Search

Background and Purpose: The proximity of the paraclinoid segment of the internal carotid artery to the visual pathways may result in visual deficits when patients present with aneurysms in this segment. Although surgical clip ligation of these aneurysms has been the standard of care for decades, the advent of coil embolization has permitted endovascular therapy in those aneurysms with favorable dome-to-neck ratios. Although immediate nonprogressive visual loss after coil embolization of paraclinoid aneurysms has been well described, isolated progressive visual loss immediately or shortly following coil embolization, to our knowledge, has not. We have identified 8 patients who experienced progressive loss of vision, unassociated with any other neurologic deficits, developing immediately or shortly after apparently uncomplicated coil embolization of a paraclinoid aneurysm., Materials and Methods: This study is a retrospective case series of 8 patients seen at 4 separate academic institutions. Inpatient and outpatient records were examined to determine patient demographics, previous ocular and medical history, and ophthalmic status before endovascular embolization. In addition, details of the primary endovascular therapy and subsequent surgical and nonsurgical interventions were recorded. Follow-up data, including most recent best-corrected visual acuity, postoperative course, and duration of follow-up were documented., Results: Eight patients developed progressive visual loss in 1 or both eyes immediately or shortly after apparently uncomplicated coiling of a paraclinoid aneurysm. MR imaging findings suggested that the visual loss was most likely caused by perianeurysmal inflammation related to the coils used to embolize the aneurysm, enlargement or persistence of the aneurysm despite coiling, or a combination of these mechanisms. Most patients experienced improvement in vision, 2 apparently related to treatment with systemic corticosteroids., Conclusion: Patients in whom endovascular treatment of a paraclinoid aneurysm is contemplated should be warned about the potential for both isolated nonprogressive and progressive visual loss in 1 or both eyes. Patients in whom progressive visual loss occurs may benefit from treatment with systemic corticosteroids.

The response of neuronal growth cones to axon guidance cues depends on the developmental context in which these cues are encountered. We show here that the transmembrane protein semaphorin 5A (Sema5A) is a bifunctional guidance cue exerting both attractive and inhibitory effects on developing axons of the fasciculus retroflexus, a diencephalon fiber tract associated with limbic function. The thrombospondin repeats of Sema5A physically interact with the glycosaminoglycan portion of both chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans (CSPGs) and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs). CSPGs function as precisely localized extrinsic cues that convert Sema5A from an attractive to an inhibitory guidance cue. Therefore, glycosaminoglycan bound guidance cues provide a molecular mechanism for CSPG-mediated inhibition of axonal extension. Further, axonal HSPGs are required for Sema5A-mediated attraction, suggesting that HSPGs are components of functional Sema5A receptors. Thus, neuronal responses to Sema5A are proteoglycan dependent and interpreted according to the biological context in which this membrane bound guidance cue is presented.

In the mammalian CNS, glial cells repel axons during development and inhibit axon regeneration after injury. It is unknown whether the same repulsive axon guidance molecules expressed by glia and their precursors during development also play a role in inhibiting regeneration in the injured CNS. Here we investigate whether optic nerve glial cells express semaphorin family members and, if so, whether these semaphorins inhibit axon growth by retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). We show that each optic nerve glial cell type, astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, and their precursor cells, expressed a distinct complement of semaphorins. One of these, sema5A, was expressed only by purified oligodendrocytes and their precursors, but not by astrocytes, and was present in both normal and axotomized optic nerve but not in peripheral nerves. Sema5A induced collapse of RGC growth cones and inhibited RGC axon growth when presented as a substrate in vitro. To determine whether sema5A might contribute to inhibition of axon growth after injury, we studied the ability of RGCs to extend axons when cultured on postnatal day (P) 4, P8, and adult optic nerve explants and found that axon growth was strongly inhibited. Blocking sema5A using a neutralizing antibody significantly increased RGC axon growth on these optic nerve explants. These data support the hypothesis that sema5A expression by oligodendrocyte lineage cells contributes to the glial cues that inhibit CNS regeneration.

During development, EphB proteins serve as axon guidance molecules for retinal ganglion cell axon pathfinding toward the optic nerve head and in midbrain targets. To better understand the mechanisms by which EphB proteins influence retinal growth cone behavior, we investigated how axon responses to EphB were modulated by laminin and L1, two guidance molecules that retinal axons encounter during in vivo pathfinding. Unlike EphB stimulation in the presence of laminin, which triggers typical growth cone collapse, growth cones co-stimulated by L1 did not respond to EphB. Moreover, EphB exposure in the presence of both laminin and L1 resulted in a novel growth cone inhibition manifested as a pause in axon elongation with maintenance of normal growth cone morphology and filopodial activity. Pauses were not associated with loss of growth cone actin but were accompanied by a redistribution of the microtubule cytoskeleton with increased numbers of microtubules extending into filopodia and to the peripheral edge of the growth cone. This phenomenon was accompanied by reduced levels of the growth cone microtubule destabilizing protein SCG10. Antibody blockade of SCG10 function in growth cones resulted in both changes in microtubule distribution and pause responses mirroring those elicited by EphB in the presence of laminin and L1. These results demonstrate that retinal growth cone responsiveness to EphB is regulated by co-impinging signals from other axon guidance molecules. Furthermore, the results are consistent with EphB-mediated axon guidance mechanisms that involve the SCG10-mediated regulation of the growth cone microtubule cytoskeleton.

In the past several years, a great deal has been learnt about the molecular basis through which specific neural pathways in the visual system are established during embryonic development. This review provides a framework for understanding the principles of retinal ganglion cell axon guidance, and introduces some of the families of axon guidance molecules involved. In addition, the potential relevance of retinal axon guidance to human visual developmental disorders, and to retinal axon regeneration, is discussed.

Retinal axon pathfinding from the retina into the optic nerve involves the growth promoting axon guidance molecules L1, laminin and netrin 1, each of which governs axon behavior at specific regions along the retinal pathway. In identifying additional molecules regulating this process during embryonic mouse development, we found that transmembrane Semaphorin5A mRNA and protein was specifically expressed in neuroepithelial cells surrounding retinal axons at the optic disc and along the optic nerve. Given that growth cone responses to a specific guidance molecule can be altered by co-exposure to a second guidance cue, we examined whether retinal axon responses to Sema5A were modulated by other guidance signals axons encountered along the retinal pathway. In growth cone collapse, substratum choice and neurite outgrowth assays, Sema5A triggered an invariant inhibitory response in the context of L1, laminin, or netrin 1 signaling, suggesting that Sema5A inhibited retinal axons throughout their course at the optic disc and nerve. Antibody-perturbation studies in living embryo preparations showed that blocking of Sema5A function led to retinal axons straying out of the optic nerve bundle, indicating that Sema5A normally helped ensheath the retinal pathway. Thus, development of some CNS nerves requires inhibitory sheaths to maintain integrity. Furthermore, this function is accomplished using molecules such as Sema5A that exhibit conserved inhibitory responses in the presence of co-impinging signals from multiple families of guidance molecules.

Axon pathfinding relies on cellular signaling mediated by growth cone receptor proteins responding to ligands, or guidance cues, in the environment. Eph proteins are a family of receptor tyrosine kinases that govern axon pathway development, including retinal axon projections to CNS targets. Recent examination of EphB mutant mice, however, has shown that axon pathfinding within the retina to the optic disc is dependent on EphB receptors, but independent of their kinase activity. Here we show a function for EphB1, B2 and B3 receptor extracellular domains (ECDs) in inhibiting mouse retinal axons when presented either as substratum-bound proteins or as soluble proteins directly applied to growth cones via micropipettes. In substratum choice assays, retinal axons tended to avoid EphB-ECDs, while time-lapse microscopy showed that exposure to soluble EphB-ECD led to growth cone collapse or other inhibitory responses. These results demonstrate that, in addition to the conventional role of Eph proteins signaling as receptors, EphB receptor ECDs can also function in the opposite role as guidance cues to alter axon behavior. Furthermore, the data support a model in which dorsal retinal ganglion cell axons heading to the optic disc encounter a gradient of inhibitory EphB proteins which helps maintain tight axon fasciculation and prevents aberrant axon growth into ventral retina. In conclusion, development of neuronal connectivity may involve the combined activity of Eph proteins serving as guidance receptors and as axon guidance cues.