Search

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the incidence and clinical significance of depression in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D). The study was also to evaluate the impact of shock therapy on depression development and long-term prognosis., Methods: The prospective study encompassed 396 consecutive heart failure (HF) patients implanted with CRT-D. All patients completed the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-II) and underwent a psychiatric examination at baseline. 221 patients free of depressive symptoms at baseline were included into the final analysis. The assessment of psychiatric status was routinely repeated every 6 months as well as after the shock delivery. The primary outcome was a composite endpoint of death or hospitalization for HF., Results: During long-term observation (median 37.1 months) 52 (23.5%) patients suffered from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock, whereas 48 (21.8%) subjects developed depression. The incidence of new-onset depression was significantly higher in patients after shock delivery (Shock Group), CRT non-responders and subjects with atrial fibrillation. The risk for a composite endpoint was higher in the Shock Group than subjects without an ICD intervention: 57.7% vs. 25.4% and in patients with new-onset depression compared to the population free of this disorder: 62.5% vs. 24.9% (all p < 0.001). New-onset depression (HR 1.7) and an ICD shock (HR 2.1) were strong independent predictors of poor prognosis., Conclusions: Depression is a common mental disorder in CRT-D recipients, that adversely affects long-term prognosis. Subjects suffering from ICD shocks and those with HF progression are at higher risk of experiencing depressive symptoms.

Background/Objectives: Increased lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] level is associated with elevated possibility of atherosclerosis progression. SYNTAX score enables to grade the anatomy of coronary arteries. To identify the impact of increased Lp(a) level on SYNTAX score in individuals with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Methods: In our analysis, we enrolled 173 consecutive adult patients hospitalized for AMI in a tertiary cardiology center from December 2022 to August 2023. Patient characteristics were compared for patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 (64 patients) and SYNTAX score < 23 (109 patients). The SYNTAX score was estimated based on the results of coronary angiography. Logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the factors associated with SYNTAX score. Results: Individuals with the SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were more likely to have arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, significant stenosis in the left main coronary artery, and higher Lp(a) levels than those with SYNTAX < 23 (all p < 0.05). On univariate analysis, age (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02-1.08, p = 0.001), Lp(a) levels (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.06, p = 0.001), and arterial hypertension (OR 2.69, 95% CI 1.26-5.74, p = 0.011) were associated with SYNTAX score ≥ 23. Multivariable determinants of SYNTAX score ≥ 23 were as follows: Lp(a) levels (OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.029), and age (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07, p = 0.005). The cut-off value for Lp(a) 166.16 nmol/L identifies patients with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with 97% sensitivity and 44% specificity (area under curve 0.78, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Elevated Lp(a) concentration is associated with a higher SYNTAX score. A cut-off value of Lp(a) above 166.16 nmol/L allows us to identify subjects with SYNTAX score ≥ 23 with good specificity and sensitivity.

Introduction: Myocarditis may be difficult to diagnose because of the variety of its clinical manifestations, and the clinical course of the disease can be unpredictable. Nevertheless, some patients may exhibit partial or full contractile recovery following myocarditis. Standard and speckle-tracking echocardiography may serve as tools to follow this recovery., Objectives: We aimed to evaluate predictors of positive left ventricular (LV) remodeling after active myocarditis (AM)., Patients and Methods: A database of a high‑volume, tertiary cardiology center was searched for patients with AM hospitalized between 2016 and 2019. They were included in the analysis based on clinical manifestations and presence of at least 1 of the following diagnostic criteria: positive findings on electrocardiography / Holter monitoring, echocardiography, elevated troponin T/I levels, functional or structural abnormalities on cardiac imaging, or tissue characterization by cardiac magnetic resonance. LV global longitudinal strain and mechanical dispersion (MD; defined as SD of the time to peak longitudinal strain derived from all LV segments in 3 apical views) were determined. Echocardiographic response (positive LV remodeling measured by transthoracic echocardiography) was defined as end‑systolic volume (ESV) reduction by 15% or greater or end-diastolic volume (EDV) reduction by 15% or greater from the baseline values., Results: A total of 61 consecutive patients were recruited. The median follow‑up was 1.4 years (range, 0.3-4). The mortality rate was 1.6%. Echocardiographic response was noted in 24 patients (39.4%). A multivariable Cox regression model including significant baseline differences as covariates showed that QRS duration (hazard ratio [HR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.17-1.57; P = 0.049), MD (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.07; P = 0.04), and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist [MRA] use (HR, 8.60; 95% CI, 1.50-46.49; P = 0.01) were independently associated with positive LV remodeling with ESV reduction. MD (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.02-1.06; P = 0.04) was also independently associated with positive LV remodeling with EDV reduction., Conclusions: Mechanical dispersion, QRS duration, and MRA use are independent predictors of positive LV remodeling in individuals with a history of AM.

Background  Compared with usual care, guideline-adherent stroke prevention strategy, based on the ABC (Atrial fibrillation Better Care) pathway, is associated with better outcomes. Given that stroke prevention is central to atrial fibrillation (AF) management, improved efforts to determining predictors of adherence with 'A' (avoid stroke) component of the ABC pathway are needed. Purpose  We tested the hypothesis that more sophisticated methodology using machine learning (ML) algorithms could do this. Methods  In this post-hoc analysis of the BALKAN-AF dataset, ML algorithms and logistic regression were tested. The feature selection process identified a subset of variables that were most relevant for creating the model. Adherence with the 'A' criterion of the ABC pathway was defined as the use of oral anticoagulants (OAC) in patients with AF with a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score of 0 (male) or 1 (female). Results  Among 2,712 enrolled patients, complete data on 'A'-adherent management were available in 2,671 individuals (mean age 66.0 ± 12.8; 44.5% female). Based on ML algorithms, independent predictors of 'A-criterion adherent management' were paroxysmal AF, center in capital city, and first-diagnosed AF. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, chronic kidney disease with chronic dialysis, and sleep apnea were independently associated with a lower likelihood of 'A'-criterion adherent management. ML evaluated predictors of adherence with the 'A' criterion of the ABC pathway derived an area under the receiver-operator curve of 0.710 (95%CI 0.67-0.75) for random forest with fine tuning. Conclusions  Machine learning identified paroxysmal AF, treatment center in the capital city, and first-diagnosed AF as predictors of adherence to the A pathway; and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, chronic kidney disease with chronic dialysis, and sleep apnea as predictors of non adherence., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest Dr Kozieł declared no conflict of interest. Sebastian Siołkowski was employee of IQVIA at the time of manuscript writing. Dr Miroslav Mihajlovic declared no conflict of interest. Professor Lip has been a consultant and speaker for BMS/Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Daiichi-Sankyo. No fees are received personally. Professor Potpara has been a consultant for Bayer/Jansen and BMS/Pfizer (no fees), (The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, permitting unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction so long as the original work is properly cited. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ).)

Background: The main complications of elevated systemic blood pressure (BP), coronary heart disease, ischaemic stroke, and peripheral vascular disease, are related to thrombosis rather than haemorrhage. Therefore, it is important to investigate if antithrombotic therapy may be useful in preventing thrombosis-related complications in patients with elevated BP., Objectives: To conduct a systematic review of the role of antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulation in patients with elevated BP, including elevations in systolic or diastolic BP alone or together. To assess the effects of antiplatelet agents on total deaths or major thrombotic events or both in these patients versus placebo or other active treatment. To assess the effects of oral anticoagulants on total deaths or major thromboembolic events or both in these patients versus placebo or other active treatment., Search Methods: The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) up to January 2021: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2020, Issue 12), Ovid MEDLINE (from 1946), and Ovid Embase (from 1974). The World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform and the US National Institutes of Health Ongoing Trials Register (ClinicalTrials.gov) were searched for ongoing trials.  SELECTION CRITERIA: RCTs in patients with elevated BP were included if they were ≥ 3 months in duration and compared antithrombotic therapy with control or other active treatment., Data Collection and Analysis: Two review authors independently extracted data for inclusion criteria, our prespecified outcomes, and sources of bias. They assessed the risks and benefits of antiplatelet agents and anticoagulants by calculating odds ratios (OR), accompanied by the 95% confidence intervals (CI). They assessed risks of bias and applied GRADE criteria.  MAIN RESULTS: Six trials (61,015 patients) met the inclusion criteria and were included in this review. Four trials were primary prevention (41,695 patients; HOT, JPAD, JPPP, and TPT), and two secondary prevention (19,320 patients, CAPRIE and Huynh). Four trials (HOT, JPAD, JPPP, and TPT) were placebo-controlled and two studies (CAPRIE and Huynh) included active comparators. Four studies compared acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus placebo and found no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.87 to 1.08; 3 studies, 35,794 participants; low-certainty evidence). We found no evidence of a difference for cardiovascular mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.17; 3 studies, 35,794 participants; low-certainty evidence). ASA reduced the risk of all non-fatal cardiovascular events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87; 1 study (missing data in 3 studies), 2540 participants; low-certainty evidence) and the risk of all cardiovascular events (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77 to 0.96; 3 studies, 35,794 participants; low-certainty evidence). ASA increased the risk of major bleeding events (OR 1.77, 95% CI 1.34 to 2.32; 2 studies, 21,330 participants; high-certainty evidence). One study (CAPRIE; ASA versus clopidogrel) included patients diagnosed with hypertension (mean age 62.5 years, 72% males, 95% Caucasians, mean follow-up: 1.91 years). It showed no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality (OR 1.02, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; 1 study, 19,143 participants; high-certainty evidence) and for cardiovascular mortality (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.26; 1 study, 19,143 participants; high-certainty evidence). ASA probably reduced the risk of non-fatal cardiovascular events (OR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.22; 1 study, 19,143 participants; high-certainty evidence) and the risk of all cardiovascular events (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.17; 1 study, 19,143 participants; high-certainty evidence) when compared to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel increased the risk of major bleeding events when compared to ASA (OR 1.35, 95% CI 1.14 to 1.61; 1 study, 19,143 participants; high-certainty evidence). In one study (Huynh; ASA verus warfarin) patients with unstable angina or non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, with prior coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) were included (mean age 68 years, 79.8% males, mean follow-up: 1.1 year). There was no evidence of a difference for all-cause mortality (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.06 to 16.12; 1 study, 91 participants; low-certainty evidence). Cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiovascular events, and all cardiovascular events were not available. There was no evidence of a difference for major bleeding events (OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.60; 1 study, 91 participants; low-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence that antiplatelet therapy modifies mortality in patients with elevated BP for primary prevention. ASA reduced the risk of cardiovascular events and increased the risk of major bleeding events.  Antiplatelet therapy with ASA probably reduces the risk of non-fatal and all cardiovascular events when compared to clopidogrel. Clopidogrel increases the risk of major bleeding events compared to ASA in patients with elevated BP for secondary prevention.  There is no evidence that warfarin modifies mortality in patients with elevated BP for secondary prevention.  The benefits and harms of the newer drugs glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel, prasugrel, ticagrelor, and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for patients with high BP have not been studied in clinical trials. Further RCTs of antithrombotic therapy including newer agents and complete documentation of all benefits and harms are required in patients with elevated BP., (Copyright © 2022 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)