1. Fine particle flow pattern and region delimitation in fountain confined conical spouted beds
- Author
-
Haritz Altzibar, Roberto Aguado, Aitor Atxutegi, Idoia Estiati, Martin Olazar, and Mikel Tellabide
- Subjects
General Chemical Engineering ,Annulus (oil well) ,Flow (psychology) ,02 engineering and technology ,Mechanics ,Conical surface ,010402 general chemistry ,021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology ,01 natural sciences ,0104 chemical sciences ,Draft tube ,Core (optical fiber) ,Percolation ,Particle ,Particle velocity ,0210 nano-technology ,Geology - Abstract
A novel borescopic technique together with the monitoring of pressure fluctuation signals (power spectral distribution, PSD) has been used to track fine particles and characterize solid flow dynamics in fountain confined conical spouted beds. Radial and axial particle velocity profiles have been obtained for different configurations, and spout-annulus and fountain core-periphery interfaces have been delineated. The downward particle velocities in the annulus peak at intermediate positions in this zone, whereas the upward velocities in the dilute zones (spout and fountain core) peak at the axis or close to this position. Among the different configurations analysed in this work, the system without draft tube shows the greatest vertical particle velocities in almost all the different radial and axial positions. The evolution of the spout size along the bed depends on the configuration used, but all of them differ from those commonly reported in the literature. Thus, the spout expands from the bed bottom to the surface, without any neck at an intermediate bed level. Furthermore, the cross-sectional spout shape has been delineated in the systems with open-sided draft tube, and significant spout expansion is observed due to air percolation from the spout into the annulus through the opened faces. Finally, the average spout diameters of the systems without draft tube and with open-sided draft tubes have been compared with those predicted by literature correlations. Those proposed by San Jose et al. and Volpicelli et al. provide the best fit for the configurations without draft tube and with open-sided draft tube, with their relative errors being 9.83% and 8.88%, respectively.
- Published
- 2021