Search

Rapid evolution is ubiquitous in nature. We briefly review some of this quite broadly, particularly in the context of response to anthropogenic disturbances. Nowhere is this more evident, replicated and accessible to study than in cancer. Curiously cancer has been late - relative to fisheries, antibiotic resistance, pest management and evolution in human dominated landscapes - in recognizing the need for evolutionarily informed management strategies. The speed of evolution matters. Here, we employ game-theoretic modeling to compare time to progression with continuous maximum tolerable dose to that of adaptive therapy where treatment is discontinued when the population of cancer cells gets below half of its initial size and re-administered when the cancer cells recover, forming cycles with and without treatment. We show that the success of adaptive therapy relative to continuous maximum tolerable dose therapy is much higher if the population of cancer cells is defined by two cell types (sensitive vs. resistant in a polymorphic population). Additionally, the relative increase in time to progression increases with the speed of evolution. These results hold with and without a cost of resistance in cancer cells. On the other hand, treatment-induced resistance can be modeled as a quantitative trait in a monomorphic population of cancer cells. In that case, when evolution is rapid, there is no advantage to adaptive therapy. Initial responses to therapy are blunted by the cancer cells evolving too quickly. Our study emphasizes how cancer provides a unique system for studying rapid evolutionary changes within tumor ecosystems in response to human interventions; and allows us to contrast and compare this system to other human managed or dominated systems in nature., Mathematical Physics

Anthropogenic changes to the environment challenge animal populations to adapt to new conditions and unique threats. While the study of adaptation has focused on genetic variation, epigenetic mechanisms may also be important. DNA methylation is sensitive to environmental stressors, such as parasites and pesticides, which may affect gene expression and phenotype. We studied the effects of an invasive ec toparasite, Philornis downsi, on DNA methylation of Galápagos mockingbirds (Mimus parvulus). We used the insecticide permethrin to manipulate P. downsi presence in nests of free-living mockingbirds and tested for effects of parasitism on nestling mockingbirds using epiGBS, a reduced-representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) approach. To distinguish the confounding effects of insecticide exposure, we con ducted a matching experiment exposing captive nestling zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to permethrin. We used zebra finches because they were the closest model organism to mockingbirds that we could breed in controlled conditions. We identi fied a limited number of differentially methylated cytosines (DMCs) in parasitized versus nonparasitized mockingbirds, but the number was not more than expected by chance. In contrast, we saw clear effects of permethrin on methylation in captive zebra finches. DMCs in zebra finches paralleled documented effects of permethrin exposure on vertebrate cellular signaling and endocrine function. Our results from captive birds indicate a role for epigenetic processes in mediating sublethal nontar get effects of pyrethroid exposure in vertebrates. Environmental conditions in the field were more variable than the laboratory, which may have made effects of both parasitism and permethrin harder to detect in mockingbirds. RRBS approaches such as epiGBS may be a cost-effective way to characterize genome-wide methylation profiles. However, our results indicate that ecological epigenetic studies in natural populations should consider the numb

Anthropogenic activities have increased exposure to heavy metal pollution in previously uncontaminated ecosystems, threatening plant communities. Considering that phenotypic variation underlies rapid adjustment to challenging environmental conditions in natural populations, the study of variation in traits related to plant response to heavy metal stress provides valuable insight into the likelihood of a population's survival. This paper investigates patterns of intraspecific phenotypic variation for heavy metal accumulation and tolerance in bryophytes, one of the most resilient and relatively understudied plant taxa. We examined two moss species with contrasting affinities for heavy metals: the heavy metal specialist Scopelophila cataractae, and the facultative metallophyte Ceratodon purpureus. We sampled four populations of S. cataractae in close microhabitats with different contamination levels of Cd and Cu, one population of C. purpureus in an urban area, and separate lab-maintained male and female isolates from one population of C. purpureus growing in axenic conditions. After clonally propagating all populations under control, Cd and Cu treatments, we measured plant fitness, oxidative damage, and Cd and Cu accumulation. Scopelophila cataractae isolates from microhabitats with higher levels of metals in the field (Sc2, Sc3) were more tolerant than those collected in less contaminated microhabitats (Sc1, Sc4). Sc2 and Sc3 accumulated significantly less Cu in the leaves compared to the stem which could limit damage to their main photosynthetic organs and contribute to the observed differences in Cu tolerance. In contrast C. purpureus showed intraspecific differences in tolerance to Cd and Cu, but not in accumulation. These differences arose among isolates that had never been exposed to heavy metals before. We also report the first evidence for sexual dimorphism for Cd tolerance in this species, with females being more tolerant than males. Altogether, our results p