1. Comparison of contrast-enhanced videofluoroscopy to unenhanced dynamic MRI in minor patients following surgical correction of velopharyngeal dysfunction
- Author
-
Shuo Zhang, Julian L. Wichmann, Kai Tobias Block, Tatjana Gruber-Rouh, M C Hoelter, Katrin Eichler, T. J. Vogl, Doris Leithner, Martin G. Mack, R Sader, Christophe T. Arendt, and Y Berdan
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Velopharyngeal Insufficiency ,Adolescent ,Article ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Velopharyngeal insufficiency ,Phonation ,Flip angle ,medicine ,Humans ,Fluoroscopy ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Prospective Studies ,Child ,Neuroradiology ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Ultrasound ,Magnetic resonance imaging ,General Medicine ,Magnetic Resonance Imaging ,Sagittal plane ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI ,Pharynx ,Radiology ,business - Abstract
To compare dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with videofluoroscopy (VFS) regarding image quality and assessment of gap size between soft palate (SP) and posterior pharyngeal wall (PPW) in children and adolescents following surgical correction of velopharyngeal dysfunction (VPD). Twenty-one patients undergoing unenhanced 3-T MRI and contrast-enhanced VFS were included in this IRB-approved prospective study. The MRI scan protocol comprised refocused gradient-echo sequences in transverse and sagittal planes during speech, with TE 1.97 ms, TR 3.95 ms, flip angle 8°, matrix size 128 × 128, and 5-mm slice thickness. Radial k-space sampling and sliding window reconstruction were used to achieve an image acquisition rate of 28 frames per second (fps). VFS with 30 fps was similarly performed in both planes. Closure of the velopharyngeal port during phonation was evaluated by two experienced radiologists. Eleven (52.4%) patients displayed a complete closure, whereas ten (47.6%) patients showed a post-operative gap during speech. VFS and MRI equally identified the cases with persistent or recurrent VPD. Differences in SP-PPW distance between VFS (3.9 ± 1.6 mm) and MRI (4.1 ± 1.5 mm) were not statistically significant (p = 0.5). The subjective overall image quality of MRI was rated inferior (p
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF