Search

Escherichia colisingle-strand (ss) DNA-binding protein (SSB) is an essential protein that binds ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance. SSB homotetramers bind ssDNA in several modes differing in occluded site size and cooperativity. The 35-site-size ((SSB)35) mode favored at low [NaCl] and high SSB/DNA ratios displays high “unlimited” nearest-neighbor cooperativity (ω35), forming long protein clusters, whereas the 65-site-size ((SSB)65) mode in which ssDNA wraps completely around the tetramer is favored at higher [NaCl] (>200 mM) and displays “limited” cooperativity (ω65), forming only dimers of tetramers. In addition, a non-nearest-neighbor high cooperativity can also occur in the (SSB)65mode on long ssDNA even at physiological salt concentrations in the presence of glutamate and requires its intrinsically disordered C-terminal linker (IDL) region. However, whether cooperativity exists between the different modes and the role of the IDL in nearest-neighbor cooperativity has not been probed. Here, we combine sedimentation velocity and fluorescence titration studies to examine nearest-neighbor cooperativity in each binding mode and between binding modes using (dT)70and (dT)140. We find that the (SSB)35mode always shows extremely high “unlimited” cooperativity that requires the IDL. At high salt, wild-type SSB and a variant without the IDL, SSB-ΔL, bind in the (SSB)65mode but show little cooperativity, although cooperativity increases at lower [NaCl] for wild-type SSB. We also find significant intermode nearest-neighbor cooperativity (ω65/35), with ω65 ≪ ω65/35 <ω35. The intrinsically disordered region of SSB is required for all cooperative interactions; however, in contrast to the non-nearest-neighbor cooperativity observed on longer ssDNA, glutamate does not enhance these nearest-neighbor cooperativities. Therefore, we show that SSB possesses four types of cooperative interactions, with clear differences in the forces stabilizing nearest-neighbor versus non-nearest-neighbor cooperativity.

The structure of the homotetrameric DNA binding domain of the single stranded DNA binding protein from Escherichia coli (Eco SSB) bound to two 35-mer single stranded DNAs was determined to a resolution of 2.8 Å. This structure describes the vast network of interactions that results in the extensive wrapping of single stranded DNA around the SSB tetramer and suggests a structural basis for its various binding modes.

E. coli single strand (ss) DNA binding protein (SSB) is an essential protein that binds ssDNA intermediates formed during genome maintenance. SSB homo-tetramers bind ssDNA in two major modes differing in occluded site size and cooperativity. The (SSB)35mode in which ssDNA wraps on average around two subunits is favored at low [NaCl] and high SSB to DNA ratios and displays high unlimited, nearest-neighbor cooperativity forming long protein clusters. The (SSB)65mode, in which ssDNA wraps completely around four subunits of the tetramer, is favored at higher [NaCl] (> 200 mM) and displays limited low cooperativity. Crystal structures of E. coliSSB and P. falciparumSSB show ssDNA bound to the SSB subunits (OB-folds) with opposite polarities of the sugar phosphate backbones. To investigate whether SSB subunits show a polarity preference for binding ssDNA, we examined EcSSB and PfSSB binding to a series of (dT)70constructs in which the backbone polarity was switched in the middle of the DNA by incorporating a reverse polarity (RP) phosphodiester linkage, either 3’-3’ or 5’-5’. We find only minor effects on the DNA binding properties for these RP constructs, although (dT)70with a 3’-3’ polarity switch shows decreased affinity for EcSSB in the (SSB)65mode and lower cooperativity in the (SSB)35mode. However, (dT)70in which every phosphodiester linkage is reversed, does not form a completely wrapped (SSB)65mode, but rather binds EcSSB in the (SSB)35mode, with little cooperativity. In contrast, PfSSB, which binds ssDNA only in an (SSB)65mode and with opposite backbone polarity and different topology, shows little effect of backbone polarity on its DNA binding properties. We present structural models suggesting that strict backbone polarity can be maintained for ssDNA binding to the individual OB-folds if there is a change in ssDNA wrapping topology of the RP ssDNA.