Search

Background Tumor molecular profile analysis by Next Generation Sequencing technology is currently widely applied in clinical practice and has enabled the detection of predictive biomarkers of response to targeted treatment. In parallel with targeted therapies, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy, with Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Microsatellite instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) analysis being the biomarkers employed most commonly. Methods In the present study, tumor molecular profile analysis was performed using a 161 gene NGS panel, containing the majority of clinically significant genes for cancer treatment selection. A variety of tumor types have been analyzed, including aggressive and hard to treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer. Besides, the clinical utility of immunotherapy biomarkers (TMB, MSI, PD-L1), was also studied. Results Molecular profile analysis was conducted in 610 cancer patients, while in 393 of them a at least one biomarker for immunotherapy response was requested. An actionable alteration was detected in 77.87% of the patients. 54.75% of them received information related to on-label or off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1, 1A.2, 2B, and 2C.1) and 21.31% received a variant that could be used for clinical trial inclusion. The addition to immunotherapy biomarker to targeted biomarkers’ analysis in 191 cases increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 22.92%, while an option for on-label or off-label treatment was provided in 71.35% of the cases. Conclusions Tumor molecular profile analysis using NGS is a first-tier method for a variety of tumor types and provides important information for decision making in the treatment of cancer patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to better tumor characterization and offer actionable information in the majority of patients. Furthermore, our data suggest that one in two patients may be eligible for on-label ICI treatment based on biomarker analysis. However, appropriate interpretation of results from such analysis is essential for implementation in clinical practice and accurate refinement of treatment strategy.

Background: Tumor molecular profile is of great importance for the detection of biomarkers of response to targeted treatment due to the increased availability, with concomitant reduction of cost, of Next Generation Sequencing technology (NGS). In parallel to targeted therapies’, immunotherapies are also evolving, revolutionizing cancer therapy, with Programmed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), Microsatellite Instability (MSI), and Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB) analysis being the biomarkers employed most commonly.Methods: In the present study, a 161 gene NGS panel, containing the majority of clinically significant genes for cancer treatment selection, was used for tumor molecular profile analysis. A variety of tumor types have been analyzed, including aggressive and hard to treat cancers such as pancreatic cancer. Besides, the clinical utility of immunotherapy biomarkers (TMB, MSI, PD-L1), was also studied.Results: Molecular profile analysis was conducted in 610 cancer patients, while in 393 of them a at least one biomarker for immunotherapy response was requested. At least one actionable alteration was detected in 77.70% of the patients. 54.59% of them received information related to on-label or off-label treatment (Tiers 1A.1, 1A.2, 2B, and 2C.1) and 21.31% received a variant that could be used for clinical trial inclusion. The addition to immunotherapy biomarker to targeted biomarkers’ analysis in 191 cases increased the number of patients with an on-label treatment recommendation by 22.40%, while an option for on-label or off-label treatment was provided in 71.35% of the cases. Conclusions: Tumor molecular profile analysis by NGS is a first-tier methodology for a variety of tumor types, which provides critical information for treatment decision making in cancer patients. Importantly, simultaneous analysis for targeted therapy and immunotherapy biomarkers could lead to a better tumor characterization and provide actionable information in the majority of patients. Moreover, our results indicate that one in two patients is eligible for ICI treatment based on the biomarkers’ analysis. However, when these analyses are performed, the challenge is their implementation in clinical practice. Multidisciplinary patient management is critical to the refinement of the strategy incorporating such information.

Objective: To investigate the resource use and costs associated with the management of metastatic anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALK+) NSCLC in Greece. Methods: The resource use was based on the outcomes of a Delphi panel with seven oncologists and unit costs derived from officially published sources. Results: The average per patient cost in the current treatment pathway (chemotherapy, crizotinib, chemotherapy, palliative care) was estimated at €67,391. The average per patient cost in future scenario 1 (crizotinib, ceritinib, chemotherapy, palliative care) was estimated at €104,571 (treatment duration 26 months) while in future scenario 2 (chemotherapy, ceritinib, chemotherapy, palliative care) was estimated at €134,215 (treatment duration 29.3 months). Conclusion: Ceritinib as second line treatment leads to an increase in total costs reflecting the longer survival

Purpose. The purpose is to evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and the toxicity of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) in patients with advanced hepatocelluar carcinoma (HCC) and inferior vena cava tumor thrombosis (IVCTT).Methods. Between 2007 and 2012, in a retrospective way, 9 patients (median age 69 years) with advanced HCC and IVCTT unfit for surgery, radiofrequency ablation, embolization, or chemotherapy were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT). The radiotherapy volume included both primary tumor and IVTT. The radiotherapy schedule was 50–52 Gy in 2 Gy fractions. Overall survival (OS), response to radiotherapy, visual analogue scale (VAS), and toxicity were assessed.Results. All patients demonstrated a response rate up to 60%. During radiotherapy, 3 patients experienced grade 1 nausea/vomit toxicity. All patients demonstrated an elevation of the liver enzymes (3 patients with grade 1 and 6 patients with grade 2). The mean VAS-score was decreased from 6.11 to 3.11, while the median overall survival was 24 months.Conclusion. 3DCRT achieves a very high local control rate and is suitable for patients with HCC and IVTT, while the documented radiation induced toxicity is moderate. It can be recommended for palliation in patients unable to undergo curative therapies.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a highly lethal disease worldwide and research for more effective treatment strategies is ongoing. Identification of molecular prognostic and predictive markers remains under investigation with results that are often conflicting.Seventy-three patients (n= 73) with stage IB-IIIA completely resected NSCLC who were postoperatively treated with 6 cycles of paclitaxel and carboplatin from July 1998 to September 2002 took part in this study. Most stage IIIA patients subsequently received adjuvant radiotherapy. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), vascular endorhelial growth factor (VEGF), dihydrodiol dehydrogenase (DDH), receptor-binding cancer antigen expressed on SiSo cells (RCAS-1) and epidermic growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1) expression were assessed immunohistochemically; Heregulin family (HER1-4), VEGF and p53 were analysed by RT-PCR.Totally, 61 (84%) men and 12 (16%) women with median age of 63 years and median PS of 0 were included in the study. There were 18 stage IB, 29 stage II and 26 stage IIIA patients. Sixty-seven samples were available for immunohistohemistry. COX-2 expression was detected in 24 patients (36%), VEGF in 14 (21%), RCAS1 in 31 (46%), DDH in 15 (22%). For EGFR, only 58 samples were evaluated, 13 of which were positive (22%). Messenger RNA expression data was only available for 60 patients; VEGF was detected in 32 (53%), p53 in 30 (50%), EGFR in 35 (58%), HER2 in 4 (7%) and HER3 in 19 (32%). HER4 was not detected in any sample. In the Cox analysis for overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), none of the factors evaluated by IHC or RT-PCR reached statistical significance.Even though the biomarkers tested are expressed in a significant proportion of lung tumors, none of them was found to be of prognostic significance in patients with NSCLC.