Search

There is a need for open-source libraries in emission tomography that (i) use modern and popular backend code to encourage community contributions and (ii) offer support for the multitude of reconstruction techniques available in recent literature, such as those that employ artificial intelligence. The purpose of this research was to create and evaluate a GPU-accelerated, open-source, and user-friendly image reconstruction library, designed to serve as a central platform for the development, validation, and deployment of various tomographic reconstruction algorithms. PyTomography was developed using Python and inherits the GPU-accelerated functionality of PyTorch and parallelproj for fast computations. Its flexible and modular design decouples system matrices, likelihoods, and reconstruction algorithms, simplifying the process of integrating new imaging modalities using various python tools. Example use cases demonstrate the software capabilities in parallel hole SPECT and listmode PET imaging. Overall, we have developed and publicly share PyTomography, a highly optimized and user-friendly software for medical image reconstruction, with a class hierarchy that fosters the development of novel imaging applications.

Purpose: Whole-body bone scintigraphy (WBS) is one of the most widely used modalities in diagnosing malignant bone diseases during the early stages. However, the procedure is time-consuming and requires vigour and experience. Moreover, interpretation of WBS scans in the early stages of the disorders might be challenging because the patterns often reflect normal appearance that is prone to subjective interpretation. To simplify the gruelling, subjective, and prone-to-error task of interpreting WBS scans, we developed deep learning (DL) models to automate two major analyses, namely (i) classification of scans into normal and abnormal and (ii) discrimination between malignant and non-neoplastic bone diseases, and compared their performance with human observers. Materials and Methods: After applying our exclusion criteria on 7188 patients from three different centers, 3772 and 2248 patients were enrolled for the first and second analyses, respectively. Data were split into two parts, including training and testing, while a fraction of training data were considered for validation. Ten different CNN models were applied to single- and dual-view input (posterior and anterior views) modes to find the optimal model for each analysis. In addition, three different methods, including squeeze-and-excitation (SE), spatial pyramid pooling (SPP), and attention-augmented (AA), were used to aggregate the features for dual-view input models. Model performance was reported through area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity and was compared with the DeLong test applied to ROC curves. The test dataset was evaluated by three nuclear medicine physicians (NMPs) with different levels of experience to compare the performance of AI and human observers. Results: DenseNet121_AA (DensNet121, with dual-view input aggregated by AA) and InceptionResNetV2_SPP achieved the highest performance (AUC = 0.72) for the first and second analyses, respectively. Moreover, on average, in the first analysis, Inception V3 and InceptionResNetV2 CNN models and dual-view input with AA aggregating method had superior performance. In addition, in the second analysis, DenseNet121 and InceptionResNetV2 as CNN methods and dual-view input with AA aggregating method achieved the best results. Conversely, the performance of AI models was significantly higher than human observers for the first analysis, whereas their performance was comparable in the second analysis, although the AI model assessed the scans in a drastically lower time. Conclusion: Using the models designed in this study, a positive step can be taken toward improving and optimizing WBS interpretation. By training DL models with larger and more diverse cohorts, AI could potentially be used to assist physicians in the assessment of WBS images.

Abstract This study intends to predict in-hospital and 6-month mortality, as well as 30-day and 90-day hospital readmission, using Machine Learning (ML) approach via conventional features. A total of 737 patients remained after applying the exclusion criteria to 1101 heart failure patients. Thirty-four conventional features were collected for each patient. First, the data were divided into train and test cohorts with a 70–30% ratio. Then train data were normalized using the Z-score method, and its mean and standard deviation were applied to the test data. Subsequently, Boruta, RFE, and MRMR feature selection methods were utilized to select more important features in the training set. In the next step, eight ML approaches were used for modeling. Next, hyperparameters were optimized using tenfold cross-validation and grid search in the train dataset. All model development steps (normalization, feature selection, and hyperparameter optimization) were performed on a train set without touching the hold-out test set. Then, bootstrapping was done 1000 times on the hold-out test data. Finally, the obtained results were evaluated using four metrics: area under the ROC curve (AUC), accuracy (ACC), specificity (SPE), and sensitivity (SEN). The RFE-LR (AUC: 0.91, ACC: 0.84, SPE: 0.84, SEN: 0.83) and Boruta-LR (AUC: 0.90, ACC: 0.85, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.83) models generated the best results in terms of in-hospital mortality. In terms of 30-day rehospitalization, Boruta-SVM (AUC: 0.73, ACC: 0.81, SPE: 0.85, SEN: 0.50) and MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.71, ACC: 0.68, SPE: 0.69, SEN: 0.63) models performed the best. The best model for 3-month rehospitalization was MRMR-KNN (AUC: 0.60, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.66, SEN: 0.53) and regarding 6-month mortality, the MRMR-LR (AUC: 0.61, ACC: 0.63, SPE: 0.44, SEN: 0.66) and MRMR-NB (AUC: 0.59, ACC: 0.61, SPE: 0.48, SEN: 0.63) models outperformed the others. Reliable models were developed in 30-day rehospitalization and in-hospital mortality using conventional features and ML techniques. Such models can effectively personalize treatment, decision-making, and wiser budget allocation. Obtained results in 3-month rehospitalization and 6-month mortality endpoints were not astonishing and further experiments with additional information are needed to fetch promising results in these endpoints.