Search

Background Ustekinumab is an effective drug in Crohn′s Disease (CD) and most frequently used dose is subcutaneous (sc), 90 mg /, 8 weeks. With the usual sc doses (90 mg every, 8–12 weeks) some patients will only partially respond or experience secondary loss of response. In this situation, shortening of the administration interval (e.g., every, 4 or, 6 weeks) or a reinduction dose has been proposed. Another unexplored option is intravenous (IV) administration at regular intervals when shortening sc dose is not effective enough. Methods We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of IV ustekinumab at regular intervals (usually every, 4–6 weeks) in patients with insufficient efficacy or loss of response to, 90 mg sc every, 4–6 weeks. All patients had active Ulcerative colitis (UC) or Crohn′s disease (CD) defined by partial Mayo score (pMS) or Harvey Bradshaw Index (HBI)>, 4 points and/or persistent biomarker elevation (calprotectin>, 250 µg/g) and/or endoscopic or radiological evidence of disease activity. We obtained data from, 79 patients (73 CD and, 6 with ulcerative colitis (UC)). Levels of fecal calprotectin before and after starting ustekinumab IV was available for, 44 patients and trough levels of drug for, 48 patients. Results Baseline characteristics of the included patients are shown in Table, 1. Complicated forms (B2-B3;, 60,6%) predominated and perianal disease was present in, 35.4% of patients. Only, 3 patients were naïve to biological treatments, 41.8% had received at least one and, 54,5% more than, 2. The mean follow-up after the first IV administration was, 13.22 months (IQR, 2–37 months). Last dose used before the start of ustekinumab IV was, 90 mg /, 6 weeks in, 31.6% and, 90 mg /, 4 weeks in, 68.4% of the patients. After, 12 weeks of the first IV dose, 43% of patients achieve clinical remission (HBI Conclusion Patients who lose response to the intensified dose of ustekinumab sc could benefit from intravenous administration as maintenance treatment. This strategy achieves clinical remission in, 60% of the patients and allows to maintain the treatment in, 80% of them for at least, 12 months.

Background The safety of ustekinumab in pregnant patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and in their offspring has been barely studied. Aims Primary: To know the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) in women exposed to ustekinumab during pregnancy and in their offspring. Secondary: To assess the risk of complications of the mothers and their offspring. To describe the patterns of use of ustekinumab during pregnancy in these patients Methods Patients with IBD exposed to ustekinumab during pregnancy from DUMBO registry of GETECCU were included. DUMBO is a prospective, observational and multicentre registry, which enrols pregnant women with IBD over 5 years in 70 centres in Spain. The registry was kicked off in September 2019. SAE definition was based on “Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting by European Medicines Agency”. Study protocol is summarized in figure 1. Results 49 pregnant patients have been exposed to ustekinumab during pregnancy so far (table 1). All pregnancies were singleton. Two patients were lost of follow-up (1st and 2nd trimester) but had uneventful pregnancies up-to last visit. There were 2 miscarriages (4%) at 1st trimester of gestation, 34 newborns and 11 pregnancies that were still on-going at the time of this analysis. All patients were on ustekinumab at conception (57% of them 90 mg/8 weeks). A total of 12 patients (24%) withdrawn ustekinumab during pregnancy: 1 (8%) due to disease flare, 1 (8%) underwent surgery due to intestinal obstruction, 2 (17%) due to patient’s choice (at 1st and 2nd trimester), and 8 (67%) due to clinicians’ decision (1 at 1st, 5 at 2nd and 2 at 3rd trimesters). No patient flared up after ustekinumab discontinuation. 10 (20%) patients had SAEs: 2 miscarriages, 1 intestinal infection, 1 subcorionic hematoma, 3 preterm birth, 1 intestinal obstruction and perforation (underwent surgery), 1 preeclapmsia, and 1 stoma obstruction. A total of 34 women gave birth after a median of 39 weeks gestation [interquartile range (IQR)=38–40], 3 (9%) preterm births, 55% by caesarean section (82% obstetric reasons and 18% perianal fistulae). Of the 34 newborns, 53% were female, median birth weight was 3,110 g (IQR=2,820–3,325), 3 (9%) low-birth weight, and 50% were breastfed exclusively. Median babies’ follow-up was 12 months (IQR=7–16). During follow-up, 3 children (9%) had severe infections (2 urinary infections, and 1 bronchiolitis by respiratory syncytial virus). In addition, 4 (13%) children were hospitalized: 1 cardiorespiratory arrest, 1 prematurity, 1 jaundice, and 1 vesicoureteral reflux Conclusion Ustekinumab seems to be safe during pregnancy in patients with IBD and their offspring.

Background Prospective registries are necessary to evaluate the safety of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment during pregnancy and in children in the long term. Aims The overall aim of DUMBO registry is to know the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) during pregnancy and in children up to 4 years of age exposed during pregnancy to drugs for IBD (mainly focused on biologics), compared to unexposed children. In this analysis we aim to evaluate the risk of SAEs during pregnancy and the predictive factors of it (mainly focused on IBD drugs). Methods Prospective, observational and multicentre registry, which enrols pregnant women with IBD (Crohn’s disease, ulcerative colitis, IBD-unclassified) over 5 years in 70 centres in Spain. The registry was kicked off in September 2019. SAE was defined based on “Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and Standards for Expedited Reporting by European Medicines Agency”. Study protocol is summarized in figure 1. Results 433 women have been included so far; 241 got pregnant at least 9 months before this interim analysis (table 1). Mean age was 34 years, and 17% of women had active disease at any time during pregnancy. 23% of pregnancies were exposed to immumodulators (thiopurines), 25% to biologics and 10% to combo therapy (biologics and immunomodulators). 85 pregnancies (35%) were exposed to biologics (60 anti-TNF, 17 ustekinumab, and 8 vedolizumab) either in combo or in monotherapy. There were 237 newborns (227 singleton and 5 pair of twins), 9 miscarriages and 1 abortion. 72% of patients had vaginal delivery and 28% C-sections (18% due to perianal CD or active disease). A total of 59 pregnancies (24.5%) reported at least one SAE: 32% in exposed to biologics and 20.5% in non-exposed group (p>0.05) (figure 2). Four out of 17 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab and 3 out of 8 exposed to vedolizumab had SAEs (non-related with the drug). In the multivariate analysis, adjusted by disease activity, in comparison with no immunosuppressive treatment, neither immunosuppressants [Odds ratio (OR)=1.1, 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.3–4.3] nor biologics in monotherapy or in combo (OR=0.8; 95%CI=0.2–3) were associated with higher risk of SAEs. 40 patients (17%) were hospitalised due to complications during pregnancy or delivery (figure 3). Two patients underwent surgery during pregnancy due to IBD complications Conclusion IBD treatment (either immunomodulators or biologics) does not increase the risk of SAEs during pregnancy. Nevertheless, one-quarter of IBD women suffer SAEs during pregnancy and about 20% need hospitalisation, which should be taken into account when managing IBD during pregnancy.

Background The efficacy of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) refractory to anti-TNF is worse than in anti-TNF naïve patients. Methods Retrospective study of patients with CD refractory or intolerant to TNF initiating ustekinumab between January 2013 and March 2020, with a minimum follow-up of 12 months, and without corticosteroid treatment. Our aim was evaluated clinical response (reduction of CDAI >100), clinical remission (CDAI Results A total of 49 patients with a medium follow-up of 28 months (IQR:13-37) were included. Patients baseline characteristics are reflected in Table 1. In 20% patients the induction was made subcutaneous (90 mg/week for 4 weeks). At week 52, clinical response, clinical remission and biochemical remission was 93%, 82% and 54% respectively (Figure 1). In the long term (3 years), 62% had clinical response, 52% remained in clinical remission, and 48% showed biochemical remission. 1/3 of patients needed intensification every year. Ustekinumab treatment discontinuation was observed in 13 patients (27%) mainly due to lack of response (6[12%]: primary, 7[14%]: secondary). No serious adverse effects have been reported. Conclusion About 50% of the patients are in clinical and biochemical remission at week 152 in a real-life cohort of anti-TNF-exposed CD patients. With a harder remission definition including biochemical parameters, our results in real life are similar to pivotal studies at week 152. Nevertheless, at week 52 our remission rates were higher.

Background INFEII registry (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02904590) is a prospective study promoted by GETECCU to determine the incidence and risk factors of infection in an inception cohort of IBD patients. Despite preventive measures and recommendations of scientific societies, TB remains a problem in patients with IBD treated with immunosuppressants (IMM) and biologics. AIMS To asses: (1) the screening of TB performed at the time of inclusion of a patient in the INFEII registry, (2) the incidence of latent TB; and (3) compliance with national and European recommendations. Methods A longitudinal prospective study of incident cases with IBD, initiated in October 2016 and with a planned follow-up of 5 years. In September 2019, INFEII registry had 1241 patients from 28 centres throughout Spain. The study protocol determines the mandatory fulfilment of TB screening in every patient, leaving to the centre the freedom of decision on what procedures to perform. Guidelines recommend a mandatory study before starting immunosuppression, especially with biological treatment, using the combination of tuberculin skin test (TST) and interferon-gamma release assay (IGRA) or at least one TST with a booster test1,2. Results Of the 1241 patients 233 (19%) had no screening, 494 (40%) had one [TST 158, IGRA 299, thorax-X-ray 37], 288 (23%) two [TST + IGRA 87, IGRA + thorax-X-ray 130, TST + thorax-X-ray 30, TST + booster 41], 128 (10%) three [TST + IGRA + thorax-X-ray 65, TST + booster + IGRA 23, TST + booster + thorax-X-ray 40] and 98 (7.9%) the four tests [TST + booster + IGRA + thorax-X-ray]. 486 patients (48%) receive pharmacological immunosuppression (172 IMMS, 195 biologics, 119 COMBO) and from them 198 (41%) followed the guidelines recommendation (131 TST and IGRA and 118 TST-booster), 245 (50%) had some method for TB screening [TST 43, IGRA 112, thorax-X-ray 15, IGRA + thorax-X-ray 57, TST + thorax-X-ray 18] and 43 patients (8.8%) had no screening. With the baseline screening, latent TB was detected in 134 patients (13%), 63 (47%) receiving anti-TB chemotherapy. In patients initiating immunosuppression, latent TB was detected in 35 cases [of which 28 received prophylaxis but 7 under IMM did not]. Active TB was detected in 4 cases: 2 during baseline screening, one without screening and one with negative screening (negative TST and IGRA, without booster receiving biological treatment). Conclusion Despite TB in IBD is a relevant problem, there is ample room for improvement for the implementation of mandatory minimum screening recommendations, even in prospective protocolised projects. References

Background Three anti-TNFs (one intravenous and two subcutaneous) are licensed for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, it is not known if the efficacy of a second anti-TNF changes on whether it is intravenous or subcutaneous; this could justify the indication of biological agents with a different mechanism of action in second line. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of a second subcutaneous or intravenous anti-TNF in UC. Methods Patients from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with consecutively intravenous and subcutaneous anti-TNF, who were naïve to biological agents, were identified. Patients were classified according to the administration route of the first anti-TNF in: IVi (intravenous initially) or SCi (subcutaneous initially). Patients treated for extraintestinal manifestations or pouchitis were excluded. Clinical activity and effectiveness were defined based on Partial Mayo Score (PMS) at baseline, 14 and 52 weeks. Loss of response, dose-escalation and treatment discontinuation were also assessed. Results 372 UC patients were included (270 IVi and 102 SCi). Both cohorts were similar in clinical-epidemiological characteristics, except for a higher proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the first anti-TNF in the IVi group (82% vs. 71%; p = 0.017) and at the beginning of the second anti-TNF (62% vs. 74%; p = 0.04). Clinical response and remission rates at week 14 for the second anti-TNF were 41% and 29% in IVi vs. 47% and 25% in SCi, respectively (p = ns). At week 52, clinical response/remission rates of the second anti-TNF were 37%/32% in IVi vs. 40%/29% in SCi (p = ns). A higher response rate at 14 weeks with the second anti-TNF was detected in the SCi group (40% vs. 68%; p = 0.012) when the reason for withdrawal of the first anti-TNF was secondary loss of response. The cumulative persistence of the second anti-TNF treatment in IVi and SCi were 55% and 54% after 1 year, and 41% and 40% after 2 years, respectively (p = ns). The SCi group had lower rates of dose-escalation with the second anti-TNF than IVi (34% and 29% in SCi vs. 57% and 49% in EVi, at 12 and 24 months, respectively -p = 0.004-). Dose-escalation of the first anti-TNF and moderate-to-severe clinical activity at the beginning of the second anti-TNF were associated with a lower probability of remission with the second anti-TNF in the short- and long-term. Conclusion The efficacy of infliximab after failure/intolerance of a subcutaneous anti-TNF is similar to that of subcutaneous anti-TNFs after infliximab failure/intolerance.

The anti-inflammatory activity of the chloroform, methanol and aqueous extracts of Wigandia urens and Acalypha alopecuroides were investigated on carrageenan-induced paw edema at doses of 400 mg/kg. The three extracts of W. urens, and the aqueous extract of A. alopecuroides caused significant inhibition of the edema (58.1±6.5% and 63.5±5.4%, respectively). Indomethacin was used as positive control (8 mg/kg), and inhibited edema by 66.3±5.2%. The methanol extract of W. urens and the aqueous extract of A. alopecuroides, at doses of 200 mg/kg, inhibited pellet implantation-induced granuloma formation by 69.4±6.5 and 70.6±6.6%, respectively. These levels of inhibition are higher than those exhibited by naproxen at doses of 50 mg/kg (46.1±7.1%). Both extracts showed activity on adjuvantinduced arthritis in rats, with the best effect being observed after 96 h (82.2±4.6 and 80.6±7.3%, respectively).