1. Understanding the mechanical behavior of intrauterine devices during simulated removal
- Author
-
La Saponara, Valeria, Wan, Shuhao, Nagarkar, Bhagyashree, Zwain, Faress, and Creinin, Mitchell D
- Subjects
Reproductive Medicine ,Biomedical and Clinical Sciences ,Female ,Humans ,Intrauterine Devices ,Copper ,Intrauterine Devices ,Levonorgestrel ,Uterus ,Device Removal ,Force ,Fracture ,Intrauterine device ,Strain ,Stress ,Clinical Sciences ,Paediatrics and Reproductive Medicine ,Public Health and Health Services ,Obstetrics & Reproductive Medicine ,Clinical sciences ,Reproductive medicine ,Health services and systems - Abstract
ObjectiveTo evaluate differences based on intrauterine device (IUD) frame geometry in force, and stress, and strain at the stem/arms junction during simulated IUD removal.Study designWe manufactured injection-molded frame models for three Nova-T IUDs (Mirena [model M]; Liletta [model L]; Kyleena [model K]) and a Tatum-T IUD (Paragard [model P]) at two-times scaling. We created a custom fixture to simulate the uterus and used a screw-driven machine to pull models at various displacement rates through the 10 cm fixture cavity to measure force and strain and calculate stress at the IUD stem/arms junction. We tested models at 30 mm/min and higher displacement rates for exploratory analyses. We used Mann-Whitney U test for statistical testing.ResultsWe completed testing at 30 mm/min using five of each Nova-T model and nine model P samples. Resistance against the cavity walls created significantly more force on model P (11.83, interquartile range [IQR] 11.61-12.31) than any Nova-T model samples (p
- Published
- 2024