Search

The promise of novel technologies to increase access to radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is crucial, given that the cost of equipping new radiotherapy centres or upgrading existing machinery remains a major obstacle to expanding access to cancer treatment. The study aims to provide a thorough analysis overview of how technological advancement may revolutionize radiotherapy (RT) to improve level of care provided to cancer patients. A comprehensive literature review following some steps of systematic review (SLR) was performed using the Web of Science (WoS), PubMed, and Scopus databases. The study findings are classified into different technologies. Artificial intelligence (AI), knowledge-based planning, remote planning, radiotherapy, and scripting are all ways to increase patient flow across radiation oncology, including initial consultation, treatment planning, delivery, verification, and patient follow-up. This review found that these technologies improve delineation of organ at risks (OARs) and considerably reduce waiting times when compared with conventional treatment planning in RT. In this review, AI, knowledge-based planning, remote radiotherapy treatment planning, and scripting reduced waiting times and improved organ at-risk delineation compared with conventional RT treatment planning. A combination of these technologies may lower cancer patients' risk of disease progression due to reduced workload, quality of therapy, and individualized treatment. Efficiency tools, such as the application of AI, knowledge-based planning, remote radiotherapy planning, and scripting, are urgently needed to reduce waiting times and improve OAR delineation accuracy in cancer treatment compared with traditional treatment planning methods. The study's contribution is to present the potential of technological advancement to optimize RT planning process, thereby improving patient care and resource utilization. The study may be extended in the future to include digital integration and technology's impact on patient safety, outcomes, and risk. Therefore, in radiotherapy, research on more efficient tools pioneers the development and implementation of high-precision radiotherapy for cancer patients., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: Bladder cancer (BCa) is one of the most common urological cancers and remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Bladder cancer is associated with a range of risk factors, with smoking being one of the most significant contributors. In addition to smoking, exposure to certain chemicals, particularly aromatic amines found in industries such as dye, rubber, leather, and textiles, also increases the risk of bladder cancer. In low-and-middle countries with lower Human Development Index (HDI), data on the underlying causes, incident rate, modes of presentation, treatment, and prognosis of bladder cancer remains unclear and often appear to be inadequate. This study aimed to assess the prevalence, mode of presentation, treatment, and risk factors associated with bladder cancer in Johannesburg, South Africa. By examining these factors, the study seeks to identify possible patterns or predisposing factors that contribute to the development and progression of bladder cancer, which could generate insights that could help to reduce the significant morbidity and mortality associated with this cancer., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed secondary data from 115 patients who were treated in the radiation oncology unit of an academic hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. By reviewing the medical records of these patients, the study aimed to gather comprehensive information on the prevalence of bladder cancer, modes of presentation, treatment approaches, and associated risk factors. Bladder cancer in this study was assessed using a comprehensive analysis of patient data on demographics, risk factors, clinicopathological aspects, and the specific therapies received. A comparison of patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the bladder was conducted as part of this study. This comparison aimed to explore differences in demographic profiles, risk factors, clinicopathological characteristics, and treatment outcomes between these two histological subtypes., Results: A total of 115 patients presenting with bladder cancer symptoms were referred to the academic hospital for evaluation and treatment. The incidence rate of bladder cancer was highest among patients with a mean age of 60.7 ± 14.9. Males constituted 60.9% of the cases, resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 1.6:1. The most common risk factors associated with bladder cancer complications included smoking, being male, black ethnicity and increasing age. Transitional cell carcinoma remained the most prevalent histological subtype at the academic hospital, compared to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) were more likely to be older (odds ratio (OR): 1.03, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.01-1.06, p = 0.029), male (OR: 2.60, 95% CI:1.10-6.04, p = 0.030). The study also found that most of the TCC cases were among black patients, though white patients were four times more likely to present with TCC compared to SCC (OR:4.22, 95% CI: 1.43-12.48, p = 0.009)., Conclusion: Bladder cancer is still widespread in LMICs, with lower HDI, with elderly males being at risk. To aggressively prevent mortality and morbidity from bladder cancer, bladder cancer health awareness must be maintained to improving prevention, as well as early detection, management and comprehensive patient care and health services for bladder cancer patients. These findings highlight the importance of targeted screening and prevention strategies for high-risk groups, particularly older males with a history of smoking., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Health and politics are deeply intertwined. In the context of national and global cancer care delivery, political forces-the political determinants of health-influence every level of the cancer care continuum. We explore the "3-I" framework, which structures the upstream political forces that affect policy choices in the context of actors' interests, ideas, and institutions, to examine how political determinants of health underlie cancer disparities. Borrowing from the work of PA Hall, M-P Pomey, CJ Ho, and other thinkers, interests are the agendas of individuals and groups in power. Ideas represent beliefs or knowledge about what is or what should be. Institutions define the rules of play. We provide examples from around the world: Political interests have helped fuel the establishment of cancer centers in India and have galvanized the 2022 Cancer Moonshot in the United States. The politics of ideas underlie global disparities in cancer clinical trials-that is, in the distribution of epistemic power. Finally, historical institutions have helped perpetuate disparities related to racist and colonialist legacies. Present institutions have also been used to improve access for those in greatest need, as exemplified by the Butaro Cancer Center of Excellence in Rwanda. In providing these global examples, we demonstrate how interests, ideas, and institutions influence access to cancer care across the breadth of the cancer continuum. We argue that these forces can be leveraged to promote cancer care equity nationally and globally., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has profoundly affected cancer care worldwide, including radiation therapy (RT) for breast cancer (BC), because of risk-based resource allocation. We report the evolution of international breast RT practices during the beginning of the pandemic, focusing on differences in treatment recommendations between countries., Materials and Methods: Between July and November 2020, a 58-question survey was distributed to radiation oncologists (ROs) through international professional societies. Changes in RT decision making during the first surge of the pandemic were evaluated across six hypothetical scenarios, including the management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), early-stage, locally advanced, and metastatic BC. The significance of changes in responses before and during the pandemic was examined using chi-square and McNemar-Bowker tests., Results: One thousand one hundred three ROs from 54 countries completed the survey. Incomplete responses (254) were excluded from the analysis. Most respondents were from the United States (285), Japan (117), Italy (63), Canada (58), and Brazil (56). Twenty-one percent (230) of respondents reported treating at least one patient with BC who was COVID-19-positive. Approximately 60% of respondents reported no change in treatment recommendation during the pandemic, except for patients with metastatic disease, for which 57.7% (636/1,103; P < .0005) changed their palliative practice. Among respondents who noted a change in their recommendation during the first surge of the pandemic, omitting, delaying, and adopting short-course RT were the most frequent changes, with most transitioning to moderate hypofractionation for DCIS and early-stage BC., Conclusion: Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, significant changes in global RT practice patterns for BC were introduced. The impact of published results from the FAST FORWARD trial supporting ultrahypofractionation likely confounded the interpretation of the pandemic's independent influence on RT delivery.

Background: Breast cancer survival in South Africa is low, but when diagnosed with breast cancer, many women in South Africa also have other chronic conditions. We investigated the impact of multimorbidity (≥ 2 other chronic conditions) on overall survival among women with breast cancer in South Africa., Methods: Between 1 July 2015 and 31 December 2019, we enrolled women newly diagnosed with breast cancer at six public hospitals participating in the South African Breast Cancer and HIV Outcomes (SABCHO) Study. We examined seven chronic conditions (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, HIV, cerebrovascular diseases (CVD), asthma/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and tuberculosis), and we compared socio-demographic, clinical, and treatment factors between patients with and without each condition, and with and without multimorbidity. We investigated the association of multimorbidity with overall survival using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Of 3,261 women included in the analysis, 45% had multimorbidity; obesity (53%), hypertension (41%), HIV (22%), and diabetes (13%) were the most common individual conditions. Women with multimorbidity had poorer overall survival at 3 years than women without multimorbidity in both the full cohort (60.8% vs. 64.3%, p = 0.036) and stage groups: stages I-II, 80.7% vs. 86.3% (p = 0.005), and stage III, 53.0% vs. 59.4% (p = 0.024). In an adjusted model, women with diabetes (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.03-1.41), CVD (HR = 1.43, 95% CI = 1.17-1.76), HIV (HR = 1.21, 95% CI = 1.06-1.38), obesity + HIV (HR = 1.24 95% CI = 1.04-1.48), and multimorbidity (HR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.13-1.40) had poorer overall survival than women without these conditions., Conclusions: Irrespective of the stage, multimorbidity at breast cancer diagnosis was an important prognostic factor for survival in our SABCHO cohort. The high prevalence of multimorbidity in our cohort calls for more comprehensive care to improve outcomes for South African women with breast cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background and Purpose: Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women and radiation therapy (RT) is crucial in its multimodality management. Since bibliometrics is a powerful tool to reveal the scientific literature, we decided to perform a bibliometric analysis of the literature on breast cancer radiotherapy. We explored emerging trends and common patterns in research, tracking collaboration and networks, and foreseeing future directions in this clinical setting., Material and Methods: The electronic Scopus database was searched using the keywords "breast cancer" and "radiotherapy" to include manuscripts published in English, between 2000 and 2021. Data analysis was performed using R-Studio 0.98.1091 software with a machine-learning bibliometric method, based on the bibliometrix R package. The most relevant authors were quantified per number and fractionalized number of authored documents. Author productivity was analysed through Lotka's law. Bradford's law was applied to identify the nucleus of journals focused on the addressed topic. Mainstream themes area included isolated topics (niche themes), new topics (emerging themes), hot topics (motor themes) and essential topics (basic themes)., Results: A total of 27 184 documents was found, mainly original articles (76 %). The annual growth rate was 6.98 %, with an increase in scientific production from 485 to 2000 documents between 2000 and 2021. Overall, 2 544 journals published ≥ 1 documents. The most relevant authors were affiliated in the United States. Surgical procedures, cancer type and treatment strategies represented basic themes, while primary systemic therapy and sentinel lymph node biopsy were emerging themes. Health-related quality of life was a niche theme, while RT techniques had high centrality., Conclusion: The primary interests of breast cancer radiation oncologists have evolved over time, adding safety, health related quality of life, sustainability of treatments and combination to systemic therapies to radiotherapy efficacy and effectiveness and treatment outcomes., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Post-operative radiation therapy (RT) reduces loco-regional recurrence rates and mortality in most patients with non-metastatic breast cancer. The aim of this critical review is to provide an overview of the applicability of moderately hypofractionated RT for breast cancer patients, focusing on factors influencing clinical decision-making. An international group of radiation oncologists agreed to assess, integrate, and interpret the existing evidence into a practical report to guide clinicians in their daily management of breast cancer patients. We conclude that moderately hypofractionated RT to the breast, chest wall (with/without breast reconstruction), and regional lymph nodes is at least as safe and effective as conventionally fractionated regimens and could be considered as the treatment option for the vast majority of the patients.For those who are still concerned about its generalised application, we recommend participating in ongoing trials comparing moderately hypofractionated RT to conventionally fractionated RT for breast cancer patients in some clinical circumstances., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)