1. Immunotherapy Discontinuation in Metastatic Melanoma: Lessons from Real-Life Clinical Experience
- Author
-
Jacob Schachter, Guy Ben-Betzalel, Tomer Meirson, Nethanel Asher, Noa Israeli-Weller, Ronnie Shapira-Frommer, and Gal Markel
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Cancer Research ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Multivariate analysis ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Ipilimumab ,Article ,complete response ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,melanoma ,RC254-282 ,Complete response ,business.industry ,Melanoma ,Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens ,Immunotherapy ,medicine.disease ,Discontinuation ,treatment discontinuation ,030104 developmental biology ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Cohort ,Toxicity ,immunotherapy ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Simple Summary Metastatic melanoma patients derive unprecedented benefit from immunotherapy, and some of them are even considered cured. Currently, there is no consensus on the safety nor on the timing of treatment discontinuation in this population. This is a real-world study on 106 advanced melanoma patients who were treated with immunotherapy for a median of 15.2 months, and who discontinued treatments in the absence of disease progression. We found that after a median follow up of 20.8 m from discontinuation, 32% had progressed. The results of this study reveal the key factors to bear in mind when considering an elective treatment cessation. Namely, patients with non-CR as best response and patients treated in an advanced-line setting should be treated for longer periods, and elective discontinuation should not take place prior to 18 m. Abstract Background: Immunotherapy has revolutionized outcomes for melanoma patients, by significantly prolonging survival and probably even curing a fraction of metastatic patients. In daily practice, treatment for responding patients is often discontinued due to treatment-limiting toxicity, or electively, following a major tumor response. To date, the criteria for a safe stop and the optimal duration of treatment remain unclear. Patients and methods: This is a real-world single-site cohort of 106 advanced melanoma patients who were treated with immunotherapy and who discontinued treatments in the absence of disease progression. Here, we describe their long-term outcomes, and analyze the differential characteristics between patients who ultimately experienced progression and those who remained in unmaintained durable response. Results: Patients were treated with anti-PD-1 monotherapy (81%) or in combination with ipilimumab (19%) for a median of 15.2 m (range, 0.7–42.3 m). Upon discontinuation, 75.5% had achieved a complete response (CR). After a median follow-up of 20.8 m (range, 6–58) from discontinuation, 32% experienced disease progression. Median time to progression was 8.5 m (range, 1.5–37). Response to re-induction with anti-PD-1 was observed in 47%. On multivariate analysis, achieving a non-CR response, immunotherapy given in advanced line, and shorter treatment duration were significantly associated with lesser progression-free survival. Conclusions: This is one of the few reports on real-world melanoma patients who discontinued immunotherapy while responding to treatment. This study reveals the key factors to bear in mind when considering an elective treatment cessation. Specifically, patients with non-CR as best response and patients treated in an advanced-line setting should be treated for longer periods, and elective discontinuation should not take place prior to 18 m.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF