1. Multigene DNA Priming-Boosting Vaccines Protect Macaques from Acute CD4+-T-Cell Depletion after Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIV89.6P Mucosal Challenge
- Author
-
LaRene Kuller, Nancy L. Haigwood, Shiu Lok Hu, Thera M. Mulvania, P. D. Greenberg, N. A. Doria-Rose, C. C. Pierce, Donovan J. Anderson, Patricia Polacino, C. Ohlen, and M. T. Hensel
- Subjects
CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes ,Cellular immunity ,viruses ,Immunology ,Immunization, Secondary ,Simian Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome ,Priming (immunology) ,HIV Infections ,Vaccinia virus ,Biology ,Antibodies, Viral ,medicine.disease_cause ,complex mixtures ,Microbiology ,Virus ,HIV Envelope Protein gp160 ,Gene gun ,law.invention ,Viral Proteins ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,law ,Virology ,Vaccines and Antiviral Agents ,Vaccines, DNA ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,AIDS Vaccines ,Immunity, Cellular ,Boosting (doping) ,Cd4 t cell ,Errata ,SAIDS Vaccines ,Simian human immunodeficiency virus ,Biolistics ,Simian immunodeficiency virus ,chemistry ,Insect Science ,HIV-1 ,Recombinant DNA ,Immunization ,Simian Immunodeficiency Virus ,Macaca nemestrina ,Vaccinia ,DNA - Abstract
We evaluated four priming-boosting vaccine regimens for the highly pathogenic simian human immunodeficiency virus SHIV89.6P inMacaca nemestrina. Each regimen included gene gun delivery of a DNA vaccine expressing all SHIV89.6 genes plus Env gp160 of SHIV89.6P. Additional components were two recombinant vaccinia viruses, expressing SHIV89.6 Gag-Pol or Env gp160, and inactivated SHIV89.6 virus. We compared (i) DNA priming/DNA boosting, (ii) DNA priming/inactivated virus boosting, (iii) DNA priming/vaccinia virus boosting, and (iv) vaccinia virus priming/DNA boosting versus sham vaccines in groups of 6 macaques. Prechallenge antibody responses to Env and Gag were strongest in the groups that received vaccinia virus priming or boosting. Cellular immunity to SHIV89.6 peptides was measured by enzyme-linked immunospot assay; strong responses to Gag and Env were found in 9 of 12 vaccinia virus vaccinees and 1 of 6 DNA-primed/inactivated-virus-boosted animals. Vaccinated macaques were challenged intrarectally with 50 50% animal infectious doses of SHIV89.6P 3 weeks after the last immunization. All animals became infected. Five of six DNA-vaccinated and 5 of 6 DNA-primed/particle-boosted animals, as well as all 6 controls, experienced severe CD4+-T-cell loss in the first 3 weeks after infection. In contrast, DNA priming/vaccinia virus boosting and vaccinia virus priming/DNA boosting vaccines both protected animals from disease: 11 of 12 macaques had no loss of CD4+T cells or moderate declines. Virus loads in plasma at the set point were significantly lower in vaccinia virus-primed/DNA-boosted animals versus controls (P= 0.03). We conclude that multigene vaccines delivered by a combination of vaccinia virus and gene gun-delivered DNA were effective against SHIV89.6P viral challenge inM. nemestrina.
- Published
- 2003