Search

Background and Purpose: With the aging population, it is becoming increasingly important to identify patients at risk for postsurgical complications who might be more suited for conservative treatment. We sought to identify predictors of morbidity after surgical treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) using a large national contemporary population-based cohort. Methods: Relying on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical-Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP; 2006-2011) database, we evaluated outcomes after transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), laser vaporization of the prostate (LVP), and laser enucleation of the prostate (LEP). Outcomes included blood-transfusion rates, length of stay, complications, reintervention rates, and perioperative mortality. Multivariable logistic-regression analysis evaluated the predictors of perioperative morbidity and mortality. Results: Overall, 4794 (65.2%), 2439 (33.1%), and 126 (1.7%) patients underwent TURP, LVP, and LEP, respectively. No significant difference in overall complications (P = 0.3) or perioperative mortality (P = 0.5) between the three surgical groups was found. LVP was found to be associated with decreased blood transfusions (odds ratio [OR] = 0.21; P = 0.001), length of stay (OR = 0.12; P < 0.001) and reintervention rates (OR = 0.63; P = 0.02). LEP was found to be associated with decreased prolonged length of stay (OR = 0.35; P = 0.01). Men with advanced age at surgery and non-Caucasians were at increased risk of morbidity and mortality. In contrast, normal preoperative albumin and higher preoperative hematocrit (>30%) levels were the only predictors of lower overall complications and perioperative mortality. Conclusions: All three surgical modalities for BPH management were found to be safe. Advanced age and non-Caucasian race were independent predictors of adverse outcomes after BPH surgery. In patients with these attributes, conservative treatment might be a reasonable alternative. Also, preoperative hematocrit and albumin levels represent reliable predictors of adverse outcomes, suggesting that these markers should be evaluated before BPH surgery.

Introduction: Patients with renal cell carcinoma who were treated with radical nephrectomy (RN) or partial nephrectomy (PN) are at risk of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), and in consequence, short-and long-term adverse outcomes. We sought to identify independent predictors of 30-day AKI in patients undergoing RN or PN. Materials and methods: Between 2005 and 2011, patients who underwent RN or PN for renal cell carcinoma Within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set were identified. Patients with preexisting severe renal failure, defined as a preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate 2 mg/d1 above baseline or the need for dialysis within 30 days of surgery. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine the association between preoperative factors and the risk of postoperative AKI. Results: Overall, 1,944 (58.6%) and 1,376 (41.4%) patients underwent RN and PN, respectively. Overall, 1.8% of the patients included in the study experienced AKI within an average of 5.4 days after RN or PN. Independent predictors for AKI included obesity (odds ratio [OR] = 2.24, P = 0.04), history of neurovascular disease (OR = 5.29, P < 0.001), and a preoperative chronic kidney disease stage R (OR = 10.00, P = 0.03) or stage III (OR = 26.49, P = 0.02). Furthermore, RN (OR = 2.87, P = 0.02) or the open approach (OR = 2.18, P = 0.04) was significantly associated with postoperative AKI. AKI was significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, such as prolonged length of stay, occurrence of any complication, and mortality (all P < 0.001). Conclusions: The assessment of preoperative kidney function and comorbidity status is essential to identify patients at risk of postoperative AKI. In addition to preoperative chronic kidney disease stages II and III, neurovascular disease, obesity, and surgical approach (RN or open) represent predictors of 30-day AKI. Careful patient selection as well as preoperative planning may help reduce this unfavorable postoperative outcome. (C) 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Introduction: Robotic and laparoscopic surgical training is an integral part of resident education in urology, yet the effect of resident involvement on outcomes of minimally-invasive urologic procedures remains largely unknown. We assess the impact of resident participation on surgical outcomes using a large multi-institutional prospective database.Methods: Relying on the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) Participant User Files (2005-2011), we abstracted the 3 most frequently performed minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures. These included radical prostatectomy, radical nephrectomy and partial nephrectomy. Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess the impact of trainee involvement (PGY 1-2: junior, PGY 3-4: senior, PGY ≥5: chief) versus attending-only on operative time, length-of-stay, 30-day complication, reoperation and readmission rates.Results: A total of 5459 minimally-invasive radical prostatectomies,1740 minimally-invasive radical nephrectomies and 786 minimally-invasive partial nephrectomies were performed during the study period, for which data on resident surgeon involvement was available. In multivariable analyses, resident involvement was not associated with increased odds of overall complications, reoperation, or readmission rates for minimally-invasive prostatectomy, radical and partial nephrectomy. However, operative time was prolonged when residents were involved irrespective of the type of procedure. Length-of-stay was decreased with senior resident involvement in minimally-invasive partial nephrectomies (odds ratio [OR] 0.49, p = 0.04) and prostatectomies (OR 0.68, p = 0.01). The major limitations of this study include its retrospective observational design, inability to adjust for the case complexity and surgeon/hospital characteristics, and the lack of information regarding the minimally-invasive approach utilized (whether robotic or laparoscopic).Conclusions: Resident involvement is associated with increased operative time in minimally-invasive urologic oncology procedures. However, it does not adversely affect the complication, reoperation or readmission rates, as well as length-of-stay.