical industry routinely utilizes panels of in vitro assays to detect undesirable off-target interactions of new chemical entities that are deployed at all stages of drug discovery and early development. The formats, approaches and size of panels vary between companies, in particular i) choice of assay technology; ii) test concentration (single vs. multiple concentrations) iii) rationale for targets and panels selection (taking into account organizational experience, primary target, therapeutic area, availability at service providers) iv) threshold level for significant interaction with a target and v) data interpretation. Data are generated during the early phases of drug discovery, principally before in vivo GLP studies (i.e., hit-to-lead, lead optimization, development candidate selection) and used to contextualize in vivo non-clinical and clinical findings. Data were included in regulatory documents, and around half of respondents experienced regulatory questions about the significance of the results., Conclusion: While it seems that in vitro secondary pharmacological profiling is generally considered valuable across the industry, particularly as a tool in early phases of drug discovery for small molecules, there is only loose consensus on testing paradigm, the required interpretation and suitable follow up strategies to fully understand potential risk., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The widespread emergence of Plasmodium falciparum (Pf) strains resistant to frontline agents has fuelled the search for fast-acting agents with novel mechanism of action. Here, we report the discovery and optimization of novel antimalarial compounds, the triaminopyrimidines (TAPs), which emerged from a phenotypic screen against the blood stages of Pf. The clinical candidate (compound 12) is efficacious in a mouse model of Pf malaria with an ED99 <30 mg kg(-1) and displays good in vivo safety margins in guinea pigs and rats. With a predicted half-life of 36 h in humans, a single dose of 260 mg might be sufficient to maintain therapeutic blood concentration for 4-5 days. Whole-genome sequencing of resistant mutants implicates the vacuolar ATP synthase as a genetic determinant of resistance to TAPs. Our studies highlight the potential of TAPs for single-dose treatment of Pf malaria in combination with other agents in clinical development.