Background: Brain metastases (BMs) are frequent events in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and are associated with poor prognosis. Small-molecule anti-HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are promising agents for the treatment of BM. In this study, we assess the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2-positive MBC and BM treated with TKI-containing regimens compared with those treated with non-TKI-containing regimens., Materials and Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and conference proceedings (ASCO, SABCS, ESMO, and ESMO Breast) were searched up to June 2021. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with BM. Secondary endpoints included PFS in patients without BM and overall survival (OS). The study was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Overall effects were pooled using random-effects models., Results: This systematic review and meta-analysis included data from 2437 patients (490 with and 1947 without BM at baseline) enrolled in five trials assessing tucatinib-, lapatinib-, pyrotinib-, or afatinib-based combinations. A nonstatistically significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens was observed in both patients with BM [hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.41-1.12; P = 0.13] and without BM (HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.24-1.26; P = 0.16). Sensitivity analysis, excluding each study singly, demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in patients with BM after the exclusion of afatinib from the analysis (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.90; P = 0.016). No statistically significant differences in OS were observed between the comparison groups., Conclusions: A trend in PFS favoring TKI-containing regimens was observed in patients with BM. Sensitivity analysis including only trials that evaluated regimens containing tucatinib, lapatinib, or pyrotinib demonstrated a significant PFS benefit favoring TKI-containing regimens in patients with BM., Competing Interests: Disclosure GNM reports support to attend medical conferences from Roche and Bayer (all outside the submitted work). DMB reports honoraria and advisory board fees from Janssen, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Angelini, AstraZeneca, and Novartis; meeting/travel grants from LEO Farmacêuticos, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Ipsen, Janssen, Roche, Laboratórios Vitória, and Novartis; and institutional grant from F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd (all outside the submitted work). EA reports speaking fee from Lilly; support to attend medical conferences from Lilly, Novartis, Roche, Genetic, and Istituto Gentili (all outside the submitted work). ML plays advisory role for Roche, Lilly, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, Seagen, Gilead, Pfizer, and Exact Sciences; and receives speaker honoraria from Roche, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Takeda, Knight, Libbs, and Ipsen (all outside the submitted work). NK reports honoraria and advisory board fees from Erytech, Innate Pharma, Seattle Genetics, and LEO Pharma; and support to attend medical conferences from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, and OSE Immunotherapeutics (all outside the submitted work). AA reports support from Roche, Lilly, Amgen, EISAI, BMS, Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Genomic Health, Ipsen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, LEO Pharma, Merck, Daiichi, Seattle Genetics, and Pierre Fabre (all outside the submitted work). EdA reports honoraria and/or advisory board fees from Roche/GNE, Novartis, Seattle Genetics, Zodiac, Libbs, and Pierre Fabre; travel grants from Roche/GNE and GSK/Novartis; research grant to institution from Roche/GNE, Astra-Zeneca, GSK/Novartis, and Servier (all outside the submitted work). All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)