Search

Objectives: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support prior to ventricular assist device (VAD) therapy is frequently used for stabilizing INTERMACS 1 and 2 paediatric patients. Data regarding outcomes with this strategy is limited., Methods: Patient characteristics and outcomes post-VAD therapy with and without preop ECMO support were compared. Survival and risk factor analysis was performed for all patients and INTERMACS profile 1 subgroup., Results: Of 541 INTERMACS 1 and 2 patients enrolled in Paediatric Interagency Registry for Mechanical Circulatory Support registry, 391 received primary VAD implantation and ECMO prior to VAD therapy was utilized in 150 patients. Younger age (P < 0.0001) and shock (P < 0.0001) were more common in group 2, with lower survival at 1, 6 and 12 months compared to group 1 (P < 0.0001). Freedom from infection (P = 0.03) was higher in group 1. Freedom from stroke (P = 0.7) was similar. Paracorporeal continuous flow devices led to poor survival in both groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.4). Implantable continuous flow (P < 0.0001) and paracorporeal pulsatile devices (P = 0.007) had better survival in primary VAD group. INTERMACS profile 1, lower weight, hepatic dysfunction, renal failure, paracorporeal continuous and percutaneous devices were associated with higher mortality. Preop ECMO therapy was not associated with higher mortality (P = 0.12). Survival of INTERMACS profile 1 patient was similar at 1, 6 and 12 months in both groups (P = 0.1)., Conclusions: INTERMACS profile 1, lower weight, hepatic dysfunction, renal failure and use of paracorporeal continuous flow or percutaneous assist devices are associated with a higher postoperative mortality. Preop ECMO therapy however is not independently associated with higher postop mortality., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Limited data are available regarding the outcomes of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) who undergo durable mechanical circulatory support implantation (dMCS). We analyzed the clinical characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality in patients who were bridged with ECMO to dMCS., Methods: Adult patients who received dMCS between January 2008 and December 2017 (n=19 824), registered in the Society of Thoracic Surgeons-Interagency Registry for Mechanical Assisted Circulatory Support (STS-INTERMACS) database were included. Baseline characteristics, outcomes, risk factors, and adverse events were compared between ECMO-supported patients (n=933) and INTERMACS profile 1 (IP-1) patients not supported by ECMO (n=2362). A propensity match analysis was performed., Results: ECMO patients had inferior survival at 12 months (66.1%) than non-ECMO patients (75.4%; P <0.0001). The proportion of patients transplanted at 2 years after dMCS was similar between the ECMO (30.8%) and non-ECMO (31.8%) groups ( P =0.49). A multiphase parametric hazard model identified 2 different periods based on risk of death. ECMO patients had a high hazard for death in the first 6 months after implantation (hazard ratio, 2.18 [1.79-2.66]; P <0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that ECMO was an independent risk factor associated with poor outcome during the early phase after dMCS (hazard ratio, 1.69 [1.37-2.09]; P <0.0001) but not during the constant phase. ECMO patients had similar outcomes to non-ECMO patients when a propensity matched cohort was analyzed., Conclusions: ECMO-supported patients before dMCS have lower survival compared with other IP-1 patients. A multivariable analysis showed that ECMO is an independent risk factor of poor outcome after dMCS. However, a propensity matched analysis suggested that when important clinical variables are controlled the outcome of both groups is similar. These data support the implantation of dMCS in carefully selected ECMO patients.