Search

Background: The results of the OlympiA study led to the approval of a PARP inhibitor (olaparib) as adjuvant treatment for early breast cancer (eBC) at high risk of relapse in patients with a germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). However, the proportion of patients in routine practice who meet the “high-risk” criteria applied in the OlympiA study, and for whom gBRCAm testing would now be mandatory, remains unknown. Patients and methods: In this population-based study, we use unique data from the French specialized Côte d'Or Breast and Gynecological Cancer Registry, to assess the real-life proportion, and long-term prognosis of patients treated for eBC between 2005 and 2015 with standard treatment, and at “high risk” of relapse according to the OlympiA trial criteria. Results: We included 3483 patients treated for HER2-negative eBC (N = 380 with ER-, and N = 3103 with ER + tumor). We found N = 62 (1.8 %) patients with gBRCA1/2 mutations. A total of 494 patients (14.2 %) were classified as “high risk” according to the Olympia criteria; 55 % with ER-tumors, and 9.1 % with ER + tumors, respectively. Despite more intensive systemic treatments in “high risk” patients, 10-year overall survival was much worse in these “high risk” patients compared to the others: 60.1 % vs 83.8 % in ER-tumors, and 55.4 % vs 84.1 % in ER + tumors. Our estimates of net survival show an even greater difference. Conclusion: This study provides real-life insights into the prevalence and prognosis of patients with high-risk eBC, in a context where the approval of adjuvant olaparib requires careful reorganization of care, so as not to overlook a patient with gBRCAm who could benefit from adjuvant olaparib.

Abstract Background Immunotherapy targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a standard of care in a number of metastatic malignancies, but less than a fifth of patients are expected to respond to ICIs (Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors). In a clinical trial, combining the anti-TIGIT (T cell immunoreceptor with Ig and ITIM domains) Mab (monoclonal antibody) tiragolumab with atezolizumab improved outcomes in non-small cell lung cancer. In preclinical models, SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) could increase expression levels of the inhibitory co-receptors TIGIT and PD-L1. We aim to assess the combination of tiragolumab with atezolizumab and SBRT in metastatic, previously treated by ICIs, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, bladder cancer, and renal cell cancer. Methods This phase I study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05259319) will assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of atezolizumab with tiragolumab and stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with histologically proven metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, renal cell cancer, bladder cancer, and head and neck cancer previously treated. First part: 2 different schedules of SBRT in association with a fixed dose of atezolizumab and tiragolumab will be investigated only with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (cohort 1). The expansion cohorts phase will be a multicentric, open-label study at the recommended scheme of administration and enroll additional patients with metastatic bladder cancer, renal cell cancer, and head and neck cancer (cohort 2, 3 and 4). Patients will be treated until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, intercurrent conditions that preclude continuation of treatment, or patient refusal in the absence of progression or intolerance. The primary endpoint of the first phase is the safety of the combination in a sequential or concomitant scheme and to determine the expansion cohorts phase recommended scheme of administration. The primary endpoint of phase II is to evaluate the efficacy of tiragolumab + atezolizumab + SBRT in terms of 6-month PFS (Progression-Free Survival). Ancillary analyses will be performed with peripheral and intratumoral immune biomarker assessments. Trial registration This study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05259319, since February 28th, 2022.

Abstract Purpose The vast majority of research studies that have described the links between DNA damage repair or homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) score, and tumor biology, have concerned either triple negative breast cancers or cancers with mutation of BRCA 1/2. We hypothesized that ER + /HER2- early breast tumors without BRCA 1/2 mutation could have high HRD score and aimed to describe their genomic, transcriptomic, and immune landscapes. Patients and methods In this study, we reported BRCA 1/2 mutational status, HRD score, and mutational signature 3 (S3) expression, in all early breast cancer (eBC) subtypes from the TCGA database, with a particular focus in ER + /HER2-. In this subtype, bioinformatics analyses of tumor transcriptomic, immune profile, and mutational landscape were performed, according to HRD status. Overall survival (OS), progression free-interval (PFI), and variables associated with outcome were also evaluated. Results Among the 928 tumor samples analyzed, 46 harbored BRCA 1/2 mutations, and 606 were ER + /HER2- (of which 24 were BRCA 1/2 mutated). We found a subset of BRCA-proficient ER + /HER2— eBC, with high HRD score. These tumors displayed significantly different immune, mutational, and tumor molecular signatures landscapes, compared to BRCA-mutated and BRCA-proficient HRD-low tumors. Outcome did not significantly differ between these 3 groups, but biological factors associated with survival are not the same across the 3 entities. Conclusion This study highlights possible novel biological differences among ER + /HER2- breast cancer related to HRD status. Our results could have important implications for translational research and/or the design of future clinical trials, but require prospective clinical evaluation.

Abstract Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is frequently managed by platinum-based chemotherapy during the disease course. The real benefit of these treatments is uncertain at advanced stages of the disease and in non-triple-negative subtypes. Since homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) could inform about tumor sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents, we aimed to determine biomarkers of genomic instability, and their link with platinum efficacy. In this single-center study, we report BRCA1/2 mutational status, HRD score and signature 3 levels, all obtained by tumor exome sequencing, in 86 patients with various subtypes of MBC and who received platinum-based chemotherapy. Overall response rate, disease control rate, PFS and PFS2/PFS1 ratio were evaluated to assess platinum-based chemotherapy efficacy. Among the 86 tumor samples analyzed, 7 harbored BRCA1/2 mutations. We found a subset of BRCA-proficient MBC with high HRD score or high S3 levels, comparable to BRCA-mutated tumors. However, these patients with high HRD score or high S3 tumor level do not seem to benefit more from platinum-based chemotherapy than the others, in terms of response rates and/or PFS, regardless of BC molecular subtype. By multivariate analysis, only the absence of liver metastases was independently associated with significantly better PFS on platinum-based chemotherapy. However, some of our exploratory analyses reveal that certain methods, when optimized, seem to associate with platinum benefit. Tumor exome sequencing methodology for quantifying HRD has to be approached systematically, and further validated and standardized prior to its clinical use. Further studies are warranted to confirm these results to guide platinum use in MBC.

Summary: The study of the tumor microenvironment (TME) and its interactions with cancer cells is an important issue in cancer research. Here, we present a protocol to sort three important cell populations from murine triple negative breast cancer 4T1 model TME, including CD45+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, cancer-associated fibroblasts, and tumor cells. The protocol includes four steps: generation of 4T1 tumors, tumor collection and digestion, magnetic sorting of the different populations, and phenotypic validation of sorted cells.For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to Limagne et al. (2022).1 : Publisher’s note: Undertaking any experimental protocol requires adherence to local institutional guidelines for laboratory safety and ethics.

With the rapid clinical development of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the standard of care in cancer management has evolved rapidly. However, immunotherapy is not currently beneficial for all patients. In addition to intrinsic tumor factors, other etiologies of resistance to ICIs arise from the complex interplay between cancer and its microenvironment. Recognition of the essential role of the tumor microenvironment (TME) in cancer progression has led to a shift from a tumor-cell-centered view of cancer development, to the concept of a complex tumor ecosystem that supports tumor growth and metastatic dissemination. The expansion of immunosuppressive cells represents a cardinal strategy deployed by tumor cells to escape detection and elimination by the immune system. Regulatory T lymphocytes (Treg), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and type-2 tumor-associated macrophages (TAM2) are major components of these inhibitory cellular networks, with the ability to suppress innate and adaptive anticancer immunity. They therefore represent major impediments to anticancer therapies, particularly immune-based interventions. Recent work has provided evidence that, beyond their direct cytotoxic effects on cancer cells, several conventional chemotherapeutic (CT) drugs and agents used in targeted therapies (TT) can promote the elimination or inactivation of suppressive immune cells, resulting in enhanced antitumor immunity. In this review, we will analyze findings pertaining to this concept, discuss the possible molecular bases underlying the selective targeting of these immunosuppressive cells by antineoplastic agents (CT and/or TT), and consider current challenges and future prospects related to the integration of these molecules into more efficient anticancer strategies, in the era of immunotherapy.

Anti-PD1/PD-L1-directed immune checkpoint inhibitors are game changers in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, but biomarkers are lacking. The aim of our study was to find clinically relevant biomarkers of the efficacy of ICI in non-squamous NSCLC. We conducted a retrospective study of patients receiving ICI for advanced non squamous NSCLC in two cohorts. For a subset of patients, RNAseq data were generated on tumor biopsy taken before ICI. The primary end point was progression-free survival under ICI. Secondary end point was overall survival from ICI initiation. In the cohort, we studied 231 patients. Clinico-pathological characteristics included KRAS mutant status (n = 88), TTF1-positive expression (n = 136), LIPI (Lung Immune Prognostic Index) score of 0 (n = 116). In our cohort, lack of TTF1 expression, LIPI score >0, line of treatment >1, and liver metastases were associated with poorer PFS. TTF1 and PD-L1 status could be used to stratify survival and improve the AUC for prediction of prognosis in comparison with the PD-L1 gold standard. Using an external cohort of 154 patients, we confirmed the independent prognostic role of TTF1. TTF1 expression and PD-L1 can be used to stratify risk and predict PFS and OS in patients treated with ICI for NS-NSCLC.

Thanks to their anti-inflammatory, anti-oedema, and anti-allergy properties, glucocorticoids are among the most widely prescribed drugs in patients with cancer. The indications for glucocorticoid use are very wide and varied in the context of cancer and include the symptomatic management of cancer-related symptoms (compression, pain, oedema, altered general state) but also prevention or treatment of common side effects of anti-cancer therapies (nausea, allergies, etc.) or immune-related adverse events (irAE). In this review, we first give an overview of the different clinical situations where glucocorticoids are used in oncology. Next, we describe the current state of knowledge regarding the effects of these molecules on immune response, in particular anti-tumour response, and we summarize available data evaluating how these effects may interfere with the efficacy of immunotherapy using immune checkpoint inhibitors.