Search

Objectives: Organ transplant is a complex process that involves various medical, legal, and social factors. The organ demand continues to outweigh the supply, leading to global challenges in the expansion of transplant programs. Ischemic time is crucial for the viability of organs, and efforts are being made to reduce transport time to improve transplant success rates. The viability and quality of the organ for transplant depends on minimized ischemic time., Materials and Methods: A new method is presently being implemented in Iran, in which, instead of transfer of organs, leading to reduced organ quality due to ischemic time, the donors themselves are transferred to transplant centers with the help of a trained team after brain death is confirmed and with the consent of the family. During the transfer process, an anesthesiologist or nurse specialized in donor care performs the relevant pretransplant procedures., Results: The successful transportation of donors to centers for organ procurement requires meticulous planning, trained personnel, and adherence to safety protocols. Quality assurance measures, including audits and safety protocols, are in place to ensure the timely and safe delivery of donated organs. Ultimately, improvements in the transportation process for organ donation can enhance transplant success., Conclusions: Successful transportation of donors to organ procurement units is crucial for reducing ischemic time and improving the success rate and quality of organ transplants. Careful planning, communication, and collaboration among health care professionals are necessary for the timely and safe delivery of donated organs.

Background: Accumulating evidence has demonstrated that RDW (red blood cell distribution width) may independently predict clinically important outcomes in many populations. However, the role of RDW has not been elucidated in brain death. We conducted this study with the aim of evaluating the predictive value of RDW in brain death., Methods: A retrospective study of seventy-seven of brain death cases during 36 months were evaluated at university hospitals, affiliated in Tehran, Iran. Demographical data include age, sex, BMI and cause of brain death, also laboratory results (red blood cell distribution, mean corpuscular volume, hemoglobin) collected by checklists from patient records. Having the three RDW measurements (days of hospital admission, day of brain death, and day of cardiac arrest) required., Results: Time interval from hospital admission until brain death was 5.27±4.07. The mean age of brain death cases was 32.65±16.53. The mean RDW values on days of hospital admission, the day of brain death, and the day of cardiac arrest were 14.53±1.98, 15.12±1.93 and 15.18±2.07, respectively. Results of the repeated-measures ANOVA test reveal that RDW level was constantly higher in the traumatic patient group compared to the non-traumatic ones (P=0.008)., Conclusion: The frequency of brain death was high in patients with high RDW values. RDW might be a prognostic biomarker for brain death. More prospective studies with large sample size and long follow-up period should be carried out to determine the prognostic significance of RDW and brain death in future., Competing Interests: None declared.

Red blood cell distribution width (RDW) has been reported as a meaningful prognostic factor in various diseases. Our study compared patients' RDW levels and prognosis at admission and discharge time. A total of 128 patients 77 patients who suffered brain death (subject group), and 51 patients who were discharged from the hospital (control group) with GCS ≤ 6 were recruited from 60 hospitals for this study. Demographical data and RDW measurements in these patients at admission time and brain death/discharge time were extracted into two groups. 46 (35.9%) patients were females and 82 patients (64.1%) were males with a median age of 36 years old. A significant difference in baseline characteristics of GCS (P < 0.001), RDW at admission time (P < 0.001), and RDW at discharge or brain death time (P < 0.001) were noted between the two groups. In the overall population, RDW at admission time had a median value of 13.75% and was positively correlated with gender (P < 0.04, rs = 0.582) and age (P < 0.023, rs = - 0.201). Initially, there were no significant differences in RDW upon admission. However, upon discharge, although the RDW in the control group was not significant (P < 0. 1), the RDW level at the time of brain death was notably 0.45 fold higher (P = 0.001) compared to the time of admission. The standardized residuals at the two-time points showed an approximately normal distribution. The most effective RDW cut-off in Brain death was determined as 14.55. Based on the findings, using RDW as a prognostic factor has a sensitivity of 0.468 and a specificity of 0.137 in diagnosing brain death. RDW biomarker is a simple and inexpensive laboratory test that may be seen as a valuable perspective for initial patient evaluation. RDW is a powerful marker for the prognosis of brain death in patients with a GCS ≤ 6 at admission time, in order to identify a subset of patients who may require more aggressive management in the trauma center., (© 2023. Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Significant hemodynamic, hormonal, and metabolic impairment of a brain-dead organ donor is often associated with the deterioration of graft viability. This study aimed to compare the effect of heparin therapy as a therapeutic dose after brain death confirmation on early graft survival in kidney and liver recipients., Method and Materials: The deceased donors were sorted into two groups based on their D-dimer level. After confirming brain death, one group was given a heparin injection (case group), while the other group did not receive any heparin (control group). A total of 71 brain death donors and matched kidney and liver transplants were included in the case group. A total of 43 brain death donors and matched kidney and liver transplants were included in the control group. A total of 5000 units of heparin were administered every 6 hours to the deceased donor case group., Results: The mean age of the case and control groups were 36.27 ± 16.13 and 36.15 ± 18.45, respectively. An independent t test showed that there were no differences between the number of procured organs in both groups ( p = 0.29). There was no significant difference between the graft survival rate and the doses of heparin injection to the liver recipients ( p = 0.06). However, a significant difference was revealed between the graft survival rate and the dose of heparin injection ( p = 0.004) in kidney recipients., Conclusions: The data suggest that administering low therapeutic doses of heparin to donors before organ donation may potentially prevent thrombosis and provide a protective benefit. We showed that heparin therapy had no significant effect on the number of donated organs and graft survival., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2023 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Background: There is a large gap between the number of patients on organ waiting lists and the number of available organs for donation. This study investigated the socioeconomic factors in Iran that influenced decisions for organ donation among the families of brain-dead donors., Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was performed among the families of 333 organ donors in Iran. Two trained researchers interviewed family members about the donor's age, sex, cause of brain death, education level, marital status, number of children, history of addiction, the financial status of the donor's family, and reasons for which they considered refusing organ donation., Results: The mean age of the donors was 37.23±16.59 years. During 2017-2019, significant differences were found according to income (P<0.001), marital status (P<0.001), sex (P=0.04), and occupation (P=0.04). More than half of the organ donors were of low socioeconomic status, and nearly half were the sole income earners of large families. Trauma was the most common cause of death (44.6%). The most common reasons for which the families considered refusing organ donation were unfamiliarity with the concept of brain death, denial, and the expectation of a miracle., Conclusions: The donor's socioeconomic status and availability of social services, such as insurance coverage, psychological services, and mourning therapy courses, play an important role in organ donation. Adequate support for the deceased's family after organ donation is imperative., (Copyright © 2022 The Korean Society for Transplantation.)