Search

BACKGROUND Chronic urticaria (CU) is a skin condition causing itchy hives that can significantly impact quality of life. While medications like omalizumab can help, some patients may seek additional relief. This study aimed to investigate the potential benefits of acupuncture, a traditional Chinese medicine practice, as an adjunctive therapy alongside omalizumab for CU patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS We enrolled 31 CU patients who received acupuncture in addition to omalizumab (study group) and 30 CU patients who received omalizumab only (controls). Mean scores of each CU-Quality of life (QoL) and urticaria control test (UCT) scores after acupuncture were compared with the pre-acupuncture scores and with the scores of the controls. RESULTS There was no significant difference in mean food limitation, symptom embarrassment, cosmetics, and sports scores before and after acupuncture (P>0.005). Other CU-QoL scores were significantly lower after acupuncture compared to pre-acupuncture scores (P<0.005). Mean total CU-QoL score was significantly lower (P<0.001) and mean UCT score was significantly higher (P=0.001) after acupuncture compared to pre-acupuncture scores. There was no significant difference in free time, falling asleep, waking up at night, tiredness, concentration, symptom embarrassment, public embarrassment, cosmetics, clothing limitation, and sports scores between the acupuncture and control groups (P>0.005). Other CU-QoL scores were significantly lower in the acupuncture group compared to the controls (P<0.005). Mean total CU-QoL score was significantly lower (P=0.006) and mean UCT score was significantly higher (P<0.001) in acupuncture group compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS Acupuncture is an effective adjunctive therapy for CU patients already receiving omalizumab, and can improve quality of life and disease control in these patients.

Introduction: Biomarkers that could reliably anticipate the effectiveness of antihistamines and omalizumab in treating chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) have not been conclusively identified. Our objective was to examine how eosinophilic cationic protein (ECP), tryptase, D-dimer, and total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) impact the response to antihistamine and omalizumab treatments in individuals with CSU., Methods: In this cross-sectional retrospective study, CSU patients that had undergone treatment with either antihistamines or omalizumab for a minimum of 12 weeks between 2015 and 2021 at an Allergy and Immunology Department were analyzed. Several demographic and laboratory parameters including eosinophil counts, mean platelet volüme (MPV), sedimentation, C-reactive protein (CRP), antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and Anti-thyroperoxidase (Anti-TPO) and total IgE, tryptase, ECP and D-dimer were retrived from patient files. The association of these biomarkers with Urticaria Control Test (UCT) and the effect of these biomarkers on treatment response were evaluated. Treatment response was assessed using the UCT, with a score of UCT ≥ 12 indicating a responder and UCT < 12 indicating a non responder., Results: The patients in the omalizumab group were older, had a longer disease duration and had worse urticaria control (lower baseline UCT scores). 421 patients were treated with antihistamines and 88 patients were treated with omalizumab. ECP was found to be inversely correlated with baseline UCT ( p  < 0.001 r=-0.268). ECP and D-dimer levels of non-responder patients in the antihistamine group were significantly higher than in responder patients (ECP: 49 ng/mL vs 28.1 ng/mL, p  < 0.001) (D-dimer: 0.60 mg/L vs 0.30 mg/L, p  < 0.001), while there were no significant difference in terms of tryptase and total IgE. These four biomarkers were similar, in omalizumab responders and non responders., Conclusion: In this study with CSU, we looked at predictors of responses to treatments. ECP can serve as a marker of poor urticaria control and may predict antihistamine refractoriness along with D-dimer.

Background: Patients with severe asthma frequently have comorbid chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with or without nasal polyps, that can increase the symptom burden and complicate treatment. Real-life clinical data on the impact of biologic treatments on CRS-specific quality-of-life questionnaires are still lacking., Materials and Methods: In this retrospective real-life study, we collected data from patients with severe asthma with comorbid CRS with/without nasal polyposis at baseline, and after 3, 6 and 12 months of treatment with omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab or dupilumab. In particular, we evaluated improvements in HRQoL as measured by SinoNasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22, 0 - 110), Visual Analog Scale symptom scores (VAS, 0-10), and Asthma Control Test (ACT, 5-25) and the proportion of patients meeting the minimal clinically important difference (MCID)., Results: Disease-specific HRQoL, as measured by SNOT 22 and VAS score improved in all patients at 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment compared with baseline (SNOT-22: 14, IQR: 0-52 vs 10, IQR:0-30 vs 0, IQR:0-15 vs 0, IQR:0-12, p  < 0.001, VAS score: 1, IQR: 0-5 vs 0, IQR:0-3 vs 0, IQR:0-2 vs 0, IQR 0-1, p  < 0.001). After 3 months of treatment >80% of patients reached the MCID for ACT, while only patients on dupilumab showed to reach a MCID in 100% of cases. The effect size depended upon the symptom burden at baseline., Conclusions: The study confirms the efficacy of omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, and dupilumab in a real-life setting, with a rapid improvement in CRS-specific HRQoL and general health status. These data highlight the importance of targeting type 2 inflammation in asthmatic patients with co-existing upper and lower airways disease.The Authors disclose that preliminary data and analysis of the present study have been presented in abstract form during the "X International Workshop on Lung Health - Respiratory Disease and Immune Response", held in Nice on 19-21 January 2023.

Background: Some patients with severe asthma may benefit from treatment with biologics, but evidence has been mostly collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs), in which patients' characteristics are different from those encountered in asthma patients in the real-world setting. The aim of this study was to describe the clinical features of complete responders versus non-complete responders to long-term treatment with biologics in patients with severe asthma attended in routine daily practice., Methods: Data of a cohort of 90 patients with severe asthma who were treated with biologics (omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab) for at least 12 months and were followed up to March 2022. Data recorded included clinical characteristics and effectiveness of treatment (exacerbation, Asthma Control Test [ACT] score, lung function, use of maintenance oral corticosteroids [mOCS]), FeNO, and blood eosinophils at baseline, at 12 months, and at the end of follow-up. Complete response is considered if, in addition to not presenting exacerbations or the use of mOCS, the ACT score was >20 and, the FEV 1 >80% predicted., Results: An improvement in all asthma control parameters was observed after 12 months of treatment and a mean follow-up of 55 months. After 12 months of treatment 27.2% of patients met the criteria of complete response and this percentage even increased to 35.3% at the end of follow-up. Long-term complete response was associated to better lung function with mepolizumab and omalizumab treatment and to less previous exacerbations in the benralizumab group. The main cause of not achieving a complete response was the persistence of an airflow obstructive pattern., Conclusions: This study shows that omalizumab, benralizumab, and mepolizumab improved the clinical outcomes of patients with severe asthma in a clinic environment with similar effect sizes to RCTs in the long term follow-up. Airflow obstruction, however, was a predictor of a non-complete response to biologics.

Background: There is a lack of real-life safety data on treatment options for chronic urticaria in the presence of comedication and comorbidities., Methods: We present a single-center UCARE pilot study of 212 outpatients with chronic urticaria. Patients were divided into three groups according to different CU therapies according to international guidelines., Results: Of 212 patients, 108 (mean age 48.9 years, 71.3% female) had 59 comorbidities, including cardiovascular, autoimmune and malignant diseases. Patients were followed for a mean of 24.6 months (SD ± 21.3). Urticaria therapies were divided into three groups: A: 105 (97.2%) with omalizumab and 2nd generation antihistamines), B: 16 patients (14.8%): dual therapy with antihistamines and cyclosporine in 10 (9.3%), montelukast in five (4. 6%), dapsone in four (3.7%), hydroxychloroquine in one patient (0.9%), C: 12 (11.1%) patients received a third drug for 4.9 months (SD ± 3.2) and one quadruple therapy (2.1 months). 10 out of 12 (83.3%) patients received montelukast, two (16.7%) cyclosporine, two (16.7%) dapsone and one (8.3%) hydroxychloroquine as a third drug for chronic urticaria., Conclusions: Combining treatment modalities for chronic urticaria and comorbidities are available and feasible with a good safety profile.

Purpose: The presence of wheals or hives has been viewed as a hallmark symptom of urticaria, a highly debilitating disease. This study explores our experience with omalizumab in patients with apparent mast-cell mediated pruritus in the absence of hives., Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective case series examining all patients with mast cell-mediated pruritus in the absence of hives from April 2022 to May 2024 at a tertiary referral clinic at Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York. Peak pruritus-numerical rating scale (PP-NRS) itch score changes over time were recorded and analyzed., Results: Six patients (67% women; mean [SD] age, 47.67 [13.52] years) were included in the analysis. The median [IQR] pruritus PP-NRS itch score before omalizumab injection was 9 [6 - 10] and the final median [IQR] PP-NRS itch score was 2.5 [0 - 5]. The mean [SD] reduction in the PP-NRS itch score was 6 [3.16]., Conclusions: This study suggests that patients with evidence of mast cell-mediated pruritus can be identified based on clinical features and may benefit from omalizumab therapy.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is associated with skin mast cell activation, and its triggering mechanisms are not completely elucidated. Evidence suggests an autoimmune component of CSU. Our aim was to assess the usefulness of an autoimmune mast cell activation test (aiMAT) for diagnosing and differentiating CSU into different subtypes. We enrolled 43 patients with active, uncontrolled CSU before starting treatment with omalizumab and 15 controls. Patients were evaluated based on omalizumab response. aiMATs were performed using non-IgE-sensitized (NS) or myeloma IgE-sensitized (S) LAD2 cells, which were then stimulated with CSU/control sera (25 µL and 10 µL). The expression of CD63 was assessed with flow cytometry. CD63 response on NS-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera ( p = 0.0007) and with 10 µL CSU/control sera ( p = 0.0001). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.82. The cutoff for autoimmune-non-IgE-sensitized-MAT was 40.3% CD63+ LAD2, which resulted in 73.3% sensitivity and 81.4% specificity. CD63 response on S-LAD2 was significantly increased in CSU patients compared to controls after the stimulation with 25 µL CSU/control sera ( p = 0.03). The ROC curve analysis demonstrated an AUC of 0.66. The cutoff for the autoimmune-myeloma IgE-sensitized-MAT was 58.4% CD63+ cells, which resulted in 62.8% sensitivity and 66.7% specificity. Overall, 36 out of 43 (84%) patients responded to omalizumab, and 7 (16%) were nonresponders. We found no differences between LAD2 CD63 response and response to omalizumab. In conclusion, aiMAT could represent a new diagnostic tool in CSU. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the potential benefits during omalizumab therapy.

Introduction: A minority of school-aged children with asthma have persistent poor control and experience frequent asthma attacks despite maximal prescribed maintenance therapy. These children have higher morbidity and risk of death. The first add-on biologic therapy, omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that blocks immunoglobulin (Ig)E, was licensed for children with severe asthma in 2005. While omalizumab is an effective treatment, non-response is common. A second biologic, mepolizumab which blocks interleukin 5 and targets eosinophilic inflammation, was licensed in 2018, but the licence was granted by extrapolation of adult clinical trial data to children. This non-inferiority (NI) trial will determine whether mepolizumab is as efficacious as omalizumab in reducing asthma attacks in children with severe therapy resistant asthma (STRA) and refractory difficult asthma (DA)., Methods and Analysis: This is an ongoing multicentre 1:1 randomised NI open-label trial of mepolizumab and omalizumab. Up to 150 children and young people (CYP) aged 6-17 years with severe asthma will be recruited from specialist paediatric severe asthma centres in the UK. Prior to randomisation, children will be monitored for medication adherence for up to 16 weeks to determine STRA and refractory DA diagnoses. Current prescribing recommendations of serum IgE and blood eosinophils will not influence eligibility or enrolment. The primary outcome is the 52-week asthma attack rate. Bayesian analysis using clinician-elicited prior distributions will be used to calculate the posterior probability that mepolizumab is not inferior to omalizumab. Secondary outcomes include Composite Asthma Severity Index, Paediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire, lung function measures (forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), bronchodilator reversibility), fractional exhaled nitric oxide, Asthma Control Test (ACT), health outcomes EuroQol 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) and optimal serum IgE and blood eosinophil levels that may predict a response to therapy. These outcomes will be analysed in a frequentist framework using longitudinal models., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee REC Number 19/SC/0634 and had Clinical Trials Authorisation from the Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (EudraCT 2019-004085-17). All parents/legal guardians will give informed consent for their child to participate in the trial, and CYP will give assent to participate. The results will be published in peer-reviewed journals, presented at international conferences and disseminated via our patient and public involvement partners., Trial Registration Number: ISRCTN12109108; EudraCT Number: 2019-004085-17., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a highly prevalent and difficult to manage cutaneous disease characterized by the presence of recurrent urticaria, angioedema, or both, for a period of 6 weeks or longer. One of the biological treatments used for patients with CSU with an autoimmune background and bad control of the disease is omalizumab, an anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. The understanding of the mechanism of action of this biological drug in CSU along with the identification of potential biomarkers of clinical response can be helpful in the personalized management of the disease., Objective: The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of omalizumab on peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations in patients with CSU in order to identify potential biomarkers of treatment response., Methods: We analyzed 71 patients with CSU [33 under omalizumab and 38 under non-immunomodulatory drugs (treated with antihistamines; NID)] and 50 healthy controls. An exhaustive immunophenotyping of whole blood T-cell subpopulations, including naïve, central memory, effector memory, effector cells, Th1, Th2, and Th17 was performed by multiparametric flow cytometry. Moreover, in CSU patients, we analyzed markers of inflammation (ESR, DD, CRP), atopy (prick test, IgE quantification), and autoimmunity (anti-thyroid antibodies and indirect basophil activation test).To evaluate the clinical activity, the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS 7) test was used., Results: In patients with CSU under treatment with omalizumab, there was a significant decrease in the percentage of naïve and an increase in the percentage of central memory CD4 T cells as well as a decrease in the percentage of naïve and increase in the percentage of effector CD8 T-cell subsets. Moreover, patients under treatment with omalizumab had higher percentages of Th1 and Th2 cells than patients under treatment with NID., Conclusion: The immune monitoring of T-cell subpopulations in patients with CSU starting omalizumab, may be a useful strategy to analyze treatment response in the clinical practice., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 López, Depreux, Bielsa, Roger, Quirant-Sanchez, Basagaña, Jurgens, Padró, Miquel, Martinez-Caceres and Teniente-Serra.)

Background and Aims: Allergic asthma has a considerable burden on the quality of life. A significant portion of moderate-to-severe allergic asthma patients need omalizumab, an anti-immunoglobulin-E monoclonal antibody, as an add-on therapy. In this phase III clinical trial P043 (Zerafil ® , CinnaGen, Iran) efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity were compared with Xolair ® (the originator omalizumab). The primary outcome was the rate of protocol-defined asthma exacerbations., Methods: Exacerbation rates, Asthma Control Test (ACT) results, spirometry measurements, immunogenicity, and safety were evaluated. Each subject received either medication with a dose ranging from 150 to 375 mg based on pre-treatment serum total IgE level (IU/mL) and body weight (kg) every two or four weeks for a duration of 28 weeks., Results: Exacerbation rates were 0.150 (CI: 0.079-0.220) in the P043 group, and 0.190 (CI: 0.110-0.270) in the omalizumab group (per-protocol). The least squares mean differences of predicted Forced Expiratory Volume in the First second (FEV 1 ) were -2.51% (CI: -7.17-2.15, P=0.29) and -3.87% (CI: -8.79-1.04, P=0.12), pre- and post-bronchodilator use. The mean ± SD of ACT scores at the screening and the last visit were 10.62 ± 2.93 and 20.93 ± 4.26 in P043 and 11.09 ± 2.75 and 20.46 ± 5.11 in the omalizumab group. A total of 288 adverse events were reported for the 256 enrolled participants. Among all, "dyspnea" and "headache" were the most reported ones. The overall incidence of adverse events (P=0.62) and serious adverse events (P=0.07) had no significant differences between the two groups. None of the samples were positive for anti-drug antibodies., Conclusion: P043 was equivalent to omalizumab in the management of asthma in reduction of exacerbations. There was no significant difference in other efficacy and safety parameters., Clinical Trial Registration: www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT05813470) and www.IRCT.ir (IRCT20150303021315N20)., Competing Interests: Author BG has received educational grants from AstraZeneca, Abidi, and Sanofi. Author MM has received research grants from Koushan Pharmed. Authors HR and DA have received research grants from AstraZeneca. Author MF has received research grants from Abidi. Author AK has received lecture honorarium from AstraZeneca. Author FJ has received research grants from Zist Takhmir and Vitabiotics. Author ST has received travel supports to attend scientific meetings from Novartis, GSK, and AstraZeneca. Author MH has collaborated with Jaber-ebne-hayyan. Author MRF has collaborated with Pooyesh darou. Author HK is the head of the medical department of Orchid Pharmed Company; which is in collaboration with CinnaGen company with respect to conducting clinical trials. Author AS is a member of CinnaGen medical biotechnology research center, which collaborates with universities and researchers all over the world with regards to research and development of medications and health issues. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. This study was supported by CinnaGen Company by grant number of 701/373. The sponsor also had participated in the conduction of the study., (Copyright © 2024 Ghanei, Ghalebaghi, Sami, Torabizadeh, Mirsadraee, Amra, Tavakol, Raji, Fallahpour, Kiani, Abedini, Jabbari Azad, Mahdaviani, Attaran, Samet, Tavana, Haddadzadeh shoushtari, Nazari, AghaeiMeybodi, Fazlollahi, Ghasemi, Sabzvari, Kafi and Idani.)

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a chronic autoimmune disease affecting the elderly population and characterized by the formation of subepidermal tense bullae. Treatment options include topical steroids, systemic steroids, immunosuppressants, and antimicrobials, and there is emerging evidence of the efficacy of omalizumab. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate omalizumab's efficacy for treating BP, and we also reported treatment-related adverse events. The retrospective cohort study included patients with BP who were followed up in our clinic's bullous diseases department between 2016 and 2023. Patients who received omalizumab were included in the study. Treatment responses of all patients were assessed by BP Disease Area Index activity and damage scores, treatment scale scoring, steroid dose reduction, and the presence/absence of pruritus. Also, total IgE levels of patients before the treatment onset and at the last visit were compared. There were 15 (male/female = 8/7) BP patients receiving omalizumab treatment. Omalizumab therapy allowed steroid dose reduction at a median of 1 month. Omalizumab (25.5 mg, 95% confidence interval 17.2-33.9, P < .001) provided a significant steroid dose reduction at the last visit compared to the beginning of treatment. Omalizumab resulted in a decrease in BP Disease Area Index activity score of 80.8 (95% confidence interval 71.8-89.8, P < .001). Also, omalizumab caused significant decline in IgE levels compared to baseline (1102.5 ± 834.5 vs 834.6 ± 613.6, P = .002). In this study, omalizumab treatment was an effective and safe option in BP patients with high baseline IgE levels who are refractory to or cannot tolerate other immunosuppressive therapies., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Omalizumab is a safe and effective treatment for antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) but is insufficient in one-third of patients. For serious cases in which omalizumab is ineffective, cyclosporine or methotrexate may be preferred. Most drug trials in CSU have focused on omalizumab or cyclosporine monotherapy., Objective: This retrospective study evaluated responses to monotherapy or combined therapy and real-life data on the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab in antihistamine-refractory CSU., Methods: A total of 133 patients who received omalizumab due to antihistamine-refractory CSU were evaluated in terms of 7-day urticaria activity score, total IgE, anti-thyroid peroxidase, C-reactive protein, skin prick test with aeroallergens and disease duration. Partial or nonresponders to omalizumab monotherapy were given antihistamine, omalizumab, cyclosporine, and methotrexate as combined or monotherapy., Results: Ninety-eight (73.7%) of the 133 patients were female and the mean age was 40.7 ± 14.4 years; 70.6% of the patients received omalizumab monotherapy and the others received combined or non-omalizumab monotherapy. Omalizumab monotherapy was effective in 66.9% of the patients. Of those with complete response to omalizumab monotherapy, 65.4% had early recurrence after discontinuing treatment. Treatment response was significantly better in patients who had high total IgE (p = 0.001). Patients with longer disease duration had significantly higher likelihood of early recurrence (p = 0.035)., Conclusions: Omalizumab monotherapy was as effective in real life as in placebo-controlled trials. Omalizumab was well tolerated by all patients. Treatment responses were comparable in patients treated with combined therapy and those who received monotherapy.

Background: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is frequently associated with psychiatric comorbidities., Objective: We aimed to determine if depressive symptoms were present in CSU patients who received omalizumab and if depression scores got better with omalizumab treatment and whether the presence of depressive symptoms impaired treatment responses., Methods: CSU patients who received at least three injections of omalizumab were included in the study. Changes in Urticaria Activity Score (UAS), Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire (CU-Q2oL), Beck Depression Inventory (Beck-D) and Urticaria Control Test (UCT) scores were compared before and after treatment., Results: From 49 patients, 20 (40.8%) had depressive symptoms at baseline. After treatment, UAS7, CU-Q2oL, Beck-D scores decreased and UCT-scores increased significantly (p < 0.001, for all). UCT scores were lower at baseline and at 3rd month following treatment in patients with depressive symptoms compared to patients without (baseline median (interquartile range-IQR) 2.5 (1-5) vs 5 (2.5-6.5); p = 0.04 and 3rd month 12 (9-13) vs 14 (12-16); p = 0.006, respectively). Omalizumab non-responders had higher baseline Beck-D-scores [18.5 (15.2-22) vs 12 (6-22.5); p = 0.031]. The number of omalizumab non-responders were significantly higher among patients with depressive symptoms compared to patients without. (40% vs 13.8%; p = 0.048). Only 6 patients scored as having depressive symptoms after treatment; of these 6 patients only one was an omalizumab responder., Conclusions: Omalizumab not only provides symptom control for urticaria but also improves psychological conditions of the patients. Coexistent psychiatric comorbidities should be taken into account in CSU patients since these conditions might impair treatment response.

Chronic rhinosinusitis whit nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is the most common comorbid disease accompanying asthma. Omalizumab is a recombinant anti-immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody, and studies suggest that omalizumab may also affect CRSwNP regardless of asthma. We aimed to assess the effect of omalizumab treatment on CRSwNP accompanying severe allergic asthma (SAA) patients. Clinical data including spirometry measurements, serum/nasal secretion biomarker levels were collected. NP scores and CRS scores (Lund-Mancay [LM] scores) were also recorded before omalizumab treatment, as well as at the 4th and 12th months of omalizumab treatment. Twenty-one patients with both CRSwNP and SAA who underwent omalizumab therapy were assessed. There was a significant difference among forced expiratory volume (FEV1), ACT scores, NP scores, LM scores, serum IgE, and blood eosinophil levels of the patients before omalizumab therapy at the 4th and 12th months of omalizumab treatment. A significant negative correlation was observed between ∆FEV1 and ∆NP scores (r=-0.485), between ∆ACT and ∆NP scores (r=-0.469), and ∆ACT and ∆LM scores (r=-0.436). When we grouped the patients who benefited from 1 year of omalizumab therapy and those who did not in terms of NP, there was no difference between the two groups related to local eosinophil and local IgE levels in the nasal polyp biopsy. Omalizumab treatment is effective for asthma and CRSwNP in patients with CRSwNP accompanied by SAA. Improvement in asthma is associated with improvement in CRSwNP. The efficacy of omalizumab on NP in patients with CRSwNP accompanied by SAA is independent of local IgE and eosinophil counts.

Introduction: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a frequent condition affecting approximately 2% of the population. Medical treatment consists long-term use of intranasal corticosteroids and short-term use of oral corticosteroids, in adjunct with saline solution rinses. Surgical management is proposed in patients who failed after medical treatment. In France, two biologics are reimbursed in case of severe uncontrolled CRSwNP despite medical treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery. Waiting for head-to-head biologics comparison, studies should report the efficacy and safety of biologics in large real-life cohorts. This study protocol describes the aims and methods of a prospective, observational, national, multicentric cohort of patients with CRSwNP treated with biologics., Methods and Analysis: The BIOlogics in severe nasal POlyposis SurvEy is a French multicentre prospective observational cohort study. The main aim is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of biologics in patients with CRSwNP, with or without association with other type 2 diseases, and to determine the strategies in case of uncontrolled disease under biologics. Patients over 18 years old requiring biologics for CRSwNP in accordance with its marketing approval in France (ie, severe nasal polyposis, with lack of control under nasal corticosteroid, systemic corticosteroids and surgery) are invited to participate. Collected data include topical history of surgical procedures and biologics, medication and use of systemic corticosteroids, visual analogical scales for specific symptoms, Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 questionnaire, nasal polyp score, asthma control test, Lund-Mackay score on CT scan and IgE concentration and eosinophilic count on blood sample., Trial Registration: NCT05228041/DRI&#95;2021/0030., Competing Interests: Competing interests: All authors report personal fees as expert consultant for Sanofi and GlaxoSmithKline., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

To date, most studies to identify biomarkers associated with response to the anti-interleukin 5 agent, mepolizumab, and to the anti-immunoglobulin E agent, omalizumab have focused on clinically available biomarkers, such as the peripheral blood eosinophil counts (BEC) and total immunoglobulin E (IgE). However, these biomarkers often have low predictive accuracy, with many patients with eosinophilic or allergic asthma failing to demonstrate clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab respectively. In this study, we evaluated the association of baseline pre-biologic plasma levels of 26 cytokines and chemokines, including T-helper 1 (Th1)-, Th2-, Th17-related cytokines, and their ratios with subsequent clinical response to mepolizumab or omalizumab. We defined clinical response as a reduction in the baseline annual exacerbation rate by half or more over the one-year period following initiation of the biologic. Baseline levels of plasma IL-13 were differentially elevated in responders versus non-responders to mepolizumab and plasma CXCL10 levels were differentially elevated in responders to omalizumab. The ratio of IL-13/TNF-α had the best sensitivity and specificity in predicting response to mepolizumab and CXCL10/CCL17 to omalizumab, and these performed better as predictive biomarkers of response than BEC and IgE. Cytokines and chemokines associated with airway eosinophilia, allergic inflammation, or Th2 inflammation, such as IL-13 and CXCL10, may be better predictors of clinical response to mepolizumab and omalizumab, than IL-5 or IgE, the targets of mepolizumab and omalizumab., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Omalizumab is the only licensed drug that serves as a third-line treatment for chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). The optimum doses of omalizumab remain controversial. Therefore, this study aims to estimate the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients., Materials and Methods: Four databases were searched from the database's creation to April 8, 2023. Several keywords such as omalizumab and urticarias were used to retrieve related studies. The meta-analytical outcomes were analyzed in R 4.2.1 software and Stata 15.1 software. Cochrane risk-of-bias tool Ver. 2 was used to evaluate the risk of bias in randomized controlled trials (RCTs)., Results: In total, 2331 patients were included. Five indexes were employed to assess, including weekly Itch Severity Score (ISS7), weekly Hive Severity Score (HSS7), weekly Urticaria Activity Score (UAS7), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and adverse events (AE). A 300 mg dose of omalizumab was the optimum dose to treat CIU, followed by the 150 mg dose. Furthermore, 600 mg of omalizumab only showed a significant difference from the placebo in HSS7. No significant statistical difference was observed in AE. Meta-regression analysis revealed that time, as a covariate, was statistically significant in the comparison of omalizumab 150 mg with placebo., Conclusion: 300 mg of omalizumab was the optimum dosage to treat CIU patients, with a 150 mg dose also exhibiting good efficacy. Further studies are required to explore the efficacy and safety of different doses of omalizumab in the treatment of CIU patients., (© 2024 The Author(s). Skin Research and Technology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Many chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) patients have highly stressful life events and exhibit psychiatric comorbidities. Emotional stress can cause or exacerbate urticaria symptoms by causing mast cell degranulation via neuromediators., Objectives: To investigate the frequency of stressful life events and compare psychiatric comorbidities and serum neuromediator levels in patients with CSU who responded to omalizumab with healthy controls., Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we included 42 patients with CSU who received at least 6 months of omalizumab treatment and a control group of 42 healthy controls. Stressful life events were evaluated with the Life Events Checklist for DSM-5 (LEC-5). The Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-42 (DASS-42) was used to evaluate depression, anxiety and stress levels. Serum nerve growth factor (NGF), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and substance P (SP) levels were measured using the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) technique., Results: Twenty-six (62%) patients reported at least one stressful life event a median of 3.5 months before the onset of CSU. There were no significant differences in all three variables in the DASS subscales between the patient and control groups. Serum NGF levels were found to be significantly lower in patients with CSU (p <0.001), whereas CGRP levels were found to be significantly higher (p <0.001). There was no significant difference for SP., Conclusions: The psychological status of patients with CSU who benefited from omalizumab was similar to that of healthy controls. Omalizumab may affect stress-related neuromediator levels., Competing Interests: There are no conflicts of interest.

Background and Objectives: The guidelines for chronic urticaria in children contain recommendations that are often based on adult studies. The diagnostic pathway has not been standardized and the effectiveness of anti-H1, omalizumab, montelukast, and systemic glucocorticoids is rarely reported in the pediatric population. There is a wide variation in the rate of remission of chronic urticaria between studies. The aim of this study is to enhance our understanding of pediatric chronic urticaria. Materials and Methods: This study enrolled 37 children with chronic urticaria aged from 0 to 18 years. Demographic parameters, medical history, clinical features, laboratory data and treatment information were collected. Children were treated with the recommended dosage of second-generation H1-antihistamines, which was increased by up to twofold. Omalizumab was added for refractory anti-H1 patients. A three-day course with systemic glucocorticoids was administered for severe exacerbations. Montelukast was administered to some children. Results : Wheals without angioedema were common. Chronic urticaria was spontaneous in 32 children (86.48%), inducible in 2 (5.41%), induced by a parasite in 1 and vasculitic in 2. Treatment of the potential causes of chronic urticaria was of no benefit, except for eradication of Dientamoeba fragilis. Chronic urticaria was resolved within three years in 45.9% of cases. Allergic diseases were present in nine children (24.32%) and autoimmune diseases were present in three (8.11%). All children were treated with anti-H1 at the licensed dose or at a higher dose. A partial or complete response to anti-H1 was observed in 29 (78.38%) patients. Montelukast showed no benefit. All children treated with omalizumab responded. Systemic glucocorticoids were successfully used to treat exacerbations. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that laboratory tests should not be routinely performed in children with chronic urticaria without clinical suspicion. However, comorbidities such as thyroid autoimmune disease and coeliac disease are suggested to be monitored over the chronic urticaria course. These clinical conditions could be diagnosed from the diagnostic framework of chronic urticaria. Increasing the dosage of anti-H1 and omalizumab was effective in children resistant to standard treatment but we still need further studies to generate a standard patient-centered treatment.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) involves recurrent, pruritic wheals lasting more than 6 weeks in response to various etiologies, including unknown causality. Though most cutaneous reactions to the COVID-19 vaccine series are self-limited and of short duration, more complex presentations including chronic spontaneous urticaria have been described. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of chronic spontaneous urticaria following heterologous mRNA COVID-19 booster vaccination that includes vaccination with both forms of the mRNA vaccine. Our patient received Pfizer-BioNTech for the primary series and Moderna for the booster. After failing several therapies, our patient's urticaria was refractory even to omalizumab. The source for chronic spontaneous urticaria development in our patient may be related to the unique humoral response elicited by receipt of a different mRNA vaccine manufacturer.

Background and Objectives : Real-life data on the efficacy of biologic agents (BAs) on asthma-comorbid CRSwNP are needed. Our primary goal is to investigate the effects of BAs on CRSwNP symptoms, as well as endoscopic and tomography scores. Our secondary goal is to show a reduction in the frequency of acute sinusitis exacerbations and the need for surgery. Materials and Methods : We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, real-life study. We screened the patients with asthma-comorbid CRSwNP treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab. A total of 69 patients (40 F/29 M; omalizumab n = 55, mepolizumab n = 14) were enrolled. We compared the visual analog scale (VAS), sinonasal outcome test-22 (SNOT-22), nasal congestion score (NCS), Lund-Mackay computed tomography score (LMS), and total endoscopic polyp scores (TPS) before and after BAs. We evaluated the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and acute exacerbations of chronic rhinosinusitis (AECRS) frequencies separately, according to the BAs. Results: The overall median (min-max) age was 43 (21-69) years. The median (min-max) of biologic therapy duration was 35 (4-113) months for omalizumab and 13.5 (6-32) for mepolizumab. Significant improvements were seen in VAS, SNOT-22, and NCS with omalizumab and mepolizumab. A significant decrease was observed in TPS with omalizumab [95% CI: 0-4] ( p < 0.001), but not with mepolizumab [95% CI: -0.5-2] ( p = 0.335). The frequency of ESS and AECRS were significantly reduced with omalizumab [95% CI: 2-3] ( p < 0.001) and [95% CI: 2-5] ( p < 0.001); and mepolizumab [95% CI: 0-2] ( p = 0.002) and [95% CI: 2-8.5] ( p < 0.001), respectively. There was no significant difference in LMS with either of the BAs. Conclusions: Omalizumab and mepolizumab can provide a significant improvement in the sinonasal symptom scores. BAs are promising agents for CRSwNP patients with frequent exacerbations and multiple surgeries.

The basis of our current understanding of allergies begins with the discovery of IgE in the mid-1960s. The whole theory of the physiology and pathophysiology of allergic diseases, including rhinitis and asthma, dates from that period. Among the key regions of IgE identified were the FAB (fragment antigen binding) portion that has the ability to capture allergens, and the Cε3 domain, through which IgE binds to its membrane receptor. It was then postulated that blocking IgE at the level of the Cε3 domain would prevent it from binding to its receptor and thus set in motion the allergic cascade. This was the beginning of the development of omalizumab, a monoclonal antibody with an anti-IgE effect. In this article, we review the pathophysiology of allergic disease and trace the clinical development of omalizumab. We also review the benefits of omalizumab treatment that are apparently unrelated to allergies, such as its effect on immunity and bronchial remodeling.

Introduction: Recurrences occur when corticosteroid therapy is discontinued or reduced during the treatment of chronic eosinophilic pneumonia (CEP). The probability of recurrence is once in 50% of patients and twice or more in 25%. In such instances, new treatment options are deemed necessary. This study aims to assess the efficacy of omalizumab treatment as a steroid-sparing drug in patients with CEP., Materials and Methods: The clinical features of patients treated with omalizumab for recurrent CEP were evaluated retrospectively before and after treatment. All data from patients and diagnoses were reviewed. The effects of treatment on recurrence rate, oral corticosteroid (OCS) use and lung functions, peripheral eosinophil values, and symptom scores were evaluated. Radiological regression was also evaluated., Result: In the final analysis, we included ten patients with a median follow-up of 22 months after initiation of omalizumab. During this follow-up period, the results were associated with a significant reduction in the number of asthma attacks per year, the number of CEP relapses, the rate of hospitalization, the amount of corticosteroids consumed daily, and the total corticosteroid dose. In addition, improvement was observed in the symptom scores and lung functions of the patients. Systemic steroids were completely discontinued in two patients receiving omalizumab treatment. In other patients, the mean steroid dose was reduced by 77.2 percent in the first year of omalizumab treatment and 82 percent in the second year, respectively. Nevertheless, there was no elevation in peripheral eosinophil count, and radiological regression was observed., Conclusions: Omalizumab can be an effective treatment for CEP and can be used as a steroid-sparing agent.

Background: Hay fever, characterized by seasonal allergic reactions, poses a significant health challenge. Existing therapies encompass standard drug regimens, biological agents, and specific immunotherapy. This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of anti-IgE (omalizumab), medication therapy, and subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) for hay fever., Methods: Conducted as a retrospective cohort study, this research involved 98 outpatient hay fever patients who underwent routine medication, omalizumab treatment, or SCIT before the onset of the spring pollen season. A follow-up was performed one month after the start of the pollen season. The comprehensive symptoms and drug scores were used to evaluate patients with different intervention methods, facilitating a comparative analysis of therapeutic outcomes., Results: Compared with before treatment, the symptoms of patients treated with the three methods were all significantly relieved, and the medication score were significantly reduced. Patients treated with omalizumab demonstrated higher symptoms and medication scores than SCIT group before treatment, but similar scores after treatment, which were both lower than medicine treatment group. After treatment with omalizumab or SCIT, patients in both groups had significantly lower medication scores than the medication group and were close to no longer using medication for symptom relief. The mountain juniper-sIgE was significantly higher after treatment than before treatment in both medicine treatment group and omalizumab treatment group., Conclusion: Omalizumab and SCIT offer superior effects than medication therapy in hay fever patients., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Tang, Lyu, Hou, Yang, Fu, Zhu, Xue, Li and Wang.)

Early detection of CSU patients with low probability of a clinical response with antihistamines could undergo prompt initiation of therapeutic alternatives. The aim of the study was to develop and internally validate a model for predicting the clinical response to antihistamines in adult patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), who consult allergology and dermatology care centers. A cohort of CSU patients, recruited from four participating centers, were followed up for 12 months. Fifteen candidate variables were selected to be included in the multivariate model and then internal validation was done with bootstrap analysis with 1000 simulations. The outcome variable, clinical response to antihistamines, was evaluated with the UAS (Urticaria Activity Score) scale for seven days: "No response to antihistamines" was defined as UAS7 ≥7 points after at least one month with a maximum dose of antihistamines, while "Response to antiH1" was defined as UAS7 ≤6 points for at least three months with the use of antiH1. A total of 790 patients were included. Among the different models analyzed, the model that included age, angioedema, anxiety/depression, time with the disease, NSAIDs (Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) intolerance, and UAS7 baseline was considered the one with the best performance (accuracy 0.675, HL 0.87, AUC 0.727). The internal validation analyses demonstrated good consistency of the model. In conclusion, this prediction model identifies the probability of response to antihistamines in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria. The model could be useful for a personalized therapeutic approach according to individual patient risk., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright: © 2024 Sánchez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.)

This article presents the experience of successfully switching therapy from omalizumab 150 mg to benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in a patient with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The effectiveness of biological therapy was evaluated when switching from omalizumab 150 mg subcutaneously at a dose of 600 mg for 36 weeks. Therapy for the drug benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml subcutaneously the first three injections monthly, the rest a month later for 52 weeks with bronchial asthma (BA), a severe uncontrolled course with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in a patient Ch., born in 2004. Switching therapy from omalizumab 150 mg to benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml allowed to achieve complete control of asthma symptoms (AST = 23 points), to achieve the absence of asthma exacerbations during 52 weeks, restore respiratory function to normal values, as well as improve the quality of life. The study reflects the good tolerability, high efficacy and safety of biological therapy when switching from one genetically engineered biological drug (GIBP) omalizumab 150 mg to another GIBP benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in severe uncontrolled asthma with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Therapy with benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml in severe BA has demonstrated a more effective clinically significant improvement in the course of the disease, control of symptoms of the disease. Reduction of exacerbations, normalization of respiratory function indicators, complete control of the disease has been achieved. Consequently, the use of different biological molecules for the therapy of BA with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype contributes to achieving disease control, improving the patient's quality of life and reducing the dose of oral glucocorticosteroids. The targeted biological drug benralizumab 30 mg/1 ml has a targeted effect on the key links in the pathogenesis of severe uncontrolled asthma with a combined allergic and eosinophilic phenotype in the presence of hypersensitivity to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and reduces the burden of severe disease.

Background: Evaluation of biologic therapy response is vital to monitor its effectiveness. Authors have proposed various response criteria including good responder, super-responder, non-responder, and clinical remission., Objectives: To ascertain the prevalence of response and clinical remission after long-term treatment (>6 months) of anti-IgE and anti-IL-5/IL-5Rα biologics, compare these results with existing criteria, and identify predictors for non-responders and clinical remission., Methods: A multicenter, real-life study involving severe asthma patients in Spain. Various outcomes were assessed to gauge response and clinical remission against established criteria., Results: The study included 429 patients, 209 (48.7%) omalizumab, 112 (26.1%) mepolizumab, 19 (4.4%) reslizumab and 89 (20.7%) benralizumab, with a mean treatment duration of 55.3±38.8 months. In the final year of treatment, 218 (50.8%) were super-responders, 173 (40.3%) responders, 38 (8.9%) non-responders, and clinical remission in 116 (27%), without differences among biologics. The short-term non-responders (<6 months) were 25/545 (4.6%). Substantial variations in response and clinical remission were observed when applying different published criteria. Predictors of non-response included higher BMI (OR:1.14; 95% CI:1.06-1.23; p<0.001), admissions at ICU (2.69; 1.30-5.56; p=0.01), high count of SAE (1.21; 1.03-1.42; p=0.02) before biologic treatment. High FEV 1 % (0.96; 0.95-0.98; p<0.001), a high ACT score (0.93; 0.88-0.99; p=0.01) before biologic treatment or NSAID-ERD (0.52; 0.29-0.91; p=0.02) showed strong associations with achieving clinical remission., Conclusion: A substantial proportion of severe asthma patients treated long-term with omalizumab or anti-IL5/IL-5Rα achieved a good response. Differences in response criteria highlight the need for harmonization in defining response and clinical remission in biologic therapy to enable meaningful cross-study comparisons., (Copyright © 2023 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Background: With the rise of targeted treatments for asthma, treatment with omalizumab is a new option., Objectives: To assess the improvement of pulmonary function with additional omalizumab treatment in patients (⩾6 years old) with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma., Data Sources and Methods: Observational studies of randomized controlled trials of add-on omalizumab for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe allergic asthma, published from the establishment till August 2022, were retrieved from WAN FANG DATA, PubMed, CNKI, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases. Data extraction and quality evaluation were performed on the literature that met the inclusion criteria, using RevMan 5.3 to analyze the data., Results: A total of 11 randomized controlled clinical trials were included, involving a total of 3578 patients with asthma, 1856 patients in the omalizumab group, and 1722 patients in the control group. The improvement in Forced expiratory volume in 1 s as a percentage of predicted normal and Forced expiratory volume in 1 s was more pronounced in the omalizumab-treated group [MD = 3.91, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.89-5.94, p  = 0.0002; MD = 0.09, 95% CI: 0.05-0.13, p  < 0.0001], while the improvement in Morning Peak expiratory flow rate was not statistically different between the two groups (MD = 3.64, 95% CI: -22.17-29.45, p  = 0.78)., Conclusion: Additional omalizumab treatment showed some improvement in lung function in patients with moderate-to-severe asthma., Trial Registration: PROSPERO ID:CRD42022378498.

Despite promising advancements in oral immunotherapy for food allergies, medical implementation faces limitations. Non-specific treatment options based on inhibiting the type 2 inflammatory pathway, including monoclonal antibodies, are under investigation. TNX-901 and omalizumab have demonstrated increased reaction thresholds, reducing adverse events in peanut-allergic patients. Dupilumab, blocking the IL-4 receptor, shows positive results in both food allergies and eosinophilic esophagitis. Antibodies against alarmins and anti-IL-5, such as etokimab and mepolizumab, have proven efficacy in preclinical studies and clinical trials. While further studies are needed to establish their practical clinical use and determine suitability for different types of food allergies, these monoclonal antibodies present a promising horizon for the treatment of such conditions.

Background: Impairment of smell is more commonly related to chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) than without, especially when asthma and/or NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease and type 2 inflammation are also present. Therapeutic options include intranasal and systemic corticosteroids, surgery, and, more recently, biological therapy. We summarize current knowledge on the effect of biologics on olfaction in patients with CRSwNP., Methods: We performed a systematic search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases from January 2001 to June 2022. The inclusion criteria were as follows: adult patients with CRS treated with dupilumab, omalizumab, mepolizumab, benralizumab, or reslizumab; and studies published in English reporting outcomes for sense of smell based on psychophysical and/or subjective tools. We excluded reports that did not assess CRSwNP, loss of smell evaluated with a method other than those accepted in the inclusion criteria, review articles, and expert opinions. No funding was received., Results: Dupilumab has demonstrated rapid and sustained long-term improvement in smell in clinical trials and in real life. Omalizumab improves smell at 24 weeks. This improvement is maintained in the long-term, although it is not clinically relevant. Mepolizumab and benralizumab improved smell in the long term based on a subjective scale. No studies examining the improvement in smell in patients with CRSwNP treated with reslizumab were found. Indirect comparisons by meta-analysis consistently conclude that dupilumab is the most effective biologic for improving impaired sense of smell., Conclusion: Dupilumab seems to be more efficacious for improving the sense of smell than omalizumab, mepolizumab, and benralizumab.

Introduction: Biomarkers are needed to inform the choice of biologic therapy in patients with asthma given the increasing number of biologics. We aimed to identify proteins associated with response to omalizumab and mepolizumab., Methods: Aptamer-based proteomic profiling (SomaScan) was used to assess 1437 proteins from 51 patients with moderate to severe asthma who received omalizumab (n = 29) or mepolizumab (n = 22). Response was defined as the change in asthma-related exacerbations in the 12 months following therapy initiation. All models were adjusted for age, sex, and pre-treatment exacerbation rate. Additionally, body mass index was included in the omalizumab model and eosinophil count in the mepolizumab model. We evaluated the association between molecular signatures and response using negative binomial regression correcting for the false discovery rate (FDR) and gene set enrichment analyses (GSEA) to identify associated pathways., Results: Over two-thirds of patients were female. The average age for omalizumab patients was 42 years and 57 years for mepolizumab. At baseline, the average exacerbation rate was 1.5/year for omalizumab and 2.4/year for mepolizumab. Lower levels of LOXL2 (unadjusted p: 1.93 × 10E-05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) and myostatin (unadjusted: 3.87 × 10E-05, FDR-corrected: 0.028) were associated with better response to mepolizumab. Higher levels of CD9 antigen (unadjusted: 5.30 × 10E-07, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) and MUC1 (unadjusted: 1.15 × 10E-06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) were associated with better response to omalizumab, and LTB4R (unadjusted: 1.12 × 10E-06, FDR-corrected: 0.0006) with worse response. Protein-protein interaction network modeling showed an enrichment of the TNF- and NF-kB signaling pathways for patients treated with mepolizumab and multiple pathways involving MAPK, including the FcER1 pathway, for patients treated with omalizumab., Conclusions: This study provides novel fundamental data on proteins associated with response to mepolizumab or omalizumab in severe asthma and warrants further validation as potential biomarkers for therapy selection., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: A significant breakthrough has been made in treating severe asthma, with the recognition of various asthma phenotypes and an updated management guideline. Type 2 targeted therapies, such as benralizumab and omalizumab; have been identified as an effective treatment for severe asthma, improving patient response, lung function tests and asthma symptom control. This study aimed to evaluate factors contributing to poor response to therapy., Methods: A retrospective single-center cohort study of 162 patients with severe asthma who started biologic therapy; their data were retrieved from medical records for further analysis. Poor responders were patients remained clinically and functionally uncontrolled despite even after augmenting all treatment options., Results: Childhood-onset asthma, bronchiectasis, poor symptom control (ACT below 19), severe airway obstruction (< 60% predicted), and maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use were significantly associated with poor response to omalizumab and benralizumab; p = 0.0.4 and 0.01; 0.003 and 0.01; 0.01 and 0.001, 0.05 and 0.04; 0.006 and 0.02, respectively. However, chronic rhinosinusitis and IgE < 220kIU/L were associated with higher poor response rates to omalizumab (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively). At the same time, female patients and those with blood eosinophils level < 500 cells/mm3 had a higher poor response rate to benralizumab (p = 0.02 and 0.01, respectively). Ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and continued use of OCS increased the likelihood of poor response to omalizumab by 21, 7, and 24 times (p = 0.004, 0.008, and 0.004, respectively). In contrast, the female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher BMI increased the likelihood of poor response to benralizumab by 7, 7 and 2 times more, p = 0.03, 0.02 and 0.05, respectively., Conclusion: Poor response to omalizumab treatment was independently associated with ischemic heart disease (IHD), bronchiectasis, and a history of maintenance oral corticosteroid (mOCS) use. Conversely, poor response to benralizumab therapy was independently linked to female gender, childhood-onset asthma and higher body mass index (BMI)., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has gained popularity recently for IgE-mediated food allergy. Omalizumab (OMZ) has been used in patients (10-20%) who have too severe/frequent allergic reactions (AR) to continue OIT, to reduce these reactions. In this study, it was aimed to compare two groups of patients who completed OIT with and without OMZ and to seek determinants predicting the need of this treatment. It was also aimed to share the clinical findings regarding the long-term use of OMZ and the withdrawal process. Forty-one patients were started OIT and 93% could be desensitized. Two groups were similar in means of demographic characteristics, and clinical and laboratory findings. The patients who needed OMZ during OIT had also lower reaction doses during oral challenge (p = 0.037). Higher AR rate in this group declined after starting OMZ (p < 0.001). The injection intervals of OMZ were gradually extended. Most patients were able to discontinue OMZ (81%). There were no severe reactions during drug withdrawal attempts. The low reaction thresholds during oral food challenge may give a clue about OMZ requirement during OIT. It may be an option to start the treatment before OIT if reaction was seen in the first few steps of the oral food challenge. For the sake of safety, extension of injection intervals should be preferred instead of abruptly stopping OMZ.

In obese severe asthmatics, the degree of type 2 inflammation may vary according to their atopic status and past smoking history. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical and physiopathological features of obese and nonobese severe asthmatics treated with omalizumab or mepolizumab treatment. In addition we aimed to compare the clinical, spirometric outcomes and total peripheral eosinophilic count (TEC) changes after treatment with these 2 biologic agents in obese and nonobese groups. In this retrospective, cross sectional study, 121 severe asthmatic treated with biologic agents (omalizumab = 88 or mepolizumab = 33) for at least 16 weeks were included. Obese (n: 44) and nonobese severe asthmatics (n: 77) were analyzed according to whether they provided a ≥ 10 pack/years (p/y) or <10 p/y smoking history and were found to be atopic. Obese and nonobese groups were compared in terms of the change in the asthma control test, asthma attacks, TEC, and forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) after treatment. In patients with ≥10 p/y smoking history, nonobese group had a significantly higher TEC compared to obese group [median (min-max) 660 cells/μL (200-1500) vs 300 cells/μL (110-770); p: 0.013]. Within the nonobese group, nonatopic patients had a significantly higher TEC compared to atopic patients [median (min-max) 1200 cells/μL (100-2100) vs 310 cells/μL (0-2730); p: 0.021]. Both biologic agents had similar effects on improving asthma control test and in reducing asthma attacks; however, mepolizumab was more effective in suppressing TEC. The improvement in FEV1 in obese group following biologic 2 agents was very similar but in nonobese group, mepolizumab was found to be superior (510 mL vs. 295 mL; p: 0.034). In our real-life study, nonobese severe asthmatics with ≥10 p/y smoking history and those that were nonatopic had higher TEC. Compared to omalizumab, mepolizumab was superior at reducing TEC in all asthmatics and in improving FEV1 in nonobese group., Competing Interests: All authors have no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Omalizumab is a valuable alternative treatment for allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (ABPA). The effectiveness and safety of this medication have not been confirmed. The main purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of omalizumab for ABPA., Methods: This study involved a retrospective chart review. The main indicators used were asthma control test (ACT) scores, lung function parameters, doses of corticosteroids, acute exacerbation, hospitalization rates, total serum immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels, and blood eosinophil counts. Related adverse events were also reviewed to evaluate the safety of omalizumab., Results: Fourteen patients with ABPA were included, of whom 10 (71%) concurrently had allergic rhinitis (AR). There were improvements in the mean percentages of the forced vital capacity, percentages of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s, and ACT score after omalizumab administration (p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.01, respectively). After the initiation of omalizumab administration, the median corticosteroid dose, acute exacerbation rate, hospitalization rate, and mean blood eosinophil count decreased when compared with the baseline values (p < 0.05, p < 0.05, p < 0.01, and p < 0.05, respectively). A reduction in the total serum IgE level was observed in patients with ABPA without AR compared with that in patients with AR (p < 0.05). One patient reported a concurrent skin rash, which spontaneously resolved without medication., Conclusion: It is safe and effective to prescribe omalizumab to patients with ABPA, irrespective of whether they have AR. Dose adjustment of omalizumab is safe after disease control. The total serum IgE level might be a predictor of the effectiveness of omalizumab in patients without AR., (© 2023. BioMed Central Ltd., part of Springer Nature.)

Background: The value, if any, of anti-IgE approaches in the treatment of atopic dermatitis has not been fully clarified. Studies using the anti-IgE omalizumab have yielded conflicting results., Objective: Antibodies with an IgE-suppressive capacity stronger than omalizumab might be more efficacious., Study Design: We assessed the safety and efficacy of the high-affinity anti-IgE antibody ligelizumab (280 mg, subcutaneous, every other week) in 22 adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis in a placebo and active (cyclosporine A) controlled, randomized, multicenter, double-blind clinical trial for 12 weeks., Results: We found that ligelizumab treatment resulted in either complete (patients with baseline IgE < 1,500 IU/ml) or partial (baseline IgE > 1,500 IU/ml) suppression of serum and cell-bound IgE as well as of allergic skin prick tests. On the other hand, ligelizumab-as opposed to cyclosporine A-was not significantly superior to placebo in inducing Eczema Area and Severity Index 50 response or significantly reducing pruritus and sleep disturbance. Interestingly though, patients with high baseline IgE exhibited a slightly but not significantly better treatment response than those with low baseline IgE., Conclusion: Our study shows that an immunologically efficacious anti-IgE approach is not clearly superior to placebo in treating atopic dermatitis. Larger studies are needed to determine whether certain patient subgroups may benefit from this strategy., Trial Registration: The study was registered in 2011 at clinicaltrialsregister.eu, EudraCT Number 2011-002112-84., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The mechanism of action of omalizumab in urticaria is still not literally known. This study examines the serum values of substance P (SP), calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), neuropeptide Y (NPY), and interleukin-31 (IL-31) in patients using omalizumab. In this study, 30 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) who were going to be treated with omalizumab and 20 healthy volunteers took part. Demographic data, clinical data, and disease activity scores were noted. For serum SP, CGRP, NPY, and IL-31 values, 10 mL of blood were taken from the patients before starting the treatment, 3 months after the treatment, at the end of the 6th month, and from healthy volunteers all at once. The change in values measured at baseline, 3rd month, and 6th month was analyzed by the Friedman Test. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the parameters obtained from the patients and control groups. The significance level was set at p =0.05. SP, CGRP, NPY, and IL-31 values were all statistically significantly lower in the CSU patient group compared to the control group. After treatment, the levels of SP and CGRP in the serum went up, and the levels of serum IL-31 went down. These changes were statistically significant. This study supports the view that omalizumab does not only affect IgE receptors but also affects mast cells through other mechanisms. According to our knowledge, this is the first study to show that omalizumab therapy and serum CGRP levels are related., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Cagdas Boyvadoglu et al.)

Omalizumab is effective in chronic spontaneous urticaria unresponsive to antihistamines. Of the licensed dosing schedules, Korean patients prefer a low dose, of 150 mg/month, for financial reasons. However, real-world experiences of low-dose omalizumab consumption have not been reported. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the treatment outcomes and long-term clinical course of patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria who were treated with low-dose omalizumab. The study included 179 patients aged ≥ 20 years who were treated with omalizumab 150 mg/month for ≥ 12 weeks. Baseline disease activity was mild, moderate, and severe in 54.7%, 35.2%, and 10.1% of patients, respectively. A complete response was observed in 133 patients at 12 weeks, among whom 88 patients showed early responses within 4 weeks. Overall, 158 patients finally achieved a complete response. Multivariate analyses revealed that baseline disease activity is more likely to be mild in patients who experience early and final complete responses. The absence of atopic comorbidities correlated with an early response. Smoking was associated with a final complete response. This study shows that low-dose omalizumab provides favourable treatment outcomes in antihistamine-refractory chronic spontaneous urticaria. Disease severity, atopic comorbidity, and smoking may be predictive factors for studying the response to omalizumab.

Allergic conditions, such as asthma, chronic urticaria, atopic dermatitis (AD), and eosinophilic esophagitis, have long been treated with oral and topical steroids which resulted in negative off-target effects. However, newer biologic medications are increasingly being developed and approved for treatment of these conditions. These medications have a variety of mechanisms of action to target pathophysiology specific to these diseases. As biologics become more targeted, fewer off-target effects are seen improving tolerability for patients as well as expanded options for treatment of these conditions. This review discusses monoclonal antibody therapies (omalizumab, mepolizumab, reslizumab, benralizumab, dupilumab, tezepelumab, and tralokinumab) including their safety and use in asthma, chronic urticaria, AD, and eosinophilic esophagitis., (© 2023 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Science published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics.)

Chronic urticaria (CU) is a debilitating skin disease affecting around 1% of the population. CU can be subdivided into chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and chronic inducible urticaria (CIndU). Different pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed to play a role in the development of CU, and these are also being investigated as potential biomarkers in the diagnosis and management of the disease. As of now the only assessment tools available for treatment response are patient reported outcomes (PROs). Although these tools are both validated and widely used, they leave a desire for more objective measurements. A biomarker is a broad subcategory of observations that can be used as an accurate, reproducible, and objective indicator of clinically relevant outcomes. This could be normal biological or pathogenic processes, or a response to an intervention or exposure, e.g., treatment response. Herein we provide an overview of biomarkers for CU, with a focus on prognostic biomarkers for treatment response to omalizumab, thereby potentially aiding physicians in personalizing treatments.

Background: Pulmonary aspergillosis is a pulmonary infectious disease that is clinically difficult to diagnose and treat. When the lower respiratory tract is invaded by Aspergillus, the clinical manifestations and imaging features vary among patients with different immune states. The use of antifungal drugs and glucocorticoids are important, but some patients do not respond satisfactorily to treatment., Case Presentation: A 59-year-old female had a long history of asthma and poor symptom control, with long-term use of long-acting inhaled glucocorticoids combined with a long-acting β2 receptor agonists (ICS + LABA) (salmeterol fluticasone inhalation powder). The ground glass shadow, tree-in-bud sign, and bronchiectasis in the middle lobe of the right lung and the lower lobe of both lungs were first detected by chest CT over 5 years ago. Atelectasis in the middle lobe of the right lung was detected over 3 years ago. Over 2 years ago, the patient was hospitalized and a repeat chest CT showed persistent atelectasis in the middle lobe of the right lung, and more lesions in bilateral lower lungs than before. Aspergillus fumigatus was detected in alveolar lavage fluid and sputum pathogenic culture, which confirmed the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis. After treatment with voriconazole and amphotericin B, the middle lobe of the right lung partially reopened, but the lesions in bilateral lower lungs persisted. After 21 weeks of treatment, the antifungal drugs were stopped because the patient refused to use oral/intravenous glucocorticoids, and omalizumab was finally chosen for treatment. After 1 month of treatment, the patient's clinical symptoms began to ease. After 1 year of treatment, imaging reexamination of lung showed that the lesions were completely cleared, accompanied by significant improvement in nutritional status and airway function., Conclusions: We reported the case of a patient with pulmonary Aspergillus infection who was treated with omalizumab and showed significant improvement in clinical symptoms and imaging abnormalities, which provides a new option for patients with pulmonary Aspergillus infection who show unsatisfactory response with first-line drugs., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)