Search

This paper presents an overview of different kinds of lists of scholarly publication channels and of experiences related to the construction and maintenance of national lists supporting performance-based research funding systems. It also contributes with a set of recommendations for the construction and maintenance of national lists of journals and book publishers.

This study aims to present the key systemic changes in the Polish book evaluation model to focus on the publisher list, as inspired by the Norwegian Model.

This study compares publication pattern dynamics in the social sciences and humanities in five European countries. Three are Central and Eastern European countries that share a similar cultural and political heritage (the Czech Republic, Slovakia, and Poland). The other two are Flanders (Belgium) and Norway, representing Western Europe and the Nordics, respectively. We analysed 449,409 publications from 2013-2016 and found that, despite persisting differences between the two groups of countries across all disciplines, publication patterns in the Central and Eastern European countries are becoming more similar to those in their Western and Nordic counterparts. Articles from the Central and Eastern European countries are increasingly published in journals indexed in Web of Science and also in journals with the highest citation impacts. There are, however, clear differences between social science and humanities disciplines, which need to be considered in research evaluation and science policy., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

This article discusses the open-identity label, i.e., the practice of disclosing reviewers' names in published scholarly books, a common practice in Central and Eastern European countries. This study's objective is to verify whether the open-identity label is a type of peer-review label (like those used in Finland and Flanders, i.e., the Flemish part of Belgium), and as such, whether it can be used as a delineation criterion in various systems used to evaluate scholarly publications. We have conducted a two-phase sequential explanatory study. In the first phase, interviews with 20 of the 40 largest Polish publishers of scholarly books were conducted to investigate how Polish publishers control peer reviews and whether the open-identity label can be used to identify peer-reviewed books. In the other phase, two questionnaires were used to analyze perceptions of peer-review and open-identity labelling among authors (n = 600) and reviewers (n = 875) of books published by these 20 publishers. Integrated results allowed us to verify publishers' claims concerning their peer-review practices. Our findings reveal that publishers actually control peer reviews by providing assessment criteria to reviewers and sending reviews to authors. Publishers rarely ask for permission to disclose reviewers' names, but it is obvious to reviewers that this practice of disclosing names is part of peer reviewing. This study also shows that only the names of reviewers who accepted manuscripts for publication are disclosed. Thus, most importantly, our analysis shows that the open-identity label that Polish publishers use is a type of peer-review label like those used in Flanders and Finland, and as such, it can be used to identify peer-reviewed scholarly books., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Methane is a major greenhouse gas linked to global warming; however, patterns of in situ methane oxidation by methane-oxidizing bacteria (methanotrophs), nature's main biological mechanism for methane suppression, are often inconsistent with laboratory predictions. For example, one would expect a strong relationship between methanotroph ecology and Cu level because methanotrophs require Cu to sustain particulate methane monooxygenase (pMMO), the most efficient enzyme for methane oxidation. However, no correlation has been observed in nature, which is surprising because methane monooxygenase (MMO) gene expression has been unequivocally linked to Cu availability. Here we provide a fundamental explanation for this lack of correlation. We propose that MMO expression in nature is largely controlled by solid-phase Cu geochemistry and the relative ability of Cu acquisition systems in methanotrophs, such as methanobactins (mb), to obtain Cu from mineral sources. To test this hypothesis, RT-PCR expression assays were developed for Methylosinus trichosporium OB3b (which produces mb) to quantify pMMO, soluble MMO (the alternate MMO expressed when Cu is "unavailable"), and 16S-rRNA gene expression under progressively more stringent Cu supply conditions. When Cu was provided as CuCl(2), pMMO transcript levels increased significantly consistent with laboratory work. However, when Cu was provided as Cu-doped iron oxide, pMMO transcript levels increased only when mb was also present. Finally, when Cu was provided as Cu-doped borosilicate glass, pMMO transcription patterns varied depending on the ambient mb:Cu supply ratio. Cu geochemistry clearly influences MMO expression in terrestrial systems, and, as such, local Cu mineralogy might provide an explanation for methane oxidation patterns in the natural environment.

Intrinsic acidity constants (pK(a)(int)) for Bacillus subtilis (Gram+) and Escherichia coli (Gram-) cells were calculated from potentiometric titration data at different salt concentrations. Master curves were generated by replotting charge excess data as a function of pH(S) (pH at the location of surface reactive sites) where pH(S) was determined as a function of Donnan potential, Psi(DON). This potential decreased in magnitude with increasing ionic strength, from -48.5+/-0.2 to -3.5+/-0.0 mV for B. subtilis and -47.9+/-0.3 to -3.5+/-0.0 mV for E. coli at 0.01 and 0.5 M K(+), respectively, indicating an efficient surface charge neutralization by counterions. A fully optimized continuous (FOCUS) pK(a) distribution method revealed four binding sites on B. subtilis and E. coli surfaces from the master curves with pK(a)(int) values of 3.59+/-0.38, 4.33+/-0.57, 5.94+/-0.66, and 8.64+/-0.57 for B. subtilis and 3.73+/-0.44, 4.85+/-0.71, 6.56+/-0.64, and 8.79+/-0.62 for E. coli. These were assigned to functional groups according to reported pK(a) ranges of 2.0-6.0 (carboxylic acid), 3.2-3.5 (phosphodiesters), 5.6-7.2 (phosphoric acid), and 9.0-11.0 (amine groups). Average points of zero salt effect (pH(pzse)) for B. subtilis experiments were 6.63+/-0.21 and 6.42+/-0.08 as a function of pH(bulk) and pH(S), respectively. Under the same criteria, E. coli calculations yielded 5.73+/-0.23 and 5.45+/-0.05. An understanding of metal and proton reactivity on bacterial cell surfaces can be addressed quantitatively through the use of electrostatic and chemical equilibrium modeling techniques proposed in this study. The results are consistent with those of electrical force microscopy studies used to document the intrinsic electrochemical heterogeneity of bacterial cell surfaces.