Search

Antiviral treatment is recommended for all hospitalized children with suspected or confirmed influenza, regardless of their risk profile. Few data exist on adherence to these recommendations, so we sought to determine factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral treatment in children.Hospitalized children18 years of age with acute respiratory illness (ARI) were enrolled through active surveillance at pediatric medical centers in seven cities between 11/1/2015 and 6/30/2016; clinical information was obtained from parent interview and chart review. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models to identify factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral treatment.Of the 2299 hospitalized children with ARI enrolled during one influenza season, 51% (n = 1183) were tested clinically for influenza. Clinicians provided antiviral treatment for 61 of 117 (52%) patients with a positive influenza test versus 66 of 1066 (6%) with a negative or unknown test result. In multivariable analyses, factors associated with testing included neuromuscular disease (aOR = 5.35, 95% CI [3.58-8.01]), immunocompromised status (aOR = 2.88, 95% CI [1.66-5.01]), age (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.91-0.96]), private only versus public only insurance (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.63-0.98]), and chronic lung disease (aOR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.51-0.81]). Factors associated with antiviral treatment included neuromuscular disease (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.04, 3.31]), immunocompromised state (aOR = 2.63, 95% CI [1.38, 4.99]), duration of illness (aOR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.84, 0.99]), and chronic lung disease (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.38, 0.95]).Approximately half of children hospitalized with influenza during the 2015-2016 influenza season were treated with antivirals. Because antiviral treatment for influenza is associated with better health outcomes, further studies of subsequent seasons would help evaluate current use of antivirals among children and better understand barriers for treatment.

Background Annual United States (US) estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in children typically measure protection against outpatient medically attended influenza illness, with limited data evaluating VE against influenza hospitalizations. We estimated VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization among US children. Methods We included children aged 6 months–17 years with acute respiratory illness enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network during the 2015–2016 influenza season. Documented influenza vaccination status was obtained from state immunization information systems, the electronic medical record, and/or provider records. Midturbinate nasal and throat swabs were tested for influenza using molecular assays. We estimated VE as 100% × (1 – odds ratio), comparing the odds of vaccination among subjects testing influenza positive with subjects testing negative, using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 1653 participants, 36 of 707 (5%) of those fully vaccinated, 18 of 226 (8%) of those partially vaccinated, and 85 of 720 (12%) of unvaccinated children tested positive for influenza. Of those vaccinated, almost 90% were documented to have received inactivated vaccine. The majority (81%) of influenza cases were in children ≤ 8 years of age. Of the 139 influenza-positive cases, 42% were A(H1N1)pdm09, 42% were B viruses, and 14% were A(H3N2). Overall, adjusted VE for fully vaccinated children was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%–71%) against any influenza-associated hospitalization, 68% (95% CI, 36%–84%) for A(H1N1)pdm09, and 44% (95% CI, –1% to 69%) for B viruses. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the importance of annual influenza vaccination in prevention of severe influenza disease and of reducing the number of children who remain unvaccinated or partially vaccinated against influenza.

Background Parent-reported influenza vaccination history may be valuable clinically and in influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) studies. Few studies have assessed the validity of parental report among hospitalized children. Methods Parents of 2597 hospitalized children 6 months–17 years old were interviewed from November 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016, regarding their child’s sociodemographic and influenza vaccination history. Parent-reported 2015–2016 influenza vaccination history was compared with documented vaccination records (considered the gold standard for analysis) obtained from medical records, immunization information systems, and providers. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to determine potential factors associated with discordance between the 2 sources of vaccination history. Using a test-negative design, we estimated VE using vaccination history obtained through parental report and documented records. Results According to parental report, 1718 (66%) children received the 2015–2016 influenza vaccine, and of those, 1432 (83%) had documentation of vaccine receipt. Percent agreement was 87%, with a sensitivity of 96% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95%–97%) and a specificity of 74% (95% CI, 72%–77%). In the multivariable logistic regression, study site and child’s age 5–8 years were significant predictors of discordance. Adjusted VE among children who received ≥1 dose of the 2015–2016 influenza vaccine per parental report was 61% (95% CI, 43%–74%), whereas VE using documented records was 55% (95% CI, 33%–69%). Conclusions Parental report of influenza vaccination was sensitive but not as specific compared with documented records. However, VE against influenza-associated hospitalizations using either source of vaccination history did not differ substantially. Parental report is valuable for timely influenza VE studies.

BACKGROUND: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is a major cause of hospitalized acute respiratory illness (ARI) among young children. With RSV vaccines and immunoprophylaxis agents in clinical development, we sought to update estimates of US pediatric RSV hospitalization burden. METHODS: Children RESULTS: Among 2969 hospitalized children included in analyses, 1043 (35%) tested RSV-positive; 903 (87%) children who were RSV-positive were CONCLUSIONS: During the 2015–2016 season, RSV infection was associated with one-third of ARI hospitalizations in our study population of young children. Hospitalization rates were highest in infants

Background Effective environmental surface cleaning plays a vital role in reducing transmission of hospital-acquired infections. There remains a paucity of data in the pediatric literature regarding environmental pathogen reduction utilizing UV-C light. The objective of this study was to evaluate the reduction of environmental pathogens using UV-C light (Clorox Optimum-UV) as an adjunct to terminal cleaning in a free-standing tertiary pediatric hospital. Methods Upon patient discharge, a subset of patient rooms were tested for pathogens. Surface swabs were collected from high touch surfaces (call button, telemetry monitor, door handle, flush handle of toilet, faucet, bed rail, phone, keyboard pad, mouse, side table, dresser, and light switch). After terminal cleaning of the room, per hospital protocol the Clorox Optimum-UV completed one or two cycles of 5 minutes each depending on the dimensions of the room. Post-UV-C surface swabs were obtained from the same high touch areas in the room. Total colony count was reported from each of the surfaces swabbed. Swabs were streaked onto non-selective agar and incubated at 30-35oC for 72–96 hours. Mean plate colony count was determined manually and reported as CFU/swab. Data analysis was performed in Minitab 18.1. Fisher least significant difference (LSD) test was used to describe the difference between total bacterial counts at each time point (Pre-clean: dirty room, Post-clean: pre-UV-C/post-terminal clean, Post-UV: post UV-C light cycle). Results Mean total colony counts prior to cleaning the room was 92.3 CFU (33 surfaces), Pre-UV-C light 45.6 CFU and post-UV-C light 5.8 CFU (64 surfaces). Total bacterial counts are represented in Graphs 1 and 2. Upon multivariate analysis, the time the sample was taken (preclean, postclean, or post-UV) was the single explanatory variable for the differences seen in the means of total bacterial counts (P = 0). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that UV-C disinfection is a highly effective adjunctive cleaning method with standard terminal cleaning to reduce bacterial burden from environmental surfaces. Disclosures A. Lucas, Clorox: Research Contractor, Grant recipient. M. Nayakwadi Singer, Clorox: Grant Investigator, Grant recipient.

Background Viral infections are a significant cause of severe acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) in young children. Understanding the current epidemiology of these viruses is important for informing treatment and prevention measures. We describe the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN) and report preliminary results from 2015 to 2016. Methods Prospective active surveillance for hospitalized ARI was conducted from November 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016 among children Results Among 2,974 hospitalized children with ARI whose specimens were tested for viruses, 2,228 (75%) were 1 virus detected in 234 (8%). RSV was detected in 1,039 (35%) children with ARI, HMPV in 245 (8%), influenza in 104 (4%), and PIV-1, PIV-2, and PIV-3 in 49 (2%), 2 ( Conclusion During the 2015–2016 season, viral detections were common in young children hospitalized for ARI at seven US sites. NVSN combines clinical data with current molecular laboratory techniques to describe respiratory virus epidemiology in cases of hospitalized pediatric ARI in order to inform current and future prevention, treatment, and healthcare utilization measures. Disclosures N. Halasa, Sanofi Pasteur: Investigator, Research support. GSK: Consultant, Consulting fee. Moderna: Consultant, Consulting fee. J. Englund, Gilead: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Novavax: Investigator, Research support. GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator, Research support. Alios: Investigator, Research support. MedImmune: Investigator, Research support. J. V. Williams, Quidel: Board Member, Consulting fee. GlaxoSmithKline: Consultant, Consulting fee.

Background We investigated clinical influenza testing and treatment in children hospitalized with acute respiratory illness (ARI) who had distinct respiratory syndromes. Methods Children Results Among 2,134 children with available ICD10 codes, on preliminary analysis 1,119 (52%) had influenza testing ordered by a clinician: 111 (10%) were positive, and 57 (51%) of 111 received antiviral treatment. Of the 2,134, 858 (40%) had one of the four mutually exclusive syndromes (table). Hospital clinical testing per clinician discretion was influenza positive in 16 of the 858 children (percent positivity per syndrome ranged from Conclusion Understanding testing and treatment practices by clinical syndrome may help to identify missed opportunities for influenza diagnosis and treatment. Table: Disclosures J. Englund, Gilead: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Novavax: Investigator, Research support. GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator, Research support. Alios: Investigator, Research support. MedImmune: Investigator, Research support. N. B. Halasa, sanofi pasteur: Investigator, Research support. GSK: Consultant, Consulting fee. Moderna: Consultant, Consulting fee.

Background Although antiviral therapy is recommended for hospitalized patients with suspected or confirmed influenza, clinicians often rely on test results to determine management. Rapid influenza diagnostic tests (RIDTs) have suboptimal sensitivity; use of molecular assays may improve care. We evaluated clinical influenza testing and antiviral treatment practices in hospitalized children. Methods Children aged Results Of 2267 children, 1165 (51%) had clinical diagnostic testing on upper respiratory samples: 276 (24%) by RIDT alone, 780 (67%) by molecular testing alone, and 109 (9%) by both. The use of molecular testing alone varied by site, from 10% to 100% of samples tested. Of 116 (10%) children testing positive for influenza, 60 (52%) were treated; by site, treatment of children positive for influenza ranged from 25% to 83%. Antiviral treatment was given to 16/20 (80%) of those admitted ≤2 days from symptom onset vs. 44/96 (46%) children admitted >2 days after onset. Among 94 children tested by one method who were positive, >80% had samples collected in the emergency department or on day of admission, and 47 started treatment (Figure, A): 16/37 (43%) and 31/57 (54%) were treated when tested by RIDT alone and molecular testing alone, respectively. Of those positive children treated, 7/16 (44%) tested by RIDT vs. 22/31 (71%) by molecular testing started treatment on the day of testing (Figure, B). Conclusion Half of hospitalized children with ARI who tested positive for influenza received antiviral treatment. Although there was high variability in testing and treatment by site, in positive patients who were treated the use of molecular testing appeared to be associated with prompt antiviral therapy. Understanding clinician reasons for relatively low treatment overall will require further investigation. Disclosures J. Englund, Gilead: Consultant and Investigator, Research support Chimerix: Investigator, Research support Alios: Investigator, Research support Novavax: Investigator, Research support MedImmune: Investigator, Research support GlaxoSmithKline: Investigator, Research support N. B. Halasa, sanofi pasteur: Research Contractor, Research support Astra Zeneca: Research Contractor, Grant recipient