Search

Most of the published works so far have aimed at finding genes associated with multiple sclerosis (MS) susceptibility. Very few studies have attempted to correlate disease features with DNA variants. In a well-characterized sample (651 patients) representative of multiple sclerosis natural history, we engaged a comprehensive study of the role of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) in the course of the disease. We investigated the role of HLA-DRB1*15 allele in samples stratified according to severity evaluated by the Multiple Sclerosis Severity Score (MSSS), time to reach EDSS 6.0 and disease type. We found that HLA-DRB1*15 genotype does not influence MS severity even among patients presenting with a given type of the disease. However, we show for the first time that HLA-DRB1*15 allele modulates the course of MS for relapsing–remitting (RR) onset patients likely by precipitating the secondary progressive (SP) phase.Genes and Immunity (2008) 9, 570–574; doi:10.1038/gene.2008.52; published online 10 July 2008 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Eculizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting the C5 complement protein, has been approved for the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) in adult patients who are anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibody positive (Ab+). The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of eculizumab in French adults with NMOSD and to describe patients' characteristics, disability, and quality of life using data collected in a real-world setting., Methods: This is the protocol for ECUP4, an ongoing prospective, observational, non-comparative, multicenter study conducted in 32 reference centers in France. Eligible patients must also be enrolled in NOMADMUS, a nested cohort of the French national multiple sclerosis registry (OFSEP). The primary endpoint is the annualized relapse rate. Secondary endpoints include the long-term safety of eculizumab, as well as patients' characteristics, treatment outcomes, disability, pain, visual acuity, and quality of life. Visits and treatments follow routine clinical practice. The case report forms (CRF) comprise data recorded in the context of the NOMADMUS cohort, collected during routine visits. The inclusion period is planned for 3 years, with no limitation on the number of patients enrolled. The maximum follow-up duration will be 5.5 years., Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of eculizumab in patients with AQP4+ NMOSD have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials that showed a significant reduction in the risk of relapse, with a safety profile consistent with other indications. This study will provide clinical and patient-reported evidence of the benefits of eculizumab, using data from a real-world setting in France., Trial Registration Number: This study is registered at the French public repertory Health data Hub, N° F20211228123801. All information can be accessed at: https://www.health-data-hub.fr/., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Marignier, Laplaud, Zéphir, Papeix, Leray, Amri, Piotaix and de Sèze.)

Introduction: Many studies have investigated pregnancy in women with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, no study has measured prenatal healthcare utilization in women with MS or adherence to follow-up recommendations to improve antenatal care quality. A better knowledge of the quality of antenatal care in women with MS would help identify and better support women with insufficient follow-up. Our objective was to measure the level of compliance to prenatal care recommendations in women with MS using data from the French National Health Insurance Database., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included all pregnant women with MS who gave live birth in France between 2010 and 2015. Using the French National Health Insurance Database, follow-up visits with gynecologists, midwives, and general practitioners (GPs) were identified, as well as ultrasound exams and laboratory tests. Based on the Adequacy of Prenatal Care Use and Content and Timing of care in Pregnancy indices, a new tool adapted to the French recommendations was developed to measure and classify the antenatal care trajectory (adequate or inadequate). Explicative factors were identified using multivariate logistic regression models. A random effect was included because women may have had more than one pregnancy during the study period., Results: In total, 4,804 women with MS ( N = 5,448 pregnancies ending in live births) were included. When considering only visits with gynecologists/midwives, 2,277 pregnancies (41.8%) were considered adequate. When adding visits with GP, their number increased to 3,646 (66.9%). Multivariate models showed that multiple pregnancy and higher medical density were associated with better adherence to follow-up recommendations. Conversely, adherence was lower in 25-29-year-old and >40-year-old women, in women with very low income, and agricultural and self-employed workers. No visits, ultrasound exams, and laboratory tests were recorded in 87 pregnancies (1.6%). In 50% of pregnancies, women had at least one visit with a neurologist during the pregnancy, and women restarted disease-modifying therapy (DMT) within 6 months after delivery in 45.9% of pregnancies., Discussion: Many women consulted their GP during pregnancy. This could be linked to a low density of gynecologists but may also reflect the preferences of women. Our findings can help adapt recommendations and healthcare providers' practices according to the women's profiles., Competing Interests: MM declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest. ELP received honoraria for lectures or consulting from Biogen Idec, Merck Serono, Novartis, SanofiAventis, TEVA, Roche, Alexion. LM has received personal compensation for consulting, speaking or other activities with Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme, Teva and BMS. EL has received personal compensation for consulting, serving on a scientific advisory board, speaking, or other activities with Alexion, Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme., (Copyright © 2023 Mainguy, Le Page, Michel and Leray.)

Background: The effects of socio-economic status on mortality in patients with multiple sclerosis is not well known. The objective was to examine mortality due to multiple sclerosis according to socio-economic status., Methods: A retrospective observational cohort design was used with recruitment from 18 French multiple sclerosis expert centers participating in the Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques. All patients lived in metropolitan France and had a definite or probable diagnosis of multiple sclerosis according to either Poser or McDonald criteria with an onset of disease between 1960 and 2015. Initial phenotype was either relapsing-onset or primary progressive onset. Vital status was updated on January 1st 2016. Socio-economic status was measured by an ecological index, the European Deprivation Index and was attributed to each patient according to their home address. Excess death rates were studied according to socio-economic status using additive excess hazard models with multidimensional penalised splines. The initial hypothesis was a potential socio-economic gradient in excess mortality., Findings: A total of 34,169 multiple sclerosis patients were included (88% relapsing onset (n = 30,083), 12% progressive onset (n = 4086)), female/male sex ratio 2.7 for relapsing-onset and 1.3 for progressive-onset). Mean age at disease onset was 31.6 (SD = 9.8) for relapsing-onset and 42.7 (SD = 10.8) for progressive-onset. At the end of follow-up, 1849 patients had died (4.4% for relapsing-onset (n = 1311) and 13.2% for progressive-onset (n = 538)). A socio-economic gradient was found for relapsing-onset patients; more deprived patients had a greater excess death rate. At thirty years of disease duration and a year of onset of symptoms of 1980, survival probability difference (or deprivation gap) between less deprived relapsing-onset patients (EDI = -6) and more deprived relapsing-onset patients (EDI = 12) was 16.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) [10.3%-22.9%]) for men and 12.3% (95%CI [7.6%-17.0%]) for women. No clear socio-economic mortality gradient was found in progressive-onset patients., Interpretation: Socio-economic status was associated with mortality due to multiple sclerosis in relapsing-onset patients. Improvements in overall care of more socio-economically deprived patients with multiple sclerosis could help reduce these socio-economic inequalities in multiple sclerosis-related mortality., Funding: This study was funded by the ARSEP foundation "Fondation pour l'aide à la recherche sur la Sclérose en Plaques" (Grant Reference Number 1122). Data collection has been supported by a grant provided by the French State and handled by the "Agence Nationale de la Recherche," within the framework of the "Investments for the Future" programme, under the reference ANR-10-COHO-002, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques (OFSEP)., Competing Interests: Sarah Wilson, Fabien Rollot, Mathieu Fauvernier, Laurent Remontet, Laure Tron, Marc Debouverie, Jérôme de Sèze, Thibault Moreau, Christine Lebrun Frenay, Pierre Labauge, Jean Pelletier and Olivier Dejardin report no disclosures. Floriane Calocer: received funding for the present research from the ARSEP foundation for a Postdoctoral Fellowship (payment to the institution), from the “Réseau Bas-Normand pour la SEP” for a Postdoctoral Fellowship (payment to the institution), from the Regional Council of Normandy (payment to the institution), from the Ecole Doctorale of Caen University for a training in LSHTD to conduct this research (payment to the institution). She received support for attending meetings and/or travel from the ARSEP Foundation (paid directly to herself, unrelated to this work). Sandra Vukusic: received grants or contracts (paid to her university hospital) from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva; received consulting fees from Biogen, BMS-Celgene, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva (paid to her university hospital); received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva (paid to her university hospital); received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Biogen, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva, participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Biogen (contracts with her university hospital), all of the above unrelated to this work. Emmanuelle Le Page: received payment or honoraria for consulting or lectures from Biogen, Merck, Teva, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis Alexion; received research support from Teva and Biogen, and received academic research grants from PHRC and LFSEP, and a travel grant from the ARSEP Foundation; received payment for consulting from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, and Novartis; received invitations for national and international congresses from Biogen, Merck, Sanofi-Genzyme, Novartis Alexion, all of the above unrelated to this work. Jonathan Ciron: participated on a Data Safety Monitory Board of Advisory Board with Biogen, Novartis, Merck, Sanofi, Roche, Alexion and BMS-Celgene (all unrelated to this work). Aurélie Ruet: Consultancy fees from Roche and Biogen, payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Merck, Roche, Biogen, research grants (paid to the institution) from Roche, Biogen and Sanofi-Genzyme, and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Biogen, Novartis and Alexion, all of the above unrelated to this work. Hélène Zephir: received research support for one PhD student from Roche, and research support for one MD student from FHU Imminent, consulting fees from Biogen IDEC (Symposium Biogen Idec in ISNI congress); received payment or honoraria for lectures from Merck, received payment or honoraria for lectures and boards from Novartis, all of the above unrelated to this work. David-Axel Laplaud: received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Biogen, Merck, Alexion, BMS, Roche and Novartis, all of the above unrelated to this work. Pierre Clavelou: received consulting fees from Biogen, Janssen, Medday, Merck, Novartis, Roche, Sanofi-Genzyme and Teva Pharma; and support for attending meetings and/or travel from Sanofi-Genzyme, and participated on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Medday, Merck and Novartis. All of the above unrelated to this work. Eric Berger: received consulting fees from Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen, Genzyme, Roche and Teva Pharma; received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Novartis, Sanofi Aventis, Biogen, Genyme, Roche and Teva Pharma (all of the above unrelated to this work). Olivier Heinzlef: consulting fees from Bayer Schering, Merck, Teva, Genzyme, Novartis, Almirall and BiogenIdec, support for attending meetings and/or travel grants from Novartis, Teva, Genzyme, Merck Serono and Biogen Idec and other financial or non-financial interests from Novartis, Teva, Genzyme, Merck Serono and BiogenIdec (all of the above unrelated to this work). Eric Thouvenot: received grants or contracts from Novartis and Biogen (paid to the institution), consulting fees from Merck, Novartis, Biogen and Celgene (paid directly to himself); received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Merck, Novartis, Biogen, Celgene (paid directly to himself). All of the above unrelated to this work. Jean Philippe Camdessanché: received grants or contracts from CSL-Behring, Grifols, Laboratoire Français des Biotechnologies, consulting fees from Akcea, Alexion, Alnylam, Argenx, Bristol Myers Squibb, Laboratoire Français des Biotechnologies, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, SNF-Floeger, received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Akcea, Alexion, Alnylam, Argenx, Biogen, CSL-Behring, Genzyme, Grifols, Laboratoire Français des Biotechnologies, Merck-Serono, Natus, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma and Teva. Received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Akcea, Alexion, Alnylam, Argenx, Biogen, CSL-Behring, Genzyme, Grifols, Laboratoire Français des Biotechnologies, Merck-Serono, Natus, Novartis, Pfizer, Teva, SNF-Floeger, all of the above unrelated to this work. Emmanuelle Leray: received consulting fees from Alexion, Merck, Novartis, Roche and Biogen, received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, speakers bureaus, manuscript writing or educational events from Sanofi Genzyme, and received support for attending meetings and/or travel from Sanofi Genzyme, all of the above unrelated to this work. Gilles Defer Received research grants (paid to institution) from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme; payment for speaker honoraria from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, BMS; funding for travel from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals; and personal compensation for scientific advisory boards from Biogen, Merck Serono, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme, Teva Pharmaceuticals, and BMS. All of the above unrelated to this work., (© 2022 The Author(s).)

Introduction: It is important to confirm the effectiveness and tolerability of disease-modifying treatments for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) in real-world treatment settings. This prospective observational cohort study (VIRGILE) was performed at the request of the French health authorities. The primary objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of fingolimod 0.5 mg in reducing the annualised relapse rate (ARR) in patients with RRMS., Methods: Participating neurologists enrolled all adult patients with RRMS starting fingolimod treatment between 2014 and 2016, who were followed for 3 years. Follow-up consultations took place at the investigator's discretion. The primary outcome measure was the change in ARR at month 24 after fingolimod initiation. Relapses and adverse events were documented at each consultation; disability assessment (EDSS) and magnetic resonance imagery were performed at the investigator's discretion., Results: Of 1055 eligible patients, 633 patients were assessable at month 36; 405 (64.0%) were treated continuously with fingolimod for 3 years. The ARR decreased from 0.92 ± 0.92 at inclusion to 0.31 ± 0.51 at month 24, a significant reduction of 0.58 [95% CI - 0.51 to - 0.65] relapses/year (p < 0.001). Since starting fingolimod, 461 patients (60.9%) remained relapse-free at month 24 and 366 patients (55.5%) at month 36. In multivariate analysis, no previous disease-modifying treatment, number of relapses in the previous year and lower EDSS score at inclusion were associated with a greater on-treatment reduction in ARR. The mean EDSS score remained stable over the course of the study. Sixty-one out of 289 (21.1%) patients presented new radiological signs of disease activity. Treatment-related serious adverse events were lymphopenia (N = 21), bradycardia (N = 19), elevated transaminases (N = 9) and macular oedema (N = 9)., Conclusions: The effectiveness and tolerability of fingolimod in everyday clinical practice are consistent with findings of previous phase III studies. Our study highlights the utility of fingolimod for the long-term management of patients with multiple sclerosis., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: The availability of new disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) provides an opportunity for improving outcomes but makes disease management more complex. Our study aimed to describe changes in therapeutic practices over the period 2009-2018 and measure the impact of the arrival of oral DMTs on the use of injectable DMTs., Methods: Data were extracted from a representative 1/97 sample of the French population covered by the healthcare insurance system. Study period was set from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2018. Four periods of MS identification were defined (before 2009, 2009-2011, 2012-2015, and 2016-2018)., Results: Overall, 1,508 patients with MS were included, of whom 876 (58.1%) were treated at least once over the study period. Untreated patients were older and had more comorbidities than treated ones. First-line DMTs were the most frequent initial DMT (78.5%), and a shift has operated from injectable to oral drugs over time. The proportion of patients receiving several DMTs increased with the number of available drugs. End 2018, relative parts of all DMTs were almost equal., Conclusions: This study provides valuable insights into the real-world use of DMTs and changes that have operated over time.

In France, two therapeutic strategies can be offered after fingolimod (FNG) withdrawal to highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients: natalizumab (NTZ) or anti-CD20. We compared the effectiveness of these two strategies as a switch for FNG within the OFSEP database. The primary endpoint was the time to first relapse. Other outcomes were the relapse rates over 3-month periods, time to worsening the EDSS score, proportion of patients with worsened 24-month MRI, time to treatment discontinuation, and incidence rates of serious adverse events. The dynamics of event rates over time were modeled using multidimensional penalized splines, allowing the possibility to model the effects of covariates in a flexible way, considering non-linearity and interactions. A total of 740 patients were included (337 under anti-CD20 and 403 under NTZ). There was no difference between the two treatments regarding the dynamic of the first occurrence of relapse, with a monthly probability of 5.0% at initiation and 1.0% after 6 months. The rate of EDSS worsening increased in both groups until 6 months and then decreased. No difference in the proportion of patients with new T2 lesions at 24 months was observed. After 18 months of follow-up, a greater risk of NTZ discontinuation was found compared to anti-CD20. This study showed no difference between NTZ and anti-CD20 after the FNG switch regarding the clinical and radiological activity. The effect of these treatments was optimal after 6 months and there was more frequent discontinuation of NTZ after 18 months, probably mainly related to JC virus seroconversions., (© 2022. The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc.)

Background: The first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic confronted healthcare systems around the world with unprecedented organizational challenges, particularly regarding the availability of intensive care unit (ICU) beds. One strategy implemented in France to alleviate healthcare pressure during the first COVID-19 wave was inter-hospital transfers of selected ICU patients from overwhelmed areas towards less saturated ones. At the time, the impact of this transfer strategy on patient mortality was unknown. We aimed to compare in-hospital mortality rates among ICU patients with COVID-19 who were transferred to another healthcare facility and those who remained in the hospital where they were initially admitted to., Method: A prospective observational study was performed from 1 March to 21 June 2020. Data regarding hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were collected from the Ministry of Health-affiliated national SI-VIC registry. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality., Results: In total, 93,351 hospital admissions of COVID-19 patients were registered, of which 18,348 (19.6%) were ICU admissions. Transferred patients (n = 2228) had a lower mortality rate than their non-transferred counterparts (n = 15,303), and the risk decreased with increasing transfer distance (odds ratio (OR) 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6-0.9, p = 0.001 for transfers between 10 and 50 km, and OR 0.3, 95% CI: 0.2-0.4, p < 0.0001 for transfer distance > 200 km). Mortality decreased overall over the 3-month study period., Conclusions: Our study shows that the mortality rates were lower for patients with severe COVID-19 who were transferred between ICUs across regions, or internationally, during the first pandemic wave in France. However, the global mortality rate declined overall during the study. Transferring selected patients with COVID-19 from overwhelmed regions to areas with greater capacity may have improved patient access to ICU care, without compounding the short-term mortality risk of transferred patients., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Introduction: During spring 2020, four regions of France faced a surge of severe COVID-19 patients which threatened to overflow local intensive care units (ICU) capacities. As an emergency response, between 13 March 2020 and 10 April 2020, an estimated 661 patients were transferred from overcrowded ICUs to eight other French regions and four neighbouring countries. The intensity, geographical spread and the diversity of vectors used are unprecedented. The study aims at assessing the impact of these inter-ICU transfers on the short-term and medium-term physical and psychological outcomes in this population of severe COVID-19 patients., Methods and Analysis: The TRANSCOV cohort is a multicentre observational retrospective study. All transferred patients between ICUs outside the origin region will be invited to take part. For each transfer, up to four control patients will be selected among those admitted in the same ICU during the same period (±4 days of transfer date). Clinical data will be extracted from medical records and will include haemodynamic and respiratory parameters, as well as clinical severity scores before, during and after transfer. Data linkage with medicoadministrative data will enrich the clinical database and allow follow-up up to 1 year after initial admission., Ethics and Dissemination: The study has been approved by the French Ethics and Scientific Committee on the 16 July 2020 (file no. 2046524). The results will be disseminated via publication of scientific articles and communications in national and international conferences., Trial Registration Number: 20 CO 015 CZ., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In multiple sclerosis, treatment start or switch is prompted by evidence of disease activity. Whilst immunomodulatory therapies reduce disease activity, the time required to attain maximal effect is unclear. In this study we aimed to develop a method that allows identification of the time to manifest fully and clinically the effect of multiple sclerosis treatments ('therapeutic lag') on clinical disease activity represented by relapses and progression-of-disability events. Data from two multiple sclerosis registries, MSBase (multinational) and OFSEP (French), were used. Patients diagnosed with multiple sclerosis, minimum 1-year exposure to treatment, minimum 3-year pretreatment follow-up and yearly review were included in the analysis. For analysis of disability progression, all events in the subsequent 5-year period were included. Density curves, representing incidence of relapses and 6-month confirmed progression events, were separately constructed for each sufficiently represented therapy. Monte Carlo simulations were performed to identify the first local minimum of the first derivative after treatment start; this point represented the point of stabilization of treatment effect, after the maximum treatment effect was observed. The method was developed in a discovery cohort (MSBase), and externally validated in a separate, non-overlapping cohort (OFSEP). A merged MSBase-OFSEP cohort was used for all subsequent analyses. Annualized relapse rates were compared in the time before treatment start and after the stabilization of treatment effect following commencement of each therapy. We identified 11 180 eligible treatment epochs for analysis of relapses and 4088 treatment epochs for disability progression. External validation was performed in four therapies, with no significant difference in the bootstrapped mean differences in therapeutic lag duration between registries. The duration of therapeutic lag for relapses was calculated for 10 therapies and ranged between 12 and 30 weeks. The duration of therapeutic lag for disability progression was calculated for seven therapies and ranged between 30 and 70 weeks. Significant differences in the pre- versus post-treatment annualized relapse rate were present for all therapies apart from intramuscular interferon beta-1a. In conclusion we have developed, and externally validated, a method to objectively quantify the duration of therapeutic lag on relapses and disability progression in different therapies in patients more than 3 years from multiple sclerosis onset. Objectively defined periods of expected therapeutic lag allows insights into the evaluation of treatment response in randomized clinical trials and may guide clinical decision-making in patients who experience early on-treatment disease activity. This method will subsequently be applied in studies that evaluate the effect of patient and disease characteristics on therapeutic lag., (© The Author(s) (2020). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Mental disorders (MDs) in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients decreases treatment adherence and quality of life, and increases the risk of disability progression and care consumption., Objective: This study was to assess the prevalence of MDs in MS patients compared with healthy controls (HC) of the French general population and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients., Methods: The 2015 prevalence of MDs for MS patients, RA patients and general population was estimated using a random population-based data sample from 'National Inter-Scheme Information System on Health Insurance' in the 2011-2015 period. Two control groups (1:5 ratio for the HC and 1:1 for the RA group) were matched to the MS group for year of birth, gender, area of residence and health insurance scheme., Results: A total of 1145 MS patients were identified (sex ratio of 2.5 (F/M); median age 50 years). The prevalence of MDs was higher in the population of patients with MS (37.3%) than in the French general population (13.6%), and to a lesser extent in the RA group (21.1%) leading to the prevalence ratios of 2.8 (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 2.5-3.0) and 1.9 (95% CI 1.7-2.3), respectively., Conclusions: This study confirmed that MS patients are at a higher risk of MDs than the French general population or RA patients., (© The Author(s) 2020.)

Objective: To describe pregnancies exposed to teriflunomide (TERIF) in women with multiple sclerosis (MS) in France over the period 2014-2016., Methods: All 15- to 49-year-old women with MS in the national health insurance database were included. Pregnancies that had started between August 2014 and March 2016 were identified from their outcomes. Three groups according to treatment exposure were compared: TERIF, interferons (IFNs) or glatiramer acetate, and no medication., Results: Among the 44,008 women with MS followed 24.5 months on average, 2,639 pregnancies were identified. There were 1,538 pregnancies (58.3%) that were not exposed to any MS treatment in accordance with the guidelines. A total of 673 pregnancies (25.5%) were exposed to IFN and/or glatiramer acetate, and possible or probable exposure to contra-indicated treatments was observed in 428 pregnancies (16.2%), of whom 47 pregnancies were exposed to TERIF. The annual incidence rate of pregnancies exposed to TERIF was 1.4 per 100 patient-years; i.e., 3 times less than the 2 control groups (5.6 and 4.7, respectively). The median exposure duration to TERIF was 45 days after conception. The outcomes comprised 23 live births, 22 abortions (3 times more than the 2 other groups), and 2 miscarriages. All newborns were healthy at birth., Conclusions: Despite specific TERIF guidelines for pregnancy-related issues and the availability of alternative therapies, some pregnancies exposed to TERIF were identified. Most of the cases were because of the absence of the recommended accelerated elimination procedure and appeared to be mostly unplanned pregnancies that probably reflect a lack of effective contraception., (© 2019 American Academy of Neurology.)

Worldwide, the beta interferons remain the most commonly prescribed disease-modifying drugs for multiple sclerosis. However, it is unclear if they alter survival. We investigated the association between beta interferon and mortality in the 'real-world' setting. This was a multi-centre population-based observational study of patients with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis who were initially registered at a clinic in British Columbia, Canada (1980-2004) or Rennes, France (1976-2013). Data on this cohort were accessed from the clinical multiple sclerosis databases and from individually linked health administrative data; all data were collected prospectively. Participants were followed from the latter of their first multiple sclerosis clinic visit, 18th birthday or 1 January 1996; until death, emigration or 31 December 2013. Only those who were naïve to disease-modifying therapy and immunosuppressant treatment of multiple sclerosis at the start of their follow-up were included in the analysis. A nested case-control approach was used. Up to 20 controls, matched to cases (deaths) by country, sex, age ± 5 years, year and disability level at study entry, were randomly selected from the cohort by incidence density sampling. The associations between all-cause mortality and at least 6 months beta interferon exposure, and also cumulative exposure ('low', 6 months to 3 years; and 'high', >3 years), were estimated by conditional logistic regression adjusting for treatment with other disease-modifying therapies and age in years. Further analyses included separate analyses by sex and country, additional adjustment for comorbidity burden in the Canadian cohort, and estimation of the association between beta interferon and multiple sclerosis-related death in both countries. Among 5989 participants (75% female) with a mean age of 42 (standard deviation, SD 11) years at study entry, there were 742 deaths (70% female) and the mean age at death was 61 (SD 13) years. Of these cases, 649 were matched to between one and 20 controls. Results of the conditional logistic regression analyses are expressed as adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. The odds of beta interferon exposure were 32% lower among cases than controls (0.68; 0.53-0.89). Increased survival was associated with >3 years beta interferon exposure (0.44; 0.30-0.66), but not between 6 months and 3 years exposure (1.00; 0.73-1.38). Findings were similar within sex and country, and for multiple sclerosis-related death. Beta interferon treatment was associated with a lower mortality risk among people with relapsing-onset multiple sclerosis. Findings were consistent between two geographically distinct regions in North America and Europe., (© The Author(s) (2019). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: Approximately 12 disease-modifying treatments are available worldwide for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS). These recent therapeutic advances have led to major changes in patient and neurologist attitudes toward drug prescription. Herein, we aimed to characterize patient choice regarding treatment for MS and identify how neurologists assess and monitor patient compliance during follow-up., Methods: In 29 patients with MS, we observed visits to their neurologist to understand how questions related to compliance were addressed in the doctor-patient relationship. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 15 of the 29 patients to discuss how they dealt with their drug prescription from a patient-centered perspective., Results: Of the 15 patients with MS, nine were offered a choice of treatment. However, we found that neurologists were not always willing to consider the patients' input. Even if physicians attempt to align treatment choice with patient preferences to ensure compliance, preferences are often assumed rather than solicited from patients. Furthermore, patients may be unwilling to make their own treatment decisions. Various ways for neurologists to assess compliance during visits were also identified. Noncompliance can be considered as a way for patients to communicate their preferences and demonstrate involvement in their drug therapy, and it can lead to a renegotiation of the current treatment course., Conclusions: These findings suggest that the neurologist-patient relationship has a great influence on patient compliance throughout the MS disease course.

Background: Triggers of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses are essentially unknown. PM 10 exposure has recently been associated with an increased risk of relapses., Objectives: We further explore the short-term associations between PM 10 , NO 2 , benzene (C 6 H 6 ), O 3 , and CO exposures, and the odds of MS relapses' occurrence., Methods: Using a case-crossover design, we studied 424 MS patients living in the Strasbourg area, France between 2000 and 2009 (1783 relapses in total). Control days were chosen to be ± 35 days relative to the case (relapse) day. Exposure was modeled through ADMS-Urban software at the census block scale. We consider single-pollutant and multi-pollutant conditional logistic regression models coupled with a distributed-lag linear structure, stratified by season ("hot" vs. "cold"), and adjusted for meteorological parameters, pollen count, influenza-like epidemics, and holidays., Results: The single-pollutant analyses indicated: 1) significant associations between MS relapse incidence and exposures to NO 2 , PM 10 , and O 3 , and 2) seasonality in these associations. For instance, an interquartile range increase in NO 2 (lags 0-3) and PM 10 exposure were associated with MS relapse incidence (OR = 1.08; 95%CI: [1.03-1.14] and OR = 1.06; 95%CI: [1.01-1.11], respectively) during the "cold" season (i.e., October-March). We also observed an association with O 3 and MS relapse incidence during "hot" season (OR = 1.16; 95%CI: [1.07-1.25]). C 6 H 6 and CO were not significantly related to MS relapse incidence. However, using multi-pollutant models, only O 3 remained significantly associated with the odds of relapse triggering during "hot" season., Conclusion: We observed significant single-pollution associations between the occurrence of MS relapses and exposures to NO 2 , O 3 and PM 10 , only O 3 remained significantly associated with occurrence of MS relapses in the multi-pollutant model., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Seasonal variation of relapses in multiple sclerosis (MS) suggests that season-dependent factors, such as ambient air pollution, may trigger them. However, only few studies have considered possible role of air pollutants as relapse's risk factor., Objective: We investigated the effect of particulate matter of aerodynamic diameter smaller than 10µm (PM 10 ) on MS relapses., Methods: In total, 536 relapsing MS patients from Strasbourg city (France) were included, accounting for 2052 relapses over 2000-2009 period. A case-crossover design was used with cases defined as the days of relapse and controls being selected in the same patient at plus and minus 35 days. Different lags from 0 to 30 days were considered. Conditional logistic regressions, adjusted on meteorological parameters, school and public holidays, were used and exposure was considered first as a quantitative variable and second, as a binary variable., Results: The natural logarithm of the average PM 10 concentration lagged from 1 to 3 days before relapse onset was significantly associated with relapse risk (OR =1.40 [95% confidence interval 1.08-1.81]) in cold season. Consistent results were observed when considering PM 10 as a binary variable, even if not significant., Conclusion: With an appropriate study design and robust ascertainment of neurological events and exposure, the present study highlights the effect of PM 10 on the risk of relapse in MS patients, probably through oxidative stress mechanisms., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Geographical variation in the prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) is controversial. Heterogeneity is important to acknowledge to adapt the provision of care within the healthcare system. We aimed to investigate differences in prevalence of MS in departments in the French territory., Methods: We estimated MS prevalence on October 31, 2004 in 21 administrative departments in France (22% of the metropolitan departments) by using multiple data sources: the main French health insurance systems, neurologist networks devoted to MS and the Technical Information Agency of Hospitalization. We used a spatial Bayesian approach based on estimating the number of MS cases from 2005 and 2008 capture-recapture studies to analyze differences in prevalence., Results: The age- and sex-standardized prevalence of MS per 100,000 inhabitants ranged from 68.1 (95% credible interval 54.6, 84.4) in Hautes-Pyrénées (southwest France) to 296.5 (258.8, 338.9) in Moselle (northeast France). The greatest prevalence was in the northeast departments, and the other departments showed great variability., Discussion: By combining multiple data sources into a spatial Bayesian model, we found heterogeneity in MS prevalence among the 21 departments of France, some with higher prevalence than anticipated from previous publications. No clear explanation related to health insurance coverage and hospital facilities can be advanced. Population migration, socioeconomic status of the population studied and environmental effects are suspected., Competing Interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: M. Debouverie has done consulting research and/or workshops for Biogen-Idec, Bayer-Schering, Genzyme, Merck-Serono, Novartis, Sanofi-Aventis and Teva Pharma. The organizations mentioned in this statement did not participate in any aspects of the design, execution, analysis, or write-up of this study. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.