Search

Introduction Bladder pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma is a rare and aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis. There are no reports of immune checkpoint inhibitors for bladder pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma to date. Case presentation A 72-year-old man presented with gross hematuria due to multiple bladder cancers. Despite transurethral bladder resection and intravesical injection of Bacillus Calmette-Guerin, bladder cancer recurred. Nineteen months later, he underwent total cystectomy. Pathological examination revealed bladder giant cell carcinoma. Twenty-eight months later, pembrolizumab was administered due to para-aortic lymph node metastasis. Forty-four months later, the lymph node metastasis disappeared, and pembrolizumab administration was terminated. Fifty-eight months later, the patient has remained in remission at the time of writing. Conclusion Immune checkpoint inhibitors manifest a therapeutic potential in bladder pleomorphic giant cell carcinoma.

Introduction Mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma is a rare and progressive cancer of the prostatic urethra. Reports on palliative systemic treatment for mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma are few. We present a case of coexisting mucinous urethral and prostate adenocarcinomas managed with systemic treatment. Case presentation A 66-year-old man presented with gross hematuria and urinary retention. Prostate-specific antigen level was elevated, at 99 ng/mL, and prostate biopsy revealed moderately to poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. Hormone therapy and standard chemotherapy for prostate adenocarcinoma were ineffective. Prostate re-biopsy revealed coexisting mucinous urethral and prostate adenocarcinomas. Gemcitabine + cisplatin chemotherapy and folinic acid + 5-fluorouracil + irinotecan chemotherapy temporarily suppressed the cancer, but 14 months after presentation, he developed liver metastasis and died. Autopsy revealed metastasis of both mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma and carcinosarcoma. Conclusion Mucinous urethral adenocarcinoma is difficult to diagnose in coexistence with prostate adenocarcinoma. This was an extremely rare case showing chemoresistance due to epithelial-mesenchymal transition.

Introduction Atypical femoral fractures are atraumatic or minimally traumatic fractures and rare side effects of bone resorption inhibitors. Bone resorption inhibitors are frequently used in the treatment of prostate cancer. Case presentation A 62-year-old man complained of difficulty in walking and left lower limb pain. Androgen deprivation and denosumab therapy for prostate cancer-induced bone metastasis was initiated 27 months ago. Even though the prostate-specific antigen level did not increase, imaging studies indicated the possibility of bone metastasis. The patient underwent bone biopsy; however, no malignancy was detected. Afterward, he had a fall, causing a complete fracture in his left femur. Conclusion Atypical femoral fractures occasionally mimic typical imaging findings and outcomes of bone metastasis. This case is important for recognizing such cases.

Background A spontaneous iliopsoas muscle hematoma is relatively rare and often associated with abnormal coagulation. Nafamostat mesilate is an anticoagulant agent that is sometimes used to treat hemodialysis patients at high risk of bleeding. Although severe drug allergy caused by nafamostat mesilate was previously reported, spontaneous iliopsoas muscle hematoma secondary to disseminated intravascular coagulation caused by nafamostat mesilate allergy has not yet been reported. Case presentation Severe nafamostat mesilate allergy occurred in a 78-year-old male patient with a 2-year history of hemodialysis. During hospitalization, disseminated intravascular coagulation occurred followed by a progressive iliopsoas muscle hematoma a few days later. Emergent transarterial lumbar artery embolization was successfully performed. Conclusion For dialysis patients, a detailed medical history including repeated nafamostat mesilate use and considering an allergy to nafamostat mesilate in differential diagnosis are critical. In addition to early diagnosis, when an iliopsoas hematoma occurs, early intravascular treatment is important.

Molecular-targeted therapy was recommended for the systemic therapy of renal cell cancer (RCC) in the RCC guidelines, but these guidelines do not address the order of administration of the multiple presently available agents. There are several aspects that remain unknown regarding the optimal administration order and combination of molecular-targeted drugs. Until the optimal treatment sequence is determined by clinical trials, treatment individualization is required for each patient based on patient and disease characteristics. We herein investigate 12 cases of RCC patients who received axitinib. Axitinib was used as the first-line drug in 4 cases, second-line in 5 cases, third-line in 1 case and as a fourth-line drug in 2 cases. Partial response (PR) was observed in 4 cases (30%) and stable disease in 4 cases (30%) during axitinib treatment, with an overall response rate of 60%. The duration of PR ranged from 6 to 19 months. Based on our cases, axitinib exhibited reasonable therapeutic efficacy as first- as well as second-line treatment. However, more cases are required to draw firm conclusions.

A combination therapy of nivolumab and ipilimumab is effective for advanced renal cell carcinoma, but there are concerns about immune-related adverse events. A 46-year-old man was hospitalized for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. On day 9, he received nivolumab and ipilimumab. On days 16 and 49, he presented with fever, skin rash, and hypotension after contrast-enhanced computed tomography. A 70-year-old man was hospitalized for metastatic renal cell carcinoma. On day 9, he received nivolumab and ipilimumab. On day 44, he presented with fever, skin rash, and hypotension after contrast-enhanced computed tomography. Both patients were diagnosed with anaphylaxis due to the contrast agent.

(Objectives) To evaluate the outcomes of patients who were surgically treated for retroperitoneal liposarcoma in our hospital from February 2002 to August 2015. (Methods) Fifteen patients were surgically treated for retroperitoneal liposarcoma in our hospital during the study period. All patients were diagnosed with liposarcoma on pathological examination. The mean follow-up period was 46.7 months (range, 1-126 months). (Results) There was no difference in the sex distribution of the patients (7 men and 8 women). The median age was 67 years (range, 33-78 years). The median tumor diameter was 24 cm (range, 7.5-45 cm) and the median tumor weight was 1,959 g (range, 545-15,400 g). One patient's operation was unsuccessful, with incomplete tumor resection. The surgical margin was positive in two patients. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 67% and 50%, respectively. There was a significant difference in the survival rate between complete resection and incomplete resection, including surgical margin-positive patients (p=0.0019). Moreover, there was a significant difference in the recurrence-free rate between complete resection and surgical margin-positive patients (p=0.013). There was no significant difference according to whether removal of the tumor with adjacent viscera or removal of the tumor only had been performed (p=0.09 and 0.90, respectively). (Conclusions) Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal liposarcoma, and complete resection is necessary.