Search

The in vivo composition of the mycelial extracellular matrix (ECM) of Aspergillus fumigatus during host invasion is reported here for the first time. A new galactosaminogalactan and the galactomannan were the major polysaccharides of the in vivo ECM. The composition of the ECM in vivo varied with the aspergillosis pathologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Discusses the conidial hydrophobins of aspergillus fumigatus. Role of RodBp, a 14-kDa protein encoded by RODB gene, in the structure of the conidial cell wall; Sensitivity of rodletless mutant to killing by alveolar macrophages; Involvement of the rodlet structure in the resistance of the host cells.

Background: In allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA), prolonged nebulised antifungal treatment may be a strategy for maintaining remission., Methods: We performed a randomised, single-blind, clinical trial in 30 centres. Patients with controlled ABPA after 4-month attack treatment (corticosteroids and itraconazole) were randomly assigned to nebulised liposomal amphotericin-B or placebo for 6 months. The primary outcome was occurrence of a first severe clinical exacerbation within 24 months following randomisation. Secondary outcomes included the median time to first severe clinical exacerbation, number of severe clinical exacerbations per patient, ABPA-related biological parameters., Results: Among 174 enrolled patients with ABPA from March 2015 through July 2017, 139 were controlled after 4-month attack treatment and were randomised. The primary outcome occurred in 33 (50.8%) out of 65 patients in the nebulised liposomal amphotericin-B group and 38 (51.3%) out of 74 in the placebo group (absolute difference -0.6%, 95% CI -16.8- +15.6%; OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.50-1.90; p=0.95). The median (interquartile range) time to first severe clinical exacerbation was longer in the liposomal amphotericin-B group: 337 days (168-476 days) versus 177 days (64-288 days). At the end of maintenance therapy, total immunoglobulin-E and Aspergillus precipitins were significantly decreased in the nebulised liposomal amphotericin-B group., Conclusions: In ABPA, maintenance therapy using nebulised liposomal amphotericin-B did not reduce the risk of severe clinical exacerbation. The presence of some positive secondary outcomes creates clinical equipoise for further research., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: C. Godet reports having received speaker fees, travel support from Pfizer, MSD; fees for board memberships from SOS Oxygène and Pulmatrix; grant support from Ohre Pharma, Pfizer, MSD, SOS Oxygène, ISIS Medical and AstraZeneca. Conflict of interest: F. Couturaud reports having received research grant support from Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer and fees for board memberships or symposia from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme and AstraZeneca, and having received travel support from Bayer, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Pfizer, Leo Pharma, Merck Sharp & Dohme and Actelion. Conflict of interest: S. Marchand-Adam reports having received consultancy for board membership, consultancy or speaker fees and travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis and Roche. Conflict of interest: C. Pison reports having received, outside of the submitted work, consultancy for board membership, consultancy or speaker fees, travel support from AGIR à Dom, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, SOS Oxygène, AstraZeneca and Novartis. Conflict of interest: F. Gagnadoux reports having received grants and personal fees from Resmed; personal fees and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim, Nyxoah, Sefam; personal fees from Actelion, Cidelec, Novartis, and non-financial support from Asten, unrelated to the submitted work. Conflict of interest: E. Blanchard reports having received consultancy or speaker fees, travel support from Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Gilead, Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, SOS Oxygene and ISIS Medical. Conflict of interest: C. Taillé reports having received consulting or advisory fees from Sanofi, GSK, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Chiesi, and research grants from Sanofi and GSK, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: B. Philippe reports having received speaker fees, travel support from Chiesi, Novartis and Oxyvie. Conflict of interest: S. Hirschi reports having received research grant support from CSL Behring and Adiral, and fees for board membership from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche. Conflict of interest: C. Andréjak reports having received fees for board memberships or symposia and travel support from GSK, AstraZeneca, Zambon and Insmed. Conflict of interest: A. Bourdin reports having received grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cephalon/TEVA, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron; has provided consultancy for Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, MedinCell, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Sanofi-Regeneron; and has acted as an investigator or co-investigator for trials sponsored by Actelion, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Regeneron and Vertex. Conflict of interest: C. Chenivesse reports having received grants from AstraZeneca and Santelys outside the submitted work, personal fees from ALK-Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKlein, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron and TEVA outside the submitted work and congress support from ALK-Abello, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, Pfizer, Roche and TEVA. Conflict of interest: S. Dominique reports having received consultancy for board membership, speaker fees, travel support from Roche, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, Novartis and Actelion, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Bassinet has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Murris-Espin reports having received consultancy for board membership or speaker fees, or travel support, from Insmed, MSD, Pfizer, Asten, LVL, Vertex, Vivisol and Zambon. Conflict of interest: F. Rivière reports having received consultancy fees from Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim. Conflict of interest: G. Garcia reports having received grants from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Sanofi-Regeneron and Chiesi; has provided consultancy for AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis and Sanofi-Regeneron; and has acted as an investigator or co-investigator for trials sponsored by AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline and Sanofi-Regeneron. Conflict of interest: D. Caillaud reports having received consultancy or speaker fees, travel support from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GSK, Menarini and Novartis. Conflict of interest: F-X. Blanc has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Goupil reports having received travel support from Aliseo/Asten Santé, GSK, Chiesi, Novartis and Actelion. Conflict of interest: A. Bergeron reports having received consultancy or speaker fees, from Pfizer, Gilead, MSD, AstraZeneca and Takeda, and grants from SOS Oxygene. Conflict of interest: A. Gondouin reports having received consultancy or speaker fees, or travel support from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, Vitalaire, Actelion, LFB, GSK and Pfizer. Conflict of interest: J-P. Frat reports having received grants from the French Ministry of Health, outside the submitted work; grants, personal fees and non-financial support from Fisher & Paykel HealthCare, outside the submitted work; personal fees and non-financial support from SOS Oxygène, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: T. Flament has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: B. Camara reports having received outside of the submitted work, consultancy for speaker fees, travel supports from AGIR à Dom. Conflict of interest: P. Priou received travel support from Asten Santé. Conflict of interest: A-L. Brun has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Laurent reports having received consultancy for board membership, consultancy or speaker fees, travel support from Bayer, Roche, Chiesi, Boehringer Ingelheim, SOS Oxygène, AstraZeneca, Basilea, Novartis and Actelion. Conflict of interest: S. Ragot has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J. Cadranel reports having received speaker fees from MSD and Pfizer., (Copyright ©The authors 2022. For reproduction rights and permissions contact permissions@ersnet.org.)

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is the most frequent chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia in adults. The management of rare diseases in France has been organised by a national plan for rare diseases, which endorsed a network of expert centres for rare diseases throughout France. This article is an overview of the executive summary of the French guidelines for the management of IPF, an initiative that emanated from the French National Reference Centre and the Network of Regional Competence Centres for Rare Lung Diseases. This review aims at providing pulmonologists with a document that: 1) combines the current available evidence; 2) reviews practical modalities of diagnosis and management of IPF; and 3) is adapted to everyday medical practice. The French practical guidelines result from the combined efforts of a coordination committee, a writing committee and a multidisciplinary review panel, following recommendations from the Haute Autorité de Santé. All recommendations included in this article received at least 90% agreement by the reviewing panel. Herein, we summarise the main conclusions and practical recommendations of the French guidelines., (©ERS 2014.)