Search

Background/Aim: The aim of this study was to evaluate the mechanical performance and the effect on dose distribution and deliverability of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for prostate cancer created with the commercial knowledge-based planning (KBP) system (RapidPlan™). Materials and Methods: Three institutions, A, B, and C were enrolled in this study. Each institution established and trained a KBP model with their own cases. CT data and structures for 45 patients at institution B were utilized to validate the dose-volume parameters (D(2(%)), D(95(%),) and D(98(%)) for target, and V(50(%)), V(75(%),) and V(90(%)) for rectum and bladder), and the following mechanical performance parameters and gamma passing rates of each KBP model: leaf sequence variability (LSV), aperture area variability (AAV), total monitor unit (MU), modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), MU/control point (CP), aperture area (AA)/CP, and MU×AA/CP. Results: Significant differences (p95% for all cases in each institution. Dose distribution and mechanical performance significantly differed between the three models. Conclusion: Each KBP model had different dose distributions and mechanical performance but could create an acceptable plan for deliverability regardless of mechanical performance.

Dosimetric potential of knowledge-based RapidPlan planning model trained with HyperArc plans (Model-HA) for brain metastases has not been reported. We developed a Model-HA and compared its performance with that of clinical volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans.From 67 clinical stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) HyperArc plans for brain metastases, 47 plans were used to build and train a Model-HA. The other 20 clinical HyperArc plans were recalculated in RapidPlan system with Model-HA. The model performance was validated with the 20 plans by comparing dosimetric parameters for normal brain tissue between clinical plans and model-generated plans. The 20 clinical conventional VMAT-based SRS or stereotactic radiotherapy plans (CL-VMAT) were reoptimized with Model-HA (RP) and HyperArc system (HA), respectively. The dosimetric parameters were compared among three plans (CL-VMAT vs. RP vs. HA) in terms of planning target volume (PTV), normal brain excluding PTVs (Brain - PTV), brainstem, chiasm, and both optic nerves.In model validation, the optimization performance of Model-HA was comparable to that of HyperArc system. In comparison to CL-VMAT, there were no significant differences among three plans with respect to PTV coverage (p 0.17) and maximum dose for brainstem, chiasm, and optic nerves (p 0.40). RP provided significantly lower VThe Model-HA has the potential to significantly reduce the normal brain dose of the original VMAT plans for brain metastases.

To determine the thickness of a soft variable shape tungsten rubber (STR) as a lung compensating filter in total body irradiation.A tough water (TW) phantom and tough lung (TL) phantom were used as water and lung-equivalent phantoms. The TW with a thickness of 3 cm simulating the thoracic wall was used (upper layer). The TW or TL with a thickness from 1 to 15 cm (1 cm increments) was placed beneath the upper layer (middle layer). The TW with a thickness of 5 cm simulating the mediastinum was placed beneath the middle layer (lower layer), and a farmer ionization chamber was placed beneath this layer. The relative doses of a 10 MV X-rays were then measured. The TL was compensated in 1 mm increments from 1 to 11 mm of the STR, and the thickness of the STR at the same dose of TW (water equivalent) was obtained.The compensating ability of STR increased as the thickness of the TL increased, and an STR with a thickness of 1 mm reduced the dose by 2%-4%, depending on the thickness of lung. The STR thickness as an equivalent dose of TW per cm of TL was approximately linear, and the thickness was 0.62 mm/cm of TL.The STR can be used as a lung compensating filter for a water equivalent dose with 0.62 mm of STR per cm of lung.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the dose–volume parameters and regression scatter plots of the iteratively improved RapidPlan (RP) models, specific knowledge‐based planning (KBP) models, in volumetric‐modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer over three periods. Methods A RP1 model was created from 47 clinical intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)/VMAT plans. A RP2 model was created to exceed dosimetric goals which set as the mean values +1SD of the dose–volume parameters of RP1 (50 consecutive new clinical VMAT plans). A RP3 model was created with more strict dose constraints for organs at risks (OARs) than RP1 and RP2 models (50 consecutive anew clinical VMAT plans). Each RP model was validated against 30 validation plans (RP1, RP2, and RP3) that were not used for model configuration, and the dose–volume parameters were compared. The Cook's distances of regression scatterplots of each model were also evaluated. Results Significant differences (p

BACKGROUND/AIM We investigated the plan complexity of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with knowledge-based plan (KBP) for oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) with a single optimization and whether it could be used clinically. MATERIALS AND METHODS KBP model was configured using 55 consecutive OPC and nasopharyngeal cancer plans. Plan complexity as a characteristic of multileaf collimator (MLC) motion and γ pass rate (2%/2 mm criterion) were compared between clinical manual plan (CMP) and KBP for other 10 plans. RESULTS Plan complexity metrics that had significant differences (p

Purpose Skin collimation provides a sharp penumbra for electron beams, while the effect of bremsstrahlung from shielding materials is a concern. This phantom study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a real‐time variable shape rubber containing‐tungsten (STR) that can be placed on a patient’s skin. Methods Electron beam profiles were acquired with the STR placed on a water‐equivalent phantom and low melting‐point alloy (LMA) placed at the applicator according to commonly used procedures (field sizes: 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters). Depth and lateral dose profiles for 6‐ and 12‐MeV electron beams were obtained by Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and were benchmarked against film measurements. The width of the off‐axis distance between 80% and 20% doses (P 80‐20) and the maximum dose were obtained from the lateral dose profiles. Bremsstrahlung emission was analyzed by MC simulations at the depth of maximum dose (R 100). Results The depth dose profiles calculated by the MC simulations were consistently within 2% of the measurements. The P 80‐20 at R 100 for 20‐ and 40‐mm diameters were 4.0 mm vs. 7.6 mm (STR vs. LMA) and 4.5 mm vs. 9.2 mm, respectively, for the 6‐MeV electron beam with 7.0‐mm‐thick STR, and 2.7 mm vs. 5.6 mm and 4.5 mm vs. 7.1 mm, respectively, for the 12‐MeV electron beam with 12.0‐mm‐thick STR. A hotspot was not observed on the lateral dose profiles obtained with the STR at R 100. The bremsstrahlung emission under the region shielded by the STR was comparable to that obtained with the LMA, even though the STR was placed on the surface of the phantom. Conclusions Skin collimator with STR provided superior dosimetric characteristics and comparable bremsstrahlung emission to LMA collimator at the applicator. STR could be a new tool for the safe and efficient delivery of electron radiotherapy.

PURPOSE Knowledge-based planning (KBP) has disadvantages of high monitor unit (MU) and complex multi-leaf collimator (MLC) motion. We investigated the optimal aperture shape controller (ASC) level for the KBP to reduce these factors in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer. METHODS The KBP model was created based on 51 clinical plans (CPs) of patients who underwent the VMAT for prostate cancer. Another 10 CPs were selected randomly, and the KBPs with/without ASC, changed stepwise from very low (KBP-VL) to very high (KBP-VH), were performed with a single auto-optimization. The parameters of dose-volume histograms (DVHs) and MLC performance metrics were evaluated. We obtained the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv), closed leaf score (CLS), small aperture score (SAS), leaf travel (LT), and total MU. RESULTS The ASC did not affect the DVH parameters negatively. The following comparisons of MLC performance were obtained (KBP vs. KBP-VL vs. KBP-VH, respectively): 0.25 vs. 0.27 vs. 0.30 (MCSv), 0.19 vs. 0.18 vs. 0.16 (CLS), 0.50 vs. 0.45 vs. 0.40 (SAS10 mm), 0.73 vs. 0.68 vs. 0.63 (SAS20 mm), 768.35 mm vs. 671.50 mm vs. 551.32 mm (LT), and 672.87 vs. 642.36 vs. 607.59 (MU). There were significant differences between KBP and KBP-VH for MCSv and LT (p

Background An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (LINAC) with a 6-MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam that contains representative information such as the percent depth dose, profile and output factor for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide information about the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods After mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference data (RD) and the measured data (MD). For good agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10 and 20 cm). The field size results from the RD were compared with the results from the MD using the same condition. Results All fitting curves show goodness of fit, R2, values that are greater than 0.99. The differences in field size between the RD and the MD were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The smallest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion Application of the SCF method has been proven to accurately capture the field size of the preconfigured RD and the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to determine the field size from RD in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes for clinical use of the Halcyon system.

This study aimed to evaluate the possibility of reducing the imaging dose for image‐guided radiotherapy by using planar kilovoltage orthogonal imaging and fiducial markers (kV‐FM). We tested kilovoltage planar images under clinical imaging conditions for the pelvis (75 kVp, 200 mA, 50 ms) at a decreasing tube current (from 200 to 10 mA). Imaging doses were measured with a semiconductor detector. The visibility of the kV‐FM, aspects of image quality (spatial resolution, low contrast resolution), and the resultant image registration reproducibility were evaluated using various shapes (folded, linear, tadpole‐like) of fiducial markers containing 0.5% iron [Gold Anchor™ (GA); Naslund Medical AB, Huddinge, Sweden]. The GA phantom was created by placing these variously shaped GAs in an agar phantom. The imaging doses with 200 and 10 mA were approximately 0.74 and 0.04 mGy and they were correlated to the tube current (R2 = 0.999). Regardless of the marker’s shape, the GA phantom ensured visibility even when the tube current was reduced to the minimum value (10 mA). The low contrast resolution was gradually decreased at less than 50 mA, but the spatial resolution did not change. Although the auto‐registration function could not be used, manual‐registration could be achieved with an accuracy of within 1 mm, even when the imaging dose was reduced to 1/20 of the clinical imaging condition for the pelvis. When using the GA as the fiducial marker, the imaging dose could be reduced to 1/20 of that used clinically while maintaining the accuracy of manual‐registration using the kV‐FM for image‐guided radiotherapy of the pelvis.

The present study aimed to evaluate whether knowledge-based plans (KBP) from a single optimization could be used clinically, and to compare dose–volume histogram (DVH) parameters and plan quality between KBP with (KBPCONST) and without (KBPORIG) manual objective constraints and clinical manual optimized (CMO) plans for pharyngeal cancer. KBPs were produced from a system trained on clinical plans from 55 patients with pharyngeal cancer who had undergone intensity-modulated radiation therapy or volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT). For another 15 patients, DVH parameters of KBPCONST and KBPORIG from a single optimization were compared with CMO plans with respect to the planning target volume (D98%, D50%, D2%), brainstem maximum dose (Dmax), spinal cord Dmax, parotid gland median and mean dose (Dmed and Dmean), monitor units and modulation complexity score for VMAT. The Dmax of spinal cord and brainstem and the Dmed and Dmean of ipsilateral parotid glands were unacceptably high for KBPORIG, although the KBPCONST DVH parameters met our goal for most patients. KBPCONST and CMO plans produced comparable DVH parameters. The monitor units of KBPCONST were significantly lower than those of the CMO plans (P

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the influence of cleaned-up knowledge-based treatment planning (KBP) models on the plan quality for volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) of prostate cancer. Materials and Methods: Thirty prostate cancer VMAT plans were enrolled and evaluated according to four KBP modeling methods as follows: (1) model not cleaned – trained by fifty other clinical plans (KBPORIG); (2) cases cleaned by removing plans that did not meet all clinical goals of the dosimetric parameters, derived from dose–volume histogram (DVH) (KBPC-DVH); (3) cases cleaned outside the range of ±1 standard deviation through the principal component analysis regression plots (KBPC-REG); and (4) cases cleaned using both methods (2) and (3) (KBPC-ALL). Rectal and bladder structures in the training models numbered 34 and 48 for KBPC-DVH, 37 and 33 for KBPC-REG, and 26 and 33 for KBPC-ALL, respectively. The dosimetric parameters for each model with one-time auto-optimization were compared. Results: All KBP models improved target dose coverage and conformity and provided comparable sparing of organs at risks (rectal and bladder walls). There were no significant differences in plan quality among the KBP models. Nevertheless, only the KBPC-ALL model generated no cases of >1% V78 Gy (prescribed dose) to the rectal wall, whereas the KBPORIG, KBPC-DVH, and KBPC-REG models included two, four, and three cases, respectively, which were difficult to overcome with KBP because the planning target volume (PTV) and rectum regions overlapped. Conclusions: The cleaned-up KBP model based on DVH and regression plots improved plan quality in the PTV–rectum overlap region.

PURPOSE This study investigated the dosimetric characteristics of electron beams shaped with a real-time shapeable tungsten-containing rubber (STR) collimator. METHODS Circular irradiation fields of 40 mm diameter were shaped using STR or low melting-point alloy (LMA) placed on the electron applicator. The STR heated with approximately 70-degree warm water was molded into the template bottom of the applicator. Percent depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles of 6 and 12 MeV electron beams were measured and compared between STR and LMA. For the PDDs, the depths of maximum dose (dmax), 90% dose (d90), and 80% dose (d80) were evaluated. For the lateral dose profiles, penumbra as the width of the off-axis distance from 80% to 20% doses and treatment diameter covering over 90% dose were evaluated at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80. The transmission of the STR was also investigated at thicknesses fit to electron applicator for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. RESULTS The STR was softened with 70-degree warm water. Therefore, it was easy to mold it and attach the applicator. The PDDs and penumbras at the surface, dmax, d90, and d80 for the STR were almost equal to those for the LMA with 6 and 12 MeV electron beams. The treatment diameters covering over 90% dose for the irradiation fields with 40 mm diameter at dmax (LMA vs. STR) were 20.9 vs. 21.1 mm and 19.2 vs. 18.4 mm for 6 and 12 MeV electron beams, respectively. The transmission of the STR was almost same as that of LMA. CONCLUSIONS The dosimetric characteristics of the STR on the electron applicator were almost same as those of the LMA. The heated STR was shaped easily, flexibly, and immediately. The STR can be used as a substitute for LMA in electron radiotherapy.

Background/aim Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (grid therapy) can control some bulky tumors which is challenging for conventional radiotherapy. This study aimed to investigate whether a novel tungsten contained rubber (TCR) grid collimator can be employed in electron grid therapy. Materials and methods The TCR grid collimator placed on a solid water phantom, and percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles were measured for 9 MeV electron beam with Gafchromic EBT3 films. At the lateral dose profile, the ratios of the dose in the areas with and without shielding (valley-to-peak ratios) were evaluated. Results The dmax values with the 1, 2 and 3 mm TCR grid collimators were 1.2, 1.1 and 0.7 cm, respectively, while the valley-to-peak ratios at each dmax were 0.566, 0.412 and 0.293, respectively. Conclusion Only the 2 mm TCR grid collimator had adequate dosimetric features compared to the conventional grid collimator and could be substituted.

BACKGROUND/AIM The aim of the study was to investigate the dosimetric characteristics of electron beams with a tungsten functional paper (TFP) surface collimator. MATERIALS AND METHODS The circular field of 6.0 cm diameter was created with the TFP collimator put on the phantom. Depth and lateral dose profiles for 4 and 6 MeV electron beams were obtained. The characteristics of lateral dose profile, treatment diameter as width over 90% of the dose, and penumbra as width of the off-axis positions from 80% to 20% dose levels were evaluated. RESULTS Compared to the lead collimator, the TFP collimator generated higher surface doses, the treatment diameters were increased from 42.8 to 48.6 mm and from 40.0 to 41.4 mm, and the penumbras were reduced from 15.0 to 9.6 mm and from 16.4 to 13.0 mm for 4 and 6 MeV electron beams, respectively. CONCLUSION The TFP surface collimator can provide an excellent dose distribution compared to the conventional lead collimator.

In this study, we aim to clarify the dosimetric characteristics of a real time variable shape rubber containing tungsten (STR) as a thin bolus in 6-MV photon radiotherapy. The percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles (irradiation field = 10 × 10 cm2) in the water-equivalent phantom were measured and compared between no bolus, a conventional 5-mm gel bolus, and 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses. The characteristics of the PDDs were evaluated according to relative doses at 1 mm depth (D1mm) and depth of maximum dose (dmax). The water-equivalent thicknesses of the STR boluses were determined by shifting the distance of the PDD’s build-up curve until it overlaid that with no bolus. The penumbra size and width of the 50% dose were evaluated using lateral dose profiles. The D1mm with no bolus, 5-mm gel bolus, and 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 47.6%, 91.5%, 86.6%, 89.3%, and 89.4%, respectively, and the respective dmax values were 15, 10, 12, 11, and 10 mm. The water-equivalent thicknesses of the 1-, 2-, and 3-mm STR boluses were 4.4, 4.9, and 5.1 mm, respectively. There were no differences for those in lateral dose profiles. The 1-mm-thick STR thin bolus shifted the depth dose profile by 4.4 mm and could be used as a customized bolus for photon radiotherapy.

Purpose This study investigated whether real-time variable shape tungsten rubber (STR) could be applied for nail radiation protection in total skin electron beam (TSEB) therapy. Methods Simulated finger phantoms were made from syringes filled with physiological saline of volumes 5, 10, 20, and 30 ml (inner diameters of 14.1, 17.0, 21.7, and 25.3 mm, respectively). Gafchromic film was applied to the phantom, and lead (thickness 1-3 mm) or STR (thickness 1-4 mm) with an area of 4´1.5 cm was used to cover the film. A 6 MeV electron beam with an 8 mm acrylic board was then used to irradiate the phantom. The source-surface distance (SSD) was 444 cm, the field size was 36´36 cm at SSD of 100 cm without an electron applicator, and the monitor unit was 2000 MU. The shielding rates were obtained from the dose profiles. Results The mean values of the shielding rate values for all phantoms were 50.1, 97.6, and 98.7% for 1, 2, and 3 mm of lead, respectively, and -13.6, 53.9, 91.2, and 99.4% for 1, 2, 3, and 4 mm of STR, respectively. Conclusion STR with a thickness of 4 mm had the same shielding properties as lead with a thickness of 3 mm, which was an approximately 100% shielding rate. STR could therefore be used in TSEB therapy instead of lead.

Background/aim We investigated the dosimetric characteristics of electron radiotherapy for auricular keloid using real-time variable-shape tungsten rubber (STR). Patients and methods For the first evaluation, STR was shaped into a rectangular irradiation field (3.0×5.0 cm2). In the next step, the STR was reshaped to fit the target (3.5×6.5 cm2) for the second evaluation. Percentage depth doses (PDDs) and lateral dose profiles were obtained with 6-MeV electron beams and compared with those of low-melting-point lead (LML). Results Compared to the LML on electron applicator, PDD differences were within 0.4 mm, while the penumbras as width of 20-80% dose levels were smaller (maximum reductions: 75.8% and 82.9% at first and second evaluations, respectively). The treatment process of shaping the STR, decision on output, and irradiation was completed within 45 min. Conclusion Electron radiotherapy using STR for keloid can be performed with excellent dose distribution in a short time. First clinical experience found the STR is suitable for use in individualized and immediate electron radiotherapy.

Background : An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (Linac) with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam containing the representative information regarding the percent depth dose, profile, output factor, etc. for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide the information of the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF). Methods : After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. For a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm 2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using the same condition. Results : All fitting curves show values of goodness of fit, R 2 , better than 0.99. The differences in the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The lowest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion : The application of the SCF has been proven to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a counte-rcheck methodology to determine the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon system.

Background: An O-ring gantry-type linear accelerator (Linac) with a 6 MV flattening filter-free (FFF) photon beam, Halcyon, includes a reference beam containing the representative information regarding the percent depth dose, profile, output factor, etc. for commissioning and quality assurance. However, because it does not provide the information of the field size, we proposed a method to determine all field sizes according to all depths for radiation therapy using simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF).Methods: After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. For a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data set, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles of 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm2 as a function of depth (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using the same condition.Results: All fitting curves show values of goodness of fit, R2, better than 0.99. The differences in the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The lowest difference in the field sizes at a depth of 10 cm, which is a surface-to-axis distance, was reported. Conclusion: The application of the SCF has been proven to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of the measured FFF photon beam data for the Halcyon system. The current work can be useful for beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to determine the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon system and for the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon system.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to clarify factors predicting the performance of knowledge-based planning (KBP) models in volume modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer in terms of sparing the organ at risk (OAR). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In three institutions, each KBP model was trained by more than 20 library plans (LP) per model. To validate the characterization of each KBP model, 45 validation plans (VP) were calculated by the KBP system. The ratios of overlap between the OAR volume and the planning target volume (PTV) to the whole organ volume (V(overlap)/V(whole)) were analyzed for each LP and VP. Regression lines between dose–volume parameters (V(90), V(75), and V(50)) and V(overlap)/V(whole) were evaluated. The mean OAR dose, V(90), V(75), and V(50) of LP did not necessarily match those of VP. RESULTS: In both the rectum and bladder, the dose–volume parameters for VP were strongly correlated with V(overlap)/V(whole) at institutes A, B, and C (R > 0.74, 0.85, and 0.56, respectively). Except in the rectum at institute B, the slopes of the regression lines for LP corresponded to those for VP. For dose–volume parameters for the rectum, the ratios of slopes of the regression lines in VP to those in LP ranged 0.51–1.26. In the bladder, most ratios were less than 1.0 (mean: 0.77). CONCLUSION: For each OAR, each model made distinct dosimetric characterizations in terms of V(overlap)/V(whole). The relationship between dose–volume parameters and V(overlap)/V(whole) of OARs in LP predicts the KBP models’ performance sparing OARs.

Background: The aim of this study was to investigate the performance of the RapidPlan knowledge-based treatment planning system using models including registered pseudo-structures, and to determine how many structures are required for automatic optimization of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for postoperative uterine cervical cancer. Methods: Pseudo-structures were retrospectively contoured for patients who had completed treatment at one of five institutions. For 22 patients, RPs were generated with a single optimization for models with two (RP_2), four (RP_4), or five (RP_5) registered structures, and the dosimetric parameters of these models were compared with a clinical plan with several optimizations. The total times for pseudo-structure creation and optimization were also measured.Results: Most dosimetric parameters showed no major differences between each RP. In particular, the rectum Dmax, V50Gy, and V40Gy with RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5 were not significantly different, and were lower than those of the clinical plan. In addition, the average proportions of plans achieving acceptable criteria for all dosimetric parameters were 98%, 99%, 98%, and 98% for the clinical plan, RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5, respectively. The average times for the creation and optimization of pseudo-structures were 105, 17, 21, and 29 minutes, for the clinical plan, RP_2, RP_4, and RP_5, respectively. Conclusions: The RapidPlan model with two registered pseudo-structures could generate clinically acceptable plans while saving time. This modeling approach using pseudo-structures could possibility be used for the VMAT planning process.

Purpose Novel linac improvements in speed of gantry, collimator, leaf and dose rate may increase the time-efficiency of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) delivery, however remains to be investigated. In this study, a fast-rotating O-ring linac (Halcyon) with fast moving leaves is compared with a general linac (TrueBeam: TB) in terms of plan quality for VMAT of C-shape, prostate, multi target and, head and neck (H&N) cases from AAPM TG-119. Materials and methods For the four test cases, VMAT planning was performed using single to four-arc VMAT on a Halcyon and using single to three-arc VMAT on a TrueBeam. Same conditions for optimization were used in each test case. Target coverage metrics and organ at risks (OAR) dose were compared. Monitor unit (MU) and irradiation time in each plan were also compared. Results In all cases, single-arc plans of Halcyon were inferior to TB plans on dose objectives. Conformity index (CI) to outer target of C-shape case was better for Halcyon (1-arc: 1.242, 2-arc: 1.202, 3-arc: 1.198, 4-arc: 1.181) than for TB (1-arc: 1.247, 2-arc: 1.211, 3-arc: 1.211) except to single arc. D5 (Gy) of core for C-shape case was better for halcyon (1-arc: 23.29, 2-arc: 21.01, 3-arc: 20.64, 4-arc: 20.47) than for TB (1-arc: 24.04, 2-arc: 22.94, 3-arc: 23.04). Calculated MU was smaller for Halcyon than for TB. In addition, Halcyon is more faster than TB because mechanical movements were improved. Conclusion For VMAT plan in each case, Halcyon as well or better at the plan quality of two or three arcs on TB while reducing the delivery time.

Background Delivery of a single energy 6 MV flattening filter free (FFF) photon beam is a main characteristic of an O-ring gantry type linear accelerator (linac) Halcyon. The purpose of this study is to determine the field size of the beam through an application of the simplified sigmoidal curve fitting (SCF) to the beam profiles obtained from the preconfigured reference data of Halcyon, and then to compare its parametrization with the measured beam data from Halcyon. Methods After a mathematical definition of the SCF using four coefficients, the defined curves were fitted to both the reference and measured data. When a high agreement between the fitting curve and the profiles in each data, the field sizes were determined by identifying the maximum point along the third derivative of the fitting curve. The curve fitting included the field sizes for beam profiles as 2 × 2, 4 × 4, 6 × 6, 8 × 8, 10 × 10, 20 × 20 and 28 × 28 cm 2 as a function of depths (at 1.3, 5, 10, 20 cm). The results of the field size from the reference data were compared with the results in the measured data using same condition. Results All fitting curves show an average agreement ratio higher than 97% and the values of goodness of fit, R 2 , as better than 0.99. The differences of the field size between the reference data and the measured data were within the range of 0 to 0.2 cm. The least difference of the field sizes at depth 10 cm which is a surface to axis distance was reported. Conclusion The application of the SCF has been proved to accurately obtain the field size of the preconfigured reference and of measured FFF photon beam data for Halcyon. The current work can be useful to the beam commissioning as a countercheck methodology to the field size from the reference data in the treatment planning system of a newly installed Halcyon and to the routine quality assurance to ascertain the correctness of field sizes clinically used with the Halcyon.

Positron emission tomography (PET–CT) is an essential imaging modality for the management of various diseases. Increasing numbers of PET–CT examinations are carried out across the world and deliver benefits to patients; however, there are concerns about the cumulative radiation doses from these examinations in patients. Compared to the radiation exposure delivered by CT, there have been few reports on the frequency of patients with a cumulative effective radiation dose of ≥100 mSv from repeated PET–CT examinations. The emerging dose tracking system facilitates surveys on patient cumulative doses by PET–CT because it can easily wrap up exposure doses of PET radiopharmaceuticals and CT. Regardless of the use of a dose tracking system, implementation of justification for PET–CT examinations and utilisation of dose reduction measures are key issues in coping with the cumulative dose in patients. Despite all the advantages of PET/MRI such as eliminating radiation exposure from CT and providing good tissue contrast in MRI, it is expensive and cannot be introduced at every facility; thus, it is still necessary to utilise PET–CT with radiation reduction measures in most clinical situations.

We developed a novel low‐radiation‐absorbent lok‐bar (HM‐bar) that is used to secure the immobilizers to the couch. The aim of this study was to investigate the X‐ray scattering and absorption properties of the HM‐bar in computed tomography (CT) simulation and radiotherapy dose delivery using the Varian Exact™ lok‐bar (VL‐bar) as a benchmark. CT images were obtained with or without lok‐bar, and then each image was visually evaluated for artifacts. The attenuation rates for each lok‐bar were measured using a farmer‐type ionization chamber (PTW30013) and the I'mRT phantom (IBA Dosimetry GmbH). Measurement points were between gantry angles of 110 and 180°. The treatment apparatus was a NovalisTx (Brainlab AG); X‐ray energies were set at 6 MV and 10 MV. In the presence of each lok‐bar, the radiation dose was measured in accordance with 10 volumetric modulated arc therapy–stereotactic body radiation therapy (VMAT‐SBRT) plans for lung cancer. Artifacts were seldom observed in the CT scans of the HM‐bar. The attenuation rate of each lok‐bar was higher when the X‐ray energy was set at 6 MV than at 10 MV. The highest attenuation rate in the VL‐bar was observed at a gantry angle of 112°; the rates were 22.4% at 6 MV and 19.3% at 10 MV. Similarly, the highest attenuation rate for the HM‐bar was also observed at a gantry angle of 112°; the rates were 12.2% and 10.1% at 6 MV and 10 MV, respectively. When the VL‐bar was evaluated, the isocenter dose of the VMAT‐SBRT plans was attenuated by 2.6% as a maximum case. In the case of the HM‐bar, the maximum attenuation was 1.4%. In the measurements of each VMAT‐SBRT plan, the difference of the dose attenuation rate between the VL‐bar and HM‐bar was approximately 1%. The HM‐bar could be used to minimize the occurrence of artifacts and provide good images in CT scans regarding radiotherapy planning and dose calculation. It can be used for patient therapy at hospitals to provide accurate dose delivery because of its low X‐ray scattering and absorption characteristics.

Background/Aim: We evaluated the dosimetric profiles of manually generated volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans and performance of a commercial knowledge-based planning system (KBP) in treating breast cancer. Materials and Methods: We defined the manually generated VMAT plan as the manual plan (MP). Twenty MPs were generated for left-sided breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery and used to develop a KBP training set. The other five patients were used for validation. The dosimetric parameters among MPs, tangential irradiation plans (TPs), and KBP-VMAT plans (KBP-Ps) were compared. Results: D(95) and homogeneity of the planning target volume (PTV) were significantly higher and greater in MPs and KBP-Ps than in TPs. Lung V(20), V(40). The Dmean for the left anterior descending artery was lower in MPs and KBP-Ps than in TPs. KBP could save time in generating VMAT plans. Conclusion: MPs and KBP-Ps could ensure higher dose uniformity of PTV than TPs. KBP could faster generate comparable MPs for breast cancer.

Background Four-dimensional computed tomography (4D-CT) ventilation is an emerging imaging modality. Functional avoidance of regions according to 4D-CT ventilation may reduce lung toxicity after radiation therapy. This study evaluated associations between 4D-CT ventilation-based dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes. Methods Pre-treatment 4D-CT data were used to retrospectively construct ventilation images for 40 thoracic cancer patients retrospectively. Fifteen patients were treated with conventional radiation therapy, 6 patients with hyperfractionated radiation therapy and 19 patients with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Ventilation images were calculated from 4D-CT data using a deformable image registration and Jacobian-based algorithm. Each ventilation map was normalized by converting it to percentile images. Ventilation-based dosimetric parameters (Mean Dose, V5 [percent lung volume receiving ≥5 Gy], and V20 [percent lung volume receiving ≥20 Gy]) were calculated for highly and poorly ventilated regions. To test whether the ventilation-based dosimetric parameters could be used predict radiation pneumonitis of ≥Grade 2, the area under the curve (AUC) was determined from the receiver operating characteristic analysis. Results For Mean Dose, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range showed the highest AUC value (0.809; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.663–0.955). For V20, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–20% range had the highest AUC value (0.774; 95% [CI], 0.598–0.915), and for V5, poorly ventilated lung regions in the 0–30% range had the highest AUC value (0.843; 95% [CI], 0.732–0.954). The highest AUC values for Mean Dose, V20, and V5 were obtained in poorly ventilated regions. There were significant differences in all dosimetric parameters between radiation pneumonitis of Grade 1 and Grade ≥2. Conclusions Poorly ventilated lung regions identified on 4D-CT had higher AUC values than highly ventilated regions, suggesting that functional planning based on poorly ventilated regions may reduce the risk of lung toxicity in radiation therapy.

Purpose The dosimetric error due to immobilization devices has been highlighted by the AAPM Task Group 176. We developed a novel low-radiation-absorbent immobilization adaptor (HMA), which can be used with a Styrofoam headrest for head and neck region in radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the HMA on the dose distribution and compare with a commercially released plastic adapter. Methods Computed tomography (CT) simulation and dose calculation on a treatment planning system (TPS) were performed by the use of HMA and the plastic adapter with a cylindrical phantom. Both the adapters were placed on the phantom upside and the attenuation rate was measured. Gantry angles were changed at every 1°interval from 0°to 50°for measurements. The measured dose was normalized by the value of 90°. The treatment equipment was TrueBeam (Varian medical systems); X-ray energies were set on 4, 6 and 10 MV, respectively. The measured attenuation rates were also compared with calculation results of TPS. Results The highest differences on attenuation rate of both the adapters were observed at a gantry angle of 32.0°; the differences were 3.0% at 4 MV, 2.7% at 6 MV and 3.0% at 10 MV, respectively, and lower absorption was HMA. TPS calculation results of monitor unit for the HMA were within 1.0% in each energy. Conclusion The HMA was able to provide absorption dose and calculation errors lower than a commercially released adapter. It can also provide more accurate dose delivery for radiotherapy in head and neck because of the low absorption characteristics.

Aim To evaluate the success of a patient-specific intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) practice for prostate cancer patients across multiple institutions using a questionnaire survey. Background The IMRT QA practice involves different methods of dose distribution verification and analysis at different institutions. Materials and Methods Two full-arc volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan and 7 fixed-gantry IMRT plan with DMLC were used for patient specific QA across 22 institutions. The same computed tomography image and structure set were used for all plans. Each institution recalculated the dose distribution with fixed monitor units and without any modification. Single-point dose measurement with a cylindrical ionization chamber and dose distribution verification with a multi-detector or radiochromic film were performed, according to the QA process at each institution. Results Twenty-two institutions performed the patient-specific IMRT QA verifications. With a single-point dose measurement at the isocenter, the average difference between the calculated and measured doses was 0.5 ± 1.9%. For the comparison of dose distributions, 18 institutions used a two or three-dimensional array detector, while the others used Gafchromic film. In the γ test with dose difference/distance-to-agreement criteria of 3%−3 mm and 2%−2 mm with a 30% dose threshold, the median gamma pass rates were 99.3% (range: 41.7%–100.0%) and 96.4% (range: 29.4%–100.0%), respectively. Conclusion This survey was an informative trial to understand the verification status of patient-specific IMRT QA measurements for prostate cancer. In most institutions, the point dose measurement and dose distribution differences met the desired criteria.

BACKGROUND/AIM A newly-introduced tungsten containing rubber (TCR) is a potentially useful shielding material in electron radiotherapy because it is lead-free, containing as much as 90% fine tungsten powder by weight. This study aimed to investigate the shielding ability of TCR against electron beams. MATERIALS AND METHODS Transmission of TCR was measured for energies of 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV. Dose profiles were measured to compare the TCR and lead. The electron backscatter factor (EBF) was also compared. RESULTS The transmission of equivalent thickness for 4, 6, 9 and 12 MeV with TCR (0.78%, 1.34%, 2.16% and 3.08%, respectively) were lower than that with lead (0.81%, 1.44%, 2.19% and 3.16%, respectively) (p

Background/aim Patient immobilization systems are used to establish a reproducible patient position relative to the couch. In this study, the impact of conventional lok-bars for CT-simulation (CIVCO-bar) and treatment (iBEAM-bar) were compared with a novel lok-bar (mHM-bar) in tomotherapy. Materials and methods Verification was obtained as follows: i. artifacts in CT images; ii. dose attenuation rate of lok-bar, compared to without lok-bar; and iii. dose differences between the calculated and measured absorbed doses. Results With the CIVCO-bar, there were obvious metal artifacts, while there were nearly no artifacts with the mHM-bar. The mean dose attenuation rates with the mHM-bar and iBEAM-bar were 1.31% and 2.28%, and the mean dose difference was 1.55% and 1.66% for mHM-bar and iBEAM-bar. Conclusion Using the mHM-bar reduced artifacts on the CT image and improved dose attenuation are obtained. The lok-bar needs to be inserted as a structure set in treatment planning with tomotherapy.

Aim In this study, we clarified changes of the surface dose to a low-density material on a carbon couch and verified whether a novel rigid couch (HM couch) could reduce the surface dose. Materials and methods We measured the surface dose using only a carbon couch (iBeam Couchtop STANDARD; BrainLab), a low-density material (Styrofoam board) on the carbon couch, and an HM couch for 6 and 10 MV photon beams. Results A 5-cm styrofoam board placed on the carbon couch reduced the surface dose by approximately 7-9%, while it had no impact on the depth dose profile; however, in use, such a thickness may cause collision of the patient with the gantry head. The HM couch reduced the surface dose by approximately 7-9% and shifted the depth dose profile by approximately 0.4 cm in the depth direction compared to the carbon couch. Conclusion The HM couch has the potential to reduce skin toxicity and is expected to be useful in clinical practice instead of carbon couches.

Tungsten functional paper (TFP) is a paper-based radiation-shielding material, which is lead-free and easy to cut. We developed a radiation protection undergarment using TFP for prostate cancer patients treated with permanent 125I seed implantation (PSI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the shielding ability of the undergarment with respect to household contacts and members of the public. Between October 2016 and April 2017, a total of 10 prostate cancer patients treated with PSI were enrolled in this prospective study. The external radiation exposure from each patient 1 day after PSI was measured with and without the undergarment. Measurements were performed using a survey meter at 100 cm from the surface of the patient’s body. The exposure rates were measured from five directions: anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior. The measured radiation exposure rates without the undergarment, expressed as mean ± standard deviation, from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions were 1.28 ± 0.43 μSv/h, 0.70 ± 0.34 μSv/h, 0.21 ± 0.062 μSv/h, 0.65 ± 0.33 μSv/h and 1.24 ± 0.41 μSv/h, respectively. The undergarment was found to have (mean ± standard deviation) shielding abilities of 88.7 ± 5.8%, 44.0 ± 42.1%, 50.6 ± 15.9%, 72.9 ± 27.0% and 90.4 ± 10.7% from the anterior, anteriorly oblique, lateral, posteriorly oblique, and posterior directions, respectively. In conclusion, this shielding undergarment is a useful device that has the potential to reduce radiation exposure for the general public and the patient’s family.

It is important to improve the magnitude of dose variation that is caused by the interplay effect. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of breaths (NBs) to the dose variation for VMAT‐SBRT to lung cancer. Data on respiratory motion and multileaf collimator (MLC) sequence were collected from the cases of 30 patients who underwent radiotherapy with VMAT‐SBRT for lung cancer. The NBs in the total irradiation time with VMAT and the maximum craniocaudal amplitude of the target were calculated. The MLC sequence complexity was evaluated using the modulation complexity score for VMAT (MCSv). Static and dynamic measurements were performed using a cylindrical respiratory motion phantom and a micro ionization chamber. The 1 standard deviation which were obtained from 10 dynamic measurements for each patient were defined as dose variation caused by the interplay effect. The dose distributions were also verified with radiochromic film to detect undesired hot and cold dose spot. Dose measurements were also performed with different NBs in the same plan for 16 patients in 30 patients. The correlations between dose variations and parameters assessed for each treatment plan including NBs, MCSv, the MCSv/amplitude quotient (TMMCSv), and the MCSv/amplitude quotient × NBs product (IVS) were evaluated. Dose variation was decreased with increasing NBs, and NBs of >40 times maintained the dose variation within 3% in 15 cases. The correlation between dose variation and IVS which were considered NBs was shown stronger (R 2 = 0.43, P 40 times during irradiation of two partial arcs VMAT (i.e., NBs = 16 breaths per minute) may be suitable for VMAT‐SBRT for lung cancer.

Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate low-dose kilovoltage cone-beam CT (kV-CBCT) for image-guided radiotherapy, with a particular focus on the accuracy of image registration with low-dose protocols. Methods: Imaging doses were measured with a NOMEX semiconductor detector positioned at the front of head, thorax, and pelvis human body phantoms while kV-CBCT scans were acquired at different tube currents. Aspects of image quality (spatial resolution, noise, uniformity, contrast, geometric distortion, and Hounsfield unit sensitivity) and image registration accuracy using bone and soft tissue were evaluated. Results: With preset and the lowest tube currents, the imaging doses were 0.16 and 0.08 mGy, 5.29 and 2.80 mGy, and 18.23 and 2.69 mGy for head, thorax, and pelvis, respectively. Noise was the only quality aspect directly dependent on tube current, being increased by 1.5 times with a tube current half that of the preset in head and thorax, and by 2.2 times with a tube current 1/8 of the preset in the pelvis. Accurate auto-bone matching was performed within 1 mm at the lowest tube current. The auto-soft tissue matching could not be performed with the lowest tube current; however, manual-soft tissue matching could still be performed within 2 mm or less. Conclusion: Noise was the only image quality aspect dependent on the imaging dose. Auto-bone and manual-soft tissue matching could still be performed at the lowest imaging dose. Advances in knowledge: When optimizing kV-CBCT imaging dose, the impact on bone and soft tissue image registration accuracy should be evaluated.

Tungsten functional paper (TFP), which contains 80% tungsten by weight, has radiation‐shielding properties. We investigated the use of TFP for the protection of operators during interventional or therapeutic angiography. The air kerma rate of scattered radiation from a simulated patient was measured, with and without TFP, using a water‐equivalent phantom and fixed C‐arm fluoroscopy. Measurements were taken at the level of the operator's eye, chest, waist, and knee, with a variable number of TFP sheets used for shielding. A Monte Carlo simulation was also utilized to analyze the dose rate delivered with and without the TFP shielding. In cine mode, when the number of TFP sheets was varied through 1, 2, 3, 5, and 10, the respective reduction in the air kerma rate relative to no TFP shielding was as follows: at eye level, 24.9%, 29.9%, 41.6%, 50.4%, and 56.2%; at chest level, 25.3%, 33.1%, 34.9%, 46.1%, and 44.3%; at waist level, 45.1%, 57.0%, 64.4%, 70.7%, and 75.2%; and at knee level, 2.1%, 2.2%, 2.1%, 2.1%, and 2.1%. In fluoroscopy mode, the respective reduction in the air kerma rate relative to no TFP shielding was as follows: at eye level, 24.8%, 30.3%, 34.8%, 51.1%, and 58.5%; at chest level, 25.8%, 33.4%, 35.5%, 45.2%, and 44.4%; at waist level, 44.6%, 56.8%, 64.7%, 71.7%, and 77.2%; and at knee level, 2.2%, 0.0%, 2.2%, 2.8%, and 2.5%. The TFP paper exhibited good radiation‐shielding properties against the scattered radiation encountered in clinical settings, and was shown to have potential application in decreasing the radiation exposure to the operator during interventional radiology.