Search

We examined the association between lifetime traumatic events with or without trauma response symptoms and depressive symptomatology in American Indians aged ≥ 55 years from a tribe in the Southeastern US (N = 362). Twenty-three percent of the sample experienced a traumatic event without trauma-response symptoms, whereas 14% experienced a traumatic event with at least one trauma-response symptom. After adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics and social support, participants who experienced a traumatic event with one or more trauma-response symptoms had higher odds of clinically relevant depressive symptomatology compared to (1) those who never experienced a traumatic event [odds ratio (OR) 3.2, p

In 2019, the NIH presented the results of its two-year visioning process to advance the science of minority health and health disparities. The PRISMA Health REACH Expansion (PH-REACH E) is an innovative, community-academic partnership between a hospital memory clinic, meal delivery service, research university, and low-income health clinic. The purpose is to: 1) increase the dementia capability of community-based programs, 2) offer caregivers of persons with dementia the REACH intervention, and 3) identify and connect racial minority and/or rural residents with services to promote health and well-being in older adulthood. This presentation will detail the PH-REACH E framework and present program results, which include improved caregiver outcomes (e.g., reduced burden, increased self-efficacy, reduced depression) and enhanced dementia capability (e.g., increased dementia knowledge) of partner organizations. This program illustrates some key recommendations of the NIH – community engagement in intervention adaptation, multisectoral collaboration, and promoting systems-level change to reduce health disparities.

The overall goal of the PRISMA Health - REACH (PH-REACH) project was to reduce caregiver burden and improve caregiving skills among caregivers of community-living Alzheimer's disease and related dementia patients and, as a result, improve care and quality of life for both the patients and their caregivers. This evidence-based, person-centered program emphasizes positive aspects of caregiving and provides tools to improve stress management, caregiver self-care, and coping skills for managing problem behaviors. PH-REACH provided in-home caregiver training, support, and service referral to 126 caregivers in the Greenville area. Trained coaches delivered the program to caregivers of persons with moderate to severe dementia in its original format but later adapted it to better fit the caregivers’ needs. Analysis of pre- and post-test data showed that both the standard and adapted interventions provided benefits across multiple caregiver outcomes, including reduced caregiver burden, ability to manage disruptive behaviors of the care recipient, increased caregiver self-efficacy, reduced depression, and a slight improvement in the number of chronic health conditions. This supports and expands on previous research that has demonstrated the ability of this program to translate across different community-based and clinical settings. The tailored version of PH-REACH succeeded in assisting these caregivers, meeting them where they were in their caregiving journey, and provided measurable benefits to both their mental and physical health. Overall, this project provided evidence of the utility of the PH-REACH intervention and laid the groundwork to extend caregiver training and support to other institutions, both inside and outside the health system.

With the increase in our older adult population there is a need for dementia training for informal and formal dementia caregivers. The objective of this scoping study was to assess dementia knowledge instruments utilized in educational programs and interventions intended for formal and informal dementia caregivers. Scoping review methodology was used to search PubMed, PsycInfo, CINAHL, and Web of Science with tailored database search terms. The search yielded 8,101 results, with 35 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Studies were conducted in eight countries, had varying study designs (RCTs=9, non-RCTs=6, one-group study design=20), and utilized previously published (19) and author-developed (16) instruments. Only two studies focused on minority populations. While author-developed instruments may be more relevant and time-saving, studies should strive to validate instruments or use previously published instruments to help standardize findings across studies and better understand the effects of education programs on caregiver knowledge.