Search

In this multi-institutional series, we aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, and long-term outcomes of graft infection in patients post-femoropopliteal bypass.A multi-institutional database was retrospectively queried for all femoropopliteal bypass procedures from 1995 through 2020. Cumulative incidence function estimated the long-term rate of bypass graft infection (BGI), and the Fine-Gray model was used to determine independent risk factors for BGI to account for death as a competing risk.Over the 25-year period, 1315 femoral popliteal bypasses were identified with a median follow-up of 2.89 years (interquartile range, 0.75-6.55 years). BGI was diagnosed in 34 patients (2.6%). BGI occurred between 9 days and 11.2 years postoperatively, with a median of 109 days. Estimated 1- and 5-year incidence of BGI was 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4%-3.1%) and 2.8% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.9%), respectively. Medical comorbidities, indications for bypass, and popliteal bypass targets (above- vs below-knee) were similar between patients with BGI and all patients (P = not significant for each). Patients with BGI were more frequently complicated by postoperative hematoma (14.7% vs 3.7%), superficial wound infection (38.2% vs 19.2%), lymphocele/lymphorrhea (8.8% vs 2.1%), and 30-day readmission rates (47.1% vs 21.3%) (P .05 for each). Most commonly isolated pathogens were Staphylococcus aureus (n = 19; 55.9%) and polymicrobial cultures (n = 5; 14.7%). Reoperation for BGI involved incision and drainage (n = 7; 20.6%), graft excision without reconstruction (n = 12; 35.3%), graft excision with in-line reconstruction (n = 11; 32.4%), and graft excision with extra-anatomic reconstruction (n = 2; 5.9%). Nine patients with BGI (26.5%) ultimately required major amputation. Prosthetic bypass (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR], 3.73; 95% CI, 1.64-8.51; P = .002), postoperative hematoma (SHR, 3.44; 95% CI, 1.23-9.61; P = .018), and 30-day readmission (SHR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.27-5.44; P = .010) were independently associated with BGI. One-year amputation-free survival was 50% (95% CI, 31.9%-65.7%) after BGI.BGI is a rare complication of femoral-popliteal bypass with significant morbidity. Graft infection is associated with the use of prosthetic grafts, postoperative hematoma, and unplanned hospital readmission. Mitigation of these risk factors may decrease the risk of this dreaded complication.

Thromboelastography (TEG) is diagnostic modality that analyzes real-time blood coagulation parameters. Clinically, TEG primarily allows for directed blood component resuscitation among patients with acute blood loss and coagulopathy. The utilization of TEG has been widely adopted in among other surgical specialties; however, its use in vascular surgery is less prominent. We aimed to provide an up-to-date review of TEG utilization in vascular and endovascular surgery.Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review with the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms "TEG and arterial events", "TEG and vascular surgery", "TEG and vascular", "TEG and endovascular surgery", "TEG and endovascular", "TEG and peripheral artery disease", "TEG and prediction of arterial events", "TEG and prediction of complications ", "TEG and prediction of thrombosis", "TEG and prediction of amputation", and "TEG and amputation" was performed in Cochrane and PubMed databases to identify all peer-reviewed studies of TEG utilization in vascular surgery, written between 2000 and 2021 in the English language. The free-text and MeSH subheadings search terms included diagnosis, complications, physiopathology, surgery, mortality, and therapy to further restrict the articles. Studies were excluded if they were not in humans or pertaining to vascular or endovascular surgery. Additionally, case reports and studies with limited information regarding TEG utilization were excluded. Each study was independently reviewed by two researchers to assess for eligibility.Of the 262 studies identified through the MeSH strategy, 15 studies met inclusion criteria and were reviewed and summarized. Literature on TEG utilization in vascular surgery spanned cerebrovascular disease (n = 3), peripheral arterial disease (n = 3), arteriovenous malformations (n = 1), venous thromboembolic events (n = 7), and perioperative bleeding and transfusion (n = 1). In cerebrovascular disease, TEG may predict the presence and stability of carotid plaques, analyze platelet function before carotid stenting, and compare efficacy of antiplatelet therapy after stent deployment. In peripheral arterial disease, TEG has been used to predict disease severity and analyze the impact of contrast on coagulation parameters. In venous disease, TEG may predict hypercoagulability and thromboembolic events among various patient populations. Finally, TEG can be utilized in the postoperative setting to predict hemorrhage and transfusion requirements.This systematic review provides an up-to-date summarization of TEG utilization in multiple facets of vascular and endovascular surgery.

Antiplatelet therapy has been a pillar of management for peripheral artery disease (PAD). However, a significant subset of patients with PAD will be resistant to certain antiplatelet medications and, therefore, have an increased risk of graft and/or stent thrombosis unknown to the surgeon. At present, no point-of-care testing to identity which patients will experience benefit from these medications has been incorporated into the treatment guidelines. Thromboelastography with platelet mapping affords an opportunity to evaluate real-time coagulation dynamics and platelet function. In the present prospective, observational study, we aimed to delineate the variation in response to antiplatelet therapy in patients with PAD undergoing revascularization.All patients who were undergoing named vessel revascularization during December 2020 through April 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Platelet mapping assays were performed in three clinical phases: preoperative, postoperative inpatient, and postoperative outpatient. The distribution of platelet reactivity within patients receiving mono- vs dual antiplatelet therapy was assessed, and a between-group inferential analysis was performed. The effect of comorbidities and intervention subtype on platelet inhibition was also analyzed.A total of 521 platelet mapping samples from 143 individual patients were analyzed using thromboelastography with platelet mapping. We found wide variability in the distribution of platelet inhibition, with a range of 0 to 100 and an interquartile range of 37.6. Although platelet inhibition with clopidogrel 75 mg was higher on average (44.8 ± 30.2) than that with aspirin 81 mg (24.6 ± 23.7) or aspirin 325 mg (27.1 ± 26.4; P = .001), clopidogrel at 75 mg demonstrated the highest variability in response.These data have demonstrated significant variability in the response to both mono- and dual antiplatelet therapy in PAD patients undergoing lower extremity revascularization. Future research on the effect of this variability in response on the clinical outcomes could provide invaluable understanding of the perioperative thrombotic risk.

Objective Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is a resource-intensive approach for the management of refractory cardiogenic shock. Within this population exists a substantial cohort of patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD), which independently increases the risk of complications and all-cause mortality. We studied 10-year national trends of the impact of PAD among VA-ECMO recipients to better understand the prevalence of PAD and implications on outcomes in this vulnerable population. Methods This 10-year retrospective, propensity score-matched study identified all adult patients (≥18) who underwent VA-ECMO between 2009 and 2018, from a large US database (National Inpatient Sample). Patients with an ICD diagnosis of PAD were identified. The primary endpoints of in-hospital mortality, bleeding complications and major limb loss (above- or below-knee amputation) were compared between patients with PAD to those without. Results A total of 6768 patients were identified, of which 342 (5.3%) had PAD. The median age at admission was significantly higher in PAD patients [64 years vs. 55 years; p < .01], as was male gender [71% vs. 64%; p < .01]. Patients with PAD had higher rates of smoking (38.9% vs. 23.3%), hypertension (71.1% vs. 50%), diabetes (37.4% vs. 27.0%), chronic kidney disease (30.1% vs. 18.0%), coronary artery disease (76.0% vs. 35.0%) and dyslipidemia (76.0% vs. 35.0); all p < .01. After propensity-matching 2:1 for comorbidities, PAD patients were found to have significantly greater overall complications, including in-hospital mortality, bleeding, surgical wound infections, pseudoaneurysms, and major adverse limb events [71.9% vs. 63.9%; p < .01]. Subgroup analysis revealed greater in-hospital mortality [62.2% vs. 55.3%; p < .05], major amputations [4.1% vs. 0.3%; p < .01] and blood transfusions [32.2% vs. 26.2%; p < .05] in PAD patients. Over 2014–2018, the non-PAD group demonstrated statistically discernable trends in a 51.1% decrease in overall complications and a 28.1% increase in survival to discharge (all p < .01). Over the same time period the PAD cohort experienced a modest, nonsignificant, decrease in complications [7.0%, p = .40] and a decrease in those surviving to discharge [47.1% vs. 40.5%, p = .91]. Conclusion Patients with PAD on VA-ECMO are sicker at baseline and experience significantly greater major amputations and higher in-hospital mortality. They have not benefitted from the considerable decrease in complication rates and increase in survival to discharge over time as compared to their non-PAD counterparts. These findings demonstrate the substantial frailty of the PAD population within an already high-risk cohort, and highlight the need for better procedural approaches and innovative technologies.

Anticoagulant and antiplatelet (AC/AP) medications have been reported to improve bypass graft patency, however, the optimal AC/AP strategy remains unclear in the heterogenous peripheral artery disease population.A multi-institutional retrospective review utilizing the Research Patient Data Registry database from 1995 to 2020 was performed for all patients who underwent femoropopliteal bypass procedures. Electronic medical records were used to obtain demographic information, comorbidities, smoking status, operative details (bypass target), postoperative AC/AP medications, postoperative complications, and long-term outcomes and were reviewed for the cohort. Cox proportional hazards model was used to determine independent risk factors for major adverse limb events (MALE) after bypass. MALE was defined as reintervention for patency or major amputation of index limb (above- or below-knee amputation).A total of 1421 patients underwent femoropopliteal bypass between 1995 and 2020 throughout five institutions included in this study. Complete data were available for 1292 of the 1421 patients (90.9%). The indications for bypass included intermittent claudication (21.4%), rest pain (30.3%), tissue loss (33.5%), and nonatherosclerotic disease (14.8%). Distal bypass targets comprised above-knee (38.6%) and below-knee (61.4%) popliteal arteries. Patients were divided into six groups based on postoperative AC/AP use including none (n = 57 [4.4%]), monoantiplatelet therapy (n = 587 [45.4%]), dual AP therapy (n = 214 [16.6%]), AC alone (n = 73 [5.7%]), AC + monoantiplatelet therapy (n = 319 [24.7%]), and AC + dual AP therapy (n = 42 [3.3%]). Postoperative bleeding complications were low for both hematoma (3.7%) and pseudoaneurysm (0.7%). There was no difference in bleeding complications across AC/AP groups (hematoma, P = .61; pseudoaneurysm, P = .31). After adjusting for patient factors, below-knee bypass target (hazard ratio [HR], 1.25; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-1.52; P = .019) and bypass for tissue loss (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.04-1.88; P = .028) were independent predictors for MALE. Great saphenous vein conduit trended toward protection for MALE, compared with prosthetic grafts (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.70-1.01; P = .06). No AC/AP regimen was associated with of MALE, even stratifying by above-knee and below-knee bypass cohorts. The median follow-up period was 2 years.Among patients undergoing femoropopliteal bypass grafting, no combination of AC or AP medications was associated with improved graft patency; however, a below-knee target and tissue loss were associated with adverse limb events. AC and AP regimen may be individualized after bypass with regard to other concomitant medical comorbidities.

Background: Previously published single center studies suggest the morbidity associated with brain arteriovenous malformations (AVM) hemorrhage to be lower than assumed. Given the recent controversy over the appropriate management of unruptured brain AVMs, we performed a multi-center critical assessment of the morbidity associated with ruptured brain AVMs. Methods: A retrospective chart review from tertiary care, urban, academic medical centers was performed. Inclusion criteria consisted of patients admitted for intracranial hemorrhage caused by a previously untreated AVM. Thirty-seven variables were analyzed, including patient demographics, imaging findings, clinical course and clinical exams. Results: 101 patients from three medical centers dating from 2008-2014 met the inclusion criteria. Admission NIHSS scores of 0, 1-9 and ≥10 were 26%, 29% and 45% respectively. Hematoma location was parenchymal in 32%, intraventricular in 11%, subarachnoid in 5%, and combined in 52%. Deep venous drainage was present in 43% of cases, and associated aneurysms were present in 44%. Thirty-seven percent underwent emergent hematoma evacuation while 8 patients expired during their admission. At discharge, of those that survived, 69% had a NIHSS ≥ 1, and 23% had a NIHSS ≥ 10. At 90 day follow-up, 27% had a mRS ≥ 3. Patients with admission NIHSS ≥ 10 had significantly higher rates of midline shift, surgical hematoma evacuation, and follow-up mRS ≥ 3( p < 0.05). Conclusion: This multicenter critical assessment of the morbidity associated with brain AVM rupture suggests poorer clinical outcomes than previously assumed and reported. Rupture morbidity should be considered alongside rupture risk and procedural risk when considering preventative anatomic treatment of unruptured brain AVMs.