Search

The study of polymers' rheological properties is of paramount importance both for the problems of their industrial production as well as for their practical application. Two polymers used for embolization of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are studied in this work: Onyx-18 ® and Squid-12 ® . Viscosity curve tests and computational fluid dynamics (CFD) were used to uncover viscosity law as a function of shear rate as well as behavior of the polymers in catheter or pathological tissue models. The property of thermal activation of viscosity was demonstrated, namely, the law of dependence of viscosity on temperature in the range from 20 °C to 37 °C was established. A zone of viscosity nonmonotonicity was identified, and a physical interpretation of the dependence of the embolic polymers' viscosity on the shear rate was given on the basis of Cisco's model. The obtained empirical constants will be useful for researchers based on the CFD of AVMs. A description of the process of temperature activation of the embolic polymers' viscosity is important for understanding the mechanics of the embolization process by practicing surgeons as well as for producing new prospective embolic agents.

Numerical modeling is an effective tool for preoperative planning. The present work is devoted to a retrospective analysis of neurosurgical treatments for the occlusion of cerebral aneurysms using flow-diverters and hemodynamic factors affecting stent endothelization. Several different geometric approaches have been considered for virtual flow-diverters deployment. A comparative analysis of hemodynamic parameters as a result of computational modeling has been carried out basing on the four clinical cases: one successful treatment, one with no occlusion and two with in stent stenosis. For the first time, a quantitative assessment of both: the limiting magnitude of shear stresses that are necessary for the occurrence of in stent stenosis (MaxWSS > 1.23) and for conditions in which endothelialization is insufficiently active and occlusion of the cervical part of the aneurysm does not occur (MaxWSS < 1.68)—has been statistacally proven (p < 0.01).

Background: Precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid is a newly introduced liquid embolic agent for endovascular embolization with some technical advantages over other liquid embolic agents. We present our initial experience with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid in the endovascular treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations., Methods: From October 2015 to January 2018, 27 patients harboring cerebral arteriovenous malformations underwent endovascular embolization with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid 25. Clinical features, angiographic results, procedural details, complications, and follow-up details were retrospectively analyzed., Results: Twenty-seven patients with cerebral arteriovenous malformations were included. Total obliteration in one endovascular session was confirmed for 14/27 (52%) patients. Partial embolization was attained in 13 patients (48%) in whom staged treatment with following radiosurgery or surgery was planned. No mortality was recorded in this series. Complications during or after the embolization occurred in six of 27 (22.2%) patients., Conclusion: In our initial experience, precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid has acceptable clinical outcome comparable to other liquid embolic agents. Although this is the largest reported study in arteriovenous malformation treatment with precipitating hydrophobic injectable liquid, further studies are needed to validate its safety and efficacy.

Utilization of flow diverting devices is accompanied with dual antiplatelet therapy to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events, even though this increases the risk of hemorrhagic complications. The updated Pipeline Flex embolization device with Shield Technology has been created using a phosphorylcholine coating that reduces thrombogenicity and possibly reduces the need for dual antiplatelet therapy. However, because of the potential risk to patients of utilizing a pipeline embolization device without dual antiplatelet therapy, the pipeline embolization device with Shield Technology has not been tested in human subjects without dual antiplatelet therapy, and its contribution to preventing thromboembolic events is therefore unknown. We report a case in which a patient, following complications that limited his absorption of dual antiplatelet therapy, had low levels of dual antiplatelet therapy medications in his bloodstream following treatment for an intracranial aneurysm with a pipeline embolization device with Shield Technology. The patient recovered without signs of luminal stenosis or thromboembolic event.

Endovascular embolization is an important modality in the treatment of brain AVMs. Nowadays staged embolization is the method of choice for the prevention of perioperative hemorrhagic complications. Current theory suggests that simultaneous occlusion of more than 60% of AVM volume induces significant redistribution local blood flow. That, in turn, may lead to hemorrhage due to AVM rupture. Aside from angiographic findings, there is still no method that predicts the degree of safe partial embolization. Intraluminal measurement of flow velocity and pressure in the vicinity of the AVM nidus might allow detecting the changes in local hemodynamics. That can provide a valuable data and shed the light on the origin of vascular catastrophes. Ten patients underwent 12 embolization sessions with intraluminal flow velocity and pressure monitoring. The measurements were performed by dual-sensor guidewire. The "Combomap" (Volcano) system with Combowire microguidewires was chosen for measurements, as there is a documented experience of safe use of said guidewires in the cerebral vasculature. The findings observed during the study matched empirical data as well as the current physiological hypothesis of AVM hemorrhage. In conjunction with DSA runs, intraluminal flow velocity and pressure monitoring has the potential to become a valuable tool in AVM treatment., (© The Author(s) 2015 Reprints and permissions:]br]sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav.)