Search

Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) for treatment of hematologic malignancies frequently fails because of disease recurrence. We therefore conducted pretargeted (P)RIT studies to augment the efficacy in mice of therapy using a pretargeted anti-human (h)CD45 antibody (Ab)-streptavidin (SA) conjugate followed by a biotinylated clearing agent and radiolabeled 1,4,7,10-tetraazacylodode cane N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic (DOTA)-biotin. Tumor-to-blood ratios at 24 hours were 20:1 using pretargeted anti-hCD45 RIT and

Despite the promise of radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20 antibodies (Ab) for the treatment of relapsed patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), most patients treated with conventional doses of 131I-tositumomab or 90Y-ibritumomab eventually relapse. We did comparative assessments using conventional radioimmunotherapy targeting CD20, CD22, and HLA-DR on human Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts in athymic mice to assess the potential for improving the efficacy of radioimmunotherapy by targeting other NHL cell surface antigens. Results of biodistribution studies showed significant differences in tumor localization consistent with variable antigenic expression on the different lymphoma cell lines. Interestingly, the radioimmunoconjugate that yielded the best tumor-to-normal organ ratios differed in each tumor model. We also explored administering all three 111In-1,4,7,10-tetra-azacylododecane N,N′,N″,N‴-tetraacetic acid antibodies in combination, but discovered, surprisingly, that this approach did not augment the localization of radioactivity to tumors compared with the administration of the best single radiolabeled Ab alone. These data suggest that conventional radioimmunotherapy using anti-CD20, anti–HLA-DR, or anti-CD22 Abs is effective when used singly and provides targeted uptake of radiolabel into the tumor that is dependent on the levels of antigen expression. Improvements in tumor-to-normal organ ratios of radioactivity cannot be achieved using directly labeled Abs in combination but may be afforded by novel pretargeting methods. [Cancer Res 2007;67(12):5921–8]

Pretargeted radioimmunotherapy (PRIT) using streptavidin (SA)–conjugated antibodies (Abs), followed by clearing agent and radiolabeled biotin is a promising method that can increase the effectiveness of RIT, while decreasing the toxicities associated with directly labeled Abs. Although CD20 has been the traditional target antigen for RIT of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), studies targeting HLA DR and CD22 have yielded promising results. Targeting all 3 antigens at once may further augment the effect of PRIT. This study compares the targeting of Ramos, Raji, and FL-18 lymphoma xenografts with either anti-CD20 Ab/SA (1F5/SA), anti-HLA DR Ab/SA (Lym-1/SA), anti-CD22 Ab/SA (HD39/SA), or all 3 conjugates in combination, followed 24 hours later by a biotin-N-acetyl-galactosamine clearing agent, and 3 hours after that by 111In-DOTA-biotin. The Ab/SA conjugate yielding the best tumor uptake and tumor-to–normal organ ratios of radioactivity varied depending on the target antigen expression on the cell line used, with 1F5/SA and Lym-1/SA yielding the most promising results overall. Also, the best tumor-to–normal organ ratios of absorbed radioactivity were obtained using single conjugates optimized for target tumor antigen expression rather than the combination therapy. This study highlights the importance of screening the antigenic expression on lymphomas to select the optimal reagent for PRIT.

As more US HIV surveillance programs routinely use late HIV diagnosis to monitor and characterize HIV testing patterns, there is an increasing need to standardize how late HIV diagnosis is measured. In this study, we compared two measures of late HIV diagnosis, one based on time between HIV and AIDS, the other based on initial CD4+results. Using data from Washington's HIV/AIDS Reporting System, we used multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of late HIV diagnosis. We also conducted tests for trend to determine whether the proportion of cases diagnosed late has changed over time. Both measures lead us to similar conclusions about late HIV diagnosis, suggesting that being male, older, foreign-born, or heterosexual increase the likelihood of late HIV diagnosis. Our findings reaffirm the validity of a time-based definition of late HIV diagnosis, while at the same time demonstrating the potential value of a lab-based measure.