Search

Pierce D Nunley,1 Vikas V Patel,2 Douglas G Orndorff,3 William F Lavelle,4 Jon E Block,5 Fred H Geisler6 1Spine Institute of Louisiana, Shreveport, LA, 2The Spine Center, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, CO, 3Spine Colorado, Mercy Regional Hospital, Durango, CO, 4Upstate Bone and Joint Center, East Syracuse, NY, 5Independent Consultant, San Francisco, CA, 6Independent Consultant, Chicago, IL, USA Background: Lumbar spinal stenosis is the most common indication for spine surgery in older adults. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) using a stand-alone spacer that functions as an extension blocker offers a minimally invasive treatment option for intermittent neurogenic claudication associated with spinal stenosis.Methods: This study evaluated the 5-year clinical outcomes for IPD (Superion®) from a randomized controlled US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) noninferiority trial. Outcomes included Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) symptom severity (ss), physical function (pf), and patient satisfaction (ps) subdomains, leg and back pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).Results: At 5 years, 84% of patients (74 of 88) demonstrated clinical success on at least two of three ZCQ domains. Individual ZCQ domain success rates were 75% (66 of 88), 81% (71 of 88), and 90% (79 of 88) for ZCQss, ZCQpf, and ZCQps, respectively. Leg and back pain success rates were 80% (68 of 85) and 65% (55 of 85), respectively, and the success rate for ODI was 65% (57 of 88). Percentage improvements over baseline were 42%, 39%, 75%, 66%, and 58% for ZCQss, ZCQpf, leg and back pain VAS, and ODI, respectively (all P1.0; all P

Background: The aging spine often presents multifaceted surgical challenges for the surgeon because it can directly and indirectly impact a patient's spinal alignment and quality of life. Elderly and osteoporotic patients are predisposed to progressive spinal deformities and potential neurologic compromise and surgical management can be difficult because these patients often present with greater frailty., Methods: This was a literature review of spinal alignment changes, preoperative considerations, and spinal alignment considerations for surgical strategies., Results: Many factors impact spinal alignment as we age including lumbar lordosis flexibility, hip flexion, deformity, and osteoporosis. Preoperative considerations are required to assess the patient's overall health, bone mineral density, and osteoporosis medications. Careful radiographic assessment of the spinopelvic parameters using various classification/scoring systems provide the surgeon with goals for surgical treatment. An individualized surgical strategy can be planned for the patient including extent of surgery, surgical approach, extent of the constructs, fixation techniques, vertebral augmentation, ligamentous augmentation, and staging surgery., Conclusions: Surgical treatment should only be considered after a thorough assessment of the patient's health, deformity, bone quality and corresponding age matched alignment goals. An individualized treatment approach is often required to tackle the deformity and minimize the risk of hardware related complications and pseudarthrosis. Anabolic agents offer a promising benefit in this patient population by directly addressing and improving their bone quality and mineral density preoperatively and postoperatively., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting Interests : William Lavelle has stock ownership in Curiteva Spine, a sponsor of this special issue.

Introduction: Anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) is the standard surgical procedure for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy, although ACDF includes risks of adjacent segment disease (ASD) and subsequent revision procedures. Various interbody cage, plate, and screw options can be utilized. Stand-alone devices were designed to overcome undesired complications of hardware prominence and associated dysphagia, soft tissue violation, and adjacent level encroachment. Implants include biomechanical structural support (cage) composed of various materials (polyetheretherketone (PEEK)/titanium) and integral fixation (screws/blades). The purpose was to compare intraoperative, short- and long-term outcomes of revision ACDF using a stand-alone implant (ACDF-ZP group) versus traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation (ACDF-CP group)., Methods: This was a retrospective, cohort study reviewing charts of patients who underwent revision ACDF. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of postoperative dysphagia. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative, short-term, and long-term outcomes and complications., Results: Sixty-one patients were included (ACDF-ZP group = 50; ACDF-CP group = 11). In-hospital incidence of dysphagia was significantly less in the ACDF-CP group (P = 0.041). Thrity-one (62.0%) of the ACDF-ZP group reported dysphagia postoperatively, half resolved by 6 weeks, and two persisted for more than 6 months. Five (45.5%) of the ACDF-CP group reported dysphagia with most resolving within 6 weeks. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in short- or long-term complications, dysphonia, or reoperation rates. No statistical significance was seen in blood loss, operative time, hospital stay, local and global alignment, or cage subsidence., Conclusion: Rates of dysphagia were comparable between groups at short and long-term follow-up, despite a greater incidence of postoperative dysphagia in the ACDF-ZP group. All complications and occurrences of cage subsidence were observed in the ACDF-ZP group, which may be attributed to the larger sample size. Given these findings, zero-profile stand-alone implants and traditional interbody PEEK cage, titanium plate, and screw instrumentation appear to be both safe and effective options for revision ACDF., Competing Interests: The authors have declared financial relationships, which are detailed in the next section., (Copyright © 2023, Alhammoud et al.)

Purpose: Evaluate the ability of pre-contoured rods to induce thoracic kyphosis (TK) in human cadaveric spines and determine the effectiveness of sequential surgical adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) release procedures., Methods: Six thoracolumbar (T3-L2) spine specimens were instrumented with pedicle screws bilaterally (T4-T12). Over correction using pre-contoured rods was performed for intact condition and Cobb angle was measured. Rod radius of curvature (RoC) was measured pre- and post-reduction. The process was repeated following sequential release procedures of (1) interspinous and supraspinous ligaments (ISL); (2) ligamentum flavum; (3) Ponte osteotomy; (4) posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL); and (5) transforaminal discectomy. Cobb measurements determined the effective contribution of release on TK and RoC data displayed effects of reduction to the rods., Results: The intact TK (T4-12) was 38.0° and increased to 51.7° with rod reduction and over correction. Each release resulted in 5°-7°of additional kyphosis; the largest releases were ISL and PLL. All releases resulted in significant increases in kyphosis compared to intact with rod reduction and over correction. Regionally, kyphosis increased ∼2° for each region following successive releases. Comparing RoC before and after reduction showed significant 6° loss in rod curvature independent of release type., Conclusion: Kyphosis increased in the thoracic spine using pre-contoured and over corrected rods. Subsequent posterior releases provided a substantial, meaningful clinical change in the ability to induce additional kyphosis. Regardless of the number of releases, the ability of the rods to induce and over correct kyphosis was reduced following reduction., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Shi, Ordway, Sun, Albanese and Lavelle.)

Background: Proximal junctional fractures (PJFr) can be a catastrophic complication associated with adult spinal deformity surgery. Osteoporosis can be a major risk factor for the cause of PJFr. Recent studies suggest using surrogate computed tomography (CT) scans in place of spinal dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scores for bone mineral density (BMD). Investigate the feasibility of using preoperative CT based bone mineral density at upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV) and one level proximally (UIV+1) and distally (UIV-1) to predict the possibility of PJFr risk., Methods: Retrospective two-academic center case-controlled study, reviewed consecutive adult spinal deformity surgeries; included constructs encompassing at least five fusion levels and fusions to pelvis. Examined demographic, surgical, and radiographic data preoperatively, postoperatively, and final follow-up. Formed groups based on type of proximal junctional deformity (PJD): Control (no PJD), proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and PJFr. Preoperative CT BMD values measured in Hounsfield units (HU) for sagittal and axial planes at UIV, UIV+1, and UIV-1 and compared between groups., Results: N=92 patients. Preoperative CT scan BMD values were significantly lower in PJFr vs. control at: UIV+1 in sagittal (p=0.007), axial (p=0.02) planes; UIV sagittal (p=0.04) and axial (p=0.03) planes; and UIV-1 sagittal (p=0.05) plane. Similarly, lower CT scan BMD values noted in PJFr vs. PJK at: UIV+1 in sagittal (p=0.04) and axial (p=0.03) planes. Trend seen with lower CT scan BMD values at UIV+1 level in PJFr vs. PJK in sagittal (p=0.12) and axial (p=0.10) planes. Preoperative global sagittal imbalance measurements significantly lower in control, but comparable between PJK and PJFr., Conclusions: Higher preoperative global sagittal imbalance with lower preoperative CT BMD values at UIV and UIV+1 vertebral body may increase the risk of proximal junctional fractures after adult spine deformity surgery. Proximal junctional hooks may supplement the pathogenesis. Readers should note the small sample size. Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: This study was performed with the approval of SUNY Upstate Medical University IRB and The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center IRB and in accordance with the boards’ regulations. The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2022 The Authors.)

Background: Pelvic fixation improves the stability of spinal instrumentation and can be used in high-grade degenerative disease, trauma, deformity, and destabilizing invasive pathologies, such as infection and tumor. Classic techniques for spinopelvic fixation include traditional iliac screws and S2-Alar-Iliac screws. We present a case series describing the distal ventral iliac pathway (DVIP) for spinopelvic fixation and discuss surgical indications and merits of this technique. We describe the use of the DVIP for spinopelvic fixation in the setting of degenerative and traumatic pathologies, compare this technique with existing approaches, and summarize literature to support this approach., Methods: One hundred twenty-eight cases of DVIP screws were identified at 1 academic medical center, and 3 cases were chosen as representative examples for technique demonstration., Results: Patient ages ranged from 19 to 81 (mean 62) years. Intraoperative and postoperative complications include 12 incidental durotomies, 3 suprafascial infections, and 2 compressive hematomas. There were 22 instances of hardware failure and 8 instances of pseudoarthrosis. Overall, 26 patients underwent revision surgery. Mean estimated blood loss, operative time, and time under fluoroscopy were 1959 mL, 386 minutes, and 3.19 minutes, respectively., Conclusions: The DVIP is both safe and effective as a treatment for patients with degenerative and traumatic lumbosacral pathology. Spinopelvic fixation provides improved soft tissue coverage and fewer hardware complications at minimum of 1 year follow up. This case series demonstrates a novel surgical technique for spinopelvic fixation in the setting of numerous spinal pathologies., Level of Evidence: 4., Clinical Relevance: This surgical technique is less technically challenging than current approaches, minimizes radiation exposure, and obviates the need for horizontal connector rods. In addition, in highly destabilizing pathologies, this technique also allows for multiple screw placement within the ilium, while maintaining the ability to connect to a single rod construct. This technique is safe, technically approachable, and broadly applicable to an array of spinopelvic pathologies., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2021 ISASS.)

Background: Many studies report benefits using negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in surgical site infections (SSIs). We measured and compared efficacy and complications associated with NPWT for traditional versus suprafascial vacuum-assisted closures (VACs)., Methods: This is a retrospective chart review of consecutive SSIs managed with negative wound therapy after spinal procedures between 2012 and 2015 from a single, academic center. Patients were collected through International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, procedure codes. Inclusion criteria were patients with spine SSIs managed by irrigation and debridement with a VAC device; infection occurring after spinal surgeries; and age over 18. A total of 23 consecutive patients met the criteria. We reviewed demographic data, surgical data, infectious disease data, discharge summaries, and postoperative follow-up charts. We compared and analyzed demographics, duration of VAC therapy, and reoperation rates between VAC groups. Statistical analysis was completed using analysis of variance and χ 2 tests; P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant., Results: A total of 7 patients had traditional VACs (Group 1), and 16 patients had suprafascial VACs (Group 2). Average blood loss and number of levels involved during index surgery were not statistically significant between groups. Locations of infection occurrence were cervical spine = 3, thoracic spine = 1, and lumbar spine = 19. Reoperation rate after initial wound VAC placement was 34%, with rates significantly higher for Group 1 (71%) than Group 2 (16%), P = 0.02. Average duration of wound therapy was longer in Group 1 (77 days) than Group 2 (33 days), P = 0.08. Average number of operating room visits after initial wound VAC implantation were 0.7 for Group 1 and 0.3 for Group 2, P = 0.26, before obtaining a clean wound closure., Conclusions: Small sample size and retrospective nature were limitations. Negative pressure wound therapy may be useful for managing spinal infections, and suprafascial VAC had less time duration, lower risk of sponge fragment retainment, and fewer procedures to ultimately achieve wound closure., Level of Evidence: 3., (This manuscript is generously published free of charge by ISASS, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery. Copyright © 2020 ISASS.)

Background: With the COVID-19 pandemic disrupting many facets of our society, physicians and patients have begun using telemedicine as a platform for the delivery of health care. One of the challenges in implementing telemedicine for the spine care provider is completing a comprehensive spinal examination. Currently, there is no standardized methodology to complete a full spinal examination through telemedicine., Methods: We propose a novel, remote spinal examination methodology that is easily implemented through telemedicine, where the patient is an active participant in the successful completion of his or her examination. This type of examination has been validated in a neurology setting. To facilitate the telemedicine visit, we propose that video instruction be shared with the patient prior to the telemedicine visit to increase the efficacy of the examination., Results: Since the issuance of stay-at-home order across the states, many spine practices around the country have rapidly adopted and increased their telemedicine program to continue provide care for patients during COVID-19 pandemic. At a tertiary academic center in a busy metropolitan area, nearly 700 telemedicine visits were successfully conducted during a 4-week period. There were no remote visits being done prior to the shutdown., Conclusions: Implementation of our proposed remote spinal examination has the potential to serve as a guideline for the spine care provider to efficiently assess patients with spine disease using telemedicine. Because these are only suggestions, providers should tailor examination to each individual patient's needs., Level of Evidence: V., Clinical Relevance: It is likely that physicians will incorporate telemedicine into health care delivery services even after the COVID-19 pandemic subsides because of telemedicine's efficiency in meeting patient needs. Using the standard maneuvers provided in our study, spine care providers can perform a nearly comprehensive spine examination through telemedicine. Further studies will be needed to validate the reproducibility and reliability of our methodology., Competing Interests: Disclosures and COI: The authors declare no conflicts of interests with this manuscript. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors., (©International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery 2020.)

Introduction: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) has become an acceptable alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for a significant patient population with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy secondary to degenerative changes in the cervical spine. There are sufficient mid- and long-term data supporting performance and safety of one-level CDA. With the success of single-level cervical CDA, considerable interest exists about CDA use for multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). This review analyzes the safety and efficacy of two-level CDA for treatment of symptomatic cervical DDD with focus on the Mobi-C® Cervical Disc., Areas Covered: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'two-level-anterior cervical arthrodesis; two-level anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF); two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA); two-level cervical total disc replacement; two-level symptomatic degenerative disc disease (DDD); Mobi-C® disc'., Expert Opinion: Two-level CDA with the Mobi-C® device demonstrated equivalent, and in certain aspects, favorable outcomes compared to ACDF for treatment of symptomatic cervical 2-level degenerative disc disease (DDD) indicating a satisfactory safety and efficacy profile.

Background: Vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are common comorbidities encountered in the elderly, and they are on the rise. Kyphoplasty may be superior in VCF management compared with conservative management. A comprehensive review of literature was conducted, focusing on the effect of kyphoplasty on mortality and overall survivorship in patients with a diagnosis of symptomatic VCFs., Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted to find recently published literature on kyphoplasty effects on mortality using the following keywords: "kyphoplasty," "mortality," "morbidity," "vertebral compression fractures," and "survivorship." We only included articles that listed one of their primary or secondary outcomes as morbidity and mortality after a kyphoplasty procedure in VCF patients., Results: Of 27 articles, only 6 articles met the inclusion criteria. Studies have reported that surgical procedures have decreased the mortality rate in symptomatic VCF patients. Four studies concluded that the mortality rate was lower after kyphoplasty compared with vertebroplasty and nonoperative treatments. One study reported there was no significant difference between kyphoplasty and nonoperative management. One study summarized that the mortality rate was not significantly different between kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty., Conclusions: Multicenter prospective and randomized control studies are required to fully evaluate the decreasing trend of mortality rates after a kyphoplasty procedure., Competing Interests: Disclosures and COI: There were no sources of funding from any source for this study. There were no grants for this paper, and no authors have any personal or institutional financial interest in drugs, materials, or devices described in this submission.

Background: Three-column osteotomy is an effective means of correcting fixed sagittal plane deformities. Deformity correction surgeries may be associated with early postoperative neurological deficits often presenting as palsies involving the lumbar roots. The objective was to retrospectively assess a subset of our series of adult deformity correction surgeries and analyze neurological deficits and associated patient and surgical factors., Methods: Hospital records of 17 patients from a single center were examined. Inclusion criterion were adults (>18 years) who underwent a 3-column osteotomy (pedicle subtraction osteotomy) at the lumbar level for fixed sagittal plane deformities including positive sagittal balance, flat back syndrome, and posttraumatic kyphosis. These also included cases with associated degenerative lumbar scoliosis. Patients were divided in 2 groups: Group 1 with lumbar root deficit and Group 2 with no deficits. We examined the surgical details of the osteotomy, complications during surgery, and observed if the magnitude of correction in the sagittal or coronal plane bore any influence on the nerve deficit., Results: All 17 patients had a single-level resection except 1 patient who had 2-level osteotomy; 23.5% (4 of 17) developed nerve deficit. Nerve deficit presented as bilateral foot drop (1); unilateral extensor hallucis longus (EHL) weakness (2); and unilateral quadriceps weakness (1). The patient with quadriceps weakness partially recovered to functional strength. Two patients with EHL weakness fully recovered; however, the patient with bilateral foot drop did not improve. L5-S1 interbody fusion was done in 3 of 4 cases in Group 1 and 4 of 13 cases in Group 2., Conclusions: Nerve deficits after 3-column corrective osteotomies occurred in 23% cases. All but 1 case had significant improvement. Most nerve palsies are neuropraxia and unilateral and tend to recover. L5 weakness appears most common after high lumbar osteotomies. Significant correction of scoliosis at the osteotomy level (>50%) may be a reason for nerve palsy., Competing Interests: Disclosures and COI: There were no sources of funding or grants from any source. This work had institutional review board approval.

Lumbar spinal stenosis has been shown to negatively impact health-related quality of life. Interspinous process decompression (IPD) is a minimally invasive procedure that utilizes a stand-alone spacer to serve as a joint extension blocker to relieve neural compression in patients with spinal stenosis. Using the 5-year results from an FDA randomized controlled trial of IPD, the quality of life in 189 patients treated with the Superion® spacer was evaluated with the SF-12. Physical and mental component summary (PCS, MCS) scores were computed preoperatively and at annual intervals. For the PCS, mean scores improved from 29.4 ± 8.1 preoperatively to 41.2 ± 12.4 at 2 years (40%) and to 43.8 ± 11.6 at 5 years (49%) (p<0.001 for both comparisons). At 2 years, 81% (103 of 128) of subjects demonstrated maintenance or improvement in PCS scores. The mean MCS score improved from 50.0 ± 12.7 preoperatively to 54.4 ± 10.6 and 54.7 ± 8.6 at 2 and 5 years, respectively (p>0.10 for both comparisons). These results demonstrate that the significant impairment in physical well-being found in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis can be ameliorated, in large part, by IPD treatment.

Introduction: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) was developed as an alternative for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for nerve root decompression. The rationale behind CDA was to help prevent adjacent segment degeneration which potentially may lead to additional surgery. Multiple randomized controlled trials have evaluated a myriad of disc arthroplasty devices over the past 10 years and provided data regarding clinical benefits and safety. Their long-term data, reporting results at 5-10 years, presents the opportunity to comment on the overall efficacy, safety and reported complications of these devices. This report reviews results of the Prestige, proDisc-C, Mobi-C Disc and various other arthroplasty devices and provides an overall report of the longest term available data and comparisons between devices., Areas Covered: This review summarizes previously published articles in a literature search using keywords: 'cervical disc arthroplasty', 'cervical total disc replacement', 'anterior cervical decompression and fusion', 'anterior cervical arthrodesis', 'symptomatic degenerative disc disease' and commercial names of devices., Expert Commentary: CDA, with the devices reviewed, resulted in favorable outcomes in comparison to ACDF for the treatment of symptomatic cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD) taking in to account the long-term functional recovery, adverse events, development of adjacent segment degeneration and subsequent surgical interventions.

Background: Treating surgeon's visual assessment of axial MRI images to ascertain the degree of stenosis has a critical impact on surgical decision-making. The purpose of this study was to prospectively analyze the impact of surgeon experience on inter-observer and intra-observer reliability of assessing severity of spinal stenosis on MRIs by spine surgeons directly involved in surgical decision-making., Methods: Seven fellowship trained spine surgeons reviewed MRI studies of 30 symptomatic patients with lumbar stenosis and graded the stenosis in the central canal, the lateral recess and the foramen at T12-L1 to L5-S1 as none, mild, moderate or severe. No specific instructions were provided to what constituted mild, moderate, or severe stenosis. Two surgeons were "senior" (>fifteen years of practice experience); two were "intermediate" (>four years of practice experience), and three "junior" (< one year of practice experience). The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) was calculated to assess inter-observer reliability. Seven MRI studies were duplicated and randomly re-read to evaluate inter-observer reliability., Results: Surgeon experience was found to be a strong predictor of inter-observer reliability. Senior inter-observer reliability was significantly higher assessing central(p<0.001), foraminal p=0.005 and lateral p=0.001 than "junior" group.Senior group also showed significantly higher inter-observer reliability that intermediate group assessing foraminal stenosis (p=0.036). In intra-observer reliability the results were contrary to that found in inter-observer reliability., Conclusion: Inter-observer reliability of assessing stenosis on MRIs increases with surgeon experience. Lower intra-observer reliability values among the senior group, although not clearly explained, may be due to the small number of MRIs evaluated and quality of MRI images.Level of evidence: Level 3.

Background: The standard for evaluating scoliosis is PA radiographs using Cobb angle to measure curve magnitude. Newer PACS systems allow easier Cobb angle calculations, but have not improved inter/intra observer precision of measurement. Cobb angle and its progression are important to determine treatment; therefore, angle variability is not optimal. This study seeks to demonstrate that a performance equivalent to that achieved in the manual method is possible using a novel computer algorithm with limited user input. The authors compared Cobb angles from predetermined spinal levels in the average attending score versus the computer assisted approach., Methods: Retrospective analysis of PA radiographs from 58 patients previously evaluated for scoliosis was collected. Predesignated spinal levels (e.g., T2-T10) were assigned for different curves and calculated by Cobb method. Four spine surgeons evaluated these Cobb angles. Their average scores were measured and compared to formulated values using the novel computer-based algorithm. Literature reports inter-observer reliability is 6.3-7.2degrees. Limits of accuracy were set at 5 degrees of average orthopedic surgeons' score., Results: The computer-based algorithm calculated Cobb angles within 5 degrees of orthopedic surgeons' average with a standard deviation of 3.2 degrees. This result was based on a 95% confidence interval with p values <0.001. The computer algorithm was plotted against average angle determined by the surgeons, with individual determinations and linear regression (r 2 =0.90). The average difference between surgeons' measures and computer algorithm was 0.4 degrees(SD= 3.2degrees, n=79). There was a tendency for the computer algorithm program to overestimate the angle at larger angles, but difference was small with r 2 = 0.09., Conclusions: Our study showed the novel computer based algorithm was an efficient and reliable method to assess scoliotic curvature in the coronal plane with the possibility of expediting clinic visits, ensuring reliability of calculation and decreasing patient exposure to radiation. Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Correction of fixed spinal imbalance in a sagittal and/or coronal plane frequently needs a tricolumnar wedge resection when the deformity is rigid. Complications associated with deformity correction surgery are pseudoarthrosis and implant failure located along the construct. The purposes of this study were to assess comparative rates of pseudoarthrosis (implant failure) at weaker points along lumbosacral junction and level of osteotomy, estimate overall incidence of implant failure, and comparatively analyze failures at different points along the construct., Methods: This was an IRB approved, single center study retrospective analysis. Twenty-six patients who underwent three column osteotomies were grouped according to procedure: pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO, ( n  = 18)); vertebral column resection (VCR, ( n  = 4)); hemivertebra excision (HE, ( n  = 2)); and extracavitary corpectomy (EC, ( n  = 2)). Follow-up data is presented on all of the study patients. Number of levels of fusion, anchors, percent saturation of fixation levels, type of bone graft and graft substitutes, and rod material and diameter were recorded. Radiographical data was reviewed preoperatively and postoperatively at 2 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months and annually to determine sagittal and coronal balance, lumbopelvic parameters, presence or absence of interbody structural support, laterality or rod failure, and time to implant failure., Results: Twenty-seven percent (7/26) patients demonstrated rod breakage either unilaterally ( N  = 2) or bilaterally ( N  = 5) during follow-up. Seventy-one percent had increasing back pain or worsening sagittal balance, while remaining failures found incidentally. No failures in children were seen., Conclusion: Tricolumnar osteotomy by posterior approach is a valuable tool. Rod failures found approximately 1 year from surgery, with 86% located at level of osteotomy and 14% at lumbosacral junction. Possible reasons are increased stress in the rod at this point and relatively deficient bone stock secondary to wide laminectomy. The low rate of rod breakage at lumbosacral junction may be related to adoption of structural interbody graft and stronger iliac screws. Additional biomechanical studies needed to assess the importance of these factors. This was a level IV study.

Introduction: Early onset scoliosis can be both a disfiguring as well as a life threatening condition. When more conservative treatments fail, pediatric spinal surgeons are forced to consider operative interventions. Traditionally, these interventions have involved the insertion of a variety of implants into the patient with a limited number of anchor points controlling the spine. In the past, these pediatric patients have had multiple surgeries for elective lengthening of these devices to facilitate their growth while attempting to control the scoliosis. These patients often experience a physical and emotional toll from their multiple repeated surgeries. Growing spine techniques have also had a noted high complication rate due to implant dislodgement and infections. Recently, the development of non-invasively, self-lengthening growing rods has occurred. These devices have the potential to allow for the devices to be lengthened magnetically in a conscious patient in the surgeon's office. Areas covered: This review summarized previously published articles in the English literature using a key word search in PubMed for: 'magnetically controlled growing rods', 'Magec rods', 'magnetic growing rods' and 'growing rods'. Expert commentary: Magnetically controlled growing rods have an advantage over growing rods in lengthening the growing spine in the absence of repetitive surgeries.

Background: Long-term outcomes of patients undergoing extensive fusions for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) have conflicting results. Moskowitz found uninstrumented scoliosis fusion patients had similar back pain as a normal age matched population. Recently, long-term outcomes of patients with Harrington rod instrumentation were reviewed and found similar functional outcome scores to non-scoliosis patients, with trending toward worse outcomes when fusions extended to L4. Our study examined long-term functional outcomes of patients treated with Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) instrumentation and determined whether distal level of instrumented fusion (L4 and L5) correlate with increased back pain or lower functional level., Methods: Retrospective review of AIS surgeries from 1986 to 1996 was undertaken. Patient demographics and surgical data were collected via case-note audit. Patients were contacted and asked to complete a series of functional outcome questionnaires including visual analog scales (VAS) for pain, Short-Form 36 (SF-36), Scoliosis Research Society 22 (SRS-22) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) for function. ANOVA technique categorically compared outcome scores to most distal levels of fusion. Linear regression compared patient reported outcomes to time elapsed since surgery. Statistical significance was p < 0.05., Results: One hundred twelve patients were identified, 50 patients were contacted, and 22 agreed to participation and completed a full assessment. Follow-up time since surgery ranged from 15 to 26 years and age ranged from 30 to 43 years. Six patients reported daily VAS back pain of ≥5; with a mean of 2.5. Back pain was not associated with level of distal fusion (p = 0.92). ODI was 15.36, with six patients' ODI >20. No relationship was shown between ODI and distal level of fusion (p = 0.72). SF-36 and SRS 22 values were also not related to distal level of instrumentation. Patient reported VAS back pain scores (r(2) = 0.18, p = 0.05), ODI (r(2) = 0.09, p = 0.17), and SF-36 and SRS-22 were not worse in patients with longer follow-up over time. Back pain and certain functional score subcategories of the SF-36 and SRS-22 trended toward improved results over time., Conclusions: Most patients who underwent multi-segment spinal fixation appeared to do well long-term, with minimal back pain. Lowest instrumented segment did not appear to be associated with increased back pain after 15 to 25 years follow-up.

Background: Morbidity and mortality scores are useful to control for medical comorbidities in study populations where either effects of an illness or benefits of a treatment are examined. Our study examined if a direct relationship existed between the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA) score and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) in an osteoporosis population where patients had sustained a vertebral compression fracture., Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients with osteoporotic compression fractures treated by the same orthopedic surgeon between June 2000 and June 2004 was performed. The primary endpoint was death by the close of the study period (September 2006). A board certified Anesthesiologist blindly assigned all of the ASA scores as well as the Charlson Scores independently in a blinded manner. All patients were assumed to be undergoing surgery as they were assigned. A statistical relationship was examined between ASA and CCI scores through a cross table analysis with chi-squared testing as both scoring systems were considered categorical. A Pearson correlation was completed to examine the quality of a linear relationship between the categorical variable ASA compared to the continuous variable Charlson. A value of p < 0.05 was considered significant., Results: Ninety patients elected conservative therapy with oral analgesics and an orthosis, while 94 patients elected for kyphoplasty. The CCI by log rank testing was not significant (p= 0.2027) for the surgery population; however, the test resulted in a highly significant value (p = 0.0161) in non-operative population. The ASA Score was correlated with significance to mortality (p= 0.0150) for the surgery population, while the test was not significant (p = 0.1439) in non-operative population. Treating both ASA and CCI scores as categorical variables, a relationship between them was examined and found to be highly significant (p= 0.000001) meaning patients with low ASA scores were likely to have low CCI scores., Conclusion: The ASA score was predictive of mortality in a surgical population, while CCI was highly predictive of mortality in a non-surgical population. There is great agreement between the CCI score and the ASA score, reflecting that anesthesiologists subjectively consider the same elements of the patient's medical history when assigning ASA scores as the CCI objectively uses. This was a Level III Study.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the use of Central Epidural Steroid Injections (ESI) and Selective Nerve Root Blocks (SNRB) along with the crossover rate to lumbar discectomy in patients with a lumbar disc herniation using retrospective records database search. Butterman et al found a crossover rate for patients with symptomatic disc herniations treated with ESI of 54% (27/50), while Riew similarly found a 53% (29/55) crossover patients receiving SNRB., Methods: The database was searched in a sequential Boolean style for patients with the diagnosis of a lumbar disc herniation (Displaced Lumbar Disc - 722.1) and a SNRB (64483) or ESI (62311) who subsequently underwent a Lumbar Discectomy (63030) over a three year time period from January 2004 through December 2006. Statistical analysis was preformed examining the impact of injection type, age, location, gender, and year., Results: Of 482,893 patients with the diagnosis of a disc herniation, 27,799(5.76%) underwent a lumbar discectomy. The 29,941 patients who received at least one SNRB for a disc herniation, 10.80% later underwent a lumbar discectomy. The 41,420 patients who received at least one ESI for a disc herniation 9.34% later underwent a lumbar discectomy. There was a noted increase in injection procedures, particularly SNRB during the study with a greater than 50% increase., Conclusions: Our examination found a much smaller, but similar crossover rate to surgery between both injection methods, which argues against one method being more effective than another in avoiding surgery. It is likely that patients are receiving these procedures more frequently during the course of conservative treatment for a disc herniation., Level of Evidence: This was a Level III study.

Objective: To compare the two-year clinical outcomes of a prospective, randomized controlled trial of an FDA-approved interspinous spacer with the compilation of published findings from 19 studies of decompressive laminectomy for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis., Methods: Back and leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) values were compared between spacer- and laminectomy-treated patients preoperatively and at 12 and 24 months., Results: Percentage improvements between baseline and 24 months uniformly favored patients treated with the spacer for back pain (65% vs. 52%), leg pain (70% vs. 62%), ODI (51% vs. 47%) and ZCQ symptom severity (37% vs. 29%) and physical function (36% vs. 32%)., Conclusion: Both treatments provide effective and durable symptom relief of claudicant symptoms. This stand-alone interspinous spacer offers the patient a minimally invasive option with less surgical risk.

Background: Pedicle screws are used increasingly in spine surgery. Concerns of complications associated with screw breach necessitates accurate pedicle screw placement. Postoperative CT imaging helps to detect screw malposition and assess its severity. However, accuracy is dependent on the reading of the CT scans. Inter- and intra-observer variability could affect the reliability of CT scans to assess multiple screw types and sites. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability of multi-observer analysis of CT scans for determining pedicle screw breach for various screw types and sites in patients with spinal deformity or degenerative pathologies., Methods: Axial CT scan images of 23 patients (286 screws) were read by four experienced spine surgeons. Pedicle screw placement was considered 'In' when the screw was fully contained and/or the pedicle wall breach was ≤2 mm. 'Out' was defined as a breach in the medial or lateral pedicle wall >2 mm. Intra-class coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess the inter- and intra-observer reliability., Results: Marked inter- and intra-observer variability was noticed. The overall inter-observer ICC was 0.45 (95% confidence limits 0.25 to 0.65). The intra-observer ICC was 0.49 (95% confidence limits 0.29 to 0.69). Underlying spinal pathology, screw type, and patient age did not seem to impact the reliability of our CT assessments., Conclusion: Our results indicate the evaluation of pedicle screw breach on CT by a single surgeon is highly variable, and care should be taken when using individual CT evaluations of millimeters of breach as a basis for screw removal. This was a Level III study.

Background: Extrusion is a known complication of lumbar nucleus replacement devices. Despite this fact, this complication has not been well studied in an in vitro cadaveric model under fatigue-loading conditions., Methods: Lumbar constructs (with treated and control levels) were tested in intact, postdisectomy, and postnucleus implant conditions under compression, torsion, and bending for initial biomechanical assessment. Constructs were then tested for 100(k) cycles under fatigue loading to assess extrusion risk. Potential adverse effects to vertebral and endplate fractures were assessed using gross dissection and macroscopic and micro-computed tomography evaluation techniques., Results: Based on the initial biomechanical assessment, implantation of the nucleus device significantly increased disc height compared with the discectomy condition, and there were no significant differences between the intact and implanted conditions for range of motion or stiffness. All constructs completed the 100(k) cycles with no extrusions. There was evidence of implant shift toward the right lateral annulus on postfatigue images. Postfatigue dissection and imaging showed no evidence of macroscopic endplate or trabecular fractures., Conclusion: Using a 2-level lumbar in vitro construct, the biomechanical function of the treated level with an articulating nucleus implant was similar to intact. In vitro fatigue testing showed no implant extrusion and macroscopic changes to the bony structure or cartilaginous endplates when comparing treated and intact levels.