18 results on '"Minuk L"'
Search Results
2. Favezelimab (anti-LAG-3) plus pembrolizumab in patients with anti-PD-1-naive relapsed or refractory (R/R) classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL): An open-label phase 1/2 study.
- Author
-
Johnson N.A., Lavie D., Borchmann P., Gregory G., Herrera A.F., Minuk L., Vucinic V., Armand P., Avigdor A., Gasiorowski R., Herishanu Y., Keane C., Kuruvilla J., Palcza J., Pillai P., Marinello P., Timmerman J., Johnson N.A., Lavie D., Borchmann P., Gregory G., Herrera A.F., Minuk L., Vucinic V., Armand P., Avigdor A., Gasiorowski R., Herishanu Y., Keane C., Kuruvilla J., Palcza J., Pillai P., Marinello P., and Timmerman J.
- Abstract
Background: PD-1 inhibitors are a standard of care in pts with R/R cHL but new approaches are still needed to deepen and lengthen responses. Dual blockade of PD-1 and LAG-3 has demonstrated antitumor activity in preclinical models. The multicohort phase 1/2 MK-4280-003 study (NCT03598608) evaluated the safety and efficacy of favezelimab (MK-4280), a humanized IgG4 LAG-3 inhibitor, plus pembrolizumab (pembro; a PD-1 inhibitor) in pts with R/R hematologic malignancies. This analysis focused on anti-PD-1-naive pts with R/R cHL (cohort 1). Method(s): This study included a safety lead-in phase (part 1) to determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) followed by a dose-expansion phase (part 2). Eligible pts in cohort 1 must have R/R cHL after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or be ineligible for ASCT and have had no prior anti-PD-1 therapy. In part 1, patients from all cohorts received pembro IV 200 mg Q3W and favezelimab IV 200 mg or 800 mg Q3W. Dose escalation followed the mTPI design. In part 2, pts received pembro + favezelimab at the established RP2D for up to 35 cycles. Primary end point was safety. Secondary end point was ORR. DOR, PFS, and OS were exploratory end points. Result(s): Only 1 dose-limiting toxicity (DLT; autoimmune hepatitis [grade 4]) was identified among the first 6 pts from all cohorts in part 1 at the favezelimab 200 mg dose; thus, the dose was escalated to 800 mg. No DLTs were observed in the 15 additional pts treated at the 800 mg dose. The RP2D for the combination was defined as 800 mg Q3W + pembro 200 mg Q3W. In cohort 1, 30 pts were enrolled; median age was 40 years, 53% had ECOG PS 0, and 80% had <=3 prior lines of therapy. After a median follow-up of 13.5 mo, ORR for cohort 1 was 73% (95% CI, 54-88; CR, 7 pts [23%]; PR, 15 pts [50%]). 28 of 30 pts (93%) had reduction from baseline in target lesions. Median DOR was not reached (NR; 95% CI, 0+ to 23+ mo); 6 pts (51%) had response >=12 mo. Median PFS was 19 mo (95% CI, 8-NR); 12-mo
- Published
- 2022
3. Carfilzomib or bortezomib in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): an interim overall survival analysis of an open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial
- Author
-
Dimopoulos, M.A. Goldschmidt, H. Niesvizky, R. Joshua, D. Chng, W.-J. Oriol, A. Orlowski, R.Z. Ludwig, H. Facon, T. Hajek, R. Weisel, K. Hungria, V. Minuk, L. Feng, S. Zahlten-Kumeli, A. Kimball, A.S. Moreau, P.
- Abstract
Background The phase 3 ENDEAVOR trial was a head-to-head comparison of two proteasome inhibitors in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Progression-free survival was previously reported to be significantly longer with carfilzomib administered in combination with dexamethasone than with bortezomib and dexamethasone in an interim analysis. The aim of this second interim analysis was to compare overall survival between the two treatment groups. Methods ENDEAVOR was a phase 3, open-label, randomised controlled trial in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Patients were recruited from 198 hospitals and outpatient clinics in 27 countries in Europe, North America, South America, and the Asia-Pacific region. Patients were aged 18 years or older, had relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma, and had received between one and three previous lines of therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive carfilzomib and dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib and dexamethasone (bortezomib group) through a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four), stratified by International Staging System stage, previous lines of treatment, previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, and planned route of bortezomib delivery if assigned to the bortezomib group. Carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m2 thereafter) was given as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of 28-day cycles; bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2) was given as an intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of 21-day cycles. Dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) was given on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 22, and 23 in the carfilzomib group and on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, and 12 in the bortezomib group. The primary endpoint of ENDEAVOR, progression-free survival, has been previously reported. A stratified log-rank test was used to compare overall survival between treatment groups for this prospectively planned second interim analysis. Efficacy assessments were done in all randomly assigned patients (the intention-to-treat population) and the safety analysis included patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866, and is no longer enrolling patients. Findings Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 1096 patients were assessed for eligibility, of whom 929 were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group and 465 to the bortezomib group). The cutoff date for this prespecified interim analysis was Jan 3, 2017. Median overall survival was 47·6 months (95% CI 42·5–not evaluable) in the carfilzomib group versus 40·0 months (32·6–42·3) in the bortezomib group (hazard ratio 0·791 [95% CI 0·648–0·964], one-sided p=0·010). Grade 3 or worse adverse events were reported in 377 (81%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group and 324 (71%) of 456 patients in the bortezomib group, and serious adverse events in 273 (59%) patients in the carfilzomib group and 182 (40%) in the bortezomib group. The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events were anaemia (76 [16%] of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group vs 46 [10%] of 456 patients in the bortezomib group), hypertension (67 [15%] vs 15 [3%]), pneumonia (42 [9%] vs 39 [9%]), thrombocytopenia (41 [9%] vs 43 [9%]), fatigue (31 [7%] vs 35 [8%]), dyspnoea (29 [6%] vs ten [2%]), decreased lymphocyte count (29 [6%] vs nine [2%]), diarrhoea (18 [4%] vs 39 [9%]), and peripheral neuropathy (six [1%] vs 28 [6%]). Treatment-related deaths occurred in five (1%) of 463 patients in the carfilzomib group (pneumonia [n=2], interstitial lung disease [n=1], septic shock [n=1], and unknown [n=1]) and two (
- Published
- 2017
4. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): And randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study
- Author
-
Dimopoulos, Ma, Moreau, P, Palumbo, A, Joshua, D, Pour, L, Hájek, R, Facon, T, Ludwig, H, Oriol, A, Goldschmidt, H, Rosiñol, L, Straub, J, Suvorov, A, Araujo, C, Rimashevskaya, E, Pika, T, Gaidano, G, Weisel, K, Goranova Marinova, V, Schwarer, A, Minuk, L, Masszi, T, Karamanesht, I, Offidani, M, Hungria, V, Spencer, A, Orlowski, Rz, Gillenwater, Hh, Mohamed, N, Feng, S, Chng, Wj, ENDEAVOR Investigators: Leahy, M, Kerridge, I, Durrant, S, Cooney, J, Horvath, N, Rowlings, P, Hahn, U, Fay, K, Renwick, W, Quach, H, Taylor, K, Ho, Sj, Johnston, A, Kasparu, H, Delforge, M, Schots, H, Vekemans, Mc, Offner, F, Wu, Kl, Doyen, C, Bittencourt, R, Duarte, G, Maiolino, A, Schaan, M, Scheliga, A, Zadra, C, Gercheva, L, Mihaylov, G, Grudeva Popova, Z, Sandhu, I, Reiman, A, Kanjeekal, S, Dueck, G, Leblanc, R, Tay, J, White, D, Maisnar, V, Scudla, V, Gregora, E, Hajek, R, Stoppa, Am, Karlin, L, Garderet, L, Fermand, Jp, Lenain, P, Rigaudeau, S, Eveillard, Jr, Escoffre Barbe, M, Knop, S, Kropff, M, Rollig, C, Munder, M, Langer, C, Mugge, Lo, Hanel, M, Niederwieser, D, Dimopoulos, M, Egyed, M, Szomor, A, Borbenyi, Z, Illes, A, Yehuda, Db, Benyamini, N, Nagler, A, Mittleman, M, Izhar, H, Cavo, M, De Fabritiis, P, Petrini, Mario, Foa, R, Gobbi, M, Rossi, G, Guglielmelli, T, Lazzaro, A, Musto, P, Gozzetti, A, Takazako, N, Izumi, T, Chou, T, Ozaki, S, Hatake, K, Suzuki, K, Uike, N, Asakura, S, Kosugi, H, Handa, H, Matsumoto, M, Tobinai, K, Iida, S, Kizaki, M, Miyamoto, T, Shibayama, H, Ando, K, Ishikawa, T, Ishida, T, Sugiura, I, Izutsu, K, Taniwaki, M, Lee, Jh, Kim, K, Kim, Js, Min, Ck, Yoon, Ss, Lee, Jo, Suh, C, Simpson, D, Ganly, P, Blacklock, H, Doocey, R, Chiruka, S, Hellmann, A, Gornik, S, Komarnicki, M, Malgorzata, Calbecka, Grosicki, S, Jurczyszyn, A, Stoia, R, Gheorghita, E, Danaila, Cd, Abdulkadyrov, K, Zaritskiy, A, Andreeva, N, Balakireva, T, Podoltseva, E, Rossiev, V, Pristupa, A, Hsieh, Ws, Gopalakrishnan, Sk, Mistrik, M, Rocafiguera, Ao, Mateos, V, Rubia, J, Dachs, Lr, Sanchez, Jm, Alegre, A, Bargay, J, de Oteyza JP, Martinez, J, Chen, Ty, Lin, Tl, Liu, Jh, Wang, Mc, Yeh, Sp, Huang, Sy, Vinnyk, Y, Kriachok, I, Pylypenko, H, Shparyk, Y, Kaplan, P, Karamanesht, L, Rekhtman, G, Romanyuk, N, Kaiser, M, Mehta, A, Williams, C, Basu, S, Rabin, N, Ramasamy, K, Hunter, H, Tholouli, E, Lebovic, D, Siegel, D, Wang, M, Niesvizky, R, Kovacsovics, T, Hurd, D, Gabrail, N, Matous, J, Pendergrass, K, Agrawal, M, Boccia, R, Chandra, S, Kassim, A, Stanisic, S, Coleman, M, Gersten, T, Braunschweig, I, Chowdhury, S, Sahovic, E., Dimopoulos, Meletios A, Moreau, Philippe, Palumbo, Antonio, Joshua, Dougla, Pour, Ludek, Hájek, Roman, Facon, Thierry, Ludwig, Heinz, Oriol, Albert, Goldschmidt, Hartmut, Rosiñol, Laura, Straub, Jan, Suvorov, Aleksandr, Araujo, Carla, Rimashevskaya, Elena, Pika, Toma, Gaidano, Gianluca, Weisel, Katja, Goranova-Marinova, Vesselina, Schwarer, Anthony, Minuk, Leonard, Masszi, Tamá, Karamanesht, Ievgenii, Offidani, Massimo, Hungria, Vania, Spencer, Andrew, Orlowski, Robert Z, Gillenwater, Heidi H, Mohamed, Nehal, Feng, Shibao, Chng, Wee-Joo, Cavo, M, Laboratory of Molecullar and Cellular Therapy, and Clinical sciences
- Subjects
Oncology ,Male ,Clinical Trial, Phase III ,Dexamethasone ,Ixazomib ,Bortezomib ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,immune system diseases ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Elotuzumab ,Multiple myeloma ,education.field_of_study ,Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't ,Medicine (all) ,Anemia ,Multicenter Study ,Survival Rate ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Randomized Controlled Trial ,Hypertension ,Retreatment ,Oligopeptide ,Female ,Multiple Myeloma ,Oligopeptides ,Human ,medicine.drug ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Aged ,Disease-Free Survival ,Follow-Up Studies ,Humans ,Pneumonia ,Thrombocytopenia ,Population ,Follow-Up Studie ,03 medical and health sciences ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Comparative Study ,education ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol ,business.industry ,medicine.disease ,Carfilzomib ,Surgery ,chemistry ,Proteasome inhibitor ,business ,030215 immunology - Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. METHODS: In this randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one to three previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) using a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four) to receive carfilzomib with dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib with dexamethasone (bortezomib group). Randomisation was stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, previous lines of treatment, International Staging System stage, and planned route of bortezomib administration if randomly assigned to bortezomib with dexamethasone. Patients received treatment until progression with carfilzomib (20 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m(2) thereafter; 30 min intravenous infusion) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m(2); intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The study is ongoing but not enrolling participants; results for the interim analysis of the primary endpoint are presented. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866. FINDINGS: Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 929 patients were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group; 465 to the bortezomib group). Median follow-up was 11·9 months (IQR 9·3-16·1) in the carfilzomib group and 11·1 months (8·2-14·3) in the bortezomib group. Median progression-free survival was 18·7 months (95% CI 15·6-not estimable) in the carfilzomib group versus 9·4 months (8·4-10·4) in the bortezomib group at a preplanned interim analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·65]; p
- Published
- 2016
5. Ibrutinib combined with bendamustine and rituximab compared with placebo, bendamustine, and rituximab for previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma (HELIOS) : a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study
- Author
-
Chanan-Khan, Asher, Cramer, Paula, Demirkan, Fatih, Fraser, Graeme, Silva, Rodrigo Santucci, Grosicki, Sebastian, Pristupa, Aleksander, Janssens, Ann, Mayer, Jiri, Bartlett, Nancy L, Dilhuydy, Marie-Sarah, Pylypenko, Halyna, Loscertales, Javier, Avigdor, Abraham, Rule, Simon, Villa, Diego, Samoilova, Olga, Panagiotidis, Panagiots, Goy, Andre, Mato, Anthony, Pavlovsky, Miguel A, Karlsson, Claes, Mahler, Michelle, Salman, Mariya, Sun, Steven, Phelps, Charles, Balasubramanian, Sriram, Howes, Angela, Hallek, Michael, Assouline, S, Bence-Bruckler, I, Buckstein, R, Fraser, G, Larratt, L, Minuk, L, Villa, D, Angevine, A, Bartlett, N, Bixby, D, Caimi, P, Chanan-Khan, A, Craig, M, Forero-Torres, A, Ganguly, S, Goy, A, Heffner, L, Hermann, R, Lansigan, F, Leis, J, Letzer, J, Link, B, Liu, D, McCaul, K, McGuire, E, Skinner, W, Starodub, A, Stuart, R, Thirman, M, Tirumali, N, Yang, J, Janssens, A, Offner, F, Van den Neste, E, Van Hoof, A, Mayer, J, Novak, J, Trneny, M, Cartron, G, Dartigeas, C, Dilhuydy, M, Ghez, D, Haioun, C, Leblond, V, Salles, G, Balser, C, Cramer, P, Dreger, P, Durig, J, Eckart, M, Heinrich, B, Illmer, T, Jentsch-Ullrich, K, Pfreundschuh, M, Schetelig, J, Schlag, R, Soling, U, Stilgenbauer, S, Anagnostopoulos, A, Dimopoulos, A, Panagiotidis, P, Vrakidou, E, Bairey, O, Yehuda, D Ben, Braester, A, Fineman, R, Herishanu, Y, Nagler, A, Ruchlemer, R, Tadmor, T, Grosicki, S, Homenda, W, Jurczak, W, Pluta, A, Woszczyk, D, Espirito Santo, A, Luis, R, Raposo, J, Viveiros, C, Alexeeva, J, Dunaev, Y, Golubeva, M, Khuageva, N, Loginov, A, Lysenko, I, Osmanov, E, Pavlov, V, Pristupa, A, Proydakov, A, Rossiev, V, Samarina, I, Samoilova, O, Serduk, O, Shneider, T, Udovitsa, D, Voloshin, S, Gayoso, J, Gonzalez, M, Gonzalez Barca, E, Hernandez Rivas, J, Jargue, I, Loscertales, J, Karlsson, C, Sender, M, Aktan, M, Arslan, O, Demirkan, F, Ferhanoglu, B, Kaynar, L, Sayinalp, N, Vaural, F, Yagci, M, Dyagil, I, Kaplan, P, Masliak, Z, Oliynyk, H, Popovska, T, Pylypenko, H, Rekhtman, G, Dearden, C, Morley, N, Moss, P, Rule, S, Pavlovsky, M, Riveros, D, Santucci-Silva, R, Romeo, M, Scheliga, A, Salazar, L, Gomez, D, Ramirez, E, and Jung, C
- Subjects
Male ,Medizin ,Gastroenterology ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,0302 clinical medicine ,Piperidines ,immune system diseases ,hemic and lymphatic diseases ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,Atrial Fibrillation ,Bendamustine Hydrochloride ,Aged, 80 and over ,Anemia ,Nausea ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,Fludarabine ,Intention to Treat Analysis ,Oncology ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Ibrutinib ,Retreatment ,Disease Progression ,Rituximab ,Female ,medicine.drug ,Bendamustine ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Neutropenia ,Hemorrhage ,Disease-Free Survival ,03 medical and health sciences ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Aged ,Performance status ,business.industry ,Adenine ,medicine.disease ,Interim analysis ,Leukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-Cell ,Thrombocytopenia ,Surgery ,Regimen ,Pyrimidines ,chemistry ,Pyrazoles ,Mantle cell lymphoma ,business ,030215 immunology - Abstract
Most patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma relapse after initial therapy. Bendamustine plus rituximab is often used in the relapsed or refractory setting. We assessed the efficacy and safety of adding ibrutinib, an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK), to bendamustine plus rituximab in patients with previously treated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma.The HELIOS trial was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study in adult patients (≥18 years of age) who had active chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma with measurable lymph node disease (1·5 cm) by CT scan, and had relapsed or refractory disease following one or more previous lines of systemic therapy consisting of at least two cycles of a chemotherapy-containing regimen, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-1, and adequate bone marrow, liver, and kidney function. Patients with del(17p) were excluded because of known poor response to bendamustine plus rituximab. Patients who had received previous treatment with ibrutinib or other BTK inhibitors, refractory disease or relapse within 24 months with a previous bendamustine-containing regimen, or haemopoietic stem-cell transplant were also excluded. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by a web-based system to receive bendamustine plus rituximab given in cycles of 4 weeks' duration (bendamustine: 70 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 2-3 in cycle 1, and days 1-2 in cycles 2-6; rituximab: 375 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycle 1, and 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of cycles 2-6 for a maximum of six cycles) with either ibrutinib (420 mg daily orally) or placebo until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified according to whether they were refractory to purine analogues and by number of previous lines of therapy. The primary endpoint was independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival. Crossover to ibrutinib was permitted for patients in the placebo group with IRC-confirmed disease progression. Analysis was by intention-to-treat and is continuing for further long-term follow-up. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01611090.Between Sept 19, 2012, and Jan 21, 2014, 578 eligible patients were randomly assigned to ibrutinib or placebo in combination with bendamustine plus rituximab (289 in each group). The primary endpoint was met at the preplanned interim analysis (March 10, 2015). At a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 13·7-20·7), progression-free survival was significantly improved in the ibrutinib group compared with the placebo group (not reached in the ibrutinib group (95% CI not evaluable) vs 13·3 months (11·3-13·9) in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p0·0001). IRC-assessed progression-free survival at 18 months was 79% (95% CI 73-83) in the ibrutinib group and 24% (18-31) in the placebo group (HR 0·203, 95% CI 0·150-0·276; p0·0001). The most frequent all-grade adverse events were neutropenia and nausea. 222 (77%) of 287 patients in the ibrutinib group and 212 (74%) of 287 patients in the placebo group reported grade 3-4 events; the most common grade 3-4 adverse events in both groups were neutropenia (154 [54%] in the ibrutinib group vs 145 [51%] in the placebo group) and thrombocytopenia (43 [15%] in each group). A safety profile similar to that previously reported with ibrutinib and bendamustine plus rituximab individually was noted.In patients eligible for bendamustine plus rituximab, the addition of ibrutinib to this regimen results in significant improvements in outcome with no new safety signals identified from the combination and a manageable safety profile.Janssen ResearchDevelopment.
- Published
- 2016
6. Carfilzomib and dexamethasone versus bortezomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (ENDEAVOR): And randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study
- Author
-
Dimopoulos, M.A. Moreau, P. Palumbo, A. Joshua, D. Pour, L. Hájek, R. Facon, T. Ludwig, H. Oriol, A. Goldschmidt, H. Rosiñol, L. Straub, J. Suvorov, A. Araujo, C. Rimashevskaya, E. Pika, T. Gaidano, G. Weisel, K. Goranova-Marinova, V. Schwarer, A. Minuk, L. Masszi, T. Karamanesht, I. Offidani, M. Hungria, V. Spencer, A. Orlowski, R.Z. Gillenwater, H.H. Mohamed, N. Feng, S. Chng, W.-J.
- Subjects
hemic and lymphatic diseases - Abstract
Background: Bortezomib with dexamethasone is a standard treatment option for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Carfilzomib with dexamethasone has shown promising activity in patients in this disease setting. The aim of this study was to compare the combination of carfilzomib and dexamethasone with bortezomib and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: In this randomised, phase 3, open-label, multicentre study, patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had one to three previous treatments were randomly assigned (1:1) using a blocked randomisation scheme (block size of four) to receive carfilzomib with dexamethasone (carfilzomib group) or bortezomib with dexamethasone (bortezomib group). Randomisation was stratified by previous proteasome inhibitor therapy, previous lines of treatment, International Staging System stage, and planned route of bortezomib administration if randomly assigned to bortezomib with dexamethasone. Patients received treatment until progression with carfilzomib (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1; 56 mg/m2 thereafter; 30 min intravenous infusion) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion) or bortezomib (1·3 mg/m2; intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection) and dexamethasone (20 mg oral or intravenous infusion). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. All participants who received at least one dose of study drug were included in the safety analyses. The study is ongoing but not enrolling participants; results for the interim analysis of the primary endpoint are presented. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01568866. Findings: Between June 20, 2012, and June 30, 2014, 929 patients were randomly assigned (464 to the carfilzomib group; 465 to the bortezomib group). Median follow-up was 11·9 months (IQR 9·3-16·1) in the carfilzomib group and 11·1 months (8·2-14·3) in the bortezomib group. Median progression-free survival was 18·7 months (95% CI 15·6-not estimable) in the carfilzomib group versus 9·4 months (8·4-10·4) in the bortezomib group at a preplanned interim analysis (hazard ratio [HR] 0·53 [95% CI 0·44-0·65]; p
- Published
- 2016
7. Effect of unintentional cyclophosphamide underdosing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma response to chemotherapy: a retrospective review
- Author
-
Al-Ahmadi, M., primary, Lazo-Langner, A., additional, Mangel, J., additional, Phm, A. D. B., additional, Liu, K., additional, and Minuk, L., additional
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Health-related quality-of-life in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the FIRST trial: lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone versus melphalan, prednisone, thalidomide
- Author
-
Delforge, M., primary, Minuk, L., additional, Eisenmann, J.-C., additional, Arnulf, B., additional, Canepa, L., additional, Fragasso, A., additional, Leyvraz, S., additional, Langer, C., additional, Ezaydi, Y., additional, Vogl, D. T., additional, Giraldo-Castellano, P., additional, Yoon, S.-S., additional, Zarnitsky, C., additional, Escoffre-Barbe, M., additional, Lemieux, B., additional, Song, K., additional, Bahlis, N. J., additional, Guo, S., additional, Monzini, M. S., additional, Ervin-Haynes, A., additional, Houck, V., additional, and Facon, T., additional
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Access to Thalidomide for the Treatment of Multiple Myeloma in Canada: Physician Behaviours and Ethical Implications
- Author
-
Minuk, L., primary, Sibbald, R., additional, Peng, J., additional, Bejaimal, S., additional, and Chin-Yee, I., additional
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Metamodel-Based Multidisciplinary Design Optimization of a Deep-Sea Manganese Nodules Test Miner
- Author
-
Minuk Lee, Su-gil Cho, Jong-Su Choi, Hyung-Woo Kim, Sup Hong, and Tae Hee Lee
- Subjects
Mathematics ,QA1-939 - Abstract
A deep-sea manganese nodules test miner has not only coupled relationship between system components but also various design requirements of each system to meet the specified multitasks. To accomplish the multiobjectives of complex systems, multidisciplinary design optimization (MDO) is performed. Metamodels such as the kriging model and the response surface model are employed to reduce computational costs for MDO and to integrate component systems in a design framework. After verifying the accuracy of each metamodel, metamodel-based MDO for a deep-ocean test miner is formulated and performed. Finally, results and advantages of the proposed design methodology are discussed.
- Published
- 2012
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Normal levels of protein C and protein S tested in the acute phase of a venous thromboembolic event are not falsely elevated
- Author
-
Kovacs Judy, Lazo-Langner Alejandro, Minuk Leonard, Robbins Melinda, Morrow Bev, and Kovacs Michael
- Subjects
Diseases of the blood and blood-forming organs ,RC633-647.5 - Abstract
Abstract Background Protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) determination is part of the thrombophilia investigation in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Based on scarce evidence it is a common notion that PC and PS levels decrease during the acute phase of VTE, necessitating delay of testing and temporary transition from warfarin to low molecular weight heparin. We have previously demonstrated that an abnormal PC or PS result determined within 24 hours of VTE diagnosis and before the initiation of warfarin needs to be repeated for confirmation ≥3 months after starting treatment and ≥14 days after stopping anticoagulation therapy. In the current study, we sought to show that normal PC and PS values determined during the acute phase of VTE are not false negatives. Methods 99 patients with acute idiopathic VTE who had normal PC and PS determination within the first 24 hours of presentation and who subsequently had their oral anticoagulation discontinued after six months of therapy. PC and PS determinations were repeated ≥6 months after starting treatment and ≥ 14 days after stopping warfarin. Proportions of patients who tested abnormal on the second test were calculated and 95% confidence intervals obtained using the Wilson's score method. Data from a previously published study on patients with abnormal initial tests was included for comparison. Results None of the 99 patients who had normal PC and PS initially had an abnormal result on repeated testing (0%; 95% CI 0 - 3.7%). Data from the previous study showed that, among patients who initially had abnormal results, 40% (95%CI 35.4-84.8%) were confirmed to have low PC and 63.6% (95%CI 16.8-68.7%) low PS on repeated testing. The difference between proportions was statistically significant (χ2 p-value < 0.001). Conclusion Our results suggest that PC and PS can be determined during the acute phase of VTE and whereas abnormal results need to be confirmed with repeat testing at a later date, a normal result effectively rules out deficiency with only one test.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Approach to red blood cell antibody testing during pregnancy: Answers to commonly asked questions.
- Author
-
Minuk L, Clarke G, and Lieberman L
- Subjects
- Erythrocytes, Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Isoantibodies immunology, Pregnancy, Fetomaternal Transfusion diagnosis, Fetomaternal Transfusion immunology, Rh Isoimmunization, Rho(D) Immune Globulin therapeutic use
- Abstract
Objective: To provide family physicians with an understanding of blood bank tests performed during pregnancy. The value of routine blood type and antibody tests, as well as the follow-up required when a patient develops a red blood cell antibody or experiences a fetal-maternal hemorrhage (FMH) will be reviewed., Sources of Information: The approach described is based on the authors' clinical expertise and peer-reviewed literature from 1967 to 2020., Main Message: An ABO and RhD group and antibody screen test is performed on every pregnant patient during the first trimester. Although antibodies to red blood cell antigens occur infrequently, some can lead to substantial adverse fetal or neonatal consequences including hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Early identification and quantification of important antibodies ensures that at-risk mothers are referred to and followed by obstetricians experienced with high-risk care. Another valuable and related test is the FMH test. For RhD-negative women, these tests are performed at every delivery and following antepartum events that could contribute to FMH. This test determines the number of fetal red blood cells in the maternal circulation and is used to determine the dose of Rh immune globulin an RhD-negative mother requires to prevent alloimmunization to fetal RhD., Conclusion: An understanding of blood bank tests performed during pregnancy and their role and limitations is vital to optimal practice and aids clinicians in their decision making. When there is doubt or confusion regarding antenatal testing or immunoprophylaxis, consult the regional laboratory or transfusion medicine specialists for additional guidance., (Copyright© the College of Family Physicians of Canada.)
- Published
- 2020
13. Randomized double-blind safety comparison of intravenous iron dextran versus iron sucrose in an adult non-hemodialysis outpatient population: A feasibility study.
- Author
-
Louzada ML, Hsia CC, Al-Ani F, Ralley F, Xenocostas A, Martin J, Connelly SE, Chin-Yee IH, Minuk L, and Lazo-Langner A
- Abstract
Background: Intravenous iron therapy is a treatment option for iron deficient patients who are intolerant to oral iron or where oral iron is ineffective, but with possible adverse effects. Currently, prospective studies comparing different intravenous iron formulations are needed to determine safety and efficacy of these agents., Methods: We conducted a prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the feasibility of a trial comparing the safety of high molecular weight intravenous iron dextran, Infufer®, with intravenous iron sucrose, Venofer®, in non-hemodialysis adult outpatients. Primary outcome was the occurrence of immediate severe drug reactions., Results: We enrolled 143 patients in a one-year period. Overall, 45/143 (31.5 %) patients (20 iron dextran, 25 iron sucrose) developed 48 infusion reactions (14 immediate, 28 delayed, and 3 both). The risk of an immediate reaction was similar in both groups, 9/73 (12.3 %) iron dextran versus 8/70 (11.4 %) iron sucrose, RR = 0.93 (95 % CI; 0.38 to 2.27). The risk of a delayed reaction was significantly higher in the iron sucrose group 22/70 (31.4 %) versus the iron dextran group 9/73 (12.3 %), RR = 2.55 (95 % CI; 1.26 to 5.15; p = 0.0078)., Conclusion: In this limited feasibility study, no major differences in immediate reactions were seen, but a significantly higher number of delayed reactions were seen in the iron sucrose group. Further, under our assumptions and design a full RCT to evaluate the safety of different intravenous iron preparations is not feasible. Future studies should consider modifying the clinical outcomes, utilize multiple centers, and consider other emerging parenteral iron formulations. (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT005936197 January 3, 2008).
- Published
- 2016
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Prophylaxis in older Canadian adults with hemophilia A: lessons and more questions.
- Author
-
Jackson SC, Yang M, Minuk L, Sholzberg M, St-Louis J, Iorio A, Card R, and Poon MC
- Abstract
Background: Although prophylaxis is a standard of care for young children in developed countries, known to reduce the severity of hemophilic arthropathy, older adults with existing arthropathy have not traditionally used prophylaxis. Recent studies have shown that adults with hemophilia A are increasingly adopting prophylaxis but the characteristics of this treatment in older adults are not well understood. This multicenter observational study was conducted to describe how secondary/tertiary prophylaxis is being used in older adults (≥40 years of age) in comparison to younger adults with severe hemophilia A., Methods: Eligible adult (≥18 years of age) Canadian males with baseline FVIII:C ≤2% from the participating centres were observed over a 2 year period., Results: Of the 220 adult severe hemophilia patients enrolled, 70% (155/220) used prophylaxis during the observational period. Only 27% (60/220) are older adults with very few >60 years of age. A lower proportion of older adults use prophylaxis compared to younger adults (58% vs. 75%, p = 0.016), with most patients in both groups using continuous prophylaxis (92 and 94% respectively). When considering all treatment modalities together, younger subjects use more factor concentrate than older subjects (2437 u/kg/year vs. 1702 u/kg/year, p = 0.027); however, older subjects on prophylaxis use 3447 u/kg/year and had an ABR of 12 while those on demand use 560 u/kg/year and had an ABR of 13., Conclusion: A significant number of older adults use secondary/tertiary continuous prophylaxis in Canada, accounting for a significant fraction of factor concentrate utilization.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage in a patient with prolymphocytic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia.
- Author
-
Davies GA, Lazo-Langner A, Shkrum M, and Minuk L
- Abstract
Prolymphocytic transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia is a rare but recognized entity. We present the case of a 76-year-old gentleman with a previous diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia who presented with fatigue, fever, and a white blood cell count of 500 000 with prolymphocytes on peripheral blood examination. Chlorambucil and dexamethasone were initiated. He developed progressive anemia during his admission with no clear cause on initial CT examination. Bilateral hip pain began several days later and he was unfortunately diagnosed with a large spontaneous retroperitoneal hemorrhage postmortem. This condition is rare and generally occurs in those receiving therapeutic anticoagulation or dialysis, with known bleeding disorders or vascular malformation, none of which were present in our patient. Pathology revealed marked leukemoid engorgement of the vessels of many organs with prolymphocytes. We discuss the potential etiologies and relationships between these critical diagnoses.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Drosophila genomes and the development of affordable molecular markers for species genotyping.
- Author
-
Minuk L and Civetta A
- Subjects
- Animals, Base Sequence, DNA chemistry, DNA genetics, Drosophila classification, Drosophila Proteins genetics, Electrophoresis, Agar Gel, Genetic Variation, Genotype, Molecular Sequence Data, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Reproducibility of Results, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Sequence Homology, Nucleic Acid, Species Specificity, Drosophila genetics, Genetic Markers genetics, Genome, Insect genetics, Molecular Typing methods
- Abstract
The recent completion of genome sequencing of 12 species of Drosophila has provided a powerful resource for hypothesis testing, as well as the development of technical tools. Here we take advantage of genome sequence data from two closely related species of Drosophila, Drosophila simulans and Drosophila sechellia, to quickly identify candidate molecular markers for genotyping based on expected insertion or deletion (indel) differences between species. Out of 64 candidate molecular markers selected along the second and third chromosome of Drosophila, 51 molecular markers were validated using PCR and gel electrophoresis. We found that the 20% error rate was due to sequencing errors in the genome data, although we cannot rule out possible indel polymorphisms. The approach has the advantage of being affordable and quick, as it only requires the use of bioinformatics tools for predictions and a PCR and agarose gel based assay for validation. Moreover, the approach could be easily extended to a wide variety of taxa with the only limitation being the availability of complete or partial genome sequence data.
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Normal levels of protein C and protein S tested in the acute phase of a venous thromboembolic event are not falsely elevated.
- Author
-
Minuk L, Lazo-Langner A, Kovacs J, Robbins M, Morrow B, and Kovacs M
- Abstract
Background: Protein C (PC) and protein S (PS) determination is part of the thrombophilia investigation in patients with idiopathic venous thromboembolism (VTE). Based on scarce evidence it is a common notion that PC and PS levels decrease during the acute phase of VTE, necessitating delay of testing and temporary transition from warfarin to low molecular weight heparin. We have previously demonstrated that an abnormal PC or PS result determined within 24 hours of VTE diagnosis and before the initiation of warfarin needs to be repeated for confirmation >/=3 months after starting treatment and >/=14 days after stopping anticoagulation therapy. In the current study, we sought to show that normal PC and PS values determined during the acute phase of VTE are not false negatives., Methods: 99 patients with acute idiopathic VTE who had normal PC and PS determination within the first 24 hours of presentation and who subsequently had their oral anticoagulation discontinued after six months of therapy. PC and PS determinations were repeated >/=6 months after starting treatment and >/= 14 days after stopping warfarin. Proportions of patients who tested abnormal on the second test were calculated and 95% confidence intervals obtained using the Wilson's score method. Data from a previously published study on patients with abnormal initial tests was included for comparison., Results: None of the 99 patients who had normal PC and PS initially had an abnormal result on repeated testing (0%; 95% CI 0 - 3.7%). Data from the previous study showed that, among patients who initially had abnormal results, 40% (95%CI 35.4-84.8%) were confirmed to have low PC and 63.6% (95%CI 16.8-68.7%) low PS on repeated testing. The difference between proportions was statistically significant (chi2 p-value < 0.001)., Conclusion: Our results suggest that PC and PS can be determined during the acute phase of VTE and whereas abnormal results need to be confirmed with repeat testing at a later date, a normal result effectively rules out deficiency with only one test.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Abstracts of presentations to the Annual Meetings of the Canadian Association of General Surgeons Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons Canadian Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Society Canadian Society of Surgical Oncology Canadian Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons: Victoria, BC Sept. 10-13, 2009.
- Author
-
Nenshi R, Kennedy E, Baxter NN, Saskin R, Sutradhar R, Urbach DR, Sroka G, Feldman LS, Vassiliou MC, Kaneva PA, Fayez R, Fried GM, Krajewski SA, Brown CJ, Hur C, McCrea PH, Mitchell A, Porter G, Grushka J, Razek T, Khwaja K, Fata P, Martel G, Moloo H, Picciano G, Boushey RP, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Haas B, Xiong W, Brennan-Barnes M, Gomez D, Nathens AB, Yang I, Forbes SS, Stephen WJ, Loeb M, Smith R, Christoffersen EP, McLean RF, Westerholm J, Garcia-Osogobio S, Farrokhyar F, Cadeddu M, Anvari M, Ponton-Carss A, Hutchison C, Violato C, Segedi M, Mittleman M, Fisman D, Kinlin L, Rousseau M, Saleh W, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Stanbridge DD, Mayrand S, Fried GM, Pandya A, Gagliardi A, Nathens A, Ahmed N, Tran T, Demyttenaere SV, Polyhronopoulos G, Seguin C, Artho GP, Kaneva P, Fried GM, Feldman LS, Demyttenaere SV, Bergman S, Anderson J, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS, Racz JM, Dubois L, Katchky A, Wall WJ, Faryniuk A, Hochman D, Clarkson CA, Rubiano AM, Clarkson CA, Boone D, Ball CG, Dixon E, Kirkpatrick AW, Sutherland FR, Feliciano DV, Wyrzykowski AD, Nicholas JM, Dente CJ, Ball CG, Feliciano DV, Ullah SM, McAlister VC, Malik S, Ramsey D, Pooler S, Teague B, Misra M, Cadeddu M, Anvari M, Kaminsky M, Vergis A, Gillman LM, Gillman LM, Vergis A, Altaf A, Ellsmere J, Bonjer HJ, Klassen D, Orzech N, Palter V, Aggarwal R, Okrainec A, Grantcharov TP, Ghaderi I, Feldman LS, Sroka G, Kaneva PA, Fried GM, Shlomovitz E, Reznick RK, Kucharczyk W, Lee L, Iqbal S, Barayan H, Lu Y, Fata P, Razek T, Khwaja K, Boora PS, White JS, Vogt KN, Charyk-Stewart T, Minuk L, Eckert K, Chin-Yee I, Gray D, Parry N, Humphrey RJ, Bütter A, Schmidt J, Grieci T, Gagnon R, Han V, Duhaime S, Pitt DF, Palter V, Orzech N, Aggarwal R, Okrainec A, Grantcharov TP, Dubois L, Vogt KN, Davies W, Schlachta CM, Shi X, Birch DW, Gu Y, Moser MA, Swanson TW, Schaeffer DF, Tang BQ, Rusnak CH, Amson BJ, Vogt KN, Dubois L, Hobbs A, Etemad-Rezai R, Schlachta CM, Claydon E, McAlister V, Grushka J, Sur W, Laberge JM, Tchervenkov J, Bell L, Flageole H, Labidi S, Gagné JP, Gowing R, Kahnamoui K, McAlister CC, Marble A, Coughlin S, Karanicolas P, Emmerton-Coughlin H, Kanbur B, Kanbur S, Colquhoun P, Trottier DC, Doucette S, Huynh H, Soto CM, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP, Jamal MH, Rousseau M, Meterissian S, Snell L, Racz JM, Davies E, Aminazadeh N, Farrokhyar F, Reid S, Naeeni A, Naeeni M, Kashfi A, Kahnamoui K, Martin K, Weir M, Taylor B, Martin KM, Girotti MJ, Parry NG, Hanna WC, Fraser S, Weissglas I, Ghitulescu G, Bilek A, Marek J, Galatas C, Bergman S, Chiu CG, Nguyen NH, Bloom SW, Wiebe S, Klassen D, Bonjer J, Lawlor D, Plowman J, Ransom T, Vallis M, Ellsmere J, Menezes AC, Karmali S, Birch DW, Forbes SS, Eskicioglu C, Brenneman FD, McLeod RS, Fraser SA, Bergman S, Garzon J, Gomez D, Lawless B, Haas B, Nathens AB, Lumb KJ, Harkness L, Williamson J, Charyk-Stewart T, Gray D, Malthaner RA, Van Koughnett JA, Vogt KN, Gray DK, Parry NG, Teague B, Cadeddu M, Anvari M, Misra M, Pooler S, Malik S, Swain P, Chackungal S, Vogt KN, Yoshy C, Etemad-Rezai R, Cunningham I, Dubois L, Schlachta CM, Scott L, Vinden C, Okrainec A, Henao O, Azzie G, Deen S, Hameed M, Ramirez V, Veillette C, Bray P, Jewett M, Okrainec A, Pagliarello G, Brenneman F, Buczkowski A, Nathens A, Razek T, Widder S, Anderson I, Klassen D, Saadia R, Johner A, Hameed SM, Qureshi AP, Vergis A, Jimenez CM, Green J, Pryor AD, Schlachta CM, Okrainec A, Perri MT, Trejos AL, Naish MD, Patel RV, Malthaner RA, Stanger J, Stewart K, Yasui Y, Cass C, Damaraju S, Graham K, Bharadwaj S, Srinathan S, Tan L, Unruh H, Finley C, Miller L, Ferri LE, Urbach DR, Darling G, Spicer J, Ergun S, McDonald B, Rousseau M, Kaneva P, Ferri LE, Spicer J, Andalib A, Benay C, Rousseau M, Kushner Y, Marcus V, Ferri LE, Hunt I, Gazala S, Razzak R, Chuck A, Valji A, Stewart K, Tsuyuki R, Bédard ELR, Bottoni DA, Campbell G, Malthaner RA, Rousseau M, Guevremont P, Chasen M, Spicer J, Eckert E, Alcindor T, Ades S, Ferri LE, McGory R, Nagpal D, Fortin D, Inculet RI, Malthaner RA, Ko M, Shargall Y, Compeau C, Razzak R, Gazala S, Hunt I, Veenstra J, Valji A, Stewart K, Bédard ELR, Davis PJ, Mancuso M, Mujoomdar AA, Gazala S, Bédard ELR, Lee L, Spicer J, Robineau C, Sirois C, Mulder D, Ferri LE, Cools-Lartigue J, Chang SY, Mayrand S, Marcus V, Fried GM, Ferri LE, Perry T, Hunt I, Allegretto M, Maguire C, Abele J, Williams D, Stewart K, Bédard ELR, Grover HS, Basi S, Chiasson P, Basi S, Gregory W, Irshad K, Schieman C, MacGregor JH, Kelly E, Gelfand G, Graham AJ, McFadden SP, Grondin SC, Croome KP, Chudzinski R, Hanto DW, Jamal MH, Doi SA, Barkun JS, Wong SL, Kwan AHL, Yang S, Law C, Luo Y, Spiers J, Forse A, Taylor W, Apriasz I, Mysliwiec B, Sarin N, Gregor J, Moulton CE, McLeod RS, Barnett H, Nhan C, Gallinger S, Demyttenaere SV, Nau P, Muscarella P, Melvin WS, Ellison EC, Wiseman SM, Melck AL, Davidge KM, Eskicioglu C, Lipa J, Ferguson P, Swallow CJ, Wright FC, Edwards JP, Kelly EJ, Lin Y, Lenders T, Ghali WA, Graham A, Francescutti V, Farrokhyar F, Tozer R, Heller B, Lovrics P, Jansz G, Kahnamoui K, Spiegle G, Schmocker S, Huang H, Victor C, Law C, Kennedy ED, McCart JA, Aslani N, Swanson T, Kennecke H, Woods R, Davis N, Klevan AE, Ramsay JA, Stephen WJ, Smith M, Plourde M, Johnson PM, Yaffe P, Walsh M, Hoskin D, Huynh HP, Trottier DC, Soto C, Auer R, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP, Moloo H, Huynh HP, Trottier DC, Soto C, Moloo H, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Boushey RP, Nhan C, Driman DK, Smith AJ, Hunter A, McLeod RS, Eskicioglu C, Fenech DS, Victor C, McLeod RS, Trottier DC, Huynh H, Sabri E, Soto C, Scheer A, Zolfaghari S, Moloo H, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Boushey RP, Hallet J, Guénette-Lemieux M, Bouchard A, Grégoire RC, Thibault C, Dionne G, Côté F, Langis P, Gagné JP, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Brown CJ, Kuzmanovic A, Planting A, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Brown CJ, Huynh HP, Trottier DC, Moloo H, Poulin EC, Mamazza J, Friedlich M, Stern HS, Boushey RP, Tang BQ, Moloo H, Bleier J, Goldberg SM, Alsharif J, Martel G, Bouchard A, Sabri E, Ramsay CR, Mamazza J, Poulin EC, Boushey RP, Richardson D, Porter G, Johnson P, Al-Sukhni E, Ridgway PF, O'Connor B, McLeod RS, Swallow CJ, Forbes SS, Urbach DR, Sutradhar R, Paszat L, Rabeneck L, Baxter NN, Chung W, Ko D, Sun C, Brown CJ, Raval M, Phang PT, Pao JS, Woods R, Raval MJ, Phang PT, Brown CJ, Power A, Francescutti V, Ramsey D, Kelly S, Stephen W, Simunovic M, Coates A, Goldsmith CH, Thabane L, Reeson D, Smith AJ, McLeod RS, DeNardi F, Whelan TJ, Levine MN, Al-Khayal KA, Buie WD, Wallace L, Sigalet D, Eskicioglu C, Gagliardi A, Fenech DS, Victor C, and McLeod RS
- Published
- 2009
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.