Search

Aims: Patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) present with considerable heterogeneity in cardiac damage depending on underlying aetiology, disease progression, and comorbidities. This study aims to capture their cardiopulmonary complexity by employing a machine-learning (ML)-based phenotyping approach., Methods and Results: Data were obtained from 1426 patients undergoing mitral valve transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (MV TEER) for MR. The ML model was developed using 609 patients (derivation cohort) and validated on 817 patients from two external institutions. Phenotyping was based on echocardiographic data, and ML-derived phenotypes were correlated with 5-year outcomes. Unsupervised agglomerative clustering revealed four phenotypes among the derivation cohort: Cluster 1 showed preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF; 56.5 ± 7.79%) and regular left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD; 35.2 ± 7.52 mm); 5-year survival in Cluster 1, hereinafter serving as a reference, was 60.9%. Cluster 2 presented with preserved LVEF (55.7 ± 7.82%) but showed the largest mitral valve effective regurgitant orifice area (0.623 ± 0.360 cm2) and highest systolic pulmonary artery pressures (68.4 ± 16.2 mmHg); 5-year survival ranged at 43.7% (P-value: 0.032). Cluster 3 was characterized by impaired LVEF (31.0 ± 10.4%) and enlarged LVESD (53.2 ± 10.9 mm); 5-year survival was reduced to 38.3% (P-value: <0.001). The poorest 5-year survival (23.8%; P-value: <0.001) was observed in Cluster 4 with biatrial dilatation (left atrial volume: 312 ± 113 mL; right atrial area: 46.0 ± 8.83 cm2) although LVEF was only slightly reduced (51.5 ± 11.0%). Importantly, the prognostic significance of ML-derived phenotypes was externally confirmed., Conclusion: ML-enabled phenotyping captures the complexity of extra-mitral valve cardiac damage, which does not necessarily occur in a sequential fashion. This novel phenotyping approach can refine risk stratification in patients undergoing MV TEER in the future., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared ., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aims: To quantify extra-valvular cardiac damage associated with severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), a novel staging model was proposed. This study aimed to validate this model in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) as well as to assess its prognostic impact., Methods and Results: Based on echocardiographic findings, the following stages were applied: isolated AS (stage 0), left ventricular (LV) damage (stage 1), left atrial or mitral valve damage (stage 2), pulmonary hypertension or tricuspid regurgitation (stage 3), or right ventricular dysfunction (stage 4). The primary endpoint was 2-year all-cause mortality. The distribution across stages was 0.8% at stage 0, 7.5% at stage 1, 63.3% at stage 2, 18.3% at stage 3, and 10.1% at stage 4. All-cause mortality increased at all stages 1-4 (12.1%, 18.2%, 26.6%, and 28.2%; p = 0.023). In the multivariate model, the stage of cardiac damage, age, New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III/IV, peripheral artery disease, and previous pacemaker were independent predictors of the primary endpoint., Conclusions: Patients treated for severe AS show a high prevalence of extra-valvular cardiac damage. An increase in stage is associated with higher 2-year all-cause mortality. The application of this staging model may add value to current treatment algorithms., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Pellegrini, Duesmann, Rheude, Berg, Alvarez-Covarrubias, Trenkwalder, Mayr, Schürmann, Nicol, Xhepa and Joner.)

Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the SAPIEN 3 Ultra (Ultra) and SAPIEN 3 (S3) transcatheter heart valves (THVs)., Background: The latest generation balloon-expandable Ultra THV incorporates new technical features and might improve outcomes following TAVR., Methods: This registry included all consecutive patients who underwent TAVR with either the Ultra or S3 between January 2014 and January 2020. One-to-one propensity score matching was performed to account for differences in baseline characteristics. In-hospital and 30-day Valve Academic Research Consortium-2-defined outcomes were investigated., Results: A total of 310 patients (n = 155 Ultra, n = 155 S3) were included. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics after propensity score matching. Procedures were significantly more often performed under conscious sedation with Ultra compared with S3 (97.4% vs. 71.6%; p < 0.001). Pre-dilatation was more frequent with S3 compared with Ultra (85.2% vs. 42.6%; p < 0.001). In-hospital outcomes, including device success (91.6% vs. 95.5%; p = 0.165), major vascular complications (12.3% vs. 11.0%; p = 0.723), and new pacemaker implantation (5.8% vs. 4.5%; p = 0.608), were comparable between S3 and Ultra patients, respectively. Post-procedural mean transprosthetic gradients (13.2 ± 5.7 mm Hg vs. 13.1 ± 4.7 mm Hg; p = 0.829) and rate of moderate or greater paravalvular leakage (PVL) (1.3% vs. 2.7%; p = 0.414) were comparable, whereas mild PVL was more frequent with S3 compared with Ultra (43.0% vs. 18.7%; p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Device success rates were high with both balloon-expandable THVs, with overall low rates of adverse events up to 30 days after TAVR. Despite a lower frequency of pre-dilatation, significant reduction of mild PVL confirms improved annular sealing properties of the novel Ultra THV., Competing Interests: Author Relationship With Industry Dr. Joner has received lecture fees and research grants from Edwards Lifesciences and Boston Scientific; and is a consultant for Biotronik and Orbus Neich. Dr. Kasel is a consultant and proctor for Edwards Lifesciences. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2020 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study compares two latest-generation self-expanding transcatheter heart valves (THV), the supra-annular ACURATE neo (Boston Scientific) and the intra-annular Centera THV (Edwards Lifesciences)., Methods: In this single center observational cohort trial 317 patients treated with the ACURATE neo and 78 patients treated with the Centera TVH were included. The main endpoints were device success and the early safety endpoint at 30 days., Results: Besides higher incidence of diabetes mellitus and higher body mass index in patients treated with the ACURATE neo THV, there were no baseline differences between the groups. Device success was similar in both groups (neo: 91.8% vs. Centera: 93.6%; P=0.598), with numerically higher rates of moderate to severe paravalvular leakage in the ACURATE neo group (4.7% vs. 1.3%; P=0.214). At 30 days all-cause mortality rates were low in both groups (0.3% vs. 0%; P=0.620) and no difference occurred in the early safety at 30 days (19.3% vs. 16.7%; P=0.599). However, all-cause stroke rates were significantly higher in patients treated with the Centera THV (6.4 vs. 1.6%; P=0.015)., Conclusions: The ACURATE neo and the Centera THV show low mortality rates as well as comparable, favorable hemodynamics. The finding of higher stroke rates at 30 days with the repositionable Centera SE-THV needs further assessment., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-20-1700). AMK reports that he is a proctor and consultant for Edwards Lifesciences. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2020 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved.)

Background: Marital status has been described to affect outcome in cardiovascular diseases, however its impact on patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is unknown. We therefore aimed to assess the impact of marital status in patients undergoing TAVI., Methods: Between 2011 and 2015, 779 patients undergoing transfemoral TAVI with known marital status were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint of the study was the composite of cardiac death and readmission for congestive heart failure (CHF) at one year., Results: Mean age was 80.7±5.9 years, 47.8% were female and median logistic EuroScore was 12.7% (8.13-19.39%). Forty-three point three percent of patients were not married. Compared to married patients, unmarried patients were older (82.4±5.5 vs . 79.5±5.8 years; P<0.001), more often female (73.3% vs . 28.3%; P<0.001), presented with a higher logistic EuroScore [13.1% (9.5-21.5%) vs . 11.7% (7.0-18.5%); P<0.001], and more symptomatic with New York Heart Association functional class III/IV (69.7% vs . 60.6%; P=0.009). At one year the incidence of the primary endpoint was higher in unmarried patients (18.7% vs . 12.0%; P=0.011) which was mainly driven by more admissions for CHF (14.1% vs . 7.8%; P=0.007). After multivariable adjustment, marital status was borderline significant regarding CHF (HR 0.61, 95% CI: 0.37-1.02; P=0.06) but not the primary endpoint., Conclusions: Unmarried patients undergoing TAVI showed a higher incidence of cardiac death or CHF at one year. Hence, marital status should be taken into account in patients with aortic stenosis subjected to TAVI. Whether closer monitoring and intensified medical follow-up improves outcomes remains to be investigated in future studies., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Objective: Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become a standard therapy for patients with aortic valve stenosis. Fluoroscopic imaging is essential for TAVI with the anesthesiologist's workplace close to patient's head side. While the use of lead-caps has been shown to be useful for interventional cardiologists, data are lacking for anesthesiologists., Methods: A protective cap with a 0.35 lead-equivalent was worn on 15 working days by one anesthesiologist. Six detectors (three outside, three inside) were analyzed to determine the reduction of radiation. Literature search was conducted between April and October 2018., Results: In the observational period, 32 TAVI procedures were conducted. A maximum radiation dose of 0.55 mSv was detected by the dosimeters at the outside of the cap. The dosimeters inside the cap, in contrast, displayed a constant radiation dose of 0.08 mSv., Conclusion: The anesthesiologist's head is exposed to significant radiation during TAVI and it can be protected by wearing a lead-cap., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Objectives: This study investigates the influence of implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing on conduction abnormalities (CA) and permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) after SAPIEN 3 (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) implantation., Background: CA and PPIs are frequent complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a next-generation balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valve (SAPIEN 3). The potential underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood., Methods: Of 244 patients treated with SAPIEN 3,208 without a previous pacemaker and 184 without baseline CA were analyzed. We assessed the association of angiographic implantation depth (% of frame height below the annulus) and degree of oversizing with PPI and CA., Results: New PPI and new or worsened CA or PPI occurred in 16% (34 of 208) and 31% (57 of 184), respectively. Patients requiring PPI had a higher prevalence of atrial fibrillation (44% vs. 24%; p = 0.017), complete right bundle branch block (27% vs. 5%; p = 0.001), and bradycardia (<60 beats/min, 38% vs. 21%; p = 0.034). In patients with new CA or PPI, implantation depth was lower (at septal side: 29 ± 8% vs. 25 ± 7%; p = 0.003), and rate of oversizing was higher (19% [11 of 57] vs. 6% [8 of 126]; p = 0.007). Independent predictors of new or worsened CA or PPI were implantation depth at septal side (odds ratio [OR]: 1.063 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.017 to 1.110]; p = 0.006 per % of frame below the aortic annulus), oversizing (OR: 3.489 [95% CI: 1.236 to 9.848]; p = 0.018), and QRS duration (OR: 1.033 [95% CI: 1.011 to 1.056]; p = 0.003 per ms)., Conclusions: Implantation depth and prosthesis oversizing were associated with a higher rate of new CA or PPI using the SAPIEN 3. Thus, avoidance of deep implantation and extreme oversizing may reduce these complications., (Copyright © 2016 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a treatment strategy for patients with severe aortic stenosis. Although general anaesthesia (TAVI-GA) and sedation (TAVI-S) have previously been described for TAVI, the difference in safety and efficacy of both methods has not been studied in a randomized trial., Methods: The INSERT trial was a single centre, controlled parallel-group trial with balanced randomization. Sixty-six patients (68-94 yr) with acquired aortic stenosis undergoing transfemoral CoreValve™ were assigned to TAVI-GA or TAVI-S. Comparable operative risk was determined from risk-scores (EUROscore, STS-Score). Monitoring and anaesthetic drugs were standardized. Near-Infrared-Spectroscopy was used to monitor cerebral-oxymetry blinded. Primary outcome was the perioperative cumulative cerebral desaturation. As secondary outcomes, changes in neurocognitive function and respiratory and haemodynamic adverse events were evaluated., Results: Of 66 included patients, 62 (TAVI-GA: n=31, TAVI-S: n=31) were finally analysed. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In 24 patients (39%) cerebral desaturation was observed. Cumulative cerebral desaturation was comparable (TAVI-GA:(median [IQR]) (0[0/1308] s%) vs. TAVI-S:(0[0/276] s%); P=0.505) between the groups. Neurocognitive function did not change within and between groups. Adverse events were more frequently observed in TAVI-S patients (P<0.001). Bradypnoea (n=16, 52%) and the need for airway manoeuvres (n=11, 36%) or bag-mask-ventilation (n=6, 19%) were the most common respiratory adverse events., Conclusions: Cerebral desaturation occurred in both patient groups, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Based on primary outcome, both methods were shown to be comparable. Neurocognitive outcome was similar. The higher incidence of adverse events in the sedation group suggests a potential advantage of general anaesthesia., Clinical Trial Registration: NCT 01251328., (© The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: Evaluation of 30-day outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with the novel balloon-expandable SAPIEN 3 (S3) transcatheter heart valve (THV) (Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, California) emphasizing the updated Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC-2) criteria., Background: Preliminary data on clinical performance with the S3 THV are promising. However, information regarding 30-day outcome is limited., Methods: A total of 250 consecutive patients undergoing transfemoral TAVR with the S3 THV at our center were enrolled, and outcomes according to VARC-2 criteria were analyzed at 30 days., Results: The mean age was 81.0 ± 6.2 years, median logistic EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) and Society of Thoracic Surgeons score were 12.1% and 4.4%, respectively. VARC-2-defined device success was achieved in 244 patients (97.6%); moderate paravalvular leakage developed in 5 patients (2.0%). One patient (0.4%) died of a noncardiac cause and 8 patients (3.2%) had a stroke. Life-threatening bleeding and major vascular complications occurred in 12 (4.8%) and 9 (3.6%) of the patients, respectively. From discharge to 30 days, 5 patients (2.0%) were hospitalized due to valve-related symptoms or worsening of heart failure. The VARC-2 composite early safety endpoint was observed in 25 patients (10.0%). Permanent pacemaker implantation rate at 30 days was 15.2%. Myocardial infarction, coronary obstruction requiring intervention, valve-related dysfunction, and endocarditis were not observed., Conclusions: We found very good 30-day results using the novel S3 THV with a low rate of clinical events according to VARC-2 criteria. The S3 THV is associated with high procedural success and favorable early safety profile. The need for pacemaker implantations appears to be more frequent than with its predecessor., (Copyright © 2015 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is nowadays a routine therapy for elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) and high perioperative risk. With growing experience, further development of the devices, and the expansion to "intermediate-risk" patients, there is increasing interest in performing this procedure under conscious sedation (TAVI-S) rather than the previously favoured approach of general anesthesia (TAVI-GA). The proposed benefits of TAVI-S include; reduced procedure time, shorter intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, reduced need for intraprocedural vasopressor support, and the potential to perform the procedure without the direct presence of an anesthetist for cost-saving reasons. To date, no randomized trial data exists. We reviewed 13 non-randomized studies/registries reporting data from 6,718 patients undergoing TAVI (3,227 performed under sedation). Patient selection, study methods, and endpoints have differed considerably between published studies. Reported rates of in-hospital and longer-term mortality are similar for both groups. Up to 17% of patients undergoing TAVI-S require conversion to general anesthesia during the procedure, primarily due to vascular complications, and urgent intubation is frequently associated with hemodynamic instability. Procedure related factors, including hypotension, may compound preexisting age-specific renal impairment and enhance the risk of acute kidney injury. Hypotonia of the hypopharyngeal muscles in elderly patients, intraprocedural hypercarbia, and certain anesthetic drugs, may increase the aspiration risk in sedated patients. General anesthesia and conscious sedation have both been used successfully to treat patients with severe AS undergoing TAVI with similar reported short and long-term mortality outcomes. The authors believe that the significant incidence of complications and unplanned conversion to general anesthesia during TAVI-S mandates the start-to-finish presence of an experienced cardiac anesthetist in order to optimize patient outcomes. Good quality randomized data is needed to determine the optimal anesthetic regimen for patients undergoing TAVI.

Background: Once aprotinin was no longer available for clinical use, ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) and tranexamic acid became the only two options for antifibrinolytic therapy. We compared aprotinin and EACA with respect to their blood-sparing efficacy and other major clinical outcome criteria in infants undergoing cardiac surgery., Methods: We retrospectively analysed data from a large consecutive cohort of infants (n=227) aged 31-365 days undergoing primary cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass encompassing the transition from aprotinin to EACA (aprotinin n=88, EACA n=139); all other aspects including the medical team and departmental protocols remained unchanged. The primary outcome was postoperative blood loss measured as chest tube output (CTO). Secondary outcome parameters were transfusion requirements, reoperation due to bleeding, renal, vascular, and neurological complications, and in-hospital mortality., Results: CTO was significantly higher in the EACA patients {aprotinin 18 (13-27) ml kg(-1) 24 h(-1), EACA 23 (15-37) ml kg(-1) 24 h(-1) [mean (inter-quartile range)], P=0.001}, but transfusion requirements and donor exposures were not significantly different. A sensitivity analysis strengthened our finding that the increased blood loss in the EACA group was attributable to lower efficacy of EACA. There were no significant differences in the other clinical outcome measures., Conclusions: CTO was lower in aprotinin-treated patients. Nonetheless, EACA remains a suitable substitute without measurable differences in other clinical outcome criteria.

Background: With the withdrawal of aprotinin from worldwide marketing in November 2007, many institutions treating patients at high risk for hyperfibrinolysis had to update their therapeutic protocols. At our institution, the standard was switched from aprotinin to ε-aminocaproic acid (EACA) in all patients undergoing cardiac surgery with extracorporeal circulation including neonates. Although both antifibrinolytic medications have been used widely for many years, there are few data directly comparing their blood-sparing effect and their side-effects especially in neonates., Methods: Perioperative data from 235 neonates aged up to 30 days undergoing primary cardiac surgery were analysed. Between July 1, 2006 and November 5, 2007, all patients (n=95) received aprotinin. Starting November 6, 2007 until December 31, 2009, all patients (n=140) were treated with EACA. The primary outcome criterion was blood loss; secondary outcome criteria were transfusion requirements, renal, vascular, and neurological complications and also in-hospital mortality., Results: All descriptive and intraoperative data variable were similar. Blood loss was significantly higher in the EACA group (P=0.001), but there was no difference in the rate of re-operation for bleeding (P=0.218) nor the number of transfusions. There were no differences in the incidences of postoperative renal, neurological, and vascular events or in-hospital mortality., Conclusions: In neonatal patients undergoing cardiac surgery, the switch to EACA treatment led to a higher postoperative blood loss. However, there were no differences in transfusion requirements or major clinical outcomes.